This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Joseph, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Joseph, S. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2001, p. 2298-2299, Vol. 39, No. 6
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2298-2299.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

High-Frequency Recovery of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Isolates from the Poultry Production Environment

Joshua R. Hayes,1 Angela C. McIntosh,2 Sadaf Qaiyumi,2 Judith A. Johnson,2 Linda L. English,3 Lewis E. Carr,4 David D. Wagner,3 and Sam W. Joseph1,*

Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics1 and Department of Biological Resources Engineering,4 University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201-15952; and Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, Maryland 207083

Received 6 November 2000/Returned for modification 1 February 2001/Accepted 27 March 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The occurrence of resistance to the streptogramin quinupristin-dalfopristin in Enterococcus faecium isolates from chickens on the Eastern Seaboard, was evaluated. Quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance was found in 51 to 78% of E. faecium isolates from the food production environment. The high level of resistance in this organism suggests that this reservoir of resistance may compromise the therapeutic potential of quinupristin-dalfopristin.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Vancomycin has largely been reserved to treat multiresistant Enterococcus sp. infections and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections; however, resistance has become so prevalent over the past 10 years as to present a crisis situation. Faced with a potentially untreatable pathogen, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved use of the streptogramin quinupristin-dalfopristin (Synercid) to treat infections caused by vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE). Reports from German health agencies suggest that human carriage of quinupristin-dalfopristin-resistant Enterococcus faecium occurs at a rate of 14% (11). Although resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin has been observed in the United States, there is insufficient information, as yet, to determine the incidence in the nonhospitalized community. These observations illustrate that a pool of resistance to this antibiotic can be found in the human microbiota. In the absence of selective pressure through clinical administration of the drug, the means by which these isolates acquired resistance has yet to be fully clarified. One possible source of resistance development may have been the use of an analogue of quinupristin-dalfopristin, virginiamycin, in poultry production. Virginiamycin has been used in the United States for more than 25 years to control clostridial diseases and subtherapeutically to promote the growth of commercial poultry. As part of a larger study examining multiresistant enterococci from poultry in a region of the Eastern Seaboard, we have discovered an unusually high prevalence of quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance in E. faecium isolated from chickens.

Sixty-seven samples were collected from poultry transport containers (PTC), litter samples, and cloacal swabs. Swabs taken from nine PTC from six farms were used to inoculate colistin-nalidixic acid (CNA) agar plates. Seventeen poultry floor litter samples from 14 different farms were added at a 1:4 dilution to nalidixic acid-brain heart infusion-salt (NABS) enrichment broth for incubation at 35°C and were subsequently streaked onto CNA agar plates (5). Forty-one cloacal swabs were rinsed in tryptic soy broth (TSB) and spread plated onto either CNA or cephalexin aztreonam arabinose (CAA) agar (3) supplemented with 10 µg of quinupristin-dalfopristin/ml and 4 µg of ampicillin/ml. Colonies suspected to be Enterococcus spp. were isolated and identified using a modification of the protocol described by Facklam and Collins (2). Susceptibilities of E. faecium isolates to quinupristin-dalfopristin were assayed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion methodology on Mueller-Hinton agar (with resistance defined as a zone of >15 mm) or by use of the Sensititre antimicrobial testing system with a breakpoint MIC of >2 µg/ml (7, 8).

Twenty-one (51.2%) of 41 E. faecium isolates from cloacal swabs taken from chickens were resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin. Of the 27 E. faecium isolates from PTC swabs and litter samples, 21 (77.7%) were resistant (Table 1). Variance in the observed quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance incidence is likely due to the differences in sampling methodology as well as to differences in colonization or carriage rates among flocks.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Profile of susceptibilities of E. faecium isolates of poultry origin to quinupristin-dalfopristin

The high rate of recovery of quinupristin-dalfopristin-resistant E. faecium from chickens in the United States was troubling, but not surprising, given the routine application of the selective agent virginiamycin to poultry feed. Welton et al. have reported that virginiamycin-resistant E. faecium prevalence in domestic turkeys from Michigan can be as high as 100% because of the lengthy exposure of flocks to virginiamycin (10). Resistance development in chickens is significant in that the growout period for broiler chickens is 6 to 8 weeks versus the 16 to 19 weeks required for turkeys. In addition, per capita consumption of chicken products in the United States exceeds that of turkey by a factor of 4.3 (9).

Various plasmid-borne genetic elements, which carry quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance in agriculturally derived E. faecium, have been demonstrated to cross into E. faecium isolates of human origin in vitro (4). This finding was unsettling because of the problems that hospital physicians currently encounter in controlling nosocomial VRE. While VRE with resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin have not yet emerged as a problem in the clinical setting, it is possible that this resistance pattern will eventually occur. Indeed, the incidence of quinupristin-dalfopristin-resistant VRE has been reported to be 7.4% in German hospitals in 1998 (6). In fact, a recent report has shown that genes for quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance and vancomycin resistance were found on the same plasmid in an Enterococcus isolate from France (1).

Although the use of antibiotics at subtherapeutic concentrations in agriculture in the United States has not been definitively established as a contributor to the rising problem of antibiotic resistance in human clinical medicine, the presence in the food production environment of a population of E. faecium that harbors mobile resistance elements to quinupristin-dalfopristin is cause for concern. The European Union has banned the use of subtherapeutic antibiotics in agriculture as a precautionary measure due to a presumed risk to human health. The possibility that these strains may infect humans or that resistance elements may cross to the human microbiota, notably E. faecium, represents sufficient risk to warrant broader and continuous surveillance in the United States.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by a grant from the Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (JIFSAN), University of Maryland, College Park.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. Phone: (301) 405-5452. Fax: (301) 314-9489. E-mail: sj13{at}umail.umd.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Bozdogan, B., R. Leclerq, A. Lozniewski, and M. Weber. 1999. Plasmid-mediated coresistance to streptogramins and vancomycin in Enterococcus faecium HM1032. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2097-2098[Free Full Text].
2. Facklam, R. R., and M. D. Collins. 1989. Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:731-734[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Ford, M., J. D. Perry, and F. K. Gould. 1994. Use of cephalexin-aztreonam-arabinose agar for selective isolation of Enterococcus faecium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2999-3001[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Hammerum, A. H., L. B. Jensen, and F. M. Aarestrup. 1998. Detection of the SatA gene and transferability of virginiamycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium from food animals. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 168:145-151[CrossRef][Medline].
5. Hayes, J. R., L. E. Carr, E. T. Mallinson, L. W. Douglass, and S. W. Joseph. 2000. Characterization of the contribution of water activity and moisture content to population distribution of Salmonella spp. in commercial poultry houses. Poult. Sci., 79:1557-1561[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Klara, I., C. Konstabel, D. Badstubner, G. Werner, and W. Witte. 1999. Glycopeptide resistant enterococci in German hospitals in 1998. Bundesgesundheitbl.-Gesundheitsforsch.-Gensundheitschutz. 43:847-853.
7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7, 5th ed. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Reference standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A7, 7th ed. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
9. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2000. World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates 367. Office of the Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
10. Welton, L. A., L. A. Thai, M. B. Perri, S. Donabedian, J. McMahon, J. W. Chow, and M. J. Zervos. 1998. Antimicrobial resistance in enterococci isolated from turkey flocks fed virginiamycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:705-708[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Werner, G., I. Klare, H. Heier, K.-H. Heinz, G. Bohme, M. Wendt, and W. Witte. Quinupristin/dalfopristin-resistant enterococci of the satA (vatD) and satG (vatE) genotypes from different ecological origins in Germany. Microb. Drug Resist. 6:37-47.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2001, p. 2298-2299, Vol. 39, No. 6
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2298-2299.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • McDermott, P. F., Cullen, P., Hubert, S. K., McDermott, S. D., Bartholomew, M., Simjee, S., Wagner, D. D. (2005). Changes in Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Native Enterococcus faecium in Chickens Fed Virginiamycin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 4986-4991 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hayes, J. R., English, L. L., Carr, L. E., Wagner, D. D., Joseph, S. W. (2004). Multiple-Antibiotic Resistance of Enterococcus spp. Isolated from Commercial Poultry Production Environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 6005-6011 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jones, R. N., Deshpande, L. M. (2004). Are Enterococcus faecalis Strains with vat(E) in Poultry a Reservoir for Human Streptogramin Resistance? vat(E) Occurrence in Human Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections in North America (SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2002). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 360-361 [Full Text]  
  • Hayes, J. R., English, L. L., Carter, P. J., Proescholdt, T., Lee, K. Y., Wagner, D. D., White, D. G. (2003). Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Enterococcus Species Isolated from Retail Meats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 7153-7160 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Solway, S., Vincent, L., Tian, N., Woodford, N., Bendall, R. (2003). Isolation of streptogramin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from human and non-human sources in a rural community. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 707-710 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Simjee, S., White, D. G., Wagner, D. D., Meng, J., Qaiyumi, S., Zhao, S., McDermott, P. F. (2002). Identification of vat(E) in Enterococcus faecalis Isolates from Retail Poultry and Its Transferability to Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 3823-3828 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Simjee, S., White, D. G., Meng, J., Wagner, D. D., Qaiyumi, S., Zhao, S., Hayes, J. R., McDermott, P. F. (2002). Prevalence of streptogramin resistance genes among Enterococcus isolates recovered from retail meats in the Greater Washington DC area. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 877-882 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Joseph, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Joseph, S. W.