Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2637-2639, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2637-2639.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Practical Strategies for Detecting and
Confirming Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus
aureus: a Tertiary-Care Hospital Laboratory's
Experience
Elizabeth M.
Marlowe,*
Martin D.
Cohen,
Janet F.
Hindler,
Kevin W.
Ward, and
David A.
Bruckner
Department of Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los
Angeles, California
Received 21 February 2001/Returned for modification 31 March
2001/Accepted 15 April 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The clinical microbiology laboratory plays a critical role in the
detection of Staphylococcus aureus with decreased
susceptibility to vancomycin. Staff education and rapid laboratory
response are of utmost importance. We report on our laboratory's
experience and provide recommendations for the identification and
confirmation of vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus.
 |
TEXT |
Despite the low incidence of
vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA)
worldwide, VISA remains a significant concern. The VISA strains
isolated at the Medical Center of the University of California at Los
Angeles (UCLA) mark the fifth of eight sets of strains confirmed by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Fred Tenover,
personal communication) in the United States (1, 2, 2a, 3,
6). Internationally, cases have been reported in Japan, Korea,
and Europe (3, 4, 5). Expedient confirmation of VISA
isolates from clinical specimens is critical to patient care and
infection control. Clinical microbiologists must be knowledgeable about
procedures that can accurately detect VISA. In addition, when a VISA
strain is found, results must be effectively communicated to health
care providers and public health officials. Here we report on our
laboratory's experience with the isolation, detection, and
confirmation of two VISA isolates from a single specimen. Our goal is
to highlight specific issues that must be considered when VISA is
suspected in a clinical specimen.
On 8 June 2000, a biliary drainage specimen was submitted to the
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of the UCLA Medical Center for
bacterial culture. The specimen was obtained from a transhepatic biliary drainage catheter from a home health care patient with multiple
hepatic abscesses who had received long-term vancomycin therapy for
methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection.
Following overnight incubation, examination of the primary plates
revealed large colonies of S. aureus (isolate 1) and
pinpoint colonies of lactose-negative, gram-negative rods which were
subsequently identified as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Broth microdilution susceptibility testing of S. aureus
isolate 1 demonstrated oxacillin and vancomycin MICs of >16 and 2 µg/ml, respectively.
On the second day of incubation of the primary plates, pinpoint,
beta-hemolytic, staphylococcus-like colonies were seen. A positive
slide coagulase test confirmed the identification of these colonies as
S. aureus (isolate 2), and susceptibility testing was
performed. The results of the broth microdilution test read the next
morning (18 h) revealed an oxacillin MIC of >16 µg/ml and a
vancomycin MIC of 4 µg/ml. These results remained unchanged after
24 h of incubation. In our laboratory it is policy to inoculate a
purity plate (blood agar plate) at the time that broth microdilution MIC test plates are inoculated. The purity plate for S. aureus (isolate 2) demonstrated multiple colony types resembling
staphylococcus and was considered to possibly contain a mixture of
isolates. A Gram stain of the well that contained 2 µg of vancomycin
per ml was performed and showed only gram-positive cocci in clusters. The contents of this well and the positive control well were
subcultured onto blood agar plates to check for purity. The
susceptibilities of the two distinct colonial phenotypes, one
comprising small yellow-white isolates (S. aureus isolate
2a) and the other comprising pinpoint grey-white isolates (S. aureus isolate 2b), were determined (Fig.
1). At 18 h, the vancomycin MIC was
4 µg/ml for isolates of both phenotypes. At 24 h, the vancomycin
MIC had increased to 8 µg/ml for isolates of both phenotypes.
Interestingly, the oxacillin MICs for isolates 2a and 2b were >16 and
0.5 µg/ml, respectively. Vancomycin MICs were determined by the
E-test (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) and were 6 µg/ml for both
isolates. In addition, both isolates grew on vancomycin at 6 µg/ml on
brain heart infusion screen agar (Hardy, Santa Barbara, Calif.).

View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Photo of S. aureus morphotypes from
biliary culture. Isolates of S. aureus isolate 1 (MRSA)
appear as classical large colonies that are yellow-white and domed with
a zone of beta-hemolysis. The smaller colonies were identified as VISA.
S. aureus isolate 2a (VISA) appears as a small
yellow-white colony with a narrow zone of beta-hemolysis. S.
aureus isolate 2b (VISA) appears as a pinpoint grey-white
colony with a barely detectable zone of beta-hemolysis. Both isolate 2a
and isolate 2b were domed and distinct.
|
|
Laboratory personnel notified hospital infection control, the Los
Angeles County Public Health Department (LACPHD), and CDC. Isolates
were subcultured onto Trypticase soy agar slants (BBL Microbiology Systems, Sparks, Md.) for shipment to LACPHD and CDC. The
initial isolates sent to CDC were not confirmed to be VISA isolates.
After further investigation at our laboratory, it was discovered that
in order to expedite the confirmation process, the slants had been
incubated for only 4 h prior to shipping. An important feature of
VISA is its slow growth (8). It was suspected that this
4-h incubation period might not have been adequate and thus contributed
to the conflicting results. The isolates were again subcultured and
incubated on chocolate agar slants (BBL Microbiology Systems) for a
full 24 h before they were shipped to CDC. Subsequently, CDC
confirmed that the isolates were VISA. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
performed at both UCLA and CDC showed that the two VISA isolates were
closely related and similar to other previously confirmed VISA isolates
(Hageman et al., unpublished data).
As this report demonstrates, the detection of VISA can be challenging.
VISA isolates may demonstrate multiple colony morphologies and appear
to be mixed (Fig. 1). Detection of the VISA isolates in our laboratory
was dependent upon identification of pinpoint colonies from the primary
plate at day 2 and then testing of the various colony types from the
purity plate subcultures as MIC test inocula. Like MRSA, VISA
may demonstrate heteroresistance or there may be subpopulations
that are resistant (7; CDC, http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/hip/Lab/FactSheet/gisa.htm). To date all
CDC-confirmed clinical VISA isolates have been MRSA; however, for one
of the VISA strains isolated at UCLA, the oxacillin MIC was 0.5 µg/ml
and the strain was mecA negative by PCR (9).
Not all commonly used susceptibility test methods have been able to
detect VISA. The NCCLS disk diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) method is not an
appropriate method. Broth microdilution, with incubation for a full
24 h, remains the method of choice for detection of decreased
susceptibility to vancomycin. Conventional MicroScan panels and the
E-test can detect this resistance when the cultures are held for
a full 24 h (8; CDC,
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/hip/Lab/FactSheet/gisa.htm and
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/HIP/aresist/search.htm). The method with the Vitek system is also acceptable (8;
CDC, http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/hip/Lab/FactSheet/gisa.htm). For a
review, see the report by Tenover et al. (8).
On the basis of our experience, we recommend the following. (i)
Be aware that VISA may not appear on the primary culture plate until
day 2 of incubation (48 h). (ii) VISA grows more slowly than typical
vancomycin-sensitive S. aureus. Thus, it is recommended that
isolates for testing and shipping be incubated for a full 24 h.
(iii) Be aware that VISA isolates may demonstrate variable colony
morphologies on the primary culture and subsequent subcultures. (iv) Be
cognizant of the fact that patients with VISA infection are likely to
respond poorly to vancomycin therapy. Thus, receipt of information that
a patient is responding poorly to vancomycin should warrant
appropriate tests for VISA. (v) Determine if the susceptibility method
in your laboratory is likely to detect VISA. If not, determine if a
backup method is warranted. (vi) Define a mechanism that can be used to
communicate the results indicating probable isolation of a VISA isolate
to appropriate health care workers in a timely manner.
Algorithms for VISA detection can be designed to best fit the
institution and the patient population (Fig.
2). Information on how to detect and
report VISA is available through the CDC website
(www.cdc.gov/ncidod/hip/lab/factsheet/gisa.htm and
www.CDC.gov/ncidod/hip/ARESIST/search.htm).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Algorithm for detection and confirmation of VISA. This
algorithm is a general guideline for workup of VISA isolates in the
clinical laboratory. Algorithms should be designed for the specific
hospital and patient population. Abbreviations: BHI, brain heart
infusion; Vanco, vancomycin.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Fred Tenover for comments and assistance. We also thank
CDC for aid in the confirmation of the identities of the isolates.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Center, University of
California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA
90095-1713. Phone: (310) 794-2766. Fax: (310) 794-2765. E-mail:
bmarlowe{at}ucla.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1997.
Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin United States, 1997.
Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.
46:813-815[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Fridkin, S. K.
2001.
Vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus: what the infectious disease specialist needs to know.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
32:108-115[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2a.
| Hageman, J. C., D. Peques, C. Jepson, R. Bell, M. Guinan,
K. Ward, M. Cohen, J. Hindler, F. C. Tenover, S. McAllister, M. Kellum,
and S. Fridkin. Case report of vancomycin-intermediate
Staphylococcus aureus in a home healthcare patient. Emerg. Infect.
Dis., in press.
|
| 3.
|
Hiramatsu, K.,
N. Artiaka,
H. Hanaki,
S. Kawasaki,
Y. Hosoda,
S. Hori,
Y. Fukuchi, and I. Kobayashi.
1997.
Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin.
Lancet
350:1670-1673[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Kim, M.,
C. H. Pai,
J. H. Woo,
J. S. Ryu, and K. Hiramatsu.
2000.
Vancomycin-intermediate Staphyloccus aureus in Korea.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:3879-3881[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Marchese, A.,
G. Balistreti,
E. Tonoli,
E. A. Debbia, and G. C. Schito.
2000.
Heterogeneous vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in a large Italian hospital.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:866-869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Smith, T. L.,
M. L. Pearson,
K. R. Wilcox,
C. Cruz,
M. V. Lancaster,
B. Robinson-Dunn,
F. C. Tenover,
M. J. Zeros,
J. D. Band,
E. White, and W. R. Jarvis.
1999.
Emergence of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
N. Engl. J. Med.
340:493-501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Tenover, F. C.
2000.
VRSA, VISA, and GISA: the dilemma behind the name game.
Clin. Microbiol. Newsl.
22:49-53[CrossRef].
|
| 8.
|
Tenover, F. C.,
M. V. Lancaster,
B. C. Hill,
C. D. Steward,
S. A. Stocker,
G. A. Hancock,
C. M. O'Hara,
N. C. Clark, and K. Hiramatsu.
1998.
Characterization of staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin and other glycopeptides.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1020-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Vannuffel, P.,
J. Gigi,
H. Ezzedine,
B. Vanderman,
M. Delmee,
G. Wauters, and J. L. Gala.
1995.
Specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus species by multiplex PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2864-2867[Abstract].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2637-2639, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2637-2639.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wang, G., Hindler, J. F., Ward, K. W., Bruckner, D. A.
(2006). Increased Vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates from a University Hospital during a 5-Year Period. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 3883-3886
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brown, D. F. J., Edwards, D. I., Hawkey, P. M., Morrison, D., Ridgway, G. L., Towner, K. J., Wren, M. W. D., on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis,
(2005). Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Antimicrob Chemother
56: 1000-1018
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, M.-N., Hwang, S. H., Pyo, Y.-J., Mun, H.-M., Pai, C. H.
(2002). Clonal Spread of Staphylococcus aureus Heterogeneously Resistant to Vancomycin in a University Hospital in Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 1376-1380
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ferraro, M. J., Swenson, J. M., Tenover, F. C.
(2002). Detection of Staphylococci with Reduced Susceptibility to Glycopeptides. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 1573-1573
[Full Text]
-
Ike, Y., Arakawa, Y., Ma, X., Tatewaki, K., Nagasawa, M., Tomita, H., Tanimoto, K., Fujimoto, S.
(2001). Nationwide Survey Shows that Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Heterogeneously and Intermediately Resistant to Vancomycin Are Not Disseminated throughout Japanese Hospitals. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 4445-4451
[Abstract]
[Full Text]