This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reischl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reischl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2002, p. 3814-3817, Vol. 40, No. 10
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3814-3817.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Direct Detection and Differentiation of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila in Clinical Specimens by Dual-Color Real-Time PCR and Melting Curve Analysis

Udo Reischl,1* Hans-Jörg Linde,1 Norbert Lehn,1 Olfert Landt,2 Kevin Barratt,3 and Nele Wellinghausen4

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, D-93053 Regensburg,1 TIB Molbiol GmbH, Tempelhofer Weg 11-12, D-10829 Berlin,2 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany,4 Health Waikato Laboratory, Hamilton, New Zealand3

Received 6 September 2001/ Returned for modification 28 May 2002/ Accepted 23 July 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
A dual-color LightCycler PCR assay targeting the 16S rDNA gene of Legionella spp. was established. By using two pairs of hybridization probes, Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila could be detected and differentiated simultaneously. With 26 culture-positive and 42 culture-negative respiratory specimens from patients with atypical pneumonia, 100% sensitivity and specificity was observed for L. pneumophila.


arrow
TEXT
 
Legionellae are ubiquitous in environmental water sources and may cause sporadic as well as epidemic cases of atypical pneumonia after inhalation or aspiration of contaminated water droplets. Presently, 42 species with 64 serogroups are known (2), many of which cause disease in humans (13, 16, 20). Legionella pneumophila is the most common pathogenic species, accounting for up to 90% of legionellosis cases (20). Mortality of patients with pneumonia may exceed 30% for elderly and immunocompromised patients (3), and prognosis of patients depends in part on rapid identification of the causative agent (8).

Diagnostic culture is considered the gold standard for the laboratory detection of Legionella infections, but legionellae are slow-growing and fastidious bacteria and successful culture requires selective media and prolonged incubation periods. Furthermore, diagnostic culture is often requested after initiating antibiotic therapy, which lowers the recovery rate substantially. Direct fluorescent antibody assays (DFA) on respiratory secretions or urinary antigen detection tests can be performed rapidly but have limitations. DFA has low sensitivity, and cross-reactions with other bacteria may result in false-positive results. Urinary antigen testing has up to 85% sensitivity but detects only a limited range of pathogenic Legionella species (5, 10).

Serological methods are also widely used in clinical laboratories, but they are not helpful for rapid diagnosis of acute legionellosis, since seroconversion of the infected patients is delayed (about 50% of patients develop specific antibodies more than 2 weeks after onset of clinical symptoms) or is even absent in some cases (6).

For these reasons, nucleic acid amplification techniques are attractive tools for detection of Legionella species in clinical as well as in environmental samples. A variety of diagnostic PCR protocols have been reported that target specific regions within 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (4, 7, 9, 17, 19), 5S rDNA (7), or the macrophage infectivity potentiator (mip) gene (1, 7, 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 19).

Here we have described the development of a sensitive and specific hybridization probe-based dual-color real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of Legionella spp. and L. pneumophila in clinical specimens. In order to meet the requirements of true rapid diagnostics, the LightCycler device (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) was used for rapid thermal cycling and dual-color monitoring of specific PCR products. Amplification was based on a previously published Legionella-specific primer pair (4, 9), flanking a segment within the bacterial multicopy 16S rRNA gene. For the detection of Legionella spp. a pair of LightCycler Red640-labeled hybridization probes (Leg-HP-1 and Leg-HP-2) was selected complementary to a region conserved among all Legionella spp. For the detection of L. pneumophila, a pair of LightCycler Red705-labeled hybridization probes (Lpn-HP-1 and Lpn-HP-2) was selected complementary to an L. pneumophila-specific region within the amplicon. Sequence alignments of sensor hybridization probe Lpn-HP-1 revealed a perfect match to L. pneumophila 16S rDNA but at least two nucleotide mismatches between its sequence and 16S rDNA sequences of all other bacterial species. Oligonucleotide primers and fluorescence-labeled hybridization probes were obtained from TIB Molbiol (Berlin, Germany). Nucleotide sequences and positions are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide primers and LightCycler hybridization probes used in the PCR assaya

An initial evaluation of the PCR assay was performed with 68 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens from patients with atypical pneumonia which tested positive (n = 26) or negative (n = 42) for L. pneumophila in diagnostic culture. Three of the Legionella-negative BAL specimens were spiked with about 106 CFU of cultured Legionella longbeachae (ATCC 33462) (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.), Legionella micdadei (ATCC 33218), or Legionella bozemanii (ATCC 33217) organisms. For template DNA preparation, 500-µl aliquots of the BAL specimens were centrifuged for 2 min at 8,000 x g, and the resulting pellet plus 100 µl of the supernatant was processed with the High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturers instructions. Amplification mixtures consisted of 2 µl of 10x LightCycler-FastStart DNA Master Hybridization Probes mix (Roche Diagnostics), which contains DNA polymerase, reaction buffer, deoxynucleoside triphosphates in a ready-to-use formulation, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µM concentrations of each primer oligonucleotide, 0.2 µM concentrations of each hybridization probe oligonucleotide, and 2 µl of template DNA in a final volume of 20 µl. After an initial denaturation step for 10 min at 95°C to activate the FastStart Taq DNA polymerase, the thermocycle program included 50 cycles of three steps each, comprised of heating at 20°C/s to 95°C with a 5-s hold, cooling at 20°C/s to 55°C with a 10-s hold, and heating at 20°C/s to 72°C with a 20-s hold. Following amplification a LightCycler melting curve analysis was performed with a heating rate of 0.2°C/s starting at 40°C. Fluorescence values of each capillary were measured at 640 and 705 nm (dual-color option).

All 29 Legionella-positive samples (26 L. pneumophila culture-positive samples and 3 samples spiked with other Legionella species) were correctly amplified and detected with the Legionella spp.-specific set of hybridization probes (Fig. 1A; fluorescence readout at 640 nm). Although all of the 29 Legionella-positive samples were also detected with the L. pneumophila-specific set of hybridization probes (Fig. 1B; fluorescence readout at 705 nm), L. pneumophila-specific amplicons could be easily distinguished by their characteristic melting temperature (Tm) of above 61°C in LightCycler melting curve analysis (Fig. 2). All 39 Legionella-negative samples tested negative with both sets of hybridization probes. None of the samples showed inhibition as judged by separate amplification of the human beta-globin gene by the LightCycler Control kit DNA (Roche Diagnostics). Compared with the results of diagnostic culture, the PCR assay results showed 100% specificity and sensitivity for L. pneumophila detection and species identification of the 68 BAL specimens investigated.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Evaluation of the dual-color Legionella PCR assay with clinical specimens. A representative set of 23 L. pneumophila culture-positive BAL specimens, 4 Legionella culture-negative BAL specimens, and 3 Legionella culture-negative BAL specimens spiked with cultured L. longbeachae, L. micdadei, or L. bozemanii organisms was analyzed. Ten nanograms of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 (ATCC 33152) template DNA was used as a positive control. (A) Fluorescence readout at 640 nm showing the LightCycler results with the Legionella spp.-specific set of hybridization probes Leg-HP-1 and Leg-HP-2. (B) Fluorescence readout at 705 nm showing the LightCycler results with the L. pneumophila-specific set of hybridization probes Lpn-HP-1 and Lpn-HP-2.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Melting curve analysis performed on the L. pneumophila-specific set of hybridization probes (fluorescence readout at 705 nm). Melting curves corresponding to L. micdadei-, L. longbeachae-, L. bozemanii-, and L. pneumophila-specific amplicons are indicated by arrows.

Assay specificity was further confirmed by testing genomic DNA of 46 Legionella species and serogroups (19), including all pathogenic species, all 15 serogroups of L. pneumophila, and Legionella-like amoebal pathogen 10 as well as with genomic DNA of 26 clinical isolates of gram-negative or gram-positive bacterial species other than Legionella, including Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Positive PCR results, as evidenced by probe fluorescence, were observed only with Legionella spp., and all L. pneumophila isolates were distinguished by their characteristic Tm in melting curve analysis at 705 nm (data not shown).

To determine the lowest number of L. pneumophila cells detectable by the assay, serial dilutions of genomic DNA prepared from cultured L. pneumophila serogroup 1 (ATCC 33152) were tested. An analytical sensitivity of 10 fg of template DNA was determined for both pairs of hybridization probes, which corresponded to about 3 genome equivalents per PCR. Therefore, our assay concept should be sensitive enough for the direct detection of Legionella organisms in suitable patient specimens, such as BAL or tracheal secretions.

A cross-reaction of the L. pneumophila-specific set of hybridization probes with some non-L. pneumophila species was observed in the LightCycler amplification plots (Fig. 1B), thus requiring melting curve analysis for unambiguous identification of L. pneumophila. Such partial hybridization events of probes Lpn-HP-1 and Lpn-HP-2 with amplicons generated from non-L. pneumophila species can be abolished by applying more stringent annealing temperatures between 56 to 60°C or a touchdown protocol from 60 to 56°C, but this slightly reduces total assay sensitivity to about 10 Legionella genome equivalents per PCR.

In clinical practice, a variety of discordant results with DFA, urinary antigen, serology, and culture may be observed with patient specimens. For evaluation of our novel PCR assay, the selection of L. pneumophila culture-positive and culture-negative specimens was intentional in order to compare the results with the gold standard. Since results of DFA, urinary antigen, and serology were not available for all patients, the overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the assay remain to be established in the course of a prospective study.

The sensitive detection of Legionella on the genus level as well as the differentiation between L. pneumophila and non-L. pneumophila species is important in the case of a clinically suspected legionellosis. Using only one pair of primers and two sets of elongation-blocked hybridization probes avoids sensitivity problems generally associated with duplex PCR and distinguishes this dual-color protocol from previously described real-time PCR assays (1, 7, 17, 19). Following template DNA preparation, PCR screening of up to 30 clinical specimens plus a positive and a negative control can be performed in a single LightCycler run, resulting in a total assay time of less than 2.5 h. LightCycler melting curve analysis allows the reliable differentiation of L. pneumophila from other Legionella species, but there is not enough sequence heterogeneity in the hybridization region of probes Lpn-HP-1 and Lpn-HP-2 to separate individual non-L. pneumophila species by Tm analysis. L. bozemanii and L. longbeachae, for example, share an identical Tm of about 50°C (Fig. 2). In the case of a positive LightCycler PCR result for the genus Legionella (hybridization probes Leg-HP-1 and Leg-HP-2; fluorescence readout at 640 nm) but a negative result for L. pneumophila (observed Tm with hybridization probes Lpn-HP-1 and Lpn-HP-2 below 61°C; fluorescence readout at 705 nm), the underlying Legionella species can be identified within about 3 h by direct sequencing of the spin-column-purified PCR products.

With respect to microbiological practice, the performance characteristics of the described LightCycler assay, such as its speed, single-capillary format, dual-color hybridization probe detection, and species information obtained with melting curve analysis, make it a valuable adjunct to the spectrum of direct methods like DFA or urinary antigen detection and an attractive alternative to conventional PCR assays for detection of Legionella spp.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Universität Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany. Phone: 49-941-944-6450. Fax: 49-941-944-6402. E-mail: Udo.Reischl{at}klinik.uni-regensburg.de. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Ballard, A. L., N. K. Fry, L. Chan, S. B. Surman, J. V. Lee, T. G. Harrison, and K. J. Towner. 2000. Detection of Legionella pneumophila using a real-time PCR hybridization assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4215-4218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Benson, R. F., and B. S. Fields. 1998. Classification of the genus Legionella. Semin. Respir. Infect. 13:90-99.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Breiman, R. F., and J. C. Butler. 1998. Legionnaires' disease: clinical, epidemiological, and public health perspectives. Semin. Respir. Infect. 13:84-89.[Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Cloud, J. L., K. C. Carroll, P. Pixton, M. Erali, and D. R. Hillyard. 2000. Detection of Legionella species in respiratory specimens using PCR with sequencing confirmation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1709-1712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Dominguez, J. A., N. Gali, P. Pedroso, A. Fargas, E. Padilla, J. M. Manterola, and M. Matas. 1998. Comparison of the Binax Legionella urinary antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the Biotest Legionella Urin Antigen EIA for detection of legionella antigen in both concentrated and nonconcentrated urine samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2718-2722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Harrison, T. G., and A. G. Taylor. 1998. Timing of seroconversion in Legionnaires' disease. Lancet 2:795.
    7. 7
  7. Hayden, R. T., J. R. Uhl, X. Qian, M. K. Hopkins, M. C. Aubry, A. H. Limper, R. V. Lloyd, and F. R. Cockerill. 2001. Direct detection of Legionella species from bronchoalveolar lavage and open lung biopsy specimens: comparison of LightCycler PCR, in situ hybridization, direct fluorescence antigen detection, and culture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2618-2626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Heath, C. H., D. I. Grove, and D. F. Looke. 1996. Delay in appropriate therapy of Legionella pneumonia associated with increased mortality. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:286-290.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Jonas, D., A. Rosenbaum, S. Weyrich, and S. Bhakdi. 1995. Enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of PCR-amplified DNA of Legionellae in bronchoalveolar fluid. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1247-1252.[Abstract]
    10. 10
  10. Kazandjian, D., R. Chiew, and G. L. Gilbert. 1997. Rapid diagnosis of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 infection with the Binax enzyme immunoassay urinary antigen test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:954-956.[Abstract]
    11. 11
  11. Kessler, H. H., F. F. Reinthaler, A. Pschaid, K. Pierer, B. Kleinhappl, E. Eber, and E. Marth. 1993. Rapid detection of Legionella species in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids with the EnviroAmp Legionella PCR amplification and detection kit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:3325-3328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Koide, M., and A. Saito. 1995. Diagnosis of Legionella pneumophila infection by polymerase chain reaction. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21:199-201.[Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Kool, J. L., D. Bergmire-Sweat, J. C. Butler, E. W. Brown, E. J. Peabody, D. S. Massi, J. C. Carpenter, J. M. Pruckler, R. F. Benson, and B. S. Fields. 1999. Hospital characteristics associated with colonization of water systems by legionella and risk of nosocomial legionnaires' disease: a cohort study of 15 hospitals. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 20:798-805.[CrossRef][Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Lindsay, D. S., A. W. Abraham, and R. J. Fallon. 1994. Detection of mip gene by PCR for diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:3068-3069.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Murdoch, D. R., E. J. Walford, L. C. Jennings, G. J. Light, M. I. Schousboe, A. Y. Chereshsky, S. T. Chambers, and G. I. Town. 1996. Use of the polymerase chain reaction to detect Legionella DNA in urine and serum samples from patients with pneumonia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 23:475-480.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Neumeister, B. 1996. Legionella infections: epidemiology, diagnostics, clinical aspects, and pathogenesis. Clin. Lab. 42:715-729.
    17. 17
  17. Rantakokko-Jalava, K., and J. Jalava. 2001. Development of conventional and real-time PCR assays for detection of legionella DNA in respiratory specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2904-2910.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Ratcliff, R. M., J. A. Lanser, P. A. Manning, and M. W. Heuzenroeder. 1998. Sequence-based classification scheme for the genus Legionella targeting the mip gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1560-1567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Wellinghausen, N., C. Frost, and R. Marre. 2001. Detection of legionellae in hospital water samples by quantitative real-time LightCycler PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 3985-3993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Yu, V. L. 2000. Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires' disease), p. 2424-2435. In G.L. Mandell, J. E. Bennett, and R. Dolin (ed.), Principles and practice of infectious disease, 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2002, p. 3814-3817, Vol. 40, No. 10
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3814-3817.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Su, H.-P., Tung, S.-K., Tseng, L.-R., Tsai, W.-C., Chung, T.-C., Chang, T. C. (2009). Identification of Legionella Species by Use of an Oligonucleotide Array. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1386-1392 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ginevra, C., Lopez, M., Forey, F., Reyrolle, M., Meugnier, H., Vandenesch, F., Etienne, J., Jarraud, S., Molmeret, M. (2009). Evaluation of a Nested-PCR-Derived Sequence-Based Typing Method Applied Directly to Respiratory Samples from Patients with Legionnaires' Disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 981-987 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Diederen, B. M. W., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M., Peeters, M. F. (2008). Utility of Real-Time PCR for Diagnosis of Legionnaires' Disease in Routine Clinical Practice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 671-677 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bencini, M. A., van den Brule, A. J. C., Claas, E. C. J., Hermans, M. H. A., Melchers, W. J. G., Noordhoek, G. T., Salimans, M. M. M., Schirm, J., Vink, C., van der Zee, A., Jansen, R. (2007). Multicenter Comparison of Molecular Methods for Detection of Legionella spp. in Sputum Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 3390-3392 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Luck, P. C., Ecker, C., Reischl, U., Linde, H.-J., Stempka, R. (2007). Culture-Independent Identification of the Source of an Infection by Direct Amplification and Sequencing of Legionella pneumophila DNA from a Clinical Specimen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 3143-3144 [Full Text]  
  • Wilson, D. A., Reischl, U., Hall, G. S., Procop, G. W. (2007). Use of Partial 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing for Identification of Legionella pneumophila and Non-pneumophila Legionella spp.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 257-258 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stolhaug, A., Bergh, K. (2006). Identification and Differentiation of Legionella pneumophila and Legionella spp. with Real-Time PCR Targeting the 16S rRNA Gene and Species Identification by mip Sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 6394-6398 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Novak, R. T., Glass, M. B., Gee, J. E., Gal, D., Mayo, M. J., Currie, B. J., Wilkins, P. P. (2006). Development and Evaluation of a Real-Time PCR Assay Targeting the Type III Secretion System of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 85-90 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Buckwalter, S. P., Jones, M. F., Vetter, E. A., Yao, J. D. C., Wengenack, N. L., Rosenblatt, J. E., Cockerill, F. R. III, Smith, T. F. (2006). Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 165-256 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sheehan, K. B., Henson, J. M., Ferris, M. J. (2005). Legionella Species Diversity in an Acidic Biofilm Community in Yellowstone National Park. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 507-511 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Herpers, B. L., de Jongh, B. M., van der Zwaluw, K., van Hannen, E. J. (2003). Real-Time PCR Assay Targets the 23S-5S Spacer for Direct Detection and Differentiation of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4815-4816 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Templeton, K. E., Scheltinga, S. A., Sillekens, P., Crielaard, J. W., van Dam, A. P., Goossens, H., Claas, E. C. J. (2003). Development and Clinical Evaluation of an Internally Controlled, Single-Tube Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Legionella pneumophila and Other Legionella Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4016-4021 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wilson, D. A., Yen-Lieberman, B., Reischl, U., Gordon, S. M., Procop, G. W. (2003). Detection of Legionella pneumophila by Real-Time PCR for the mip Gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3327-3330 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reischl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reischl, U.
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»