Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2572-2575, Vol. 39, No. 7
Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical
Research, University of Ghana,1 National
Blood Transfusion Service, Ministry of Health,
Korle-Bu,2 and Hygiene Wing, Military
Hospital,3 Accra, Ghana, and
National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo,
Japan4
Received 20 November 2000/Returned for modification 4 January
2001/Accepted 19 April 2001
In West African countries such as Ghana, efficient human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing is a priority in the fight against AIDS. A new immunochromatographic rapid test, Determine HIV-1/2 (Abbott
Diagnostics, North Chicago, Ill.), that detects antibodies against HIV type 1 (HIV-1) and/or HIV-2 was evaluated using Ghanaian blood samples. Two hundred four serum and/or plasma specimens were
tested. HIV screening was done by a particle agglutination test and
confirmed by a Western blot (WB) test as the "gold standard." The
results revealed 125 HIV-seropositive AIDS patients, 75 HIV-seronegative healthy individuals, and 4 individuals for whom the
HIV-1 result was indeterminate. The results obtained by the Determine
HIV-1/2 assay and Diagnostic HIV SPOT (Genelabs), which is currently
widely used in many districts in Ghana, were compared with those of the WB test, excluding the four HIV-1-indeterminate samples. The
sensitivity of the Determine HIV-1/2 assay was 100%, compared with
98.0% for the HIV SPOT assay. The specificity was 100% for both
tests. Determine HIV-1/2 is a single-step assay and was found to be
rapid and easy to perform without any special equipment. It was highly
sensitive and specific. The kit can be applied without electricity and
water supplies, making it suitable for the detection of HIV antibodies especially in the rural areas of Ghana, West Africa.
Despite intensive efforts to prevent
new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections, the Joint United
Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS and the World Health Organization (WHO)
now estimate that 36.1 million people worldwide were living with HIV
infection and/or AIDS at the end of the year 2000. Some 21.8 million
people have died of AIDS, with a cumulative total of 4.3 million
children having died before reaching age 15 years. Sub-Saharan African countries remain the epicenter of the pandemic, with nearly 25.3 million men, women, and children infected with HIV (6). It is estimated that between 5 and 10% of all HIV infections worldwide have been acquired through transfusion of contaminated blood and blood
products (4, 8).
In Ghana, from 1986 to the end of December 1999, a cumulative total of
37,298 AIDS cases had been reported to the Ministry of Health. From
this, it is estimated retrospectively that over 55,000 AIDS cases have
existed and that about 600,000 Ghanaians are living with HIV infection
and/or AIDS. The age distribution of these HIV-seropositive persons
shows that the most sexually active age group (20 to 39 years) makes up
about 70% of the total number of cases. Nearly 90% are in the
economically productive age group (20 to 49 years), and this has
serious implications for the future social and economic development of
the country (12).
As part of the efforts to reduce the transmission of HIV, there is the
need for a simple, rapid, sensitive, and specific HIV test which would
be suitable for rural areas where electricity and water may not be
readily available. In sub-Saharan Africa, improving nutritional and
health standards and controlling malaria in children is difficult. This
results in a high incidence of chronic anemia and increases the
requirement for consequent transfusions, emphasizing the need for safe
blood supplies (8). In addition, the risk of
mother-to-child transmission of HIV can be reduced for mothers who know
they are infected through voluntary counseling and testing (VCT)
facilities (7).
Serological tests such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA), particle agglutination (PA) assay, and Western blot (WB) assay
for the detection of HIV antibodies are routinely utilized for the
screening and confirmation of HIV infection in urban areas in Ghana.
Although ELISA and WB assay are very sensitive, they require relatively
complex instrumentation. The PA method is easy and simple but consists
of several steps with about 2 h required to achieve results,
making it inappropriate, especially for emergency use, compared with
simple rapid tests (2, 10, 11, 13). The cost of the
individual simple rapid test may be higher than that of an ELISA, but
when accurate cost assessment is done, using specificity, reliability,
and reproducibility, the use of a simple rapid test is seen to be more
cost-effective (18).
A new rapid test, Determine HIV-1/2 (Abbott Diagnostics, North
Chicago, Ill.), for the rapid detection of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) and/or HIV-2 antibodies based on lateral flow immunochromatography has
been developed (14). This test requires no laboratory
infrastructure or highly skilled personnel and requires only 10 min to
obtain the result. Therefore, the test can be used on site for
screening of HIV infection, facilitating the process of VCT in rural
areas. The Determine HIV-1/2 assay has been evaluated previously with whole blood, serum, and plasma samples from Thailand and Cote d'Ivoire. The test showed 100% specificity and sensitivity for HIV-1
and HIV-2 (1). We therefore studied the suitability of the
Determine HIV-1/2 assay in Ghana for the detection of antibodies to HIV.
Blood samples.
The specimens used in this study were plasma
or serum samples collected during 1998 and 1999 from pregnant women,
persons suspected of having HIV, and blood donors from different
locations in Ghana. These samples were selected to represent the type
of population to which the rapid assay would be applied. The blood samples were centrifuged, and the serum or plasma samples were collected into vials and stored.
Sample classification.
The HIV antibody status of these
samples was determined by screening first with a Serodia HIV-1/2 PA
assay (Fujirebio, Tokyo, Japan). In the screening procedure, the PA
assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The
final results were read after 2 h of incubation. This was followed
by differentiation into HIV-1-positive, HIV-2-positive, dual positive,
or negative categories by immunoblotting with PEPTI LAV 1-2 (Sanofi
Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-La-Coquette, France). PEPTI LAV 1-2 is
based on an immunoenzymatic strip method using two synthetic
peptides specific for HIV-1 (GP41) and HIV-2 (GP36). Further
confirmation was achieved by the WB assay (New LAV-blot 1 and New
LAV-blot 2; Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur), in which reactivity against
HIV-1 and HIV-2 proteins indicated the presence of antibodies in the specimens.
Evaluation.
Based on the serological results obtained, we
selected all of the 125 HIV-positive specimens and 75 HIV-negative
specimens for the evaluation of the Determine HIV-1/2 assay (Abbott
Diagnostics). The four specimens that were indeterminate for HIV-1 by
WB assay were also used in the rapid tests, but their results were not used for the evaluation.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2572-2575.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Suitability of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Test for Detection
of Antibodies to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Ghana, West
Africa
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Statistical analysis. The sensitivities and specificities of the tests were determined for the evaluation of the utility of the tests. The following formulas were used to calculate test indices (9): sensitivity = [TP/(TP + FN)] × 100 and specificity = [TN/(TN + FP)] × 100 (where TP = number of true positives, TN = number of true negatives, FN = number of false negatives, and FP = number of false positives).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The result of the WB assay showed 125 HIV-seropositive specimens, 75 HIV-seronegative specimens, and 4 HIV-1-indeterminate specimens. However, 200 samples, comprised of 125 HIV-seropositive and 75 HIV-seronegative specimens and excluding the 4 HIV-1-indeterminate specimens, were used for the evaluation. The positive samples consisted of 107 HIV-1-positive, 12 HIV-2-positive, and 6 dual positive samples.
Table 1 shows the sensitivities and
specificities of the tests determined using the HIV-seropositive and
-seronegative samples, respectively. Determine HIV-1/2 demonstrated
100% sensitivity for the detection of HIV-1 and HIV-2 with the WB and
PEPTI LAV assays. Innotest HIV-1/2 Ab did not detect one confirmed
antibody-positive specimen obtained from an asymptomatic individual,
indicating a sensitivity of 99.2%. The HIV SPOT assay showed 98.4%
sensitivity, missing two HIV-1 antibody-confirmed seropositive
specimens. Both samples were from individuals asymptomatic for
HIV infection or AIDS and displayed faint glycoprotein bands by WB
assay.
|
All of the tests showed 100% specificity except Innotest HIV-1/2 Ab, which registered two false positives (specificity, 97.4%). These two samples detected by Innotest HIV-1/2 Ab as positive displayed mean optical density values of 1.20 and 0.90, and the cutoff values were 0.25 and 0.24, respectively, when the ELISA was repeated.
The results for samples that were negative by PEPTI LAV 1-2 but were
neither positive nor negative by WB assay are presented in Table
2. All four had at least one glycoprotein
band (GP160, GP120, or GP41) present. According to the criteria
recommended by WHO for interpreting results from WB assays, they were
classified as indeterminate (15).
|
The Determine HIV-1/2 assay detected HIV antibodies in all four indeterminate specimens, while the Innotest HIV-1/2 recorded three positives and one negative and the HIV SPOT indicated two positives and two negatives. The indeterminate samples, however, were excluded from the analysis of the sensitivities and specificities of the kits.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Determine HIV-1/2 assay showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the detection of HIV-1 and HIV-2 with serum and plasma samples. The results completely agreed with the PEPTI LAV 1-2 assay and the WB 1 and 2 assays used as the "gold standard" in the present study. Furthermore, the four specimens indeterminate for HIV-1 by WB assay were all found positive by the Determine HIV-1/2 assay, indicating its sensitivity as a supplemental screening assay. However, the indeterminate results were not used in statistical analysis for calculating sensitivity and specificity due to the limitation by the formula (9).
In Ghana, the HIV-1 subtypes currently circulating are A, D, and G, with subtype A predominating (3, 5). It has been reported that the Determine HIV-1/2 assay can detect all of the presently identified HIV-1 subtypes as well as HIV-2 subtypes A and B (14). This makes the Determine HIV-1/2 assay ideal for HIV antibody screening of the prevailing HIV subtypes in Ghana. However, other diagnostic kits may have detected subtypes which are not specified.
Diagnosis of HIV infection and surveillance activities in sub-Saharan Africa are a great challenge. This can be attributed to the fact that many clinics or health care centers are poorly equipped and lack diagnostic capabilities and equipment needed to perform a standard confirmatory assay, such as WB assay. The problem is compounded in rural areas, where most often electricity and refrigeration for storage of diagnostic test kits and reagents may be interrupted frequently or are not available.
In the other assays examined, procedures require many steps to achieve results, but the Determine HIV-1/2 assay is a rapid, one-step procedure for plasma and/or serum specimens. In addition, the Determine HIV-1/2 assay can be used for a batch or single use, since the strips can be separated into single units. Another feature is the lack of a requirement for any equipment or specific instrument for its application. In this assay, the sample and conjugate migrate by capillary flow, eliminating the need for prior centrifugation of test samples. All of these features of the Determine HIV-1/2 make it suitable for screening to detect HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies in remote and rural areas without electricity and complex laboratory equipment.
Current VCT programs worldwide have had moderate success in increasing access to HIV antibody testing. For instance, many who agreed to take an HIV test did not return to collect results (16). Tests with prompt results have the potential to change this situation if their use is incorporated into existing health care programs.
UNAIDS and WHO recommend that countries consider testing strategies for HIV antibody detection that use ELISA and/or simple rapid assays rather than ELISA and WB assay. According to strategy I of the recommendation, all serum or plasma samples should be tested with one ELISA or simple rapid assay. Reactive serum is considered HIV antibody positive, and nonreactive serum is considered HIV antibody negative. This strategy should preferably be a combined HIV-1-HIV-2 assay, which is highly sensitive when applied for safeguarding the blood supply. In strategy II, the test sample (serum or plasma) is first tested with one ELISA or simple rapid assay, and if it is reactive, it is retested with a second ELISA or simple rapid assay based on a different antigen preparation and/or a different test principle. The sample is considered HIV antibody positive if it is reactive in both tests. If there is a discordant result or both test results are reactive, then strategy III, which requires a third test of different antigen preparations and/or different test principles from those used in strategy II, should be considered. Serum reactive in all three of these tests is considered HIV antibody positive (17).
A combination of the HIV SPOT test and the Determine HIV-1/2 assay would satisfy strategy II and should prove cost-effective, since the Determine HIV-1/2 assay results are comparable to those of the WB assay. We conclude that this test is suitable for the screening of blood and for VCT programs in developing countries such as Ghana.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank the Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) and Human Science Foundation, Japan (HSF), for financial support.
We extend our appreciation to Justice Kumi and Aba Hayford, who provided technical assistance, and to Peace Gblorkpor, who did most of the secretarial work on the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Virology Unit, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG. 581, Legon, Accra, Ghana. Phone: 233-21-501178/9. Fax: 233-21-502182. E-mail: kishikaw{at}nih.go.jp.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Arai, H.,
B. Petchclai,
K. Khupulsup,
T. Kurimura, and K. Takeda.
1999.
Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for detection of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:367-370 |
| 2. |
Behets, F.,
A. Disasi,
R. W. Ryder,
K. Bishagara,
P. Piot,
M. Kashamuka,
M. Kamenga,
N. Nzila,
M. Laga,
G. Vercanteren,
V. Batter,
C. Brown, and T. Quinn.
1991.
Comparison of five commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and Western immunoblotting for human immunodeficiency virus antibody detection in serum samples from Central Africa.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2280-2284 |
| 3. | Brandful, J. A. M., W. K. Ampofo, W. Janssens, Y. Adu-Sarkodie, F. Apeagyei, F. Anyomi, S. Aidoo, N. Yamamoto, K. Ishikawa, T. Sata, and T. Kurata. 1998. Genetic and phylogenetic analysis of HIV type 1 strains from southern Ghana. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 14:815-819[Medline]. |
| 4. | Curran, J. W., H. W. Jaffe, A. M. Hardy, W. Morgan, R. M. Selik, and T. Z. Dondero. 1998. Epidemiology of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States. Science 239:610[CrossRef]. |
| 5. | Ishikawa, K., W. Janssens, J. Brandful, L. Heyndrickx, Y. Takebe, W. Ampofo, T. Sata, S. Yamazaki, M. Osei-Kwasi, N. Yamamoto, Y. Koyanagi, G. Van der Groen, and T. Kurata. 1996. Genetic and phylogenetic analysis of HIV type 1 env subtypes in Ghana, West Africa. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 12:1575-1577[Medline]. |
| 6. | Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 2000. AIDS epidemic update, p. 3-5. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS and the World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 7. | Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 1998. Discussion document. Emerging issues and challenges for women, young people and infants, p. 8. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 8. | Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 1997. Technical update; blood safety and HIV, p. 3-5. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS and the World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. |
| 9. | Karan, J. 1995. Humoral immune responses and detection during HIV infection, p. 191-209. In D. Rickwood, and B. D. Hames (ed.), HIV, a practical approach, vol. 1. Virology and immunology. Oxford University Press Inc, New York, N.Y. |
| 10. | Malone, J. D., E. S. Smith, J. Sheffield, et al. 1993. Comparative evaluation of six rapid serological tests for HIV-1 antibody. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 6:115-119. |
| 11. | Mortimer, P. P. 1991. The fallibility of HIV Western blot. Lancet 11:286-287. |
| 12. | National AIDS/STD Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Ghana. AIDS surveillance, Jan. to Dec. 1999. Ministry of Health, Accra, Ghana. |
| 13. |
Riggin, C. H.,
G. A. Beltz,
C. H. Hung,
R. M. Thorn, and D. J. Marciani.
1987.
Evaluation of passive particle agglutination test for antibody of human immunodeficiency virus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:1433-1437 |
| 14. |
Vallari, A. S.,
R. K. Hickman,
J. R. Hackett,
J. R. Catherine,
A. Brennan,
V. A. Varitek,
J. R. Sushil, and G. Devare.
1998.
Rapid assay for simultaneous detection and differentiation of immunoglobulin G antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) group M, HIV-1 group O, and HIV-2.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:3657-3661 |
| 15. | World Health Organization. 1990. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS): proposed W. H. O. criteria for interpreting results from Western blot assays for HIV-1, HIV-2 and HTLV-1/HTLV-2. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 37:281-283. |
| 16. | World Health Organization. 1992. Recommendations for the selection and use of HIV antibody tests. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 67:145-149[Medline]. |
| 17. | World Health Organization. 1997. Revised recommendations for the selection and use of HIV antibody tests. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 12:83-86. |
| 18. | World Health Organization. 1998. The importance of simple/rapid assays in HIV testing. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 73:321-326[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|