This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gradelski, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gradelski, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2001, p. 2961-2963, Vol. 39, No. 8
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2961-2963.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Correlation between Genotype and Phenotypic Categorization of Staphylococci Based on Methicillin Susceptibility and Resistance

Elizabeth Gradelski, Lourdes Valera, Lauren Aleksunes, Daniel Bonner, and Joan Fung-Tomc*

Department of Microbiology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492

Received 12 March 2001/Returned for modification 26 April 2001/Accepted 17 May 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Positive correlation between methicillin and oxacillin susceptibility test results and the detection of the mecA gene was observed for Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. haemolyticus as well as among mecA+ strains of other species of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). However, at least 50% of the mecA-negative strains of these other species of CNS were falsely classified as methicillin and oxacillin resistant.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Methicillin and oxacillin resistance (MR) in staphylococci is due to the acquisition of the mecA gene, which encodes the low-affinity penicillin-binding protein PBP2a (3, 4). Presence of the mecA gene defines the staphylococcus as MR, while absence of the gene from a staphylococcal strain indicates methicillin susceptibility (MS).

mecA+ strains can differ in their level of expression of MR (4). Strains expressing low-level MR (i.e., heterogenously MR) can be difficult to identify by MIC testing; it is often difficult to identify mecA+ strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (11). Thus, correctly categorizing staphylococci as MR or MS based on MIC test results has been a challenge. Over the years, the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) has modified the MIC interpretative criteria for MR and MS so that the MS or MR phenotype correlates better with the mecA genotype (Table 1). While Staphylococcus aureus and CNS once shared the same MIC interpretative criteria for methicillin and oxacillin (8), the two groups now have different MIC interpretive criteria for determining MR and MS (9, 10). More recently, the oxacillin MIC breakpoints for CNS were lowered to allow for increased detection of mecA+ S. epidermidis strains, and oxacillin testing is no longer recommended for S. saprophyticus, since mecA-negative strains of this species often phenotypically appear to be resistant (10).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   NCCLS definitions (interpretive criteria) for MS and MRa

In this study, we assessed the correlation between genotype and phenotypic (MS or MR) categorization of staphylococci. A total of 442 clinical isolates, including 155 S. aureus strains (120 mecA+ strains and 35 mecA-negative strains) and 287 CNS strains (104 mecA+ strains and 183 mecA-negative strains), were evaluated. S. aureus speciation was based on a positive coagulase test result, and CNS speciation was done using the API-Staph system (bioMérieux, Hazelwood, Mo.).

The detection of the mecA gene was done according to the PCR assay described by Bignardi et al. (1). Precautions were taken to prevent the samples from being contaminated by each other or by the skin of laboratory personnel. These precautions included the use of prealiquoted reagents, gloves, disposable pipettes, and disposable tips with aerosol resistant filters; in addition, the preparation of the amplification reaction mixtures and the analysis of the amplified product were performed in separate areas. Included in every set of PCRs were positive (MR S. aureus strain A27283) and negative (S. aureus strain ATCC 29213) target DNA controls. The methicillin and oxacillin MICs were determined by the NCCLS-recommended agar dilution method (7), using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 2% NaCl and a bacterium inoculum of 5 × 104 CFU/spot. The plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 h. The lowest drug concentration that prevented visible growth was considered the MIC endpoint. Methicillin was obtained from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (Syracuse, N.Y.), and oxacillin was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.).

The use of the recently determined oxacillin MIC interpretative breakpoints resulted in mecA-negative and mecA+ S. aureus strains being correctly classified as MS and MR, respectively (Table 2). Though mecA-negative and mecA+ S. aureus strains were delineated by their methicillin MICs, overlap in the methicillin MIC ranges of the two populations resulted in the misclassification of one mecA-negative S. aureus strain as MR.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Correlation between oxacillin MIC and presence of the mecA genea

Likewise, more overlap was observed in the methicillin MIC distribution than in the oxacillin MIC distribution for mecA-negative and mecA+ coagulase-negative strains (Tables 2 and 3), corroborating the NCCLS recommendation that oxacillin be used for phenotypic categorization of MS and MR. When the current oxacillin MIC breakpoint of <0.5 µg/ml for MS (10) was used, the mecA-negative S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus strains were correctly segregated from those that were mecA+, whereas when the previous oxacillin MIC breakpoint of <4 µg/ml for MS (9) was used, 13% of mecA+ S. epidermidis strains were miscategorized as MS (Table 4).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Correlation between methicillin MIC and presence of the mecA genea


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4.   Ability of the oxacillin resistance breakpoint in predicting methicillin susceptibility among mecA-positive, coagulase-negative staphylococcal strains

According to the current oxacillin breakpoint, mecA+ CNS strains were correctly grouped as MR. No mecA+ strains of S. saprophyticus, S. cohnii, and S. xylosus were encountered, and mecA+ strains of S. capitis, S. warneri, and S. simulans were uncommon. Conversely, 50% or more of the mecA-negative strains of S. hominis, S. warneri, S. capitis, S. cohnii, and S. xylosus were falsely categorized as MR according to the current oxacillin breakpoint for MS (<0.5 µg/ml) (10) (Table 5).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5.   Ability of the oxacillin susceptibility breakpoint in predicting methicillin susceptibility among mecA-negative, coagulase-negative staphylococcal strains

Our findings were similar to those of Hussain et al. (5; L. Stoakes, D. Diagre, V. Fitzgerald, R. Lannigan, and Z. Hussain, Abstr. 100th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C-327, 2000). They observed that use of the new NCCLS oxacillin breakpoint resulted in the correct classification of all CNS strains with mecA as MR and of mecA-negative strains of S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus as MS. They also noted that the oxacillin test often led to the incorrect determination of mecA-negative strains of S. simulans, S. warnerii, S. cohnii, and S. saprophyticus as MR. While Hussain et al. reported that use of the current oxacillin breakpoint resulted in the correct categorization of mecA-negative strains of S. hominis and S. capitis, our results indicated that 50 to 64% of these strains were grouped inappropriately as MR (Table 5). These discrepancies might be due to differences between the strains analyzed in the two studies or to a difference in CNS speciation. The strains used in this study were clinical trial isolates collected from a wide geographical area. The API-Staph system used in this study was reported to correctly identify 87% for clinical CNS isolates, a frequency the same as that obtained with the conventional method based on selected reactions from the Kloos and Schleifer scheme described by Gahrn-Hansen et al. (2). The species most commonly encountered in the clinical setting are S. epidermidis, S. hominis, S. haemolyticus, and S. warneri (6, 12).

In summary, the current NCCLS-recommended oxacillin breakpoints led to the accurate categorization of S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and mecA+ strains of other species of CNS. With the use of the methicillin MIC interpretative criteria, most mecA-negative strains were correctly differentiated from mecA+ S. aureus. However, use of the most recently published oxacillin breakpoint resulted in the misclassification of mecA-negative isolates of other species of CNS as MR. Laboratory workers should be aware that while the new oxacillin breakpoints can be used to accurately categorize the most commonly encountered staphylococcal species of clinical significance (i.e., S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. haemolyticus) as MS or MR, errors in the phenotypic classification of mecA-negative strains belonging to other CNS species are frequent.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Department of Microbiology---104, 5 Research Parkway, Wallingford, CT 06492. Phone: (203) 677-6370. Fax: (203) 677-6771. E-mail: fungtomj{at}bms.com.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Bignardi, G. E., N. Woodford, A. Chapman, A. P. Johnson, and D. C. E. Speller. 1996. Detection of the mec-A gene and phenotypic detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline or low-level methicillin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37:53-63[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Gahrn-Hansen, B., O. Heltberg, V. T. Rosdahl, and P. Sogaard. 1987. Evaluation of a conventional routine method for identification of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. B 95:283-292[Medline].
3. Georgopapadakou, N. H., S. A. Smith, and D. P. Bonner. 1982. Penicillin-binding proteins in a Staphylococcus aureus strains resistant to specific beta -lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 22:172-175[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Hartman, B. J., and A. Tomasz. 1984. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta -lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 158:513-516[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Hussain, Z., L. Stoakes, V. Massey, D. Diagre, V. Fitzgerald, S. El Sayed, and R. Lannigan. 2000. Correlation of oxacillin MIC with mecA gene carriage in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:752-754[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Monsen, T., M. Ronnmark, C. Olofsson, and J. Wistrom. 1998. An inexpensive and reliable method for routine identification of staphylococcal species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17:327-335[Medline].
7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Document M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1999. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Document M100-S8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Document M100-S9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
10. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Document M100-S10. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
11. Suzuki, E., K. Hiramatsu, and T. Yokota. 1992. Survey of methicillin-resistant clinical strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci for mecA gene distribution. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:429-434[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Weinstein, M. P., S. Mirrett, L. Van Pelt, M. McKinnon, B. L. Zimmer, W. Kloos, and L. B. Reller. 1998. Clinical importance of identifying coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures: evaluation of MicroScan Rapid and Dried Overnight Gram-Positive panels versus a conventional reference method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2089-2092[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2001, p. 2961-2963, Vol. 39, No. 8
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2961-2963.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pupin, H., Renaudin, H., Join-Lambert, O., Bebear, C., Megraud, F., Lehours, P. (2007). Evaluation of Moxalactam with the BD Phoenix System for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2005-2008 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bemis, D. A., Jones, R. D., Hiatt, L. E., Ofori, E. D., Rohrbach, B. W., Frank, L. A., Kania, S. A. (2006). Comparison of Tests To Detect Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus intermedius, Staphylococcus schleiferi, and Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Canine Hosts.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3374-3376 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Caierao, J., Musskopf, M., Superti, S., Roesch, E., Dias, C. G, d'Azevedo, P. A (2004). Evaluation of phenotypic methods for methicillin resistance characterization in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). J Med Microbiol 53: 1195-1199 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Horstkotte, M. A., Knobloch, J. K.-M., Rohde, H., Dobinsky, S., Mack, D. (2004). Evaluation of the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5041-5046 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wellinghausen, N., Wirths, B., Essig, A., Wassill, L. (2004). Evaluation of the Hyplex BloodScreen Multiplex PCR-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay System for Direct Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci and Gram-Negative Bacilli from Positive Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 3147-3152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ferreira, R. B. R., Iorio, N. L. P., Malvar, K. L., Nunes, A. P. F., Fonseca, L. S., Bastos, C. C. R., Santos, K. R. N. (2003). Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: Comparison of Phenotypic and Genotypic Oxacillin Susceptibility Tests and Evaluation of the Agar Screening Test by Using Different Concentrations of Oxacillin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3609-3614 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Horstkotte, M. A., Knobloch, J. K.-M., Rohde, H., Dobinsky, S., Mack, D. (2002). Rapid Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci with the VITEK 2 System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3291-3295 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shrestha, N. K., Tuohy, M. J., Hall, G. S., Isada, C. M., Procop, G. W. (2002). Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and the mecA Gene from BacT/ALERT Blood Culture Bottles by Using the LightCycler System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2659-2661 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gradelski, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gradelski, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J.