Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2001, p. 1882-1888, Vol. 39, No. 5
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1882-1888.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Molecular Variability of the Adhesin-Encoding Gene
pvpA among Mycoplasma gallisepticum
Strains and Its Application in Diagnosis
T.
Liu,1
M.
García,1,*
S.
Levisohn,2
D.
Yogev,3 and
S. H.
Kleven1
Department of Avian Medicine, College of
Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
30602,1 and Division of Avian & Aquatic
Diseases, Kimron Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan
50250,2 and Department of Membrane and
Ultrastructure Research, The Hebrew University
Hadassah Medical
School, Jerusalem 91120,3 Israel
Received 5 September 2000/Returned for modification 19 December
2000/Accepted 8 March 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Mycoplasma gallisepticum is an important pathogen of
chickens and turkeys that causes considerable economic losses to the poultry industry worldwide. The reemergence of M.
gallisepticum outbreaks among poultry, the increased use of
live M. gallisepticum vaccines, and the detection of
M. gallisepticum in game and free-flying song birds has
strengthened the need for molecular diagnostic and strain
differentiation tests. Molecular techniques, including restriction
fragment length polymorphism of genomic DNA (RFLP) and PCR-based random
amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), have already been utilized as
powerful tools to detect intraspecies variation. However, certain
intrinsic drawbacks constrain the application of these methods. The
main goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of using an
M. gallisepticum-specific gene encoding a
phase-variable putative adhesin protein (PvpA) as the target for
molecular typing. This was accomplished using a pvpA
PCR-RFLP assay. Size variations among PCR products and nucleotide
divergence of the C-terminus-encoding region of the pvpA
gene were the basis for strain differentiation. This method can be used
for rapid differentiation of vaccine strains from field isolates by
amplification directly from clinical samples without the need for
isolation by culture. Moreover, molecular epidemiology of M.
gallisepticum outbreaks can be performed using RFLP and/or
sequence analysis of the pvpA gene.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mycoplasma
gallisepticum is one of the major pathogens of domestic poultry,
causing significant economic losses to the commercial poultry industry.
M. gallisepticum infection has a wide variety of clinical
manifestations, of which chronic respiratory disease of chickens is the
most significant. The pathology associated with this disease is
characterized by severe air sac infection where M. gallisepticum is the primary pathogen followed by secondary infections with Escherichia coli and/or viruses
(17). Control of M. gallisepticum has been
based on eradication of the organism from primary breeder flocks and on
maintenance of the mycoplasma-free status in the breeders and breeder
progeny by biosecurity of the premises (15). Serological
monitoring of a representative sample of the flock is performed
periodically, and isolation or DNA-based detection methods (15,
17) confirm suspected infection by M. gallisepticum.
In recent years, a reemergence of mycoplasma infection has been
observed in poultry, possibly due to the practice of placing large
poultry populations in small geographical areas under poor biosecurity.
This has necessitated a reevaluation of control strategies for M. gallisepticum (12).
One of the options as an alternative control method is the use of live
M. gallisepticum vaccines (12, 28). Three live M. gallisepticum vaccines are currently used in many
countries worldwide: F (Schering Plough, Kenilworth, N.J.), ts-11
(Bioproperties, Inc. Australia, marketed in the United States by Merial
Select Laboratories, Gainesville, Ga.), and 6/85 (Intervet America,
Millsboro, Del.). The more widespread utilization of M. gallisepticum vaccines requires the development of improved
detection and differentiation methods in order to assess the efficacy
of vaccines in displacing wild-type isolates (18, 26).
Currently, the most widely used method to differentiate M. gallisepticum strains is a PCR-based randomly amplified
polymorphic DNA (RAPD), or arbitrarily primed PCR, analysis (3,
5, 7). This method has been used for identifying vaccine strains
in M. gallisepticum-vaccinated flocks (18) and
for epidemiological studies (19). Due to the random nature
of the primer and the low-stringency conditions of the RAPD reaction,
this assay requires the use of pure cultures of the target mycoplasma.
Isolation of mycoplasmas is expensive, time-consuming, and technically
complicated in cases in which nonpathogenic mycoplasma species may
overgrow the virulent mycoplasmas. In addition, the isolation process
itself may favor the growth of one strain where more than one M. gallisepticum subtype may be present. Furthermore, technical
factors such as the target DNA/primer ratio may significantly impact
the reproducibility of RAPD patterns (27). Progress in the
molecular biology of mycoplasmas has been achieved in the last decade,
and several surface proteins in virulent mycoplasmas have been
described (1, 22). Mycoplasmas exhibit a high degree of
phenotypic variation, which is considered a major factor in
pathogenicity and chronic infection of the host (22, 23, 24,
29). Changes in the surface topology of M. gallisepticum during host infection and the molecular
characteristics of several M. gallisepticum surface proteins
have been described (1, 6, 14, 21), including the recently
described putative cytadhesin protein PvpA (2). PvpA is a
phase-variable protein recognized by the chicken immune system
(14, 30). Structurally, PvpA is a nonlipid integral membrane protein with a surface-exposed C-terminal portion
(30). The surface-exposed C terminus of PvpA protein has a
high proline content (28%) and contains identical direct repeat
sequences consisting of 52 amino acids each, designated DR-1 and DR-2
(2). Size variation of the pvpA gene was
observed among M. gallisepticum strains as a result of
deletions occurring in the segment encoding the the proline-rich
C-terminal region of the protein. Deletions were located exactly within
the two direct repeat sequences (2). The presence of
proline-rich regions in the surface-exposed C-terminal domains of other
pathogenic mycoplasma adhesins (4, 8, 9) suggests an
important role of these domains in the function of PvpA as an adhesin
(10). Moreover, molecular typing of M. gallisepticum strains utilizing the C-terminus-encoding region of
the pvpA gene may be a relevant target for epidemiological
tracking of M. gallisepticum isolates.
The main goal of our study was to determine the feasibility of using
the variable pvpA gene as the target to differentiate M. gallisepticum strains through a PCR restriction fragment
length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay. To design consensus primers to amplify all M. gallisepticum strains, the nucleotide
sequence of the C-terminus-encoding region of the pvpA gene
was determined from 10 reference M. gallisepticum strains
and 24 field isolates. Various deletions were observed within DR-1 and
DR-2, as previously described by Boguslavsky et al. (2).
Further differentiation among M. gallisepticum reference
strains and field isolates was obtained by RFLP using three restriction
enzymes. To enhance the sensitivity of the assay, a seminested set of
primers was also designed. This assay was used to detect M. gallisepticum directly from clinical samples. Amplicons obtained
from clinical samples were analyzed according to the RFLP patterns
typed with restriction enzymes and further sequenced. This assay
accelerates the diagnosis and characterization of M. gallisepticum isolates and can be used as a molecular typing tool
in order to better understand the epidemiology of M. gallisepticum outbreaks.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Mycoplasma reference strains and isolates.
Most mycoplasma
strains were obtained from our depository at the Poultry Diagnostic and
Research Center (PDRC) in Athens, Ga. The type strains of the avian
species Mycoplasma synoviae, Mycoplasma
meleagridis, Mycoplasma iowae, Mycoplasma
gallinarum, Mycoplasma gallinaceum, Mycoplasma
iners, Mycoplasma imitans, and Mycoplasma
cloacale were used for testing the specificity of the PCR test.
The origins and biological properties of M. gallisepticum strains R, S6, A5969, F, K503, K703, K730, and HF-51 are described elsewhere (31). Vaccine strain ts-11 was obtained from
Merial Select (Gainesville, Ga.), and 6/85 was obtained from Intervet America (Millsboro, Del.). Twenty-two field isolates obtained during recent outbreaks (1995 to 1999) and two field isolates from 1973 and 1984 were collected from our depository. Among these, seven
isolates were from chickens, eleven were from turkeys, and six were
from house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). Table
1 presents a list of the isolates used.
Culture procedures and sample preparations.
All avian
mycoplasma strains were propagated in Frey's medium (17)
with 12% swine serum (FMS) as previously described (5, 6). DNA isolation was performed as follows. One milliliter of
mycoplasma broth culture was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm (Eppendorf 5417R; Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, N.Y.) for 10 min. The cell pellet was then washed twice with 1 ml of 150 mM
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) and resuspended in a final
volume of 20 µl of PBS. The cell suspension was heated in a dry block
at 110°C for 10 min and placed on ice for at least 10 min. After
boiling, the lysate was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 2 min to remove
debris. The supernatant containing DNA was collected and stored at
20°C until used.
DNA extraction from clinical samples was prepared by suspending
tracheal swabs in 1 ml of PBS (three tracheal swabs per sample) and
spinning at 13,000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was carefully removed and the resultant cell pellet suspended in 25 µl of PCR-grade H2O and treated as described above.
Clinical samples.
Clinical samples were obtained from the
United States and Israel and processed at the PDRC or at the Kimron
Veterinary Institute (Bet Dagan, Israel), respectively. Twenty tracheas
were obtained upon necropsy from two commercial egg layer flocks which
were serologically positive for M. gallisepticum infection.
Tracheas were opened longitudinally, and mucous material was collected with a swab. Trachea material was cultured on Frey's media following standard isolation procedures. Material was resuspended in 500 µl of
PBS for DNA extraction and pvpA PCR-RFLP analysis.
Tracheal swab samples from four Israeli broiler breeder flocks
suspected of having M. gallisepticum infection were
collected from live birds. Swabs were cultured on Frey's medium by
standard isolation procedure, and DNA extracts for PCR testing were
prepared from tracheal swabs by the boiling method as described above.
Primer selection.
Initial primers were designed from the
pvpA gene sequence of R strain (2). Seminested
PCR primers were designed from conserved sequences of representative
M. gallisepticum strains. These primers flank the direct
repeat area within the C-terminus-encoding region of the
pvpA gene. Primer positions are depicted in Fig.
1.

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic diagram of pvpA indicating the
location of primers for seminested PCR. Primer positions are in
relation to the R strain sequence (2). The first reaction
used primer 1 (pvpA1F), located at nucleotide positions 415 to 437 (5'GCCAM TCCAACTCAACAAGCTGA3'), and primer 2 (pvpA2R),
located at nucleotide positions 1059 to 1081 (5'GGACGTSGTCCTGGCT
GGTTAGC3'). The seminested reaction was performed with primer 3 (pvpA3F), located at nucleotide positions 583 to 604 (5'GGTAGTCCTAAGTTATTAGGTC3'), and primer 2 (pvpA2R) as for
the first amplification.
|
|
pvpA PCR.
Amplification reactions for pure
culture samples were performed in a 50-µl reaction volume as follows.
Five microliters of 10× PCR buffer containing 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 2 µl of 1 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTPs) (GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, N.Y.), 0.5 µl of outer
primers pvpA1F and pvpA2R (50 µM), 0.25 µl of Taq DNA
polymerase (5 U/µl) (Taq PCR; Qiagen Inc., Valencia,
Calif.), 40.75 µl of distilled water, and 1 µl of template DNA. All
amplifications were performed in a GeneAmp PCR system 2400 (PE
Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Initially, annealing temperatures for
primer extension of 50, 55, and 58°C were tested. The amplification
reaction using 55°C as the annealing temperature produced the best
amplification yield. This temperature was considered the optimal
annealing temperature for pvpA primer extension. The
thermocycler was programmed as follows: 94°C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 10 min as the final extension step.
In order to increase sensitivity of detection in clinical samples, two
amplifications were performed with seminested primers (Fig. 1). The
first amplification was carried out in a 25-µl reaction volume
consisting of 2.5 µl of 10× PCR buffer containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 µl of 1 mM dNTPs, 0.25 µl of outer
primers (pvpA1F and pvpA2R) (50 µM), 0.13 µl of Taq DNA
polymerase (5 U/µl), 19.87 µl of distilled water, and 1 µl of
template DNA. The first amplification was performed at 94°C for 3 min
followed by 20 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s,
and 72°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 10 min was the final extension
step. One microliter from the first amplification was used as
the template for the second amplification. The second amplification was
performed in 25 µl consisting of 2.5 µl of 10× PCR buffer
containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 µl of 1 mM dNTPs,
0.35 µl of seminested primer (pvpA3F) (50 µM), 0.35 µl of outer
primer (pvpA2R) (50 µM), 0.13 µl of Taq DNA polymerase
(5 U/µl), 19.80 µl of distilled water, and 1 µl of template DNA.
The second amplification was performed at the same temperatures and
times as the first amplification for 40 cycles.
The detection limit of seminested PCR and single PCR was determined by
conducting nine 10-fold serial dilutions from R strain stock culture in
FMS. Twenty microliters of each 10-fold dilution was plated on Frey's
medium agar plates and incubated at 37°C until colonies were visible.
Colonies were counted 5 days after inoculation of the plates. A 1-ml
aliquot from each dilution was collected for DNA extraction followed by
PCR amplification as described above.
The PCR products were detected by electrophoresis in ethidium
bromide-stained agarose gels. Ten microliters of each amplification reaction was loaded on a 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.8 µg of ethidium bromide/ml. Agarose gel electrophoresis was run for 25 min at
110 V, and the gel was visualized under UV light.
Sequence analysis.
Amplified products from 10 reference
M. gallisepticum strains and 24 field isolates were purified
with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Inc.). Purified PCR
products were sequenced at the Molecular Genetics Instrumentation
Facility, University of Georgia, utilizing automated sequencing with a
Prism DyeDeoxy terminator cycle sequencing kit (PE Biosystems).
Assembly of sequence contigs and initial multiple-sequence alignments
were performed with sequencing project management (SeqMan) and
multiple-sequence alignment (MegAlign) programs, respectively (DNASTAR;
Lasergene, Inc. Madison, Wis.). Phylogenetic analysis was performed
with PAUP 4.0b2 and 4a (Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland,
Mass.)
RFLP analysis.
Restriction enzyme analysis of sequences was
performed with MapDraw (DNASTAR; Lasergene, Inc.). PvuII
(Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.), AccI (New England
Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, Mass.), and ScrFI (New England
Biolabs, Inc.) were identified as suitable for RFLP analysis and
utilized for digestion of PCR products. The restriction enzyme
digestions were performed in 10-µl reaction mixtures (6.6 µl of
H2O, 1 µl of 10× buffer, 0.4 µl of
restriction enzyme, 2 µl of PCR product), and mixtures were incubated
at 37°C for 2 h. The digested PCR products were electrophoresed on a 10% Tris buffer-EDTA gel (Novex, San Diego, Calif.) at a constant 100 V for 50 min. Gels were visualized by silver staining according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.).
16S rRNA gene PCR.
An M. gallisepticum PCR test
was performed with the 16S rRNA primers MG13 and MG14
(13), using 5 µl of DNA extracted as described above. In
addition to serological testing and isolation, this PCR test is used
routinely in the laboratory at the Kimron Veterinary Institute and at
the PDRC to determine the M. gallisepticum status of chicken
and turkey breeder flocks.
 |
RESULTS |
Amplification of the pvpA C-terminus-encoding
region.
Amplification of the pvpA C-terminus-encoding
region demonstrated size differences of PCR products among M. gallisepticum reference strains, as previously reported by
Boguslavsky et al. (2). Amplification product size
polymorphism was also observed within field isolates analyzed. Size
variation of PCR products for reference strains and field isolates was
confirmed by nucleotide sequencing analysis. Amplification product
sizes for M. gallisepticum reference strains ranged from 267 to 497 bp (Fig. 2; Table
2). A PCR product with the expected size
of 497 bp was observed for strains R, ts-11, and A5969 (Fig. 2, lanes
3, 4, and 9, respectively); a 437-bp PCR product was obtained for
vaccine strain 6/85 and a field isolate (CK/CA/96/1) (Fig. 2, lanes 1 and 2) and for challenge strain S6 and finch isolate HF-51 (data not
shown). Atypical strains K503, K703, and K730 produced an amplicon of
410 bp (Fig. 2, lanes 7 and 8). A 267-bp amplicon was obtained for
strain F (Fig. 2, lane 5).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
PCR of M. gallisepticum reference with
outer primers pvpA 5' and pvpA 3'. Molecular weight markers (Life
Technologies, Rockville, Md.) are in the unmarked lane on the left
(sizes on the left are in base pairs). Lane 1, 6/85; lane 2, field isolate (CK/CA/96/1); lane 3, R; lane 4, ts-11; lane 5, F; lane
6, K503; lane 7, K703; lane 8, K730; lane 9, A5969; lane 10, negative
control. Size variation of amplification products from 497 bp (lanes 3, 4, and 9) to 267 bp (lane 5) was observed.
|
|
Size variation of PCR products was also observed among field isolates
(Table 3). Like 6/85 and S6, 18 of the 24 field isolates analyzed produced a 437-bp amplicon; five isolates
produced a 497-bp amplicon, and isolates CK/GA/98/1 and HF/TX/97/1
produced amplicons of 488 and 266 bp, respectively. Size variation of
PCR products was confirmed by nucleotide sequencing analysis.
RFLP and sequencing analysis of M. gallisepticum
reference strains.
The C-terminus-encoding region of the
pvpA gene was sequenced for 10 M. gallisepticum
reference strains. Multiple alignments of M. gallisepticum
reference strain sequences indicated that variation among PCR
products' relative mobilities was attributed to different size
deletions at the end of the pvpA gene corresponding to the C
terminus, as previously described by Boguslavsky et al. (2). The precise location of the deletions allowed the
design of three conserved primers (pvpA1F, pvpA2R, and pvpA3F) (Fig. 1)
utilized in a seminested PCR amplifying all the strains tested. In
addition to size variation of PCR products, nucleotide sequence differences among M. gallisepticum reference strains
produced different RFLP patterns. Digestion of M. gallisepticum reference strains with AccI,
PvuII, and ScrFI produced eight distinct pattern combinations. The exact sizes of the fragments generated from digested
PCR products are listed in Table 2. M. gallisepticum R,
ts-11, A5969, HF-51, atypical strains (K503, K703, and K730), and F
were readily differentiated into six distinct patterns designated A, B,
C, F, G, and H, respectively, with PvuII and
AccI. A third restriction enzyme, ScrFI, was used
to differentiate 6/85 and S6, and the patterns were identified as D and
E, respectively (Table 2).
RFLP and sequence analysis of field isolates.
The
C-terminus-encoding regions of pvpA for 24 field isolates
were compared by RFLP and sequence analysis. RFLP analysis classified the field isolates into seven of the eight RFLP groups described in
Table 2 for M. gallisepticum reference strains. Field
isolates were grouped as follows (Table 3): two isolates were
classified as RFLP group A, represented by challenge strain R; four
chicken isolates had RFLP pattern combinations similar to group B,
represented by vaccine strain ts-11; six isolates were classified as
RFLP group D, represented by vaccine strain 6/85; one isolate was
placed within RFLP group E, represented by strain S6; nine isolates, four from turkeys and five from finches, were characterized as RFLP
group F, represented by finch strain HF-51; one isolate showed RFLP
patterns similar to vaccine strain F, classified as group H. Isolate
CK/AK/99/1 produced a unique RFLP pattern (I), a combination not
observed for any of the M. gallisepticum reference strains or field isolates analyzed.
A perfect correlation was observed between RFLP and sequencing analysis
of the amplicon produced by the seminested PCR for 16 field isolates in
which a 100% sequence identity was observed between the field isolate
and its corresponding M. gallisepticum reference strain RFLP
group (Tables 2 and 3). One isolate in RFLP group A showed 100%
sequence identity to challenge strain R. Three of the four isolates
identified as RFLP group B showed 100% identity to vaccine strain
ts-11. Six of the seven isolates identified as RFLP group D showed
100% sequence identity to vaccine strain 6/85. One isolate in RFLP
group E had 100% sequence identity to S6, in agreement with the
results of ScrFI RFLP analysis. Five of the nine isolates
within RFLP group F, isolated from finches, showed 100% identity to
house finch isolate HF-51.
For the remaining eight field isolates, it was observed that the
sequence of pvpA corresponding to the C-terminal region was not identical to that of the corresponding RFLP group. Sequence analysis of these isolates showed sequence divergences ranging from
99.8 to 96.1% for nucleotides and 99.4 to 91.9% for deduced amino
acids (Table 3). Molecular grouping of M. gallisepticum isolates by RFLP was further confirmed by phylogenetic analysis of the
pvpA gene sequences. Figure
3 shows a dendrogram constructed from the C-terminus-encoding end of the pvpA gene. Sequences
were distributed in seven distinctive groups that correspond to the RFLP groups A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (Fig. 3). A discrepancy between phylogenetic and RFLP analysis was observed for the finch isolate HF/TX/97/1. This isolate, in contrast to the other finch isolates analyzed, produced a PCR product of the same size as vaccine strain F
and was grouped by RFLP with this strain (RFLP group H). However, nucleotide sequence comparison indicated that HF/TX/97/1 was most closely related to other finch isolates rather than to F strain (Fig.
3). Further comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of finch
isolate HF/TX/97/1 and vaccine strain F indicated four amino acid
substitutions (data not shown), resulting in amino acid sequence
homology of only 91.9%. between the two strains (Table 3). Comparison
of the deduced amino acid sequences of finch isolate HF/TX/97/1 and
finch strain HF-51 indicated an amino acid sequence homology of 96.3%
(data not shown).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Phylogentic analysis of the C-terminus-encoding portion
of pvpA of M. gallisepticum reference
strains and field isolates. The dendrogram was constructed using
parsimony analysis in a full heuristic search with 500 bootstrap
resampling replicates. The RFLP group for each respective isolate is
indicated in parentheses. Phylogenetic analysis produced seven distinct
groups, confirming RFLP grouping: A, B, C, D, E, F, and G. Discrepancies between phylogenetic and RFLP analysis were observed for
isolates in groups H* and I*.
|
|
Specificity and sensitivity of pvpA PCR.
Single
and seminested amplifications with the three pvpA primers
were performed against DNA from eight avian mycoplasma species, as
indicated in Materials and Methods, including M. gallinarum, and M. gallinaceum, common normal flora mycoplasmas of the
upper respiratory track of chickens. M. gallisepticum was
the only mycoplasma amplified by pvpA primers (data not shown).
Sensitivity of single PCR versus seminested PCR was evaluated by
comparing detection limits of both assays. Tenfold serial dilutions
were performed from R strain stock culture with an initial titer of
5 × 108 CFU/ml (Fig.
4). A single amplification with primers
pvpA3F and pvpA2R detected 500 CFU/ml (Fig. 4B), whereas the detection
limit after a second amplification with primers pvpA3F and pvpA2R
reached 50 CFU/ml (Fig. 4A), achieving a 10-fold increase in the
detection limit.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Sensitivity of seminested PCR versus single PCR. (A)
Seminested PCR. Serial dilutions of R strain amplified with
seminested primers. Lanes 1 to 10 represent dilutions from
10 1 through 10 10. Lane 11 is the negative
control. Lane 1, 5 × 108 CFU; lane 2, 5 × 107 CFU; lane 3, 5 × 106 CFU; lane 4, 5 × 105 CFU; lane 5, 5 × 104 CFU;
lane 6, 5 × 103 CFU; lane 7, 5 × 102 CFU; lane 8, 5 × 101 CFU. (B) Single
PCR with inner primers following the same serial dilutions. Both
PCR systems produced a 497-bp band as expected.
|
|
Clinical samples.
Because of the increase in sensitivity
achieved by the seminested PCR, this assay was used to analyze clinical
samples. Six of 20 samples from two U.S. layer flocks from a common
operation tested positive. One positive sample was from flock A, and
the remaining five positive samples were from flock B. None of the PCR
products were sensitive to AccI digestion, and RFLP group E
(Table 3) was observed for the six amplicons when they were digested
with PvuII. Sequences obtained from these amplicons showed 100% identity with field isolate TK/VA/96/1 (Table 3). Culture results
from tracheal samples were negative for M. gallisepticum as
well as saprophytic mycoplasma species, which may interfere with the
isolation attempt. Since tracheal levels of M. gallisepticum in chronically infected birds are often very low (11), the
number of viable cells removed from the trachea by swabbing may have been too low to be detected by isolation.
To further compare the sensitivity of pvpA PCR in clinical
samples, tracheal swabs from three commercial breeder flocks from Israel were tested by three methods: pvpA seminested PCR,
rRNA-based M. gallisepticum PCR (13), and
isolation. All four flocks were positive for M. gallisepticum by both PCR tests, although the number of individual
samples showing a positive reaction differed for the two tests (Table
4). M. gallisepticum, M. synoviae, and M. gallinarum were isolated from two
flocks tested. Testing of three other chicken and turkey breeder flocks
containing M. synoviae, M. gallinarum, and/or
M. meleagridis but negative for M. gallisepticum were negative in both PCR tests (data not shown).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Sequence analysis of the whole pvpA gene of reference
M. gallisepticum strains revealed that different-size
deletions are located within DR-1 and DR-2 of the C-terminus-encoding
region of pvpA (2). In this study we
demonstrated by sequencing of the genomic region amplified by the
seminested pvpA PCR primers that the pvpA
C-terminal deletions are present also among M. gallisepticum strains currently circulating in the field. The largest deletion observed was that of a 230-bp fragment in vaccine strain F. An amplicon
of the same size was observed for finch isolate HF/TX/97/1 (Table 3).
Differing from isolates with this large deletion were atypical M. gallisepticum strains (K503, K703, and K730), with an amplicon of
410 bp. This amplicon had six small deletions scattered in the region
of pvpA corresponding to the C terminus (2;
additional data not shown). More significant yet, 16 of the 24 field
isolates analyzed that produced a 437-bp amplicon shared a similar
60-bp deletion with M. gallisepticum representative strains
6/85, S6, and HF-51 (Table 2). Based on the deduced amino acid
sequence, the deletion extends from amino acid position 88, located
outside DR-2, to amino acid position 107, located within DR-2 (data not shown). However, not all field isolates had deletions within the pvpA gene. In common with representative strains R, A5969,
and vaccine strain ts-11, six field isolates produced the expected 497-bp amplicon where no deletions were observed within the
C-terminus-encoding pvpA region. In addition to PCR product
length polymorphism, nucleotide differences allowed differentiation of
representative M. gallisepticum strains and field isolates
by RFLP of the amplification products. M. gallisepticum
strains were characterized in seven RFLP groups, whereas field isolates
were categorized within five of these seven groups and an additional
unique group (Tables 2 and 3).
An important application of this method will be to identify specific
M. gallisepticum strains and, in particular, to detect the
presence of vaccine strains and to monitor their capacity to displace
field strains during M. gallisepticum vaccination programs.
Among analyzed field isolates, six turkey and four chicken isolates were grouped by RFLP as vaccine strains 6/85 and ts-11, respectively (Table 3). These results were confirmed by sequence analysis. A 100% sequence identity was observed among the turkey isolates and vaccine strain 6/85 and between three of the four chicken
isolates and vaccine strain ts-11.
The identification of 13 vaccine strains among the 24 field isolates
tested in this study was not surprising, since these samples were
specifically selected from flocks with previous vaccination history or
previous exposure to other vaccinated birds. The presence of vaccine
strains in these flocks was suggested on the basis of clinical data and
the identification of vaccine strains by the RAPD molecular typing used
in our laboratory (S. H. Kleven and V. Leiting, unpublished data).
RAPD analyses have been utilized previously to identify and determine
the prevalence of vaccine strains ts-11 and 6/85 in experimental
(18) and commercial (26) vaccinated flocks.
An outbreak of conjunctivitis in house finches (Carpodacus
mexicanus) caused by M. gallisepticum was first
reported during early 1994 (16, 20). Since the beginning
of this outbreak, other wild bird species, such as American goldfinches
(Carduelis tristis) and blue jays (Cyanocitta
cristata), have been infected (16). RAPD typing of
representative isolates from different bird species and geographical
regions indicated the presence of a single type (19). In
this study, RFLP and sequence analysis of finch isolates from different
states demonstrated that sequences among isolates were identical with
the exception of HF/TX/97/1. Although isolate HF/TX/97/1 was previously
characterized as having an RAPD pattern identical to those of the other
finch isolates (S. H. Kleven, unpublished data), this isolate had
a 230-bp deletion, and based on RFLP, it was grouped with vaccine
strain F. However, sequence analysis demonstrated that this isolate is
more closely related to finch isolate HF-51 than to vaccine strain F. The pvpA gene divergence among HF/TX/97/1 and other finch
isolates suggests that more than one strain of M. gallisepticum has been circulating among the finch population
during the outbreak. Although free-flying birds have not been strongly
implicated in the transmission of pathogenic mycoplasmas to commercial
poultry, the relationship between poultry and finch isolates needs to
be further analyzed (25).
Characterization of other chicken and turkey isolates was also more
reliably obtained by sequencing than by size and RFLP grouping alone.
For instance, the isolates TK/VA/96/1 and TK/CO/98/1, -2, and -3 (Table
3) have a pvpA C-terminus-encoding region closely related to
that of finch isolates, suggesting that finch and poultry isolates may
have a common ancestor. However, complete sequencing of pvpA
and other surface protein genes will be required to better elucidate
relationships among these strains.
A desired application of the seminested PCR-RFLP procedure is to detect
and rapidly differentiate M. gallisepticum strains present
in infection of commercial poultry flocks directly from tracheal
samples, thus eliminating the need for culture. Detection of M. gallisepticum directly from tracheal scrapings with
pvpA PCR was demonstrated in samples from commercial layer
hens. Probably due to the low tracheal levels of M
gallisepticum in chronically infected chickens (11),
attempts to isolate the organism were not successful and the only
evidence of infection was weak plate agglutination reactions. M. gallisepticum infection in acutely infected broiler-breeder flocks
in Israel was diagnosed by the pvpA PCR test, by M. gallisepticum PCR, and by isolation. The lower percentage of
positive samples in the pvpA PCR test, seen in Table 4,
suggests that the sensitivity of this test may be less than that of the
M. gallisepticum PCR test, which is <50 CFU (S. Levisohn, unpublished data). Nonetheless, this does not affect the
diagnostic results in these cases, since these are based on the flock
status rather than individual samples. However, further optimization of
the PCR test may be necessary in order to improve the sensitivity as
needed for testing of clinical samples.
Analysis of clinical isolates from Israel by pvpA PCR-RFLP
showed that all samples have a 400-bp amplicon. In addition, an identical and unique RFLP pattern was observed for three Israel isolates, which had been previously characterized and differentiated by
RAPD analysis (data not shown). Our findings suggest that the pvpA gene present in Israeli outbreak-related isolates is
more conserved than the pvpA gene of U.S. isolates. However,
these strains are readily differentiable from the vaccine strains.
The data presented here indicate that the pvpA gene of
M. gallisepticum is a reliable target gene for
differentiation of vaccine strains from field isolates based on either
size variation, RFLP analysis, or sequencing of PCR products.
Moreover, it was demonstrated that sequence analysis of the
pvpA gene could be utilized for epidemiology studies of
M. gallisepticum outbreaks. This is the first study where a
surface protein gene of M. gallisepticum has been utilized
for molecular epidemiological analysis of a significant number of field
isolates. Increasing sequence analysis of the pvpA and other
genes will allow a better understanding on the origin of M. gallisepticum outbreaks and therefore will facilitate better
strategies to control the disease. In addition, with further
optimization, the pvpA PCR assay can be utilized as a tool
to detect and identify specific M. gallisepticum strains
directly from clinical material without the need for isolation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Sylva Riblet, Bill Hall, Victoria Leiting, Lisa
Griffeth, Lynn Luna, and Irina Gerchman for their technical assistance.
This work was supported by grant IS-3126-99 from BARD, United
States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Avian Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605. Phone: (706) 542-5656. Fax: (706) 542-5630. E-mail:
mcgarcia{at}arches.uga.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bencina, D.,
S. H. Kleven,
M. G. Elfaki,
A. Snoj,
P. Dovc,
D. Dorrer, and I. Russ.
1994.
Variable expression of epitopes on the surface of Mycoplasma gallisepticum demonstrated with monoclonal antibodies.
Avian Pathol.
23:19-36.
|
| 2.
|
Boguslavsky, S.,
D. Menaker,
I. Lysnyansky,
T. Liu,
S. Levisohn,
R. Rosengarten,
M. García, and D. Yogev.
2000.
Molecular characterization of the Mycoplasma gallisepticum pvpA gene which encodes a putative variable cytadhesin protein.
Infect. Immun.
68:3956-3964[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Charlton, B. R.,
A. A. Bickford,
R. L. Walker, and R. Yamamoto.
1999.
Complementary randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis patterns and primer sets to differentiate Mycoplasma gallisepticum strains.
J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.
11:158-161[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Dallo, S. F.,
A. L. Lazzell,
A. Chavoya,
S. P. Reddy, and J. B. Baseman.
1996.
Bifunctional domains of the Mycoplasma pneumoniae P30 adhesin.
Infect. Immun.
64:2595-2601[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Fan, H. H.,
S. H. Kleven, and M. W. Jackwood.
1995.
Application of polymerase chain reaction with arbitrary primers to strain identification of Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
Avian Dis.
39:729-735[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
García, M.,
M. G. Elfaki, and S. H. Kleven.
1994.
Analysis of the variability in expression of Mycoplasma gallisepticum surface antigens.
Vet. Microbiol.
42:147-158[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Geary, S. J.,
M. H. Forsyth,
S. A. Saoud,
G. Wang,
D. E. Berg, and C. M. Berg.
1994.
Mycoplasma gallisepticum strain differentiation by arbitrary primer PCR (RAPD) fingerprinting.
Mol. Cell. Probes
8:311-316[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Hnatow, L. L.,
C. L. Keleer, Jr.,
L. L. Tessmer,
K. Czymmek, and J. E. Dohms.
1998.
Characterization of MGC2, a Mycoplasma gallisepticum cytadhesin with homology to the Mycoplasma pneumoniae 30-kilodalton protein P30 and Mycoplasma genitalium P32.
Infect. Immun.
66:3436-3442[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Keeler, C. L., Jr.,
L. L. Hnatow,
P. L. Whetzel, and J. E. Dohms.
1996.
Cloning and characterization of a putative cytadhesin gene (mgc1) from Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
Infect. Immun.
64:1541-1547[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Kehoe, M. A.
1994.
Cell-wall-associated proteins in gram-positive bacteria, p. 217-261.
In
J. M. Ghuysen, and R. Hakenbeck (ed.), Bacterial cell wall. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
| 11.
|
Kleven, S. H.
1985.
Tracheal populations of Mycoplasma gallisepticum after challenge of bacterin-vaccinated chickens.
Avian Dis.
29:1012-1017[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kleven, S. H.
1997.
Changing expectations in the control of Mycoplasma gallisepticum.
Acta Vet. Hung.
45:299-305[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Lauerman, L. H.
1998.
Mycoplasma PCR assays, p. 41-42.
In
L. H. Lauerman (ed.), Nucleic acid amplification assays for diagnosis of animal diseases. American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Turlock, Calif.
|
| 14.
|
Levisohn, S.,
R. Rosengarten, and D. Yogev.
1995.
In vivo variation of Mycoplasma gallisepticum antigen expression in experimentally infected chickens.
Vet. Microbiol.
45:219-231[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Levisohn, S., and S. H. Kleven.
2000.
Avian mycoplasmosis (Mycoplasma gallisepticum).
Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epizoot.
19:425-442.
|
| 16.
|
Ley, D. H.,
J. E. Berkhoff, and J. M. McLaren.
1996.
Mycoplasma gallisepticum isolated from house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) with conjunctivitis.
Avian Dis.
40:480-483[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Ley, D. H., and H. W. Yoder, Jr.
1997.
Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection, p. 194-207.
In
B. W. Calnek, H. J. Barnes, C. W. Beard, L. R. McDougald, and Y. M. Saif (ed.), Diseases of poultry, 10th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
|
| 18.
|
Ley, D. H.,
J. M. McLaren,
A. M. Miles,
H. J. Barnes, and G. Franz.
1997.
Transmissibility of live Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccine strains ts-11 and 6/85 from vaccinated layer pullets to sentinel poultry, and identification by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis.
Avian Dis.
41:187-194[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Ley, D. H.,
J. E. Berkhoff, and S. Levisohn.
1997.
Molecular epidemiological investigations of Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) conjunctivitis in songbirds by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses.
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
3:375-380[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Luttrell, P. M.,
J. R. Fischer,
D. E. Stalknecht, and S. H. Kleven.
1996.
Field investigation of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infections in house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) from Maryland and Georgia.
Avian Dis.
40:335-341[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Markham, P. F.,
M. D. Glew,
G. F. Browning,
K. G. Whithear, and I. D. Walker.
1998.
Expression of two members of the pMGA gene family of Mycoplasma gallisepticum oscillates and is influenced by pMGA-specific antibodies.
Infect. Immun.
66:2845-2853[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Razin, S.,
D. Yogev, and Y. Naot.
1998.
Molecular biology and pathogenesis of mycoplasmas.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:1094-1156[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Rosengarten, R.,
A. Behrens,
A. Stetefeld,
M. Heller,
M. Ahrens,
K. Sachse,
D. Yogev, and H. Kirchhoff.
1994.
Antigen heterogeneity among isolates of Mycoplasma bovis is generated by high-frequency variation of diverse membrane surface proteins.
Infect. Immun.
62:5066-5074[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Rosengarten, R., and D. Yogev.
1996.
Variant colony surface antigenic phenotypes within mycoplasma strain populations: implications for species diagnosis and strain standardization.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:149-158[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Stallknecht, D. E.,
M. P. Luttrell,
J. R. Fischer, and S. H. Kleven.
1998.
Potential for transmission of the finch strain of Mycoplasma gallisepticum between house finches and chickens.
Avian Dis.
42:352-358[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Turner, K. S., and S. H. Kleven.
1998.
Eradication of live F strain Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccine using live ts/11 on a multiage commercial layer farm.
Avian Dis.
42:404-407[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Tyler, K. D.,
G. Wang,
S. D. Tyler, and W. M. Johnson.
1997.
Factors affecting reliability and reproducibility of amplification-based DNA fingerprinting of representative bacterial pathogens.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:339-346[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Whithear, K. G.
1996.
Control of avian mycoplasmoses by vaccination.
Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epizoot.
15:1527-1533.
|
| 29.
|
Yogev, D.,
R. Rosengarten,
R. Watson-McKown, and K. S. Wise.
1991.
Molecular basis of mycoplasma surface antigenic variation: a novel set of divergent genes undergo spontaneous mutation of periodic coding regions and 5' regulatory sequences.
EMBO J.
10:4069-4079[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Yogev, D.,
D. Menaker,
K. Strutzberg,
S. Levisohn,
H. Kirchhoff,
K.-H. Hinz, and R. Rosengarten.
1994.
A surface epitope undergoing high-frequency phase variation is shared by Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma bovis.
Infect. Immun.
62:4962-4968[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Yogev, D.,
S. Levisohn,
S. H. Kleven,
D. Halachmi, and S. Razin.
1988.
Ribosomal RNA gene probes to detect intraspecies heterogeneity in Mycoplasma gallisepticum and M. synoviae.
Avian Dis.
32:220-231[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2001, p. 1882-1888, Vol. 39, No. 5
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1882-1888.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Roussan, D. A., Haddad, R., Khawaldeh, G.
(2008). Molecular Survey of Avian Respiratory Pathogens in Commercial Broiler Chicken Flocks with Respiratory Diseases in Jordan. Poult. Sci.
87: 444-448
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ferguson, N. M., Hepp, D., Sun, S., Ikuta, N., Levisohn, S., Kleven, S. H., Garcia, M.
(2005). Use of molecular diversity of Mycoplasma gallisepticum by gene-targeted sequencing (GTS) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis for epidemiological studies. Microbiology
151: 1883-1893
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Papazisi, L., Gorton, T. S., Kutish, G., Markham, P. F., Browning, G. F., Nguyen, D. K., Swartzell, S., Madan, A., Mahairas, G., Geary, S. J.
(2003). The complete genome sequence of the avian pathogen Mycoplasma gallisepticum strain Rlow. Microbiology
149: 2307-2316
[Abstract]
[Full Text]