Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2687-2689, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2687-2689.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Multicenter Evaluation of a Pathogenic
Mycobacterium Screening Probe
Stefan
Emler,1
Knut
Feldmann,2
Véronique
Giacuzzo,3
Peter L.
Hewitt,4
Paul E.
Klapper,5
Philippe H.
Lagrange,3
Ed W.
Wilkins,5
Karen K. Y.
Young,4 and
Jean-Louis
Herrmann3,*
Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneve,
Geneva, Switzerland1; Institut
Laboratoriumsdiagnostik, Zentralkrankenhaus, Gauting,
Germany2; Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris,
France3; Roche Molecular Systems Inc.,
Somerville, New Jersey4; and
North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, United
Kingdom5
Received 24 October 2000/Returned for modification 14 December
2000/Accepted 3 May 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The introduction of nucleic acid amplification assays into the
clinical laboratory has reduced the time needed to diagnose diseases
caused by members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis
complex (MTBC). However, several mycobacterial species other than those of the MTBC are known to cause disease, especially in
immunocompromised individuals. A screening assay has been developed for
the detection of the major pathogenic mycobacterial species. The assay
utilizes pan-genus primers to amplify mycobacterial DNA and a screening probe (KY493) that detects all major pathogenic mycobacteria. A
multicenter European study was conducted to assess the performance of
the screening probe in the clinical laboratory. The screening probe was
evaluated against individual probes specific for M. tuberculosis, M. avium, and M.
intracellulare, a genus-specific probe with broader species
coverage, and culture. The screening probe had a sensitivity equivalent
to that of the species-specific probes; all specimens positive with any
of the species-specific probes were also positive with the screening
probes. Compared to culture, the sensitivity of the screening probe was
89% (154 of 173) for all culture-positive specimens tested. This value was 89.6% for the genus-specific probe. The screening probe was more
specific than the genus-specific probe. Specificity was 93.9% (661 of
704) compared to culture results alone. The comparable specificity
value for the genus-specific probe was 84.8%. When clinical data were
taken into consideration, the sensitivity of the screening assay was
similar to that of culture (81% versus 76.2%) but the positive
predictive value of the test was lower (76.2% versus 100% for
culture). However, the screening probe was more sensitive than smear
and may be a useful tool in the rapid diagnosis of mycobacterial disease.
 |
TEXT |
Several species of mycobacteria,
such as members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex
and M. leprae, are major human pathogens. Other
mycobacterial species, such as M. avium and M. intracellulare, may be clinically significant, especially in
immunocompromised individuals. The microscopic examination of specimen
smears for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) is a rapid method of screening for
the presence of mycobacteria in clinical samples. However, its
sensitivity is usually low (1), and culture is required
for species identification. Nucleic acid amplification techniques such
as PCR coupled with hybridization to a genus-specific probe
(5) provide a sensitive screening method that can detect
the presence of mycobacterial DNA sooner than culture (2).
However, mycobacteria are ubiquitous organisms that can be found in
soil and the water supply. The presence of these environmental
mycobacteria can give rise to false-positive results with a
genus-specific probe. To circumvent this problem, a screening assay
that detects all of the major pathogenic mycobacteria but not most
environmental mycobacteria has been developed. In this assay,
mycobacterial DNA are amplified by PCR with pan-genus primers
(6). Amplification products are then hybridized to a
screening probe (KY493). The KY493 screening probe detects as little as
10 ng of DNA (equivalent of three bacteria) from the major
pathogenic mycobacteria, such as members of the M. tuberculosis complex and nontuberculous mycobacteria frequently associated with disease, such as M. leprae, M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. kansasii,
M. xenopi, and M. malmoense. Specimens positive
by this probe can be further evaluated by hybridizing the amplicons to
species-specific probes.
(Part of this work was presented at the 99th Meeting of the American
Society for Microbiology, Chicago, Ill., 1999 [S. Emler, K. Feldman,
V. Giacuzzo, J.-L. Herrmann, P. Hewitt, P. Klapper, P. Lagrange, E. Wilkins, and K. Young, Abstr. 99th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.,
abstr. U-34, 1999], and at meetings of the European Society for
Mycobacteriology in Lucerne, Switzerland, in 1999 [S. Emler, K. Feldman, V. Giacuzzo, J.-L. Herrmann, P. Hewitt, P. Klapper, P. Lagrange, E. Wilkins, and K. Young, 20th Meet. Eur. Soc.
Mycobacteriol., abstr. P45, 1999], and in Vienna, Austria, in
2000 [S. Emler, K. Feldman, V. Giacuzzo, P. L. Hewitt, P. E. Klapper, P. H. Lagrange, E. W. Wilkins, K. K. Y. Young, and J.-L.
Herrmann, 21st Meet. Eur. Soc. Mycobacteriol., abstr. C02, 2000].)
A multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the utility of KY493 as a
screening tool in the clinical setting. A total of 893 respiratory
specimens from 443 patients were collected between July 1997 and April
1998 at four study sites (Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneve,
Geneva, Switzerland; Inst. Laboratoriumsdiagnostik, Zentralkrankenhaus,
Gauting, Germany; North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, United
Kingdom; and Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris, France). All specimens were
collected as part of routine mycobacterial testing in each laboratory.
Both archival and prospective specimens were used. Each specimen was
analyzed by microscopic examination (smear), culture, and PCR. Clinical
data were obtained from each center except Manchester and analyzed
using specific criteria to allow confirmation of a diagnosis of
tuberculosis or atypical mycobacterial infection.
Respiratory samples (sputa, gastric aspirates, bronchial washes, and
aspirates) were liquefied and decontaminated by the
N-acetyl-cysteine-NaOH method as recommended by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (3). Aliquots of the
resultant sediments were analyzed by microscopic examination for
acid-fast organisms after staining with auramine and cultured in solid
(Lowenstein-Jensen) and liquid (MGIT or 12B) media. A 100-µl
aliquot of each sediment was processed for PCR with reagents from the
sample preparation kit of the Amplicor MTB assay (Roche Diagnostics,
Somerville, N.J.).
Mycobacterial DNA was amplified using reagents from the Amplicor MTB
assay. An internal control template was included in each amplification
reaction to monitor the presence of inhibitory substance (4). Amplification products were hybridized to each of
five probes immobilized separately in the wells of microtiter plates. The following probes were used: a genus-specific probe (KY166), a
screening probe (KY493), an M. tuberculosis probe
(KY172-T3), an M. avium probe (KY167), and an M. intracellulare probe (KY169). Hybridization products were detected
colorimetrically as described previously (6).
Specimens found to be inhibitory were retested, either undiluted or
diluted 10-fold. Positive cases were identified by either of the
following criteria: (i) culture was positive for M. tuberculosis or other mycobacteria, and (ii) patients were
strongly suspected of having tuberculosis (TB) (i.e., patients were
from areas of endemicity and presented with clinical symptoms of TB
which improved with antituberculous therapy). Patients under treatment
at the time of the study were excluded from the analysis (23 in
Gauting, 2 in Paris, and 1 in Geneva).
A total of 893 specimens were tested. The overall percentage of
culture-positive specimens was 19.6% (Paris, 4.6%; Manchester, 10%;
Geneva, 24.4%; and Gauting, 40.1%). There were 175 culture-positive specimens, of which 130 (74.3%) were smear positive. Of the
culture-positive specimens, 156 were positive for M. tuberculosis complex and 19 were positive for atypical
mycobacteria: 11 were positive for M. avium, 2 were positive
for M. intracellulare, 2 were positive for M. malmoense, 2 were positive for M. xenopi, 1 was
positive for M. kansasii, and 1 was positive for M. peregrinum.
At initial testing, 73 (8.2%) of the 893 specimens were
inhibitory (i.e., had negative internal control amplification
and negative results for all five probes). Repeat testing, with samples either undiluted or diluted 1/10, was performed on these specimens. Dilution of some of the specimens prior to repeat testing likely did
not affect the PCR sensitivity in this study. None of the specimens
that gave negative results after repeat testing at a 1/10 dilution were
culture positive. Only 16 (1.8% of the total) specimens remained
negative after repeat testing. These were excluded from the final analysis.
The combined results from all four sites showed that the screening
probe, KY493, was more specific than the genus-specific probe, KY166
(Table 1). The two probes had identical
sensitivities. When the use of probe KY493 was compared to culture, the
overall sensitivity and specificity were 89 and 93.9%, respectively.
Negative predictive values (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV)
were 97.3 and 78.2%, respectively. The overall sensitivity and
specificity of probe KY166 were 89.6 and 84.8%, respectively. NPV and
PPV were 97.1 and 59.6%, respectively. Results from the individual sites differed somewhat in detail, but in each case the specificity of
KY493 was higher than that of KY166 (data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Performance of the KY493 screening probe and KY166
genus-specific probe relative to culture in the detection of
mycobacteria in respiratory specimens
|
|
The screening assay had lower sensitivity and PPV with smear-negative,
culture-positive specimens than with smear-positive, culture-positive
specimens. However, sensitivity of the screening assay was
higher than that of AFB smear (Table
2). This was true at all four
sites but especially at the Paris site, where smear sensitivity was
quite low. The lower smear sensitivity in Paris was perhaps due to an
unusually low incidence of positive samples collected during the study
period (4.6%) compared to what is normally seen (~10%). This
fluctuation in the frequency of smear-positive samples demonstrates
that samples were not selected and that some of the testing was
performed on a diverse population rather than being targeted towards
those suspected of having a mycobacterial infection. The observation
that the KY493 PCR assay was nearly twice as sensitive as smear in this
population demonstrates the robustness of this PCR assay and
demonstrates that in an area with a low incidence of tuberculosis or
other mycobacterial infections, the assay performed well.
The TB prevalence rates at the Geneva, Gauting, and Paris sites were
14.9, 23.6, and 7%, respectively. Two or more specimens were collected
per patient, with up to eight samples tested at two sites (Geneva and
Gauting). Using clinical indications of tuberculosis and atypical
mycobacterial infection as criteria for analysis at the three sites
with clinical data (Paris, Geneva, and Gauting), the overall
sensitivity and specificity of KY493 in the patient population were 81 and 93.8%, respectively. NPV and PPV were 95.6 and 76.2%,
respectively (Table 3). The overall sensitivity and specificity of culture were 76.2 and 100%,
respectively, with NPV and PPV of 94.9 and 100%, respectively (Table
3).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Comparison of the KY493 screening probe and culture in
respiratory specimens relative to diagnosis and treatment for
M. tuberculosis or atypical mycobacterial infection
|
|
The screening probe results from 16 patients were considered to be
false positive. These 16 patients comprised 5 with lung carcinoma, 1 with leukemia, 4 with previous tuberculosis, 2 homeless patients
(including 1 foreigner with two KY493-positive samples), and 4 patients
lost to follow-up. The absence of positive culture for some of these
patients could be due to the presence of environmental mycobacteria,
the inability of the media to support growth of the bacteria, or
sampling error.
Data obtained from this multicenter European study showed that the
screening assay performed well in diagnosing mycobacterial infection in
a clinical laboratory setting. The sensitivity of KY493 was identical
to those of probes specific for M. tuberculosis, M. avium, and M. intracellulare. All samples positive with
one of these probes were also positive with KY493 (data not shown). In
addition, all but two of the mycobacteria isolated in this study for
which probes were not available were detected by the screening probe.
The two isolates not detected by KY493 (M. xenopi and
M. peregrinum) were positive only after 45 days of culture in liquid media and were considered by the clinicians to be contaminants.
The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential for a new
approach toward the rapid screening and diagnosis of mycobacterial
infection and the effects that it may have on laboratory testing
algorithms, workload, and ultimately patient care. The data presented
here show that such a screening approach offers greater sensitivity
than AFB smear. Furthermore, this approach has the potential for more
rapid species identification when performed in a reflex testing mode by
hybridizing positive amplicons to species-specific probes. The use of a
reflex testing mode would significantly reduce the number of samples
that have to be tested by species-specific probes. Automation of the
reflex testing process would provide an even more efficient tool for
the diagnosis of mycobacterial infections.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Service de
Microbiologie, Hopital Saint Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, Paris, France. Phone: 00 33 1 42 49 93 48. Fax: 00 33 1 42 49 92 00. E-mail:
jean-louis.herrmann{at}sls.ap-hop-paris.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
David, H. L.
1976.
Bacteriology of the mycobacteriosis.
Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga.
|
| 2.
|
Huebner, R. E.,
R. C. Good, and J. I. Tokars.
1993.
Current practices in mycobacteriology: results of a survey of state public health laboratories.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:771-775[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Kent, P. T., and G. P. Kubica.
1985.
Public health mycobacteriology a guide for the level III laboratory.
Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga.
|
| 4.
|
Rosenstraus, M.,
Z. Wang,
S. Y. Chang,
D. DeBonville, and J. P. Spadoro.
1998.
An internal control for routine diagnostic PCR: design properties and effect on clinical performance.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:191-197[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Stauffer, F.,
H. Haber,
A. Rieger,
R. Mutschlechner,
P. Hasenberger,
V. J. Tevere, and K. K. Y. Young.
1998.
Genus level identification of mycobacteria from clinical specimens by using an easy-to-handle Mycobacterium-specific PCR assay.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:614-617[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Tevere, V. J.,
P. L. Hewitt,
A. Dare,
P. Hocknell,
A. Keen,
J. P. Spadoro, and K. K. Y. Young.
1996.
Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR amplification with pan-Mycobacterium primers and hybridization to a M. tuberculosis-specific probe.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:918-923[Abstract].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2687-2689, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2687-2689.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Honore-Bouakline, S., Vincensini, J. P., Giacuzzo, V., Lagrange, P. H., Herrmann, J. L.
(2003). Rapid Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis by PCR: Impact of Sample Preparation and DNA Extraction. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 2323-2329
[Abstract]
[Full Text]