Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2001, p. 2916-2923, Vol. 39, No. 8
Institute for Magnetic Resonance Research and
Department of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, University of Sydney, St
Leonards 2065,1 and Centre for
Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (CIDM) Laboratory Services,
Institute for Clinical Pathology and Medical
Research,2 and
CIDM,3 University of Sydney at
Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia
Received 14 February 2001/Returned for modification 22 April
2001/Accepted 26 May 2001
A new fingerprinting technique with the potential for rapid
identification of bacteria was developed by combining proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) with multivariate
statistical analysis. This resulted in an objective identification
strategy for common clinical isolates belonging to the bacterial
species Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis,
Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus
pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and the Streptococcus milleri group. Duplicate cultures of 104 different isolates were examined one or more times using 1H MRS. A total of 312 cultures were examined. An optimized classifier was developed using a
bootstrapping process and a seven-group linear discriminant analysis to
provide objective classification of the spectra. Identification of
isolates was based on consistent high-probability classification of
spectra from duplicate cultures and achieved 92% agreement with
conventional methods of identification. Fewer than 1% of isolates were
identified incorrectly. Identification of the remaining 7% of isolates
was defined as indeterminate.
In both clinical and industrial
laboratories, methods for identification of microorganisms have
historically been based on multiple phenotypic characters, including
morphological features and a range of biochemical reactions. These
tests are often time-consuming and/or relatively expensive in their
application, and some are imprecise. Recently, alternative methods have
been investigated in an attempt to develop a single, rapid method for
characterization and identification of microorganisms. These have
included Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (11, 14),
pyrolysis mass spectrometry (12), electrospray ionization
mass spectrometry (7), UV resonance Raman spectroscopy
(15), and protein electrophoresis (16). While
reports of these techniques suggest the possibility of rapid and
reliable identification of some groups of microorganisms, most have
been tested with small data sets. With the exception of Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy, they are destructive techniques which
analyze cellular decomposition products. All have the limitation that
they do not directly yield information about the biochemistry of the
intact viable organism.
In contrast, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of viable cells can
provide information on a large range of metabolites. Biological
applications of MRS most commonly exploit the noninvasive nature of the
technique to study aspects of cellular biochemistry in living systems
(6). However, not all applications of MRS require or
include identification of the metabolites contributing to the MR
spectrum. Pattern recognition techniques, which detect gross spectral
characteristics associated with a priori-defined classes (such as
pathological conditions), have been successfully applied to MRS of both
tissues and body fluids. Accurate and reliable classifiers based on
multivariate analyses of 1H MR spectroscopic data have been
developed and validated for objective diagnosis of thyroid
(21), ovarian (22), prostate (9), breast (13), and brain (20)
tumors. In some pathologies, MRS is able to detect malignancy before
morphological manifestations are visible by light microscopy
(17).
A one-dimensional 1H MR spectrum of a bacterial cell
suspension provides an overview of hydrogen-containing compounds that are tumbling rapidly on the MR timescale. Consequently, the
1H MR spectrum will be more representative of the
physiology of the cell (metabolite pools) than of its structure
(comprising immobile components such as the cell wall). While many
different bacterial groups may express and utilize essentially
identical metabolic pathways, it might reasonably be expected that
differing levels of enzyme expression and activity in different groups
would give rise to distinctly different levels of particular
metabolites when dissimilar groups are grown in similar environments.
We therefore proposed that significantly different metabolite pool
sizes would be detected as differences between the 1H MR
spectra of the different bacterial groups. This was suggested in a
previous study comparing selected bacterial 1H MR spectra
(5); however, the small number of isolates examined and
the qualitative identification methods described in that study did not
permit automation or quantitative comparison of the species groups.
We show here that it is possible, using simple linear discriminant
analysis (LDA) on 312 cultures of 104 different isolates, to make
reliable automated identifications of bacteria on the basis of their
1H MR spectra.
Storage and culture of bacteria.
Isolates were obtained from
the collection of the Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical
Research, Sydney, Australia and the American Type Culture Collection,
or were recent clinical isolates from the clinical identification
laboratory of the Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
Laboratory Services. Stored isolates were suspended in 10% glycerol in
nutrient broth at
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2916-2923.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and
Staphylococcus by Multivariate Analysis of Proton
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Data from Plate Cultures
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C. Horse blood agar (HBA) was prepared by
addition of sterile horse blood to autoclaved blood agar base (Oxoid,
Basingstoke, United Kingdom or Amyl Media, Sydney, Australia). Isolates
retrieved from storage were subcultured onto 5% horse blood agar and
incubated in 5% CO2 for 18 to 24 h at 37°C. New
isolates and isolates subcultured on HBA after storage were streaked
onto duplicate HBA plates, incubated at 37°C for 18 to 24 h, and
then stored at ambient temperature (20 to 30°C) for 3 to 9 h
before being subjected to spectroscopy.
TABLE 1.
Classification and identification results with optimized
classifier
Conventional identification of bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus was identified on the basis of positive coagulase (using rabbit or human plasma) and DNase tests. Staphylococcus epidermidis was identified using the API ID32 staph test (BioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Streptococcus and Enterococcus species were identified by conventional methods, i.e., optochin sensitivity (Streptococcus pneumoniae), salt tolerance and bile-esculin positivity (Enterococcus spp.), latex agglutination (Streptococcus agalactiae), and by the API ID32 strep test (BioMérieux). All tests were carried out as specified by the manufacturers. In general, isolates were identified only once, upon receipt in the microbiology laboratory and prior to storage. Some isolates retrieved from storage were reidentified by conventional tests.
1H MRS. Bacterial colonies (2 to 200 mg [wet weight]) were gently removed from the HBA plate with a plastic inoculating loop and suspended by vortexing in 0.3 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2, room temperature) made up in D2O (PBS-D2O). For most cultures, >80% of cells were scraped off the plate. In cases of heavy growth, <10% of cells were harvested, usually from the first quadrant. The suspension was immediately transferred to a 5-mm-diameter susceptibility-matched MR sample tube (Shigemi). 1H MRS measurements were performed at 37°C on a Bruker Avance 360 MHz MR spectrometer using a 1H/13C 5-mm probe head. One-dimensional (1D) spectra were acquired with acquisition parameters as follows: frequency, 360.13 MHz; pulse angle, 90° (6 to 7 µs), repetition time, 1s; 8k data points, 256 or 512 transients; spectral width, 3600 Hz; total acquisition time, 10 or 20 min. The field was locked to D2O. Water suppression was effected by a selective excitation field gradient method (double-pulsed field gradient spin echo [DPFGSE]) (3). The spectra of cells suspended in PBS-D2O were stable for at least 2 h at 37°C.
Signal assignment. 2D homo- and heteronuclear correlation spectra were acquired for at least two isolates per species to assign 1D MR resonances to specific compounds. {1H, 1H} gradient correlation spectroscopy (COSY) experiments were performed in magnitude mode. The acquisition parameters were as follows: sweep width in t2, 3,600 Hz; t2 time domain, 2K; 256 increments of 32 or 48 acquisitions each; repetition time, 1 s. Sine bell window functions were applied in the t1 dimension, and Gaussian-Lorentzian window functions were applied in the t2 dimension. Zero filling was used to expand the data matrix to 1K in the t1 dimension. Total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY) spectra with mixing times of 40 and 150 ms were acquired with 256 increments of 2K data points and 32 acquisitions (1). {1H, 13C} one-bond shift correlation spectra were obtained in the 1H detection mode using a gradient heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) pulse sequence (23). The 1H MR spectral width was 3,600 Hz, and the 13C MR spectral width was 15,000 Hz. 13C MR decoupling during acquisition was achieved by using globally optimized alternating phase rectangular pulses (GARP) (18). The evolution time (t1) was incremented to obtain 400 FIDs, each of 40 to 64 acquisitions and consisting of 2K data points. The repetition time was 1 s. A sine bell window function was applied in the t2 dimension, and a Gaussian-Lorentzian function was applied in the t1 dimension. Zero filling to 1 K was used in the t1 dimension prior to Fourier transformation. {1H, 13C} gradient heteronuclear multiple-bond correlation (HMBC) spectra were acquired without proton decoupling using the same parameters as for the HSQC experiments, except for a 13C MR spectral width of 20 kHz (23). One-bond and long-range correlation experiments were usually optimized for 1JC,H of 140 Hz and nJC,H of 7 Hz, respectively. 1D 1H MR spectra were acquired before and after the 2D experiments to verify absence of metabolic changes.
Data processing. Spectra were processed using Bruker XWINNMR spectrometer software. Zero filling was performed to extend the free induction decay data set to 16K. An exponential window function was applied before Fourier transformation, yielding a line broadening of 1 Hz. Chemical shift calibration was performed by setting the center of the spectrum to 4.64 ppm (the nominal position of the water resonance with respect to tetramethylsilane in PBS-D2O at 37°C). Spectra were manually phase corrected to achieve a linear and flat baseline. Sixteen contiguous fixed integration regions were subjectively chosen on the basis of major peaks present in the representative spectra (see Fig. 1). The individual integrals were normalized to the total intensity of the 16 integrals.
LDA. The table of integrals was imported from Microsoft Excel into STATISTICA (StatSoft Pacific P/L) for LDA. Each of the first 15 of 16 chosen integral regions (see Results) formed one independent variable in the seven-group LDA (standard method, tolerance 0.01, a priori classification probability proportional to group size). The 16th region (arbitrary choice) was omitted from the LDA because, in a normalized data set, one region is redundant for discriminant analysis. Information from the omitted region is "embedded" in the remaining regions. Classification functions and classification probabilities were calculated with STATISTICA.
Classification of spectra and identification of isolates.
In
this paper we use the following definitions. The term
"classification" refers to assignment of an individual spectrum
from a bacterial culture to a species group. "Identification"
refers to assignment of an isolate to a species group (on the basis of classification of two independent spectra derived from duplicate cultures of the isolate). "Correct classification" refers to
assignment of a spectrum to the same species group as conventional
classification with a percent classification probability of
85%. The
chosen percentage is arbitrary but is considered a reasonably high
probability for confident assignment. "Misclassification" refers to
assignment of a spectrum to a species group different from conventional
classification with a percent classification probability of
85%.
"Indeterminate classification" refers to assignment of a spectrum
to any species group with percent classification probability of <85%.
"Correct identification" refers to assignment of both spectra of
duplicate cultures according to conventional identification and with an average percent classification probability of
85%.
"Misidentification" refers to assignment of both spectra of
duplicate cultures to the same species group but different from
conventional identification and with an average percent classification
probability of
85%. "Indeterminate identification" refers to
assignment of spectra of duplicate cultures to different groups or the
same group with an average classification probability of <85%.
Cm
1 is the crispness (defined as the fraction of test samples assigned to a
class with a percent probability of
75%) and 0
Km
1 is Cohen's chance-corrected measure of agreement (4), with Km = 1 signifying the perfect classification of a test set. The weights
Wm were obtained not for the bootstrap training
sets but for the less optimistic test sets. The optimized classifier
was then used to classify all 312 spectra. Classifier outcome is
reported as a normalized percent class probability.
The Robust BootStrap classification software was written in-house using
STATISTICA, Microsoft EXCEL, and Microsoft
VISUAL BASIC FOR APPLICATIONS and run on a Pentium-based
personal computer. The VISUAL BASIC FOR APPLICATIONS code
is available from the authors.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1H MR spectra.
Representative spectra of each of
the seven species groups and the 16 integration regions chosen
for analysis are shown in Fig. 1. Spectra
of ATCC type strains are shown where available; otherwise spectra of
isolates close to the group centroid (based on integral intensities) of
all spectra are shown. The most significant contributing metabolites
identified for each integration region and used for the statistical
analyses are listed in Table 2. Since it
is not possible to show the range of spectral patterns found in the 30 to 60 spectra examined from each species group, we show in Fig.
2 the range of normalized integral
intensities (mean ± standard deviation SD) measured for each
species group.
|
|
|
Classification of spectra and identification of isolates.
The
results of the classification of 312 spectra and identification of 104 isolates from the seven species groups based on the optimized
classifier are shown in Table 1. A summary of results in terms of
classification and identification performance is shown in Table
3. Less than 2% of spectra were
misclassified, and less than 1% of isolates were misidentified.
Nineteen spectra had a classification of indeterminate.
|
Reproducibility of spectra. Independent analysis of spectra from concurrent, duplicate cultures and of isolates retrieved repeatedly from storage over a 1 to 8-month period confirmed that the classification method is robust and is not affected by short- or long-term procedural variability due to factors such as minor changes in culture conditions, number of organisms, or storage of isolates (Table 1).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1H MRS and selection of independent variables for multivariate analysis. Visible differences between typical spectra of some species are readily observed, as seen in Fig. 1. However, differences between spectra of species such as S. pyogenes and S. pneumoniae are not obvious by visual inspection, and the only possibility of reliably distinguishing between such similar groups lies in a multivariate analysis of the data. The initial step in such an analysis is the extraction from the spectra, which are composed of many thousands of data points, of a manageable set of independent variables in which any significant group differences are manifest. While sophisticated methods have been described for the selection of optimally discriminating spectral regions (21), we chose a simple division of all spectra into 16 contiguous regions visually selected on the basis of peaks present in the spectra illustrated in Fig. 1. The advantage of this procedure is that the resultant independent variables may be assigned a specific biochemical significance (i.e., an independent variable may be associated with a particular metabolite or group of metabolites) if the metabolites contributing to the signal in each integration region can be identified. Although we have identified in Table 2 some of the major metabolites contributing to the spectra in Fig. 1, the bacterial identification method applied here does not depend on identification or quantitation of the metabolites contributing to the MR signal. It is, however, important to note that the measured cellular characteristics on which the classification is based are substantially different from those detected during routine identification and are also different from those measured by other whole-organism fingerprinting techniques. It was not our intention in this study to identify metabolites which distinguish the species groups or to construct dendrograms of group relationships. These will be addressed in a separate report.
Classification and identification strategy. Classification based on LDA requires that a set of functions derived by LDA of a training set of data be used to classify a test set of data, which is preferably independent of the training set (cross-validation). The function of the training set is to describe, in terms of the n independent variables derived from the MR spectra, the region of n-dimensional data space occupied by each of the a priori defined groups. If the defined groups in the training set are well separated in data space, the LDA will produce classification functions which assign every member of the training set to its a priori defined group. The region of data space associated with a particular group will increase with phenotype variation between the members of a particular species group and also with procedural (environmental, biochemical, and methodological) variations associated with repeated culture and classification of spectra of a specific member of a group. A training set comprising only a small number of randomly selected members of a particular group is therefore unlikely to accurately represent the data space (phenotype range) occupied by all members of that species group. If the training set contains only a single measurement of each isolate member, it may also not account for procedural variability. Consequently, it is to be expected that some misclassifications will occur when a classification function based on a training subset of a group is used to classify group members which are not members of the training set.
For classifier robustness and reliability, it is desirable that the number of spectra per species group in the training set be 5 to 10 times larger than the number of independent variables (19). Such large data sets are rare in the published literature and usually difficult to acquire, especially if the derived classifier is to be validated against a test set independent of the training set. The Robust BootStrap method attenuates this problem by allowing cross-validated classifier development with all of the available data (19). In an attempt to reduce the number of independent variables, we applied the forward stepwise method of seven-group LDA and limited the number of independent variables. There was a progressive decrease in overall classification accuracy as the number of independent variables was decreased. In contrast, pairwise LDA between any of the species groups required only two to four independent variables for 100% discrimination between any pair of species groups. We are presently developing software to classify multiple groups based on a set of classifiers derived from pairwise LDA. The ease of preparation and examination of duplicate or even triplicate cultures of a particular clinical isolate, as used in this study, has the advantage that a consensus identification of the isolate based on multiple independent analyses is obtained. This feature of our isolate identification strategy has not been applied in other microbial whole-organism fingerprinting studies (5, 8), in which, at best, only instrument duplicates were acquired. We have demonstrated that in a few cases the duplicates may be classified as different species. Consequently, identification based on analysis of a single subculture of an isolate cannot be assigned the same confidence level as an identification based on classification of independent duplicate cultures. When using conventional methods, which report an identification probability based on analysis of a single culture of an isolate, it is common practice to reexamine isolates for which the identification probability is <85%. Analysis is repeated until a single test returns an identification probability of >85%. By this method, it is possible that the average identification probability of all tests on an isolate will be <85% at the conclusion of testing. Our method of testing duplicate cultures and requiring that correct identification be based on an average probability of >85% imposes a more rigorous and reliable identification constraint than would be the case with single cultures. However, in Table 3 it can be seen that the accuracy of identification based on classification of spectra from single cultures would, in fact, have been similar to that based on duplicate cultures. Phenotypic variability within species groups was addressed by examination of at least 11 isolates from each species group. The general success of the classification method used indicates that between the species groups there are significant and consistent spectral differences, which are larger than the typical range of variation within species due to procedure or phenotype.Classification and identification results. The very small number of misclassifications of spectra could not be attributed to any specific steps of the method. Potential problems with reproducibility due to short- and long-term procedural variability (use of different batches of culture medium, storage of isolates, etc.) were excluded by undertaking (i) separate analysis of spectra from duplicate cultures of all isolates and (ii) repeated culture of 25 isolates, at times up to 8 months after original culture and spectroscopy. The single instance of misidentification (S. pyogenes Lab. No. 221-2985) may have been the result of contamination.
We did not examine a sufficient number of isolates in the S. milleri group to attempt an MRS-based assignment of the isolates to one of the three species within the group (S. anginosus, S. constellatus, and S. intermedius). However, our results demonstrate that on the basis of the nonroutine metabolites measured, the group is physiologically homogeneous relative to the diversity of the seven species groups examined. Although not surprising, this result is consistent with group similarities defined by other biochemical tests. Similarly, our data confirm that the E. casseliflavus and E. gallinarum isolates examined are physiologically more similar to E. faecalis than to the Streptococcus and Staphylococcus species tested.Choice of growth medium. In selecting the most appropriate medium for use in a clinical diagnostic or reference laboratory, we reasoned that choice of a universal growth substrate and ease of sample preparation were of prime importance. Since HBA is a common medium in use in diagnostic microbiology laboratories in Australia and since bacterial cells could be easily harvested directly from HBA plates without the need for washing, we chose this growth medium as best satisfying our objectives. It is of note that there were differences between our spectra and those published for S. aureus and E. faecalis grown on Trypticase soy sheep blood agar (5). In the latter study, interpretation of spectral patterns was reportedly not affected by the choice of growth medium, possibly because spectral patterns were inspected visually and distinguished by peak positions rather than peak intensities. We found previously that growth on or in different media (HBA versus brain heart infusion broth) affected the relative peak intensities (due to changes in metabolite pool sizes) much more significantly than it affected peak positions, which may be slightly affected by factors such as intracellular pH (R. Bourne, unpublished data). These differences suggest that the analysis is dependent on the constraint that all cultures must be grown on the same medium.
Clinical application. There are several characteristics of the method used in this study which point to the robust nature of the identification. First, the growth conditions for the samples are not strictly controlled. For example, the precise constitution of the growth medium may vary from batch to batch (base media from two different manufacturers and multiple batches of horse blood were used). The size of the inoculum may vary from plate to plate. Growth of bacteria on an agar plate is inherently inhomogeneous, due to crowding and slow diffusion of oxygen and other nutrients through colonies and agar. Our early experiments with triplicate cultures of all isolates demonstrated a lack of variation in spectra from cells grown on single batches of medium. Due to large variations between species in the amount of growth obtained overnight on HBA plates (the growth of S. milleri was usually very poor), the wet weight of cells resuspended varied from 2 to 200 mg. Since the MR signal is directly proportional to the sample concentration, there is no need to standardize the sample density. Poor bacterial growth required only an extended number of transients to achieve an adequate signal-to-noise ratio.
The phase correction and integration steps of spectrum processing, as implemented, required some subjective operator input. These deficiencies in the method will introduce some extra variance into the data. They may be overcome by procedures not presently available in our laboratory (use of magnitude spectra and automated integration [22]). Other whole-organism fingerprinting techniques are reported to require strict control of growth media and repeated standardization with control cultures (11, 12). The nondestructive nature of the method enables retention of viable organisms postanalysis for subsequent checking of contamination or methodological errors. The use of more sophisticated pattern recognition methods than those used in our study (19) may further improve discrimination and allow separate classification within the species groups, albeit at the possible expense of easily interpreted biochemical information. For an application dedicated to identification rather than characterization, this would be an acceptable compromise. We have demonstrated that, in principle, MRS may be combined with automated pattern recognition techniques to identify bacteria to the species level. We have recently achieved identification results of similar accuracy for six gram-negative species and for two Cryptococuccus neoformans varieties (unpublished results). The extreme ease of sample preparation, biochemically informative results, rapid automated identification, and the robust nature of the method are attractive for clinical and industrial applications. In practice, MR-based identification may be of most value for bacterial species which are relatively slow growing or difficult to identify by conventional methods.| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Sue Gordon and Scott McDonald for technical assistance, to Lyn Gilbert for critical reading of the manuscript, and to Ray Somorjai, for advice on the Robust BootStrap method.
This research was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (grant 980116). A provisional patent has been granted (U.S. patent 60/270,367, February 2001).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, The University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Rm. 3114, Level 3, ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, Darcy Rd., Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia. Phone: 61-2-9845-6012. Fax: 61-2-9891-5317. E-mail: tanias{at}icpmr.wsahs.nsw.gov.au.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bax, A., and D. Davis. 1986. MLEV-17-based two-dimensional homonuclear magnetization transfer spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 65:355-360. |
| 2. | Bradley, E., and R. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom. |
| 3. | Braun, S., H.-O. Kalinowski, and S. Berger. 1998. 150 and more basic NMR experiments. Wiley-VCH, New York, New York. |
| 4. | Cohen, J. 1968. Weighted Kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 70:213-218[CrossRef]. |
| 5. | Delpassand, E. S., M. V. Chari, C. E. Stager, J. D. Morrisett, J. J. Ford, and M. Romazi. 1995. Rapid identification of common human pathogens by high-resolution proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1258-1262[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Gadian, D. G. 1995. NMR and its applications to living systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 7. | Goodacre, R., J. K. Heald, and D. B. Kell. 1999. Characterisation of intact microorganisms using electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 176:17-24[CrossRef]. |
| 8. | Goodacre, R., E. M. Timmins, P. J. Rooney, J. J. Rowland, and D. B. Kell. 1996. Rapid identification of Streptococcus and Enterococcus species using diffuse reflectance-absorbance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and artificial neural networks. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 140:233-239[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. |
Hahn, P.,
I. C. P. Smith,
L. Leboldus,
C. Littman,
R. L. Somorjai, and T. Bezabeh.
1997.
The classification of benign and malignant human prostate tissue by multivariate analysis of 1H magnetic resonance spectra.
Cancer Res.
57:3398-3401 |
| 10. | Hardie, J. M., and R. A. Whiley. 1997. Classification and overview of the genera Streptococcus and Enterococcus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 83(Suppl. S):S1-S11[CrossRef]. |
| 11. |
Kummerle, M.,
S. Scherer, and H. Seiler.
1998.
Rapid and reliable identification of food-borne yeasts By Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64:2207-2214 |
| 12. | Magee, J. 1993. Whole-organism fingerprinting, p. 383-427. In M. Goodfellow, and A. G. O'Donnell (ed.), Handbook of new bacterial systematics. Harcourt Brace, New York, N.Y. |
| 13. | Mountford, C., R. Somorjai, L. Gluch, P. Malycha, C. Lean, P. Russell, M. Bilous, B. Barraclough, D. Gillett, U. Himmelreich, B. Dolenko, A. Nikulin, and I. Smith. MRS on breast fine needle aspirate biopsy determines pathology, vascularization and nodal involvement. Br. J. Surg. in press. |
| 14. | Naumann, D., V. Fijala, H. Labischinski, and G. Giebrecht. 1988. The rapid differentiation and identification of pathogenic bacteria using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J. Mol. Struct. 174:165-170[CrossRef]. |
| 15. | Nelson, W., R. Manoharan, and J. Sperry. 1992. UV Resonance Raman studies of bacteria. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 27:67-124. |
| 16. | Pot, B., P. Vandamme, and K. Kersters. 1994. Analysis of electrophoretic whole-organism protein fingerprints, p. 493-521. In M. Goodfellow, and A. O'Donnell (ed.), Chemical methods in prokaryotic systematics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom. |
| 17. | Russell, P., C. Lean, L. Delbridge, G. May, S. Dowd, and C. Mountford. 1994. Proton magnetic resonance and human thyroid neoplasia. I. Discrimination between benign and malignant neoplasms. Am. J. Med. 96:383-388[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Shaka, A., P. Barker, and R. Freeman. 1985. Computer-optimized decoupling scheme for wideband applications and low level operation. J. Magn. Reson. 64:547-552. |
| 19. | Somorjai, R., B. Dolenko, A. Nikulin, P. Nickerson, D. Rush, A. Shaw, M. Glogowski, J. Rendell, and R. Deslauriers. Distinguishing normal from rejecting renal allografts: application of a three-stage classification strategy to MR and IR of urine. Vibr. Spectrosc., in press. |
| 20. | Somorjai, R. L., B. Dolenko, A. K. Nikulin, N. Pizzi, G. Scarth, P. Zhilkin, W. Halliday, D. Fewer, N. Hill, I. Ross, M. West, I. C. P. Smith, S. M. Donnelly, A. C. Kuesel, and K. M. Briere. 1996. Classification of 1H MR spectra of human brain neoplasms: the influence of preprocessing and computerized consensus diagnosis on classification accuracy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 6:437-444[Medline]. |
| 21. | Somorjai, R. L., A. E. Nikulin, N. Pizzi, D. Jackson, G. Scarth, B. Dolenko, H. Gordon, P. Russell, C. L. Lean, and L. Delbridge. 1995. Computerized consensus diagnosis: a classification strategy for the robust analysis of MR spectra. I. Application to 1H spectra of thyroid neoplasms. Magn. Reson. Med. 33:257-263[Medline]. |
| 22. | Wallace, J. C., G. P. Raaphorst, R. L. Somorjai, C. E. Ng, M. Fung Kee Fung, M. Senterman, and I. C. P. Smith. 1997. Classification of 1H MR spectra of biopsies from untreated and recurrent ovarian cancer using linear discriminant analysis. Magn. Reson. Med. 38:569-576[Medline]. |
| 23. | Willker, W., D. Leibfritz, R. Kerssebaum, and W. Bermel. 1993. Gradient selection in inverse heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Chem. 31:287-292[CrossRef]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»