Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2002, p. 3596-3601, Vol. 40, No. 10
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3596-3601.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Duration of Persistence of Gonococcal DNA Detected by Ligase Chain Reaction in Men and Women following Recommended Therapy for Uncomplicated Gonorrhea
Laura H. Bachmann,1,2* Renee A. Desmond,1 Joan Stephens,3 Annalee Hughes,1 and Edward W. Hook III1,3
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham,1
Jefferson County Department of Public Health,3
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama2
Received 11 March 2002/
Returned for modification 12 May 2002/
Accepted 30 June 2002

ABSTRACT
Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection remains relatively common in
the United States, representing a public health challenge. Ligase
chain reaction (LCR) is both highly sensitive and specific for
the detection of
N. gonorrhoeae in urine and patient-obtained
vaginal swab specimens. Because of the LCR test's exquisite
sensitivity, it may potentially detect DNA from nonviable organisms
following effective therapy, leading to false-positive test
results and unnecessary additional treatment. The purpose of
the present study was to determine the duration that gonococcal
DNA is detectable by LCR following therapy for uncomplicated
gonococcal infection. One hundred thirty men and women between
the ages of 16 and 50 years presenting to a sexually transmitted
disease clinic with urogenital gonorrhea were enrolled. After
the standard history was taken and a genital examination was
done, the patients were asked to submit either a urine specimen
(men) or a urine specimen plus a self-obtained vaginal swab
specimen (women) for
N. gonorrhoeae testing by LCR at the initial
visit and each day during the study period. At enrollment, patients
were treated with single doses of ofloxacin, cefixime, or ceftriaxone.
The median time to a negative urine LCR test result was 1 day
for the men (mean, 1.6 ± 0.14 days) and 2 days for the
women (mean, 1.7 ± 0.19 days). Among the women the clearance
time was significantly longer for vaginal specimens (mean, 2.8
± 0.30 days) than for urine specimens (mean, 1.7 ±
0.11 days). Irrespective of patient gender and specimen type,
gonococcal DNA can be expected to be absent from urogenital
specimens within 2 weeks following successful therapy.

INTRODUCTION
Gonorrhea is the second most common reportable infectious disease
in the United States, and its control represents a continuing
public health challenge. In 2000, over 350,000 cases of gonorrhea
were reported, a 21% increase over the number of reported cases
since 1997 and a sustained reversal of the downward trend in
the prevalence of gonococcal infections reported in the United
States from 1977 to 1997 (
2). At the same time, over the past
decade powerful new tools for the diagnosis of gonorrhea have
become available. Among these are nucleic acid amplification
tests which permit the use of specimens obtained by simplified
specimen collection methods (i.e., voided urine specimens or,
for women, patient-collected vaginal swab specimens) without
any compromise in the sensitivity of detection (
4,
7,
8,
11-
13).
Because nucleic acid amplification tests do not require living
organisms for the detection of infection, concern has also been
expressed about the potential for residual nucleic acids from
nonviable organisms to persist in the genital tract, giving
rise to false-positive test results if patients are retested
too soon following successful therapy. Support for these concerns
comes from studies demonstrating the persistence of
Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids for periods as long as 2 to 3 weeks
following therapy (
1,
5,
14). No similar studies have been performed
to describe the clearance of
Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acids
from genital specimens following therapy. To address these needs
we evaluated the clearance of
N. gonorrhoeae following treatment
from urine and patient-collected vaginal swab specimens collected
daily by a commercially available ligase chain reaction (LCR)
assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population.
The study was conducted at the Jefferson County Department of
Public Health Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinic in Birmingham,
Ala. Men and women (age range, 16 to 50 years) presenting to
the clinic with urogenital gonorrhea between September 1998
and January 2001 were invited to participate in the study. For
this study a patient was considered to have gonococcal infection
if gram-negative intracellular diplococci were present on Gram
staining of genital secretions or a culture of urethral or cervical
specimens was previously positive for
N. gonorrhoeae. Patients
with complicated gonococcal infection (pelvic inflammatory disease,
epididymitis, disseminated gonococcal infection) or isolated
pharyngeal or rectal gonorrhea were excluded. Patients with
known
C. trachomatis infection or exposure, allergy to the recommended
therapy for gonorrhea, or a history of antibiotic use within
the 3 weeks preceding study enrollment and pregnant or lactating
women were also excluded. The study protocol was reviewed and
approved by the Institutional Review Boards for Protection of
Human Subjects of the University of Alabama at Birmingham and
the Jefferson County Department of Health.
Laboratory specimens.
After informed consent was obtained, patients meeting the enrollment criteria underwent a directed history and genitourinary examination. Urethral specimens (men) or cervical swab specimens (women) were collected for testing for gonorrhea by culture on Thayer-Martin agar or Gonostat (Sierra Diagnostics, Sonora, Calif.) and for testing for C. trachomatis by cell culture techniques. Cultures for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis and Gonostat testing were performed as described previously (9, 10, 13). Patients were then asked to submit either a urine specimen alone (men) or a urine specimen plus a self-obtained vaginal swab specimen (women) for testing for N. gonorrhoeae by LCR at the initial visit and each day during the study period. LCR tests were performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
At the time of study enrollment, each participant was treated with a single dose of ceftriaxone, cefixime, or ofloxacin, according to the STD treatment guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (3). Participants were asked to return to the clinic for follow-up visits every other day for up to 21 days or until two consecutive negative LCR results were obtained for specimens from each site sampled. On the interim days, patients collected their own specimens in prelabeled specimen containers which were stored in a refrigerator until the return clinic visit. Repeat cultures of urethral specimens (men) or cervical swab specimens (women) for gonococci were obtained from participants between days 5 and 7.
Questionnaire survey data.
Initial baseline data including patient demographic characteristics, symptom duration (if symptoms were present), and risk behaviors (condom use, the number of sexual partners in the last 6 months, whether the patient had new sexual partners, and a history of prior STDs) were obtained. At each subsequent follow-up visit, one of two designated study nurses (J.S. or A.H.) obtained information on symptom resolution, interval sexual exposures, and partner treatment. If symptoms persisted, a brief genital examination was performed to document the presence of physical signs, and further laboratory testing was performed as indicated.
Patients were advised to refer all sexual partners within the past 60 days or, if they had not been sexually active for greater than 60 days, their last sexual partner for treatment. Doxycycline was given (for C. trachomatis infection) at 100 mg orally twice a day at the time of a positive chlamydia culture or at the last follow-up visit. Participants were reimbursed $20 at each visit and $30 at the final visit for their time and trouble.
Statistical analysis.
Categorical data were compared by the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Continuous variables were compared by Student's t test. Gonococcal clearance data were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier curves. Time to clearance (in days) was calculated from the first treatment day for all patients. The event, consistent clearance of gonococcal nucleic acids, was defined as two successive negative gonococcal LCR tests. The data for patients who did not experience the event were censored. Patients who had an episode defined as one or more negative tests followed by a positive test were defined as intermittently shedding gonococcal nucleic acids. Depending on the pattern of shedding, participants with intermittent shedding may or may not have eventually met the study's working definition of having cleared gonococcal nucleic acids (two successive negative gonococcal LCR tests). Nucleic acid clearance was compared for participants with and without intermittent shedding by gender, site of specimen (for women, urine versus vaginal swab specimens), and history of treatment for STDs within the last year (yes versus no) by the log-rank test. Clearance times are reported as means ± standard errors (SEs) and medians. A P value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS
Descriptive data evaluation.
One hundred sixty-nine patients were enrolled in the study,
and 39 (23%) of these were lost to follow-up or their data were
censored. Therefore, the present analysis is based on 130 evaluable
individuals. The characteristics of the group not included in
the analysis did not differ significantly from those who completed
the study (data not shown). The majority of the patients were
African American (95%) and male (66%) (Table
1). The reason
for presentation differed significantly by gender, with 91%
of men presenting for care due to symptoms (discharge, dysuria)
but only 23% of women presenting for care due to symptoms. Women
more commonly presented to an STD clinic for treatment for gonorrhea
not treated after a previous positive test result (33% for women
versus 1% for males). Over half (51.5%) of the participants
had been treated for an STD within the past 12 months. The number
of reported sex partners within the last 6 months ranged from
1 to 12, with the majority of participants reporting a single
partner. Within the last 30 days, 27% reported having a new
partner, with males being significantly more likely to report
a recent new partner than females (
P = 0.02). Ninety-five percent
of patients received a single dose of ofloxacin on the day of
enrollment, 4% received cefixime, and less than 1% (1 patient)
received ceftriaxone.
Clearance analysis.
LCR tests and culture for
N. gonorrhoeae were positive for all
patients at the time of study enrollment. The median time to
a negative urine LCR test was 1 day for men (mean, 1.6 ±
0.14 days) and 2 days for women (mean, 1.8 ± 0.19 days)
(
P = 0.19) (Fig.
1). Among the women, the clearance time was
significantly longer for vaginal specimens (mean= 2.8 ±
0.30 days) than for urine specimens (mean, 1.7 ± 0.11
days) (
P = 0.008) (Fig.
2). Urine LCR tests were negative for
over 90% of the patients by day 5 following therapy. The only
factor associated with accelerated clearance of gonococcal nucleic
acids was a history of treatment for STDs within the last 12
months. Patients who had a treatable STD within the last year
had a significantly shorter clearance time than those who did
not (means, 1.3 ± 0.08 and 1.9 ± 0.2 days, respectively
[
P = 0.005]).
Overall, 18% of the population (15% of the men and 25% of the
women) experienced intermittent shedding at some point during
the follow-up period. Among the women, intermittent shedding
of gonococcal nucleic acids was detected in urine from four
women and vaginal specimens from eight women (intermittent shedding
was noted in both vaginal and urine specimens from one woman).
Tables
2 and
3 demonstrate the intermittent shedding patterns
and follow-up gonorrhea culture results for each individual
by gender. Cultures or Gono-stat tests were negative for all
21 participants with intermittent shedding (88% of the 24 participants
with intermittent shedding) for whom a culture for gonorrhea
or Gonostat testing was performed on the same day or within
several days of the transiently positive LCR test (Tables
2 and
3). The characteristics of participants with intermittent
shedding are compared to those of the remainder of the participants
in Table
4. Patients treated for an STD within the last year
were less likely to shed intermittently than patients with no
recent treatable STD. As might be expected, the patients who
experienced intermittent shedding tended to have longer clearance
times than those who did not. The 24 patients with intermittent
shedding had an overall mean clearance time of 2.2 days, whereas
those who did not have intermittent shedding had an overall
mean clearance time of 1.4 days (
P = 0.03). A multivariable
Cox regression model of predictors of clearance for urine specimens
showed that the only predictor of a faster clearance time was
a history of a treatable STD within the last 12 months (hazard
ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.0, 2.2), which was of
borderline significance (
P = 0.07).

DISCUSSION
The present treatments for uncomplicated gonorrhea recommended
by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are highly
efficacious, yielding 97 to 100% cure rates (
3) and rendering
cultures of urine, urethral swab, and semen specimens from men
with gonococcal urethritis negative within 24 h of therapy (
6).
Because of the exquisite sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification
tests such as LCR, DNA from nonviable organisms could be detected
following effective therapy, leading to a false-positive result
and unnecessary additional treatment. This phenomenon has been
reported in several studies evaluating the persistence of
C. trachomatis nucleic acids by PCR or LCR following effective
treatment (
1,
5,
14). For instance, Workowski and colleagues
(
14) documented that 15% (3 of 20) of their female population
continued to shed chlamydial DNA in cervical specimens for 1
week following completion of successful treatment with doxycycline.
Similarly, detectable chlamydial nucleic acids were demonstrated
in urine specimens tested by LCR and PCR for up to 2 weeks after
adequate therapy in a population of female high school students.
These findings are consistent with those from a smaller study
of men and women who were treated with a single dose of azithromycin
and who submitted urine specimens daily for testing for chlamydia
by PCR and transcription-mediated amplification (
1,
5). Collectively,
these findings have led to the recommendation to refrain from
using urine nucleic acid amplification tests for test of cure
within the first 3 weeks following therapy for
C. trachomatis (
3).
This study documents the rapidity with which gonococcal nucleic acids are cleared from urine and vaginal swab specimens for LCR following single-dose therapy for uncomplicated gonorrhea. Survival analysis demonstrated that 91% of urine specimens from men and 89% of urine specimens from women were cleared of nucleic acids by day 4, and all urine specimens were cleared by day 6 posttreatment (Table 5). Furthermore, gender did not affect the time to consistently negative results for urine specimens.
Interestingly, 18% of the study population shed gonococcal nucleic
acids intermittently during follow-up. Day-to-day variations
in sampling and the high sensitivity of the LCR test are likely
explanations for this observation, given that 88% (21 of 24)
of intermittent shedders had a documented negative culture result
for gonorrhea on the same day or within several days of the
positive test result.
Our study has several limitations which should be acknowledged. Logistical considerations and participant preferences precluded collection of cervical swab specimens for LCR testing following treatment. In addition, we were unable to directly supervise specimen collection in the clinic every day. Although the containers were labeled with the correct date before they were sent home with each participant, it is possible that on weekends, when more than one container was sent home, participants may have confused the dates. If the samples were not consecutive, this could account for a few of the episodes of intermittent shedding; however, this is not consistent with the patterns of intermittent shedding that we most often observed, in which a series of days with negative tests would be followed by a single positive LCR test result.
In conclusion, on the basis of the data presented here, which demonstrate the clearance of nucleic acids from all urine and vaginal swab specimens by posttreatment days 6 and 9, respectively, follow-up testing for gonococci by LCR would best be performed on day 10 following treatment or beyond. While the fact that intermittent shedding occurred in a minority of the population may raise concerns regarding the potential for false-positive test results when LCR is used for test of cure soon after treatment, we believe that in most instances this concern is offset by the general increased sensitivity of LCR as well as the ease of specimen collection in the setting of a follow-up examination (i.e., when a pelvic examination is less likely to be necessary) should test-of-cure testing be performed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill., generously donated the
LCR kits used for this study.
We thank Sharron Hagy for assistance in manuscript preparation.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 242 Zeigler Research Building, 703 19th St. South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007. Phone: (205) 975-5500. Fax: (205) 975-7764. E-mail:
lbachmann{at}idmail.dom.uab.edu.


REFERENCES
1 - Bianchi, A., M. Bogard, G. Cessot, J. M. Bohbot, J. E. Malkin, and J. M. Alonso. 1998. Kinetics of Chlamydia trachomatis clearance in patients with azithromycin, as assessed by first void urine testing by PCR and transcription-mediated amplification. Sex. Transm. Dis. 25:366-367.[Medline]
2 - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2000. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Ga.
3 - Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention. 1998. 1998 guidelines for the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 47:1-116.[Medline]
4 - Ching, S., H. Lee, E. W. Hook III, M. R. Jacobs, and J. Zenilman. 1995. Ligase chain reaction for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urogenital swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:3111-3114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Gaydos, C. A., K. A. Crotchfelt, M. R. Howell, S. Kralian, P. Hauptman, and T. C. Quinn. 1998. Molecular amplification assays to detect chlamydial infections in urine specimens from high school female students and to monitor the persistence of chlamydial DNA after therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 177:417-424.[Medline]
6 - Haizlip, J., S. F. Isbey, H. A. Hamilton, A. E. Jerse, P. A. Leone, R. H. Davis, and M. S. Cohen. 1995. Time required for elimination of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from the urogenital tract in men with symptomatic urethritis: comparison of oral and intramuscular single-dose therapy. Sex. Transm. Dis. 22:145-148.[Medline]
7 - Hook, E. W., III, S. F. Ching, J. Stephens, K. F. Hardy, K. R. Smith, and H. H. Lee. 1997. Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in women by using the ligase chain reaction on patient-obtained vaginal swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2129-2132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Hook, E. W., III, K. Smith, C. Mullen, J. Stephens, L. Rinehardt, S. M. Pate, and H. H. Lee. 1997. Diagnosis of genitourinary Chlamydia trachomatis infections by using the ligase chain reaction on patient-obtained vaginal swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2133-2135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Jaffe, H. W., S. J. Kraus, T. A. Edwards, S. S. Weinberger, and L. Zubrzycki. 1982. Diagnosis of gonorrhea using a genetic transformation test on mailed clinical specimens. J. Infect. Dis. 146:275-279.[Medline]
10 - Johnson, R. E., T. A. Green, J. Schachter, R. B. Jones, E. W. Hook III, C. M. Black, D. H. Martin, M. E. St. Louis, and W. E. Stamm. 2000. Evaluation of nucleic acid amplification tests as reference tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic men. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4382-4386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Schachter, J., E. W. Hook III, W. M. McCormack, T. C. Quinn, M. Chernesky, S. Chong, J. I. Girdner, P. B. Dixon, L. DeMeo, E. Williams, A. Cullen, and A. Lorincz. 1999. Ability of the Digene Hybrid Capture II test to identify Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in cervical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3668-3671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Smith, K. R., S. Ching, H. Lee, Y. Ohhashi, H.-Y. Hu, H. C. Fisher III, and E. W. Hook III. 1995. Evaluation of ligase chain reaction for use with urine for identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in females attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:455-457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Van Der Pol, B., D. V. Ferrero, L. Buck-Barrington, E. Hook III, C. Lenderman, T. Quinn, C. A. Gaydos, J. Lovchik, J. Schachter, J. Moncada, G. Hall, M. J. Tuohy, and R. B. Jones.2001. Multicenter evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens, female endocervical swabs, and male urethral swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1008-1016.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Workowski, K. A., M. F. Lampe, K. G. Wong, M. B. Watts, and W. E. Stamm. 1993. Long-term eradication of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection after antimicrobial therapy. Evidence against persistent infection. JAMA 270:2071-2075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2002, p. 3596-3601, Vol. 40, No. 10
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3596-3601.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rao, G G., Bacon, L, Evans, J, Dejahang, Y, Michalczyk, P, Donaldson, N, on behalf of Lewisham Chlamydia and Gonoccoccus Sc,
(2008). Prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in young subjects attending community clinics in South London. Sex. Transm. Infect.
84: 117-121
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hjelmevoll, S. O., Olsen, M. E., Sollid, J. U. E., Haaheim, H., Unemo, M., Skogen, V.
(2006). A Fast Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Method for Sensitive and Specific Detection of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae porA Pseudogene. J. Mol. Diagn.
8: 574-581
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Whiley, D. M., Tapsall, J. W., Sloots, T. P.
(2006). Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: An Ongoing Challenge. J. Mol. Diagn.
8: 3-15
[Abstract]
[Full Text]