Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Detcheva, A. Articles by Beall, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Detcheva, A. Articles by Beall, B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2002, p. 3831-3834, Vol. 40, No. 10
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3831-3834.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Erythromycin-Resistant Group A Streptococcal Isolates Recovered in Sofia, Bulgaria, from 1995 to 2001

Antoaneta Detcheva,^1* Richard R. Facklam,² and Bernard Beall²

National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sofia 1504, Bulgaria,¹ World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Streptococci, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333²

Received 31 May 2002/ Returned for modification 1 July 2002/ Accepted 15 July 2002

Top Abstract Text References

 
The frequency of erythromycin resistance within group A streptococci in Sofia, Bulgaria, from 1995 to 2001 was 2.1% (26 isolates). Of this, 57.7% was macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin (MLS) inducible, 7.7% was MLS constitutive, and 34.6% had the M phenotype. Eleven different emm sequence types were found among 25 erythromycin-resistant isolates tested. Nineteen of 26 erythromycin-resistant isolates were additionally resistant to tetracycline and/or chloramphenicol.

Top Abstract Text References

 
Group A streptococci (GAS) are common and important pathogens of humans, causing a wide variety of clinical manifestations that can involve virtually any tissue.

Penicillin has been used routinely for treating GAS infections for over 50 years, and yet GAS have remained penicillin susceptible. Macrolides are the first alternative for allergic patients and for cases where there is a poor response to penicillin. Unlike that of penicillin, the efficacy of clindamycin (a lincosamide) is not affected by GAS inoculum size or growth stage (13). Clindamycin also inhibits M-protein synthesis, thereby possibly promoting phagocytosis of GAS (13).

At present there are two known mechanisms of erythromycin resistance in GAS (9, 11, 12, 14). Methylation of 23S rRNA due to the ermB- or ermTR-encoded methylase results in the inability of all macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B to bind to their common target site in the 50S ribosomal subunit (MLS type). The methylase can be expressed constitutively (MLS-cr phenotype) or inducibly (MLS-ir phenotype). The second mechanism, characteristic of the so-called M phenotype, involves energy-dependent efflux of 14- and 15-membered macrolides but not 16-membered macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B. This efflux mechanism is encoded by the mefA gene (3, 11, 14).

Here we describe the overall incidence of macrolide resistance in GAS clinical isolates recovered in Sofia, Bulgaria. We also describe general features of these isolates, including resistance to other antibiotics, T-agglutination profiles, and emm gene sequence types. This work establishes the presence of 11 different strain types of GAS in Sofia exhibiting erythromycin resistance.

(Some of these results were presented at the XIV Lancefield International Symposium on Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases, 1999, and were included in the proceedings of the symposium [4a]).

We tested 1,221 epidemiologically nonrelated GAS isolates recovered from 1995 to 2001 in five laboratories which process more than 50% of the microbiological samples in Sofia: 1,122 pharyngeal swabs (695 from patients with tonsillitis, tonsillopharyngitis, pharyngitis, or rhinopharyngitis; 339 from patients with scarlet fever or persons in contact with scarlet fever patients; and 88 from healthy carriers), 1 puncture of peritonsillar abscess, 55 nasal swabs (42 from patients with rhinopharyngitis, 8 from patients with scarlet fever, and 5 from healthy carriers), and 43 swabs from skin lesions (39 from patients with impetigo and 4 from patients with erysipelas). One thousand seventy-six of the isolates came from children in the age groups 0 to 4, 5 to 9, and 10 to 14 years.

Serologic group identification was performed by the capillary precipitin test of antigen extracts derived by Fuller's method and rabbit group-specific antisera (10).

Susceptibility testing. MICs of erythromycin and clindamycin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) were measured by the agar dilution method for all isolates. Additionally, MICs of clarithromycin (Pfizer, Inc., New York, N.Y.), azithromycin (Pfizer, Inc.), and spiramycin (Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Paris, France) were determined for all erythromycin-resistant and 96 random susceptible isolates. We followed procedures and breakpoints recommended by the NCCLS (6). Breakpoints for spiramycin were those proposed by the French Society for Microbiology (4).

Tetracycline and chloramphenicol resistance and susceptibility were determined by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test (7) with commercial disks from Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems (Cockeysville, Md.).

The double-disk diffusion test was performed as described by Seppälä et al. (11), except that we used different concentrations (15 µg of erythromycin and 2 µg of clindamycin [Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems]) as described previously (16).

Induction experiments were carried out for the MLS-ir and M-phenotype isolates in order to confirm the phenotype as described by Seppälä et al. (11).

Subtyping. T-agglutination patterns and opacity factor reactions were determined as previously described (10). PCR of the emm gene and sequence analysis were performed as described on the website www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/protocols.htm. The emm gene sequences corresponding to the emm types and alleles listed for the isolates in this study are found on the website www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/emmtypes.htm. One of these 26 isolates was not available for emm typing.

Among the 1,221 isolates, we found 26 that were erythromycin resistant: 20 from throat swabs (12 from patients with tonsillitis, tonsillopharyngitis, or pharyngitis; 6 from patients with scarlet fever; and 2 from healthy carriers), 1 from a puncture of a peritonsillar abscess, and 5 from swabs from skin lesions (4 from patients with impetigo and 1 from a patient with erysipelas). Twenty-four isolates were from children 1 to 12 years of age, one isolate was from a 23-year-old patient with pharyngitis, and one isolate was from a 40-year-old patient with erysipelas. These data indicated a low frequency of erythromycin resistance of GAS in Sofia, 2.1% for the whole period tested, varying from 4.1% in 1995 to 0.8% in 2001. These isolates represented each of the three different phenotypes of erythromycin resistance, with the MLS-ir phenotype being the most common (57.7% of the resistant isolates). The MLS-cr phenotype was least common (7.7%) and was not observed in isolates recovered after 1996. The M phenotype was found in 34.6% of the resistant isolates.

Table 1 presents the level of resistance of the erythromycin-resistant isolates to 14-, 15-, and 16-membered macrolides and to clindamycin. MLS-cr isolates were resistant to 14-, 15-, and 16-membered macrolides and clindamycin, but the level of resistance was low. MLS-ir isolates displayed a low level of resistance to the 14-membered macrolides erythromycin and clarithromycin, while MICs of the 15-membered macrolide azithromycin were higher (up to 32 µg/ml). Isolates exhibited either low-level resistance or sensitivity to clindamycin and the 16-membered macrolide spiramycin before the induction; however, after induction with a subinhibitory concentration of erythromycin, MICs of clindamycin increased to 64 to 256 µg/ml, indicating inducible resistance. Isolates with the M phenotype showed low-level resistance to 14- and 15-membered macrolides but were susceptible to spiramycin and clindamycin, with no inducible resistance evident.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Levels of macrolide resistance found in GAS isolates in Sofia

Eleven different emm types were found among 25 erythromycin-resistant isolates (Table 2). Within the emm types found in multiple isolates, identical or closely similar T-agglutination patterns were found. The T-agglutination patterns associated with each of the 11 emm types were identical or closely similar to those of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reference strains for these specific emm sequence types.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Serotypes and emm sequence types of erythromycin-resistant GAS in Sofia

The two MLS-cr isolates were T pattern 1 and type emm1. The 15 MLS-ir isolates comprised six different emm sequence types with emm44/61 being most frequent, followed by emm4 and emm117. Single isolates of types emm43.4, emm77, and emm80 were also found. The M phenotype was found in nine isolates of types emm12.10, emm78, emm75, and emm33, with multiple isolates found within types emm12.10 (five isolates) and emm78 (two isolates).

The emm12.10 allele differs by only a single deduced conservative substitution from type emm12 (asparagine to serine at amino acid 36 of the mature M protein). We found this emm12 allele in five independent erythromycin-resistant isolates recovered from individuals in Sofia, and we have not encountered this allele out of several hundred type emm12 isolates recovered from patients with noninvasive and invasive infections in several other countries over the past 7 years. It was also interesting that no emm sequence types were found both in isolates with MLS phenotypes and in isolates with the M phenotype.

Nineteen erythromycin-resistant isolates were additionally resistant to tetracycline or both tetracycline and chloramphenicol (Table 3). The two MLS-cr isolates were susceptible to tetracycline and chloramphenicol. Within the MLS-ir and M-phenotype isolates, three resistance patterns were observed. Four of the six multiply represented emm types displayed more than one resistance pattern. For example, emm117 was represented by all three resistance patterns.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Resistance patterns of erythromycin-resistant GAS in Sofia

Our results revealed that erythromycin resistance within GAS was rare in Sofia from 1995 to 2001, with an incidence of only 2.1%. In contrast, the incidence of erythromycin resistance among invasive GAS isolates recovered in the United States in 1999 was 7.1% (C. Van Beneden, R. Facklam, R. Lynfield, et al., poster presented at the International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, Ga., 24 to 27 March 2002.). In a recent survey of 109 random GAS isolates recovered in Italy, 28% were found to be erythromycin resistant (G. Dicuonzo and G. Gherardi, unpublished data). In Bulgaria macrolides are rarely prescribed for GAS infections and are prescribed mainly for allergic patients and patients who respond poorly to penicillin. We feel that it is likely that the low number of macrolide prescriptions given in Bulgaria is a primary reason for the low rate of erythromycin resistance of GAS observed in Sofia. Moreover, all resistant isolates had low-level resistance to erythromycin (MICs not exceeding 8 µg/ml), clarithromycin (MICs of 4 µg/ml), spiramycin (MIC of 2 µg/ml), clindamycin (MIC of 1 µg/ml), and azithromycin (MIC of 32 µg/ml) relative to isolates from countries with a higher incidence of erythromycin resistance.

Within 25 isolates, 11 emm sequence types could be distinguished, indicating that there are at least 11 different GAS clonal types in Sofia associated with erythromycin resistance. Seven emm sequence types were associated with MLS phenotypes, and four emm types were associated with the M phenotype. As has been seen elsewhere (Dicuonzo and Gherardi, unpublished), the majority of erythromycin-resistant isolates were of emm types that are also commonly associated with the presence of the serum opacity factor-fibronectin binding gene (sof). Previous data have shown the presence of the sof gene in types emm44/61, emm4, emm117, emm12, emm78, and emm75, which comprised 20 of the 25 isolates (80%) in this study of known emm type (1). Possibly sof contributes to differing tissue specificities exhibited by sof-positive strains relative to sof-negative strains, effecting physical separation and reducing the frequency of horizontal transfer events between these two groups.

We found the emm12.10 allele in five independent isolates. Since we have not encountered emm12.10 elsewhere, it is possible that the population from which we obtained these GAS isolates is relatively segregated. However, except for types emm117, emm33, and emm43 (subtype emm43.4), all of the sequences described in this study have been associated with erythromycin resistance in other countries (2, 5, 8, 15; B. Beall, unpublished data), indicating that the majority of erythromycin-resistant GAS strains could have originated in other countries prior to their introduction into Sofia.

 
We thank Katerina Ivancheva, Lena Sechanova (Hospital of Infectious Diseases), Elisaveta Dragijeva (University Paediatric Hospital), Encho Savov (Military Medical Academy), and Elena Zamfirova (Hygiene-Epidemiological Inspectorate), who provided isolates. We thank Darinka Chankova (NCIPD) for assistance in MIC testing. We thank Zhongya Li and Alma Ruth Franklin (CDC) for their assistance in sequencing and serotyping. We thank Chris Van Beneden (CDC), the CDC Active Bacterial Core surveillance program, and Giordano Dicuonzo and Giovanni Gherardi (Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy) for providing unpublished information.

Part of this study was supported by the National Science Fund, Ministry of Education and Science of Bulgaria (MU-ZR 2/97).

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 26 Yanko Sakazov Blvd., Sofia 1504, Bulgaria. Phone: 359 2 9446999-314. Fax: 359 2 9433075. E-mail: Detcheva{at}hotmail.com.

Top Abstract Text References

 

1
1. Beall, B., G. Gherardi, M. Lovgren, B. Forwick, R. Facklam, and G. Tyrrell. 2000. emm and sof gene sequence variation in relation to serological typing of opacity factor positive group A streptococci. Microbiology 146:1195-1209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Brandt, C. M., M. Honscha, N. D. Truong, R. Holland, B. Hövener, A. Bryskier, R. Lütticken, and R. R. Reinert. 2001. Macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from throat infections in the region of Aachen, Germany. Microb. Drug Resist. 7:165-170.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Clancy, J., J. Petitpas, F. Dib-Hajj, W. Yuan, M. Cronan, A. V. Kamath, J. Bergeron, and J. A. Retsema. 1996. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a novel macrolide-resistance determinant, mefA, from Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 22:867-879.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Comite de l'Antibiogramme de la Societe Francaise de Microbiologie. 1996. Statement 1996 CA-SFM. Zone sizes and MIC breakpoints for non-fastidious organisms. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2(Suppl. 1):46-49.
4
5. Detcheva, A., and D. Chankova. 2000. Antibiotic resistance of group A streptococci in Sofia, Bulgaria 1995-1998, p. 289-291. In D. R. Martin and J. R. Tagg (ed.), Streptococci and streptococcal diseases. Entering the new millennium. Proceedings of XIV LISSSD. Securacopy, Porirua, New Zealand.
5
6. Kataja, J., P. Houvien, A. Moutiala, J. Vuopio-Varkila, A. Efstratiou, G. Hallas, the Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance, and H. Seppälä. 1998. Clonal spread of group A streptococcus with the new type of erythromycin resistance. J. Infect. Dis. 177:786-789.[Medline]
6
7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th ed. Approved standard M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
7
8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 7th ed. Approved standard M2-A7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
8
9. Perez-Trallero, E., J. M. Marimon, M. Montes, B. Orden, and M. de Pablos. 1999. Clonal differences among erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:235-240.[Medline]
9
10. Roberts, M. C., J. Sutcliffe, P. Courvalin, L. B. Jensen, J. Rood, and H. Seppälä. 1999. Nomenclature of macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2823-2830.[Free Full Text]
10
11. Rotta, J., and R. R. Facklam. 1980. Manual of microbiological diagnostic methods for streptococcal infections and their sequelae. World Health Organization/BAC/80. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
11
12. Seppälä, H., A. Nissinen, Q. Yu, and P. Huovinen. 1993. Three different phenotypes of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Finland. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 32:885-891.[Free Full Text]
12
13. Seppälä, H., M. Skurnik, H. Soini, M. C. Roberts, and P. Huovinen. 1998. A novel erythromycin resistance methylase gene (ermTR) in Streptococcus pyogenes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:257-262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
14. Stevens, D. L. 1995. Streptococcal toxic-shock syndrome: spectrum of disease, pathogenesis, and new concepts in treatment. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1:69-78.[Medline]
14
15. Sutcliffe, J., A. Tait-Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1817-1824.[Abstract]
15
16. Weiss, K., J. De Azavedo, C. Restieri, L. A. Galarneau, M. Gourdeau, P. Harvey, J. F. Paradis, K. Salim, and D. E. Low. 2001. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolide-resistant group A Streptococcus strains in the province of Quebec, Canada. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:345-348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
17. York, M. K., L. Gibbs, F. Perdreau-Remington, and G. F. Brooks. 1999. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from the San Francisco Bay area of Northern California. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1727-1731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2002, p. 3831-3834, Vol. 40, No. 10
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3831-3834.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Littauer, P., Caugant, D. A., Sangvik, M., Hoiby, E. A., Sundsfjord, A., Simonsen, G. S., the Norwegian Macrolide Study Group, (2006). Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Norway: Population Structure and Resistance Determinants.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 1896-1899 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Erdem, G., Ford, J., Johnson, D., Abe, L., Yamaga, K., Kaplan, E. (2005). Erythromycin-Resistant Group A Streptococcal Isolates Collected between 2000 and 2005 in Oahu, Hawaii, and Their emm Types. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2497-2499 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Heelan, J. S., Hasenbein, M. E., McAdam, A. J. (2004). Resistance of Group B Streptococcus to Selected Antibiotics, Including Erythromycin and Clindamycin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1263-1264 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Durmaz, R., Durmaz, B., Bayraktar, M., Ozerol, I. H., Kalcioglu, M. T., Aktas, E., Cizmeci, Z. (2003). Prevalence of Group A Streptococcal Carriers in Asymptomatic Children and Clonal Relatedness among Isolates in Malatya, Turkey. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5285-5287 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Acikgoz, Z. C., Gocer, S., Tuncer, S. (2003). Macrolide resistance determinants of group A streptococci in Ankara, Turkey. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 110-112 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Detcheva, A. Articles by Beall, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Detcheva, A. Articles by Beall, B.