Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2576-2580, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2576-2580.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
O-Antigen Diversity among Acinetobacter baumannii
Strains from the Czech Republic and Northwestern Europe, as Determined
by Lipopolysaccharide-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies
Ralph
Pantophlet,1,*
Alexandr
Nemec,2
Lore
Brade,1
Helmut
Brade,1 and
Lenie
Dijkshoorn3
Division of Medical and Biochemical
Microbiology, Research Center Borstel, Borstel,
Germany1; National Institute of
Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic2; and
Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University
Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands3
Received 7 February 2001/Returned for modification 16 April
2001/Accepted 29 April 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
O-antigen-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are currently being
generated to develop an O-serotyping scheme for the genus Acinetobacter and to provide potent tools to study the
diversity of O-antigens among Acinetobacter strains. In
this report, Acinetobacter baumannii strains from the
Czech Republic and from two clonal groups identified in Northwestern
Europe (termed clones I and II) were investigated for their reactivity
with a panel of O-antigen-specific MAbs generated against
Acinetobacter strains from various species. The bacteria
were characterized for their ribotype, biotype, and antibiotic
susceptibility and the presence of the 8.7-kb plasmid pAN1. By using
the combination of these typing profiles, the Czech strains could be
classified into four previously defined groups (A. Nemec, L. Janda, O. Melter, and L. Dijkshoorn, J. Med. Microbiol. 48:287-296, 1999): two relatively homogeneous groups of
multiresistant strains (termed groups A and B), a heterogeneous group
of other multiresistant strains, and a group of susceptible strains.
O-antigen reactivity was observed primarily with MAbs generated against Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter
baumannii strains. A comparison of reaction patterns confirmed
the previously hypothesized clonal relationship between group A and
clone I strains, which are also similar in other properties. The
results show that there is limited O-antigen variability among strains
with similar geno- and phenotypic characteristics and are suggestive of
a high prevalence of certain A. baumannii serotypes in the
clinical environment. It is also shown that O-antigen-specific MAbs are
useful for the follow-up of strains causing outbreaks in hospitals.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The potential of members of
the genus Acinetobacter to cause infection has been
known for decades (7-9, 11, 18). However, only after
improvement of species classification within the genus as a result of
DNA-DNA hybridization studies (1, 3, 19) was it possible
to gain insight into the ecology and clinical significance of
individual Acinetobacter species (20). Of
these, Acinetobacter baumannii (DNA group 2) has been
isolated predominantly from clinical specimens of human origin and
is clearly the main species associated with outbreaks of nosocomial
infections (21). However, the reliable identification of
this species in bacteriological laboratories is hampered by the close
pheno- and genotypic relatedness of A. baumannii to three
other species within the genus (5), two of which (unnamed
DNA groups 3 and 13TU) (19) are known to also cause
hospital-acquired infections (21). Due to the successful
use of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) as taxonomic markers for a
variety of gram-negative bacteria, we have decided to generate O-antigen-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against the LPS of
Acinetobacter strains, with the aim of developing an
identification scheme for this group of bacteria based on the chemical
and antigenic structure of the O-polysaccharide of their LPS.
In a previous study, the pheno- and genotypic similarities among
A. baumannii strains isolated in the Czech Republic were analyzed (12). Based on the results, these isolates could
be classified into four groups: two relatively homogeneous
groups of predominantly multiresistant strains (termed groups A
and B) comprising both sporadic and outbreak-associated isolates, a
heterogeneous group of other multiresistant strains, and a group of
mainly susceptible strains (12). The features of groups A
and B were found to be highly similar to those of two outbreak-related
A. baumannii clonal groups, clones I and II, which were
identified among hospital isolates in Northwestern Europe
(6). In this study, we analyzed the O-antigenic
relationship among these Czech strains, in comparison to a number of
clone I and II strains, by using O-antigen-specific MAbs. The aim of
the study was to gain insight into the prevalence of putative
Acinetobacter O-serotypes (i.e., the O-antigen diversity), within the Czech Republic in particular, but also within the general clinical environment.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacteria.
The Acinetobacter strains investigated
in this study are listed in Table
1
(n = 65). They consisted of a selection of clinical isolates from the Czech Republic (n = 52) and
Northwestern Europe (The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Belgium, and
Denmark [n = 13]). Most strains were originally
isolated from burn wounds, sputum, or urine. Forty-two Czech strains
were identified previously as A. baumannii by ribotyping and
characterized by antibiotic susceptibility, biotype, and plasmid
profile (12). These strains were selected for this study
from a set of 77 A. baumannii isolates (12) to be as heterogeneous as possible in their properties, geographical origin, and time of isolation, thus excluding multiple isolates of the
same strain from one locality. Ten previously uncharacterized strains
were added to broaden the geographical heterogeneity of the strains
from the Czech Republic. The 13 strains from Northwestern Europe (Table
1) were identified previously as A. baumannii by DNA-DNA
hybridization (6). The geno- and phenotypic
characteristics of two of these strains, RUH 875 and RUH 134, have been
compared recently to those of clinical isolates from the Czech Republic (12). For the present study, the additional Northwestern
European strains and the additionally selected Czech strains were
characterized for their ribotype, biotype, and antibiotic
susceptibility as described previously (12). The presence
of an 8.7-kb-plasmid, termed pAN1, was determined with a
digoxigenin-labeled probe prepared from pAN1 of A. baumannii
NIPH 632 (12). All strains used in this study were
preserved in glycerol stocks at
80°C.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Geno- and phenotypic properties of A. baumannii strains investigated in this study, their reactivity
with O-antigen-specific MAbs in dot and Western blots, and O-banding
patterns following acid hydrolysis of membrane-bound LPS and
immunostaining with MAb A6 for strains that did not react with any MAb
|
|
Whole-cell lysates and proteinase K digestion.
Preparation
of whole-cell lysates and proteinase K treatment of these lysates were
performed as described in another study (14). They were
stored at
20°C and heated (100°C, 5 min) prior to use.
MAbs.
The MAbs used in this study are shown in Table
2. Their generation and serological
characterization have been described in detail in other studies
(15-17; R. Pantophlet, J. A. Severin, A. Nemec, L. Brade, L. Dijkshoorn, and H. Brade, submitted for publication; R. Pantophlet, L. Brade, and H. Brade, submitted for publication). They
included MAbs against strains from the clinically more important species such as A. baumannii, DNA group 3, and DNA group
13TU, as well as MAbs against other species within the genus. All
antibodies were stored at
20°C when not in use.
Serological assays.
Dot blotting and Western blotting were
performed as described previously (15) with proteinase
K-treated bacterial lysates as antigens. Acid hydrolysis of
membrane-bound LPS and detection of its lipid A moiety with antibody
were performed as described elsewhere (13) with 1% acetic
acid and MAb A6 against bisphosphoryl lipid A (10).
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
The properties and epidemiological data of the 65 strains are
shown in Table 1. Examples of EcoRI ribotypes are shown in Fig. 1. According to their ribotypes, all
10 additonally selected Czech strains were identified as A. baumannii. These strains were all resistant to at least three of
nine antibiotics tested. Based on their EcoRI ribotypes and
biotypes, seven of these strains (ribotype I, biotype 6 or 11) could be
allocated to group A, and one strain (ribotype II, biotype 2) could be
allocated to group B. The remaining two strains (ribotype X, biotype 2)
were placed in the third group of multiresistant strains. A plasmid
with a size of approximately 8.7 kb, termed pAN1 (12), was
present in all of the additionally selected strains, which were placed in group A, as well as in the strain allocated to group B.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Examples of EcoRI ribotypes observed for
A. baumannii strains isolated in the Czech Republic.
Lanes: 1, molecular weight marker (phage DNA digested with
HindIII and StyI); 2, strain NIPH 7; 3, strain NIPH 10; 4, strain NIPH 24; 5, strain NIPH 60; 6, strain NIPH
615. Strains NIPH 7 and NIPH 24 are representative of isolates
allocated to groups A and B, respectively.
|
|
Proteinase K-digested lysates of all strains were then tested by dot
blotting with the O-antigen-specific MAbs listed in Table 2. Strains
giving positive reactions were subjected to sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting to
confirm the reactivity observed in the dot blot with the respective
MAb. O-antigen-reactivity was observed to be nearly exclusively with
MAbs generated against A. calcoacetius and A. baumannii strains (Table 1). Group A isolates reacted with MAbs S48-3-13 (n = 17) and S51-3 (n = 5),
generated against the O-antigens of an A. baumannii strain
and an A. calcoaceticus strain, respectively. It is
interesting in this context that clone I strains also reacted with MAb
S48-3-13. Moreover, in both group A and clone I strains, plasmid pAN1
was found. Together with the previously noted similarities between
group A and clone I reference strain RUH 875 (12), this finding strongly supports the hypothesis that group A and clone I
strains are clonally related. The five remaining group A strains that
reacted with MAb S51-3 may represent a subclonal group, judging from
the similarities in their ribotypes and biotypes and the presence of
plasmid pAN1 with the other group A strains. Only one other strain
(NIPH 10, in the third group of multiresistant Czech strains) also
reacted with MAb S51-3. Interestingly, plasmid pAN1 was also found in
this strain, and its ribotype was highly similar to the
EcoRI ribotype observed for group A and clone I strains
(only one band position difference; Fig. 1). Plasmid pAN1 was
originally isolated from A. baumannii strain NIPH 632 (12). Although its function and encoded properties are not
known, it has been found in all (geographically highly diverse) strains with the EcoRI ribotype specific to clone I strains from
Northwestern Europe, but rarely in other A. baumannii
strains. This plasmid may thus serve as a clonal marker; however,
further studies are needed to assess its role, if any, in the
epidemicity of A. baumannii strains. Group B strains reacted
exclusively with MAb S53-32, whereas clone II strains reacted primarily
with MAb S48-3-17. A clonal relationship between these two groups of
strains therefore seems unlikely. However, it must be noted here that
clone II strains were originally delineated based primarily on their
amplified fragment length polymorphism profile (6); two
different EcoRI ribotype patterns were observed among these
strains (Table 1) which were similar to the EcoRI ribotypes
observed for two other outbreak-related strains that could not be
allocated unambiguously to either clone I or II (6). Thus,
the possibility of variants or subclones within this particular clonal
group cannot be excluded. MAb reactivity with the other Czech strains
included in this study was sporadic: two strains reacted with MAb
S53-32, two reacted with MAb S48-3-17, and one reacted with MAb S53-25.
The latter antibody was generated against the O-antigen of a strain
belonging to genomic species 16, and its reactivity with A. baumannii strains would appear to be unusual at first glance.
However, we have shown recently (14) that certain
O-antigenic determinants may occur in different genomic species. This
seems to be true as well for the epitope recognized by MAb S53-25. The
generation of more O-antigen-specific antibodies against structurally
defined epitopes of the O-polysaccharide chains will help clarify which
epitopes determine species specificity and which do not. The high
degree of reactivity among the homogeneous groups of multiresistant
strains indicates limited O-antigen variation and supports the view
that such strains are of a common clonal origin.
By using a method to visualize any LPS via its lipid A moiety with
antibody in a Western blot following acid hydrolysis of the
membrane-bound antigen (13), it was possible to define the putative O-serotypes of some strains that had not reacted with any of
the MAbs used in the present study. Six novel banding patterns (labeled
1 to 6) were observed among 10 of the 17 strains, which did not react
with any of the O-antigen-specific MAbs used in this study (Table 1 and
Fig. 2). The lack of observation of a pattern for all strains has been noted in other studies (15, 16) and is probably because these strains have a reduced level of O-antigen expression or produce LPS that lacks an O-antigen. This is
also an example how such antibodies may help analytical biochemists
select those LPS that are worth being analyzed structurally.

View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Representative Western blot of A.
baumannii strains that did not react with any of the
O-antigen-specific MAbs used in this study following acid hydrolysis (1 h in 1% acetic acid at 100°C) of membrane-bound LPS and
immunostaining with lipid A-specific MAb A6. Bacteria are, from left to
right, strain NIPH 33 (lane 1), strain NIPH 335 (lane 2), strain NIPH 4 (lane 3), strain NIPH 45 (lane 4), strain NIPH 70 (lane 5), and strain
NIPH 201 (lane 6).
|
|
The findings presented above suggest that certain A. baumannii serotypes may be more prevalent than others in hospital
settings. In the Czech Republic, these would appear to be primarily the serotypes defined by MAbs S48-3-13, S53-32, and S51-3. In Northwestern Europe, the serotypes defined by MAbs S48-3-13 and S48-3-17 would appear to be most prevalent. Recent screening studies (R. Pantophlet, J. A. Severin, A. Nemec, L. Brade, L. Dijkshoorn, and H. Brade, submitted for publication) have shown that the serotypes defined by the
MAbs mentioned above are also present in other Eastern European
countries, such as Hungary, Bulgaria, and Poland. In Hungary and
Bulgaria, the S51-3 serotype was found, whereas in Poland, the
serotypes defined by MAbs S48-3-17 and S53-32 were identified among a
number of strains tested. The serotypes defined by these three MAbs
were also found in Italy. In Germany, the serotypes defined by MAbs
S48-3-13 and S53-32 appear to be more common, whereas the S48-3-17 and
S51-3 serotypes are found only sporadically. However, a large-scale
study will be necessary to depict more precisely the prevalence and
geographical spread of these and other serotypes. Thus, with the
generation of more O-antigen-specific MAbs, it will be possible not
only to complete a serotyping scheme for Acinetobacter, but
also to further define the prevalence of Acinetobacter
serotypes in clinical settings worldwide.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
The technical assistance of M. Willen is gratefully acknowledged.
This study was supported in part by research grant 310/98/1602 of the
Grant Agency of the Czech Republic.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Present address: The Scripps
Research Institute, Department of Immunology, IMM2, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Phone: (858) 784-8137. Fax: (858) 784-8360. E-mail: rpanto{at}scripps.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bouvet, P. J. M., and P. A. D. Grimont.
1986.
Taxonomy of the genus Acinetobacter with recognition of Acinetobacter baumannii sp. nov., Acinetobacter haemolyticus sp. nov., Acinetobacter johnsonii sp. nov., and Acinetobacter junii sp. nov., and emended descriptions of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter lwoffii.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
36:228-240[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bouvet, P. J. M., and P. A. D. Grimont.
1987.
Identification and biotyping of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter.
Ann. Inst. Pasteur (Paris)
138:569-578.
|
| 3.
|
Bouvet, P. J. M., and S. Jeanjean.
1989.
Delineation of new proteolytic genomic species in the genus Acinetobacter.
Res. Microbiol.
140:291-299[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Dijkshoorn, L.,
I. Tjernberg,
B. Pot,
M. F. Michel,
J. Ursing, and K. Kersters.
1990.
Numerical analysis of cell envelope protein profiles of Acinetobacter strains classified by DNA-DNA hybridization.
Syst. Appl. Microbiol.
13:338-344.
|
| 5.
|
Dijkshoorn, L.
1996.
Acinetobacter microbiology, p. 37-69.
In
E. Bergogne-Bérézin, M. L. Joly-Guillou, and K. J. Towner (ed.), Acinetobacter: microbiology, epidemiology, infections, management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 6.
|
Dijkshoorn, L.,
H. Aucken,
P. Gerner-Smidt,
P. Janssen,
M. E. Kaufmann,
J. Garaizar,
J. Ursing, and T. L. Pitt.
1996.
Comparison of outbreak and nonoutbreak Acinetobacter baumannii strains by genotypic and phenotypic methods.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:1519-1525[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Glew, R. H.,
R. C. Moellering, and L. J. Kunz.
1977.
Infections with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (Herellea vaginicola): clinical and laboratory studies.
Medicine
56:79-96[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Hoppe, M.,
J. Potel, and R. Malottke.
1983.
Clinical importance of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus isolations from blood cultures and venecatheters.
Zentbl. Bakteriol.
256:80-86.
|
| 9.
|
Juni, E.
1984.
Genus III. Acinetobacter Brisou and Prévot 1954, 727AL, p. 303-307.
In
N. R. Krieg (ed.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 1. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.
|
| 10.
|
Kuhn, H. M.,
L. Brade,
B. J. Appelmelk,
S. Kusumoto,
E. T. Rietschel, and H. Brade.
1992.
Characterization of the epitope specificity of murine monoclonal antibodies directed against lipid A.
Infect. Immun.
60:2201-2210[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Lautrop, H.
1974.
Acinetobacter Brisou and Prévot 1954, p. 436-438.
In
R. E. Buchanan, and N. E. Gibbons (ed.), Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.
|
| 12.
|
Nemec, A.,
L. Janda,
O. Melter, and L. Dijkshoorn.
1999.
Genotypic and phenotypic similarity of multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in the Czech Republic.
J. Med. Microbiol.
48:287-296[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Pantophlet, R.,
L. Brade, and H. Brade.
1997.
Detection of lipid A by monoclonal antibodies in S-form lipopolysaccharide after acidic treatment of immobilized LPS on Western blot.
J. Endotoxin Res.
4:89-95.
|
| 14.
|
Pantophlet, R.,
L. Brade,
L. Dijkshoorn, and H. Brade.
1998.
Specificity of rabbit antisera against lipopolysaccharide of Acinetobacter.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1245-1250[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Pantophlet, R.,
L. Brade, and H. Brade.
1999.
Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii strains with monoclonal antibodies against the O antigens of their lipopolysaccharides.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
6:323-329[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Pantophlet, R.,
L. Brade, and H. Brade.
1999.
Use of a murine O-antigen-specific monoclonal antibody to identify Acinetobacter strains of unnamed genomic species 13 Sensu Tjernberg and Ursing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:1693-1698[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Pantophlet, R.,
S. R. Haseley,
E. V. Vinogradov,
L. Brade,
O. Holst, and H. Brade.
1999.
Chemical and antigenic structure of the O-polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide from two Acinetobacter haemolyticus strains differing only in the anomeric configuration of one glycosyl residue in their O-antigen.
Eur. J. Biochem.
263:587-595[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Taplin, D.,
G. Rebell, and N. Zaias.
1963.
The human skin as a source of Mima-Herellea infections.
JAMA
186:166-168.
|
| 19.
|
Tjernberg, I., and J. Ursing.
1989.
Clinical strains of Acinetobacter classified by DNA-DNA hybridization.
APMIS
97:595-605[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Towner, K. J.,
E. Bergogne-Bérézin, and C. A. Fewson.
1991.
Acinetobacter: portrait of a genus, p. 1-24.
In
K. J. Towner, E. Bergogne-Bérézin, and C. A. Fewson (ed.), The biology of Acinetobacter: taxonomy, clinical importance, molecular biology, physiology, industrial relevance. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 21.
|
Towner, K. J.
1997.
Clinical importance and antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter spp.
J. Med. Microbiol.
46:721-746[Abstract].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2576-2580, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2576-2580.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Loehfelm, T. W., Luke, N. R., Campagnari, A. A.
(2008). Identification and Characterization of an Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilm-Associated Protein. J. Bacteriol.
190: 1036-1044
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nemec, A., Dijkshoorn, L., van der Reijden, T. J.K.
(2004). Long-term predominance of two pan-European clones among multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains in the Czech Republic. J Med Microbiol
53: 147-153
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pantophlet, R., Severin, J. A., Nemec, A., Brade, L., Dijkshoorn, L., Brade, H.
(2002). Identification of Acinetobacter Isolates from Species Belonging to the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii Complex with Monoclonal Antibodies Specific for O Antigens of Their Lipopolysaccharides. CVI
9: 60-65
[Abstract]
[Full Text]