Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2001, p. 2880-2883, Vol. 39, No. 8
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2880-2883.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of the BacT/Alert PF Pediatric FAN Blood
Culture Bottle with the Standard Pediatric Blood Culture Bottle,
the Pedi-BacT
Karen K.
Krisher,1,*
Patrick
Gibb,2
Sandra
Corbett,2 and
Deidre
Church2
Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas,
Texas 75235,1 and Calgary Laboratory
Services, Calgary Alberta, Canada TC3 0J52
Received 12 March 2001/Returned for modification 17 April
2001/Accepted 7 June 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The performance of the BacT/Alert PF (Organon-Teknika Corp.,
Durham, N.C.), a new nonvented pediatric FAN blood culture bottle, was
compared to that of the original pediatric bottle, the Pedi-BacT, with
matched aerobic cultures obtained from two separate facilities. A total
of 244 clinically significant isolates were recovered from 4,015 compliant pairs. Among the positive cultures, 170 (70%) isolates were
detected in both the BacT/Alert PF and the Pedi-BacT bottles, while 47 (19%) isolates were recovered in the BacT/Alert PF bottle only and 27 (11%) isolates were recovered in the Pedi-BacT bottle only. Although
isolation of specific microorganisms was comparable for the two
bottles, the total number of organisms recovered by the BacT/Alert PF
was greater than that by the Pedi-BacT (P = 0.0272). In addition, more organisms were recovered by the BacT/Alert PF bottle from the blood of patients receiving antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.0180). Overall time to detection
was similar for the two bottles; however, a significantly decreased
mean time to detection was recorded for yeast from the BacT/Alert PF
bottle (22.9 h; P = 0.0001) and staphylococci
from the Pedi-BacT bottle (22.5 h; P = 0.0056).
One false-negative culture and five false-positive cultures occurred
with the Pedi-BacT bottle, compared to one false-positive culture with
the BacT/Alert PF bottle. The BacT/Alert PF bottle is a reliable blood
culture bottle for pediatric blood culture specimens and may offer
improved recovery of microbes from patients on antimicrobial therapy.
The use of the nonvented bottle will both facilitate bottle processing
and decrease expenditures for materials due to the elimination of the
venting needles required for the original vented bottles.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The performance of blood cultures
from pediatric patients poses certain challenges not experienced when
performing blood cultures for adult populations. The difficulties in
collection of pediatric specimens coupled with concerns regarding
volume depletion affect the amount of blood available for culture
(2, 3, 4). Other factors include the fastidious nature of
pediatric pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and
Neisseria meningitidis, the changing venue of pathogens
commonly retrieved from blood culture specimens, and the documentation
of low concentrations of circulating organisms in the blood of some
pediatric patients (2, 3, 4, 9). In response to these
considerations, manufacturers of blood culture instruments have
developed blood culture bottles for use exclusively in pediatric
populations. These bottles differ from adult blood culture bottles in
both formulation and volume of broth. Pediatric blood culture bottles
are designed to hold approximately 20 ml of broth and accommodate an
inoculation volume of up to 4 ml. Although adult blood culture bottles
containing resins or charcoal-based substances for absorption of
antimicrobial agents or other inhibitory substances were introduced
several years ago, such additives were not available in a pediatric
formulation. In the present study, the performance of the newly
developed pediatric FAN blood culture bottle, the BacT/Alert PF
(Organon-Teknika Corp., Durham, N.C.) was compared to the first
generation of pediatric blood culture bottle produced by
Organon-Teknika Corp., the Pedi-BacT, for use with their continuously
monitoring blood culture system.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Patient population.
Calgary Laboratory Services
(CLS), Calgary, Canada, is a centralized regional laboratory that
provides microbiology services for both adult and pediatric patient
populations, including the Alberta Children's Hospital. Children's
Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas, Texas, (CMC) is a tertiary care
pediatric teaching hospital.
Blood culture bottles.
Each bottle contains 20 ml of medium.
The broth formulation of the BacT/Alert PF bottle is a casein soy base
supplemented with brain heart infusion solids and other proteins with
the addition of activated charcoal (8.5% wt/vol) and 0.025% sodium
polyethanolesulfonate. The Pedi-BacT bottle contains a media
formulation that is composed of a brain heart infusion base with .020%
sodium polyethanolesulfonate. The atmosphere of the BacT/Alert PF
bottle is oxygen and nitrogen, thus eliminating the need to vent the
bottle. The content of the Pedi-BacT bottle is overlaid with carbon
dioxide and nitrogen and requires venting prior to incubation.
Specimen collection and laboratory processing.
Unless
otherwise designated, the methods used by both facilities for bottle
processing were equivalent as established by the investigational study
protocol. Blood from a single collection site was inoculated into each
set of bottles. Individuals were instructed to inoculate the Pedi-BacT
bottle first to ensure the performance of culture by the reference
method. The optimum collection volume was set at 4.0 ml of blood for
each bottle included in the evaluation. If a total of 8 ml was not
collected, the blood was divided equally between the two bottles.
Standard recommended antisepsis procedures were used during blood
specimen collection. Upon receipt, the bottle was visually inspected
for growth, proper inoculation, and pertinent patient collection
information. Only paired study bottles containing blood from the same
collection sites and times were included in the study. The weight of
each bottle was recorded and compared to the preinoculation bottle weight for comparison of blood inoculation volumes. Bottles were monitored for the presence of bacterial growth every 10 min by the
instrument. Any growth-positive bottle was processed promptly after
detection, while the corresponding bottle was not processed until the
bottle was recorded as positive by the BacT/Alert instrument. Subcultures and direct smears from both systems were performed at the
first indication of a positive culture. Cultures that were initially
indicated to be positive but did not contain bacterial growth were
reincubated and monitored for the remainder of the incubation period.
Terminal subcultures were performed at the completion of the 5-day
incubation period in cases in which a positive culture was accompanied
by a negative bottle result. Organisms were identified by established
procedures for identification and susceptibility testing.
Data analysis.
In addition to the culture collection date
and time, pre- and postinoculation bottle weights, lot numbers, and
pertinent patient information, the following data were collected in
conjunction with the study: (i) receipt date and time (designated for
both systems as the time when the Pedi-BacT bottles were logged into the instrument); (ii) time to a positive result (designated as the time
a positive signal and/or a positive smear or culture was recorded);
(iii) a false-positive result (defined as a culture that was found to
be positive by the instrument or visual examination but whose
positivity was not confirmed by direct smear or subculture); (iv) a
false-negative result (defined as a culture found to contain growth
only after terminal subculture); (v) the antimicrobial agent(s)
administered to the patient during the culture collection period; and
(vi) the white blood cell count. Organisms retrieved from culture were
categorized as clinically significant or probable contaminants on the
basis of standard recommendations (5, 10), a total white
blood cell count suggestive of infection, and the administration of
antimicrobial therapy. In those instances in which a category could not
be assigned, the isolate was designated as category unknown.
Statistical methods.
Statistical comparisons were evaluated
by the chi-square test for paired data (McNemar's test with the Yates
correction for small numbers of observations) (1). The
significance of times to detection by each system was evaluated by the
Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
 |
RESULTS |
Collection volumes were determined by both study sites
using the pre- and postinoculation weights of the paired set. Blood volumes of
2.5 ml were inoculated into 80 to 82% of CMC blood culture bottles and 58 to 65% of CLS blood cultures. A greater than
30% difference in inoculation volumes was recorded for more than 40%
(49% for CMC and 43% for CLS) of the bottles included in the
comparison. Using the previously published limit of a twofold difference between bottle volumes as the criterion for a paired set for
pediatric blood cultures (12), >90% of the bottles
included in the evaluation (93% for CMC and 86% for CLS) satisfied
the requirement for matched volumes.
During the evaluation period, a total of 4,015 matched pairs of blood
culture specimens were received for comparative analysis by both
facilities. A total of 346 positive cultures were detected from 221 patients. Of these cultures, 197 monomicrobial cultures and 23 polymicrobial cultures from 113 patients were categorized as clinically
significant (sepsis). Of the 244 clinically significant bacterial and
fungal isolates recovered from the matched pairs of both monomicrobial
and polymicrobial cultures, 170 (70%) were recovered from both
systems, while 47 (19%) were recovered from the BacT/Alert system only
and 27 (11%) were recovered from the Pedi-BacT bottle only (Table
1). Overall recovery of organisms was
improved with the BacT/Alert PF bottle (P = 0.0272). No
significant difference was found in the recovery of microorganisms
classified as clinically insignificant (Table
2). For clinically significant cultures
from patients on antimicrobial therapy, the overall rate of retrieval
of isolates was higher for the BacT/Alert PF than for the Pedi-BacT
bottle (P = 0.0180) (Table
3). The overall times to detection ranged
from 3.3 to 60 h for the BacT/Alert PF bottle compared to 3.4 to 122.4 h for the Pedi-BacT bottle (Table 4). The
mean time to detection for yeast was significantly decreased (22.9 h;
P = 0.0001) with the BacT/Alert PF but was increased
for staphylococcus species (20.3 h; P = 0.0056)
compared to results with the Pedi-BacT bottle.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Combined yields of clinically significant (sepsis)
isolates from Pedi-BacT and BacT/Alert PF bottles from both study sites
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Combined yields of clinically insignificant isolates from
Pedi-BacT and BacT/Alert PF bottles from both study sites
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Effect of antibiotic therapy on comparative yields of
clinically significant monomicrobial isolates from Pedi-BacT and
BacT/Alert PF bottles at CMC and CLS
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Times to detection of clinically significant (sepsis)
isolates from Pedi-BacT and BacT/Alert PF bottles from both study sites
|
|
One false-positive culture was detected with the BacT/Alert PF bottle,
and five false-positive cultures and one false-negative culture were
detected with the Pedi-BacT bottle. A staphylococcus strain was
isolated from the standard bottle with no resultant growth from the
Pedi-BacT bottle.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The BacT/Alert pediatric blood culture bottle debuted in 1993 (6); however, a pediatric FAN bottle formulation was not available for evaluation until 1998. The present study was the first
clinical comparison of the new BacT/Alert PF to the standard Pedi-BacT bottle.
The BacT/Alert PF bottle was superior to the Pedi-BacT bottle in
overall detection of all microorganisms recovered during the
evaluation. Although the numbers were small, important pediatric pathogens, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and
Neisseria meningitidis, were recovered equally well by both
systems; however, a comparison of the two medium formulations for
significant differences in their abilities to retrieve more fastidious
fermenters and nonfermenters was not possible because of the low
incidence of these isolates. Yeast, however, were detected more rapidly
in the new bottle.
Retrieval of isolates from patients receiving antimicrobial therapy was
also significantly improved with the BacT/Alert PF. Both bottles have a
different medium formulation in addition to the activated charcoal in
the BacT/Alert PF bottle. Although the exact mode of action of the
activated charcoal is unknown, the substance is designed to improve the
retrieval of blood-borne pathogens, especially in the presence of
antimicrobial agents. These assertions have been confirmed by
documentation of the performance of the adult BacT/Alert FAN bottle in
other published evaluations (7, 8, 11).
Questions arise concerning the advantage the BacT/Alert PF bottle might
provide from a clinical perspective. In a retrospective analysis
performed by McDonald et al. (7) on the clinical impact of
the adult FAN bottle, the increased recovery rate for clinically important episodes of bacteremia or fungemia did positively influence therapeutic decisions and other diagnostic modalities to some degree.
Such advantages would be even more important in a pediatric institution, where rapid detection of pathogens is critical to patient
outcomes in many situations.
The need for a FAN bottle designed specifically for pediatric
specimens, however, is debated. Many institutions maintain only an
adult standard or FAN blood culture bottle for use with smaller-volume pediatric specimens. Since some infants and children maintain higher
levels of circulating organisms during sepsis, the concern over larger
blood-to-broth ratios is negated. Depending on the collection time, the
infecting organism and/or host response, and the source of bacteremia,
however, a percentage of cultures will contain lower pathogen
concentrations (2, 3). Potential loss of organisms or
decreased times to positivity may adversely affect clinical diagnosis
and therapeutic decisions. The utilization of a pediatric FAN blood
culture bottle offers the advantage of a nutritionally supplemented
broth in a reduced volume conducive to the promotion of growth of most
pediatric pathogens. The present evaluation confirms the overall
favorable performance of the BacT/Alert PF bottle and indicates the
potential for improved recovery of isolates in the presence of
antimicrobial agents or other inhibitory agents. In addition, the
elimination of the requirement for bottle venting will facilitate
processing of the bottle in the clinical laboratory as well as
resulting in cost-savings due to the elimination of venting needles.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinical
Microbiology Laboratory, Children's Medical Center of Dallas, 1935 Motor St., Dallas, TX 75235. Phone: (214) 456-2884. Fax: (214)
456-6199. E-mail: kkrisher{at}childmed.dallas.tx.us.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Illstrup, D. M.
1978.
Statistical methods employed in the study of blood culture media, p. 31-39.
In
J. A. Washington II (ed.), The detection of septicemia. CRC Press, West Palm Beach, Fla.
|
| 2.
|
Isaacman, D. J.,
R. B. Karasic,
E. A. Reynolds, and S. I. Kost.
1996.
Effect of number of blood cultures and volume of blood on detection of bacteremia in children.
J. Pediatr.
128:190-195[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Kellogg, J. A.,
J. P. Manzella, and D. A. Bankert.
2000.
Frequency of low-level bacteremia in children from birth to fifteen years of age.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:2181-2185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Kennaugh, J. D.,
W. W. Gregary,
K. R. Powell, and J. O. Hendley.
1984.
The effect of dilution during culture on detection of low concentrations of bacteria in blood.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis.
3:317-319[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Kirkley, B. A.,
K. A. Easley, and J. A. Washington.
1994.
Controlled clinical evaluation of Isolator and ESP aerobic blood culture systems for detection of bloodstream infections.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1547-1549[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Krisher, K.,
D. R. Whyburn, and F. E. Koepnick.
1993.
Comparison of the BacT/Alert pediatric blood culture system, Pedi-BacT, with the conventional culture using the 20-milliliter Becton-Dickinson supplemented peptone broth tube.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:793-797[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
McDonald, L. C.,
J. Fune,
L. B. Gaido,
M. P. Weinstein,
L. G. Reimer,
T. M. Flynn,
M. L. Wilson,
S. Mirrett, and L. B. Reller.
1996.
Clinical importance of increased sensitivity of BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:2180-2184[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Mirrett, S.,
R. J. Everts, and L. B. Reller.
2001.
Controlled comparison of original vented aerobic FAN medium with new nonvented BacT/ALERT FA medium for culturing blood.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
39:2098-2101[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Paisley, J. W., and B. A. Lauer.
1994.
Pediatric blood cultures.
Clin. Lab. Med.
14:17-30[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Weinstein, M. P.,
L. B. Reller,
J. R. Murphy, and K. A. Lichtenstein.
1983.
The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiolgic observations.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
5:35-53[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Weinstein, M. P.,
S. Mirrett,
L. G. Reimer,
M. L. Wilson,
S. Smith-Elekes,
C. R. Chuard,
K. L. Joho, and L. B. Reller.
1995.
Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:978-981[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Welby-Sellenriek, P. L.,
D. S. Keller,
R. J. Ferrett, and G. A. Storch.
1997.
Comparison of the BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and the Difco ESP 80A aerobic bottles for pediatric blood cultures.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:1166-1171[Abstract].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2001, p. 2880-2883, Vol. 39, No. 8
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2880-2883.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Flayhart, D., Borek, A. P., Wakefield, T., Dick, J., Carroll, K. C.
(2007). Comparison of BACTEC PLUS Blood Culture Media to BacT/Alert FA Blood Culture Media for Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Samples Containing Therapeutic Levels of Antibiotics. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 816-821
[Abstract]
[Full Text]