Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2001, p. 3204-3212, Vol. 39, No. 9
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3204-3212.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Novel Method for Detection, Typing, and Quantification of Human
Papillomaviruses in Clinical Samples
Keith W.
Hart,1,*
O. Martin
Williams,1
Nicola
Thelwell,2
Alison N.
Fiander,3
Tom
Brown,4
Lesek K.
Borysiewicz,1,
and
Colin M.
Gelder1
Section of Infection and Immunity, Department
of Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park,
Cardiff CF14 4XX,1 Department of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Llandough Hospital & University Hospital of
Wales, Cardiff CF4 4XX,3 Oswel Research
Products, Ltd., University of Southampton, Southampton SO16
7PX,2 and Department of Chemistry,
University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17
1BJ,4 United Kingdom
Received 2 April 2001/Returned for modification 20 May
2001/Accepted 16 July 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
We report the development of a novel detection and typing
methodology for human papillomaviruses (HPV) based on real-time PCR
with the self-probing fluorescent primers known as Scorpions. This
technique is quick, simple, specific, sensitive, and capable of
estimating viral load per cell. We report the results of over 100 typing reactions performed on cell lines, biopsies, and cervical cytobrush samples which, when compared to the current reference HPV
detection and typing technique, present a
value of 0.89. We further
report preliminary data suggesting a relationship between viral load
per cell and grade of cervical disease.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cervical cancer is the second most
frequent cause of death from cancer in women worldwide
(16). Cervical screening programs reduce the incidence of
cervical cancer (18); however, 50% of invasive cervical
cancers arise in women screened with existing cytological methodologies
(5). In recent years it has been established that a subset
of human papillomaviruses (HPV) is associated with cervical cancer, and
it is estimated that HPV DNA is present in over 99% of these cancers
(22). There are currently 84 types of HPV, approximately
30 of which infect the genital tract (17). The infecting
HPV type, the viral load, and the integration state of the HPV genome
are known to have profound implications for patient prognosis
(10, 19, 28). Thus, HPV detection and typing techniques
have been proposed as an adjunct to, or a replacement for, the current
cytological screening regime (3, 4, 12, 25). Clearly the
success of such strategies will depend on the development of rapid,
reliable, sensitive, and specific HPV detection methods applicable in
the clinical setting.
Currently, there are eight main approaches to the detection and typing
of HPV, all of which display advantages and disadvantages depending on
their application (for reviews, see references 7, 15, and
21). Despite recent innovations (6, 14), no single technique performs optimally in both clinical and research settings.
We report a new technique for HPV typing that we have named viral
evaluation using self-probing amplicons (VESPA). VESPA is a real-time
PCR-based technique that utilizes self-probing amplicon primers known
as Scorpions (24). This methodology is well suited to HPV
detection, since it is simple to perform, rapid, highly specific
(20), and reproducible and has the potential to measure viral load. We report typing results for 108 samples, including cell
lines, cervical cytobrush samples, and biopsies, performed using both
VESPA and the current reference technique, PCR-enzyme immunoassay
(EIA) (8). We also present preliminary viral load data for 16 clinically defined HPV-16-positive samples.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell lines.
The HeLa, Caski, and SiHa cell lines were a kind
gift from Steve Man, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff,
United Kingdom.
Clinical samples.
Patients either were recruited during
routine colposcopy clinics at Llandough Hospital, Cardiff, United
Kingdom, or were part of an Medical Research Council field study
in The Gambia. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Cervical samples were collected using conical cytobrushes and
transported in 0.5 ml of Digene transport medium (Silver Spring,
Md.). Samples taken in the United Kingdom were stored at 4°C for up
to 24 h before processing. Samples collected in The Gambia were
stored frozen in liquid nitrogen, shipped to the United Kingdom on dry
ice, and processed within 1 month.
DNA purification.
DNA was purified from cervical cytobrush
samples by a simple modification of the freeze-thaw method of Jacobs
and coworkers (8). In brief, epithelial cells obtained
from the cytobrush samples were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended
in 1 ml of 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), and frozen at
70°C for 24 h. A
100-µl aliquot was thawed, boiled for 10 min, chilled on ice, and
spun in a microcentrifuge (13,000 rpm; MSE Microcentaur) for 3 min, and the supernatant was decanted and stored.
DNA was extracted from biopsy material using a modification of the
above technique, in which samples were incubated in 1 ml of 10 mM Tris
HCl (pH 7.4) containing proteinase K (Sigma) (10 mg/ml) for 1 h at
56°C before being boiled.
DNA was purified from cell lines by resuspension of cells in 640 µl
of nuclear lysis buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, 0.4 M NaCl, 2 mM ethylene
diamine tetraacetate [pH 8.0], 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate), 100 µl
of 6 M NaCl, and 740 µl of chloroform. The solution was thoroughly
mixed and centrifuged, and the top phase was extracted. DNA was
precipitated by the addition of 1 ml of 95% ethanol and pelleted by
centrifugation. The pellet was washed twice with 70% ethanol, dried in
a rotary evaporator, and resuspended in 500 µl of deionized water.
PCR-EIA.
PCR-EIA was performed using the technique of Jacobs
et al., as previously described (8).
VESPA.
PCR amplification of 1 µl of DNA solution was
performed using 0.5 µM Scorpion primer (see Table 2) and 0.5 µM
GP5+ reverse primer (8) in a total reaction
volume of 10 µl. Reactions were performed using a Light Cycler
(Bio/Gene, Kimbolton, Cambridgeshire, PE18 0NJ, United Kingdom, or
Roche Diagnostics, Ltd., Lewes, East Sussex BN7 1LG, United Kingdom)
and run for 100 cycles under the following cycling parameters: 96°C
for 1 s, 40°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 1 s. The
reaction mixture conditions were as follows: 200 µM deoxynucleoside
triphosphates, 4 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.9), 10 mM
ammonium sulfate, 0.1% Tween 20, bovine serum albumin (250 ng/µl),
and 0.5 U of Taq polymerase (Advanced Biotechnologies, Epsom, Surrey,
United Kingdom)/µl. Fluorescence was detected in channel one (530 nm)
at 40°C. Control PCRs were carried out as above, but reaction
mixtures included 1 µl of SYBR Gold (Bio/Gene). Scorpion control
reaction mixtures (negative controls) contained 1 µl of
H2O in place of DNA. All primers were synthesized by Oswel Research Products, Southampton SO16 7PX, United Kingdom. Degenerate HPV
detection was performed using DNA preamplified with a tailed primer
(Table 1) and GP5+ under
conditions previously described (8). One microliter of this reaction mixture was then added to the VESPA reaction mixture containing both degenerate Scorpion primers (Table 1) and under the same conditions as those described above.
Primer design.
Table 1 shows the sequences of the 10 Scorpion typing primers used in this study. The primer sequence of each
Scorpion is type specific and is located at the same sequence position
as that of the GP6+ primer of Jacobs et
al.(8). Scorpion probe sequences were designed by aligning
the L1 open reading frames (ORFs) of 20 common HPV types (HPV-6, -11, -16, -18, -31, -33, -35, -39, -40, -42, -43, -44, -45, -51, -52, -56, -58, -59, -66, and -68) (http://hpv-web.lanl.gov). The area of
greatest sequence variation adjacent to the GP6+ primer
binding site was selected as the probe target binding site. The probe
sequence of these primers was checked against 70 common papillomavirus
sequences, and no significant homology was found. The reverse primer
target sequence is the GP5+ sequence of Jacobs and
coworkers (8). Fig. 1a and
1b show the structure and mechanism of Scorpion primers.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(a) Structure of Scorpion primer. (b) Mode of action of
Scorpion primers. The Scorpion primer consists of a conventional PCR
primer attached to a looped tail. The tail consists of a stem region in
which the DNA is self complementary and a single-stranded loop section,
or probe, contains a sequence that is complementary to a section up to
80 bp downstream of the primer binding site. The stem section keeps a
fluorophore and dark quencher in close proximity. If the primer finds a
binding site and amplification proceeds, a probe binding site is
produced. When the probe binds to this site, the loop is opened thus
removing the fluorophore from the dark quencher. An increase in
fluorescence results. A PCR blocker prevents read-through of the looped
tail in subsequent rounds of amplification. (c) Mode of action of
degenerate Scorpions. With a tailed primer containing a designer
sequence in the tail, it is possible to introduce a unique target
sequence into the amplicon after the second round of amplification.
This sequence can then provide the sole target for a single Scorpion
mixture (ScDGi and ScDGii) theoretically capable of detecting over 40 HPV types.
|
|
Degenerate HPV primers were also designed around the GP6+
primer sequence. A preamplification reaction was run under the
conditions described in reference 8, with a primer
containing a unique designer tail (Fig. 1c). After the second round of
amplification, this tail became incorporated into the amplicon,
creating a single target site for a specific degenerate Scorpion
primer. The Scorpion probe was designed to detect the GP6+
section of the primer. The background due to the detection of primer
dimer in this system, however, was unacceptable. We therefore designed
a Scorpion that overlapped by three bases into the freshly synthesized
amplicon. Two such Scorpions were required to provide complete coverage
of the 40 most common HPV sequences.
 |
RESULTS |
Typing primer validation.
The HPV-16 and -18 primers were
tested for specificity using reference cell lines with integrated HPV
DNA. The Caski cell line contains 60 to 600 copies of the HPV-16 ORF
per cell (13), and the HeLa cell line contains 10 to 50 copies of the HPV-18 L1 ORF (13). Figure
2a shows the results of separate PCRs
using the Sc16 Scorpion primer (designed for detection of HPV-16 DNA), DNA extracted from the HPV-16-positive Caski cell line, DNA from the
HPV-18-positive HeLa cell line, and a negative control (no DNA). A
significant increase in fluorescence was detected only with the
HPV-16-containing Caski DNA.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(a) HPV-16 detection. The results of HPV typing
reactions using the Scorpion primers specific for HPV-16 (Sc16), HPV-18
(Sc18), a negative control (no DNA), and DNA extracted from a
HPV-16-specific cell line (Caski) are shown. (b) The results of HPV
typing reactions using the Scorpion primers specific for HPV-16
(Sc16), HPV-18 (Sc18), a negative control (no DNA), and DNA extracted
from an HPV-18-specific cell line (HeLa) are shown.
|
|
Figure 2b shows a similar experiment with the HPV-18-positive HeLa cell
line. Here, significant fluorescence was detected only with the Sc18
Scorpion. These primers were then used to detect HPV-16 and -18 in
clinical samples previously typed by PCR-EIA (Fig.
3) and extended to enable detection of
HPV-6, -11, -31, -33, -39, -51, and -56. Since cell lines containing
these HPV types are not commercially available, primer specificity was
validated using clinical samples previously tested by PCR-EIA. Figure 3 shows positive results from typing reactions for HPV-6, -11, -16, -18, -31, -33, -39, and -51. In each experiment, cross-reactivity with all other Scorpions was investigated in separate reactions and
found to be negligible. These results are not included for the sake of
clarity but are available on request.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Examples of positive traces produced by VESPA. The
results of HPV typing experiments using clinical samples previously
typed using PCR-EIA are shown. Primers specific for HPV-6 (Sc6), HPV-11
(Sc11), HPV-16 (Sc16), HPV-18 (Sc18), HPV-31 (Sc31), HPV-33
(Sc33), HPV-39 (Sc39), and HPV-51 (Sc51) are shown.
|
|
Viral load determination.
A theoretical advantage of
VESPA is its ability to determine viral load. Shown in Fig.
4a are the results of Sc16 typing
reactions performed using a dilution series of the SiHa cell line (one
to two copies of HPV-16 per cell) (13). The dilution
series from 50,000 to 500 HPV viral copies was clearly distinguishable,
and the signal for HPV-16 remained positive down to a single copy of
HPV-16 DNA.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Demonstration of quantitative nature of VESPA. (a)
HPV-16 dilution series with Sc16. A dilution series of SiHa cells was
made from 50,000 cells per reaction mixture to 1 cell per reaction
mixture. (b) Beta-globin gene detection using ScBG and the dilution
series described in the legend to panel a.
|
|
To explore the possibility of establishing a quantitative HPV assay
capable of producing an estimate of viral load per cell, a Scorpion
primer was designed to detect (human) beta-globin DNA (ScBG) (Table 1).
The beta-globin gene is a common test gene included in many PCR-based
assays for infectious disease to control for PCR viability. Here we
have extended its use to that of a housekeeping gene, as a measure of
the amount of human DNA that was sampled. Figure 4b shows the results
of an experiment conducted using ScBG over the same dilution series of
SiHa cells used for Sc16. The fluorescent signal remained positive down
to a single cell and is quantitative at and above this level.
Since we had a quantitative measure of both viral copy number and cell
copy number, as reflected by the number of copies of the beta-globin
gene, we calculated the number of viral copies per cell. A range of
copy numbers per cell may be determined from a cell line containing a
fixed copy number by calculating the Sc16/ScBG fluorescence ratio for
two different dilutions, e.g., the Sc16 F value (Sc16
Fmax
Sc16 Fmin)
for 5,000 HPV-16 copies can be divided by that for the ScBG
F value (ScBG Fmax
ScBG Fmin) for 100 beta-globin gene copies to
obtain a value for a notional cell line containing 50 copies per cell
(5,000/100). Figure 5 shows a plot of the
ratio of the fluorescence produced by Sc16 and ScBG in the SiHa
dilution series (measured in relative virus units) against the
logarithm of the viral copy number per cell. The relationship between
the fluorescence ratio of Sc16 to ScBG and the logarithm of the viral
copy number per cell is broadly linear over 4 orders of magnitude.
Shown in Table 2 are the results
of applying this viral load determination technique to 16 clinical
samples previously found to be HPV-16 positive by PCR-EIA. For each
sample, the fluorescence value for HPV-16 was divided by the
fluorescence value for human genomic DNA and converted to average
copies per cell with the standard curve shown in Fig. 5 and Graphpad
Prism software, version 2.0 (Intuitive Software for Science, San Diego,
Calif.). The most striking finding from these experiments is that the
four cervical smears with normal cytology (samples 1 to 3 and 5) have
low viral loads (below the detection limit of VESPA). The other sample
with a low viral load (for HPV-16) but significant neoplasia is
coinfected with HPV-6 and HPV-39 (sample 4).
Comparison to PCR-EIA.
To test the suitability of VESPA for
HPV typing of cervical smears in the clinical setting, the Scorpion
primers were used to test 108 samples previously HPV typed by PCR-EIA
(8). The test was performed blinded to the PCR-EIA result,
and each sample was tested with all Scorpions. To directly compare the
two techniques, DNA extraction was performed using the freeze-thaw
method described by Jacobs and colleagues (8). This
technique is suboptimal for PCR amplification using Scorpion
primers (see discussion). The results of these experiments are shown in
Table 3. Selected positive sample types
have subsequently been confirmed by direct sequencing (data not shown).
The overall concordance between VESPA and PCR-EIA is 94% with a
value of 0.89, indicating good agreement (1). Of 108 samples, VESPA failed to detect five incidences of HPV-16 and one of
HPV-18 (see Discussion). There were no false positives.
Screening using VESPA.
To expand the capability of VESPA
for use in HPV screening, we designed a degenerate HPV Scorpion
mixture for use in conjunction with a tailed general primer (Table
1). By utilizing a tailed primer, we were able to introduce
a consensus site that enables a single Scorpion to recognize many
different HPV amplicons (Fig. 1c). This is a two-step procedure that
can theoretically detect over 40 different HPV types. Figure
6 demonstrates the ability of the
degenerate Scorpion mixture to detect HPV-6, -16, and -18.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Degenerate HPV detection using VESPA. Reactions were
performed as described in the text using samples preamplified with a
tailed primer to introduce a unique primer target site.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We report a novel real-time PCR-based technique for the detection,
typing, and quantification of HPV in clinical samples which we have
termed VESPA. We believe VESPA has several advantages over existing HPV
detection and typing methods in terms of its speed, ease of use,
sensitivity, specificity, and capability to provide quantitative
information about viral load.
When compared to the two front-line HPV detection and
typing methodologies, Hybrid Capture II and PCR-EIA, VESPA is
technically less demanding and produces results more rapidly.
The sensitivity of VESPA in cell lines is at least 2 orders of
magnitude higher than that reported by Digene (5,000 copies) for Hybrid
Capture II, which has been approved by the Federal Drug Administration
for HPV screening. VESPA has sensitivity comparable to that of other
previously published HPV detection techniques, including PCR-EIA
(10 to 200 viral copies), in which the detection limit is calculated
with enriched control templates against a low background of genomic DNA
(8, 19, 28). Although the exact viral threshold for
immediate risk of carcinogenesis is controversial (and may vary with
HPV type and between individual patients) the available evidence
suggests that it is likely to be above VESPA's lower detection limit
(19, 28).
VESPA is type specific and compares favorably with Hybrid Capture, in
which the probes for many different HPV types are multiplexed and in
which samples are categorized as low-risk and high-risk HPV types in
two reactions (21, 26). The fact that Scorpion primers may
be multiplexed has been demonstrated by us (data not shown) and others
(20), and thus VESPA could also be used in this manner as
a primary cervical screen, as is currently being investigated for
Hybrid Capture II. Screening with multiplexed probes, however, can lead
to probe cross-reactivity (21). We intend to validate the
utility of VESPA as a primary screen in a large prospective study using
degenerate Scorpion probes (discussed below).
The HPV typing achieved using VESPA correlates well in our hands with
data obtained using PCR-EIA (
= 0.89), the
most-established HPV typing method. Indeed, a similar concordance
figure was achieved when PCR-EIA was performed on identical samples by
different reference laboratories (9).
There are several explanations for the small number of
discrepancies observed between VESPA and PCR-EIA. First,
the results produced by VESPA might be false negatives. The
presence of PCR inhibitors in cervical samples has been previously
reported (11). Using a standard chloroform
extraction-based method of DNA purification, we have demonstrated that
it is possible to improve the signal produced by VESPA that is only
weakly positive to detect HPV in cervical smear samples when purified
by the freeze-thaw technique. We have used the less-efficient
freeze-thaw DNA extraction method in this study, since this
method is recommended for PCR-EIA and we wished to compare PCR-EIA and
VESPA using identical DNA samples.
Second, the results produced by PCR-EIA might be false positives. There
is evidence from a study comparing results from several different
laboratories that PCR-EIA is prone to the occasional false positive
(9).
Third, the samples may be positive for HPV but have an intratypic HPV
variant containing polymorphism within the probe binding site. Such
samples will not be overlooked, since all samples are first screened
(currently by PCR-EIA) for HPV positivity. Scorpion probes discriminate
between sequences on the basis of a single base change
(20), whereas PCR-EIA probes are more tolerant of sequence
variation (23). In this regard it may be relevant that five of six discordant samples were obtained from patients from The
Gambia, where samples are likely to show more variation within the
probe binding site (27). This increased specificity may require the inclusion of extra Scorpions to confer complete coverage while also providing the ability to investigate the relative risk associated with sequence variants. We are currently sequencing these samples.
VESPA has the potential to estimate viral load. There is increasing
evidence that viral load is a critical determinant in patient prognosis
(10, 19, 28). Indeed, some authors have suggested that the
high-risk types may be more potent, not due to the increased
oncogenicity of their transforming proteins, for example, but simply
because they proliferate more efficiently, overwhelming the immune
response (2). Our preliminary viral load data suggest that
the presence of cervical neoplasia might be related to the viral load.
Four HPV-16-positive samples (by PCR-EIA), among our cohort of 108 and
obtained from subjects with normal cervical cytology, have undetectably
low viral loads by VESPA. The only subject with significant neoplasia
and a low viral load was coinfected with HPV-6 and -39. It is perhaps
surprising that no sample contains an apparent viral load of >3 per
cell, since other groups have reported viral loads estimated to be an order of magnitude higher than this (29). However, the
range of values quoted varies enormously (in the range of
10
5 to 103 genome copies per cell) and are
often produced using semi-quantitative techniques. It is also important
to consider, when analyzing viral load data, that values are an average
summed over many cells, a large proportion of which may not be
infected, and that the viral DNA may have become integrated, disrupting
or deleting the probe target site. The fact that high viral loads are
associated with more-severe disease may be because severe disease
produces high viral loads rather than vice versa. We intend to
undertake a large prospective study of the relationship between
clinical status and virus type, load, and integration status
using VESPA.
The major application of VESPA is likely to be in probing the molecular
etiology of HPV-associated disease rather than in the primary clinical
evaluation of cervical neoplasia. However, we have designed a
degenerate Scorpion mixture that is theoretically capable of detecting
40 of the most common HPV types and demonstrably capable of detecting
HPV-6, -11, and -18 (Fig. 6). Interestingly, two of these samples, when
assessed by PCR-EIA, were barely visible after agarose gel
electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining, suggesting that
this approach produces the expected improvement in sensitivity.
Thus, VESPA may also find an application in screening for HPV.
In conclusion, we have developed a novel method for the
characterization of human papillomavirus infection. This new method is
quicker (<1 h), more specific (single-base discrimination), and less
laborious (single step) than currently available techniques and, unlike
most techniques, is capable of estimating viral load. Future work
will concentrate on increasing the armory of Scorpions to cover more
HPV types, to include probes capable of assessing the physical state of
the HPV genome and to modify VESPA for use in microtiter plate format.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are indebted to all the women who consented to take part in
this study. We are grateful to Keith McAdam, Gijs Walraven, Beryl West,
Caroline Scherf, and all the staff of the MRC Field Station, Farafenni,
The Gambia.
C.M.G. is a Wellcome Senior Fellow in Clinical Research; O.M.W. is a
Wellcome Research Training Fellow. This research was supported by an
MRC project grant (no. G9901202).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Section
of Infection and Immunity, Department of Medicine, University of Wales
College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XX, United Kingdom.
Phone: (029) 20745004. Fax: (029) 20745003. E-mail:
HartKW{at}cf.ac.uk.
Present address: Imperial College School of Medicine, London SW7
2AZ, United Kingdom.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
| Armitage, P., and G. Berry. Statistical
methods in medical research, 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications,
Oxford, United Kingdom.
|
| 2.
|
Bible, J. M.,
C. Mant,
J. M. Best,
B. Kell,
W. G. Starkey,
K. Shanti Raju,
P. Seed,
C. Biswas,
P. Muir,
J. E. Banatvala, and J. Cason.
2000.
Cervical lesions are associated with human papillomavirus type 16 intratypic variants that have high transcriptional activity and increased usage of common mammalian codons.
J. Gen. Virol.
81:1517-1527[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Costa, S.,
M. Sideri,
K. Syrjanen,
P. Terzano,
M. De Nuzzo,
P. De Simone,
P. Cristiani,
A. C. Finarelli,
A. Bovicelli,
A. Zamparelli, and L. Bovicelli.
2000.
Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer.
Acta Cytol.
44:310-318[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Cuzick, J.
2000.
Human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical cancer screening.
JAMA
283:108-109[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Cuzick, J.,
C. J. Meijer, and J. M. Walboomers.
1998.
Screening for cervical cancer.
Lancet
351:1439-1440[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Gravitt, P. E.,
C. L. Peyton,
T. Q. Alessi,
C. M. Wheeler,
F. Coutlee,
A. Hildesheim,
M. H. Schiffman,
D. R. Scott, and R. J. Apple.
2000.
Improved amplification of genital human papillomaviruses.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:357-361[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Husnjak, K.,
M. Grce,
L. Magdic, and K. Pavelic.
2000.
Comparison of five different polymerase chain reaction methods for detection of human papillomavirus in cervical cell specimens.
J. Virol. Methods
88:125-134[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Jacobs, M. V.,
P. J. F. Snijders,
A. J. C. van den Brule,
T. J. M. Helmerhorst,
C. J. L. M. Meijer, and J. M. M. Walboomers.
1997.
A general primer GP5+/GP6+-mediated PCR-enzyme immunoassay method for rapid detection of 14 high-risk and 6 low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapings.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:791-795[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Jacobs, M. V.,
P. J. Snijders,
F. J. Voorhorst,
J. Dillner,
O. Forslund,
B. Johansson,
M. von Knebel Doeberitz,
C. J. Meijer,
T. Meyer,
I. Nindl,
H. Pfister,
E. Stockfleth,
A. Strand,
G. Wadell, and J. M. Walboomers.
1999.
Reliable high risk HPV DNA testing by polymerase chain reaction: an intermethod and intramethod comparison.
J. Clin. Pathol.
52:498-503[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Josefsson, A. M.,
P. K. Magnusson,
N. Ylitalo,
P. Sorensen,
P. Qwarforth-Tubbin,
P. K. Andersen,
M. Melbye,
H. O. Adami, and U. B. Gyllensten.
2000.
Viral load of human papilloma virus 16 as a determinant for development of cervical carcinoma in situ: a nested case-control study.
Lancet
355:2189-2193[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Lampertico, P.,
J. S. Malter,
M. Colombo, and M. A. Gerber.
1990.
Detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissue by the polymerase chain reaction.
Am. J. Pathol.
137:253-258[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Meijer, C. J.,
T. J. Helmerhorst,
L. Rozendaal,
J. C. van der Linden,
F. J. Voorhorst, and J. M. Walboomers.
1998.
HPV typing and testing in gynaecological pathology: has the time come?
Histopathology
33:83-86[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Meissner, J. D.
1999.
Nucleotide sequences and further characterization of human papillomavirus DNA present in the CaSki, SiHa and HeLa cervical carcinoma cell lines.
J. Gen. Virol.
80:1725-1733[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Nelson, J. H.,
G. A. Hawkins,
K. Edlund,
M. Evander,
L. Kjellberg,
G. Wadell,
J. Dillner,
T. Gerasimova,
A. L. Coker,
L. Pirisi,
D. Petereit, and P. F. Lambert.
2000.
A novel and rapid PCR-based method for genotyping human papillomaviruses in clinical samples.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:688-695[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Nindl, I.,
M. Jacobs,
J. M. Walboomers,
C. J. Meijer,
H. Pfister,
U. Wieland,
T. Meyer,
E. Stockfleth,
R. Klaes,
M. von Knebel Doeberitz,
A. Schneider, and M. Duerst.
1999.
Interlaboratory agreement of different human papillomavirus DNA detection and typing assays in cervical scrapes.
Int. J. Cancer
81:666-668[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Parkin, D. M.,
E. Laara, and C. S. Muir.
1988.
Estimates of the worldwide frequency of sixteen major cancers in 1980.
Int. J. Cancer
41:184-197[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Pfister, H.
1996.
The role of human papillomavirus in anogenital cancer.
Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am.
23:579-595[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Sasieni, P.,
J. Cuzick, and E. Farmery.
1995.
Accelerated decline in cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales.
Lancet
346:1566-1567[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Swan, D. C.,
R. A. Tucker,
G. Tortolero-Luna,
M. F. Mitchell,
L. Wideroff,
E. R. Unger,
R. A. Nisenbaum,
W. C. Reeves, and J. P. Icenogle.
1999.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA copy number is dependent on grade of cervical disease and HPV type.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:1030-1034[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Thelwell, N.,
S. Millington,
A. Solinas,
J. Booth, and T. Brown.
2000.
Mode of action and application of scorpion primers to mutation detection.
Nucleic Acids Res.
28:3752-3761[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Vernon, S. D.,
E. R. Unger, and D. Williams.
2000.
Comparison of human papillomavirus detection and typing by cycle sequencing, line blotting, and hybrid capture.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:651-655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Walboomers, J. M.,
M. V. Jacobs,
M. M. Manos,
F. X. Bosch,
J. A. Kummer,
K. V. Shah,
P. J. Snijders,
J. Peto,
C. J. Meijer, and N. Munoz.
1999.
Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide.
J. Pathol.
189:12-19[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Wheeler, C. M.,
T. Yamada,
A. Hildesheim, and S. A. Jenison.
1997.
Human papillomavirus type 16 sequence variants: identification by E6 and L1 lineage-specific hybridization.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:11-19[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Whitcombe, D.,
J. Theaker,
S. P. Guy,
T. Brown, and S. Little.
1999.
Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence.
Nat. Biotechnol.
17:804-807[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Wise, J.
2000.
UK pilot scheme for HPV testing announced.
BMJ
320:600[Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Womack, S. D.,
Z. M. Chirenje,
P. D. Blumenthal,
L. Gaffikin,
J. A. McGrath,
T. Chipato,
E. Ngwalle, and K. V. Shah.
2000.
Evaluation of a human papillomavirus assay in cervical screening in Zimbabwe.
Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.
107:33-39.
|
| 27.
|
Yamada, T.,
M. M. Manos,
J. Peto,
C. E. Greer,
N. Munoz,
F. X. Bosch, and C. M. Wheeler.
1997.
Human papillomavirus type 16 sequence variation in cervical cancers: a worldwide perspective.
J. Virol.
71:2463-2472[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Ylitalo, N.,
P. Sorensen,
A. M. Josefsson,
P. K. Magnusson,
P. K. Andersen,
J. Ponten,
H. O. Adami,
U. B. Gyllensten, and M. Melbye.
2000.
Consistent high viral load of human papillomavirus 16 and risk of cervical carcinoma in situ: a nested case-control study.
Lancet
355:2194-2198[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Zerbini, M.,
S. Venturoli,
M. Cricca,
G. Gallinella,
P. De Simone,
S. Costa,
D. Santini, and M. Musiani.
2001.
Distribution and viral load of type specific HPVs in different cervical lesions as detected by PCR-ELISA.
J. Clin. Pathol.
54:377-380[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2001, p. 3204-3212, Vol. 39, No. 9
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3204-3212.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Cobo, F., Talavera, P., Concha, A.
(2008). Review Article: Relationship of Human Papillomavirus With Papillary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract: A Review. INT J SURG PATHOL
16: 127-136
[Abstract]
-
Santos, N., Honma, S., Timenetsky, M. d. C. S. T., Linhares, A. C., Ushijima, H., Armah, G. E., Gentsch, J. R., Hoshino, Y.
(2008). Development of a Microtiter Plate Hybridization-Based PCR-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Identification of Clinically Relevant Human Group A Rotavirus G and P Genotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 462-469
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jiang, H.-L., Zhu, H.-H., Zhou, L.-F., Chen, F., Chen, Z.
(2006). Genotyping of human papillomavirus in cervical lesions by L1 consensus PCR and the Luminex xMAP system. J Med Microbiol
55: 715-720
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Oh, T. J., Kim, C. J., Woo, S. K., Kim, T. S., Jeong, D. J., Kim, M. S., Lee, S., Cho, H. S., An, S.
(2004). Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Highly Sensitive DNA Microarray for Detection and Genotyping of Human Papillomaviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 3272-3280
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Moberg, M., Gustavsson, I., Gyllensten, U.
(2003). Real-Time PCR-Based System for Simultaneous Quantification of Human Papillomavirus Types Associated with High Risk of Cervical Cancer. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 3221-3228
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Iftner, T., Villa, L. L.
(2003). Chapter 12: Human Papillomavirus Technologies. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr
2003: 80-88
[Abstract]
[Full Text]