Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
Received 30 November 2001/ Returned for modification 18 February 2002/ Accepted 2 July 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The low infectious dose of such viruses (2) requires that investigative methods be able to detect very low numbers of virions in patient samples, contaminated ground and estuarine water, and foodstuffs such as shellfish. This high level of sensitivity remains a challenge even for nucleic acid amplification methods, especially for the detection of RNA viruses, which require an additional reverse transcription (RT) step. Nested sequential amplification has improved sensitivity, but cross-contamination of the nested amplification step by primary amplification products is a significant cause of false-positive results, diminishing the reliability of the results. The combination of both amplification reactions of the nested-PCR into a "single-tube" nested-PCR to reduce the risk of contamination has been reported. The use of differential annealing temperatures to sequentially select amplification primed by first outer (high melting temperature [Tm]) primer pairs, followed by inner (low Tm) primer pairs, is one such method (17, 19). Alternative approaches have physically separated the primers and additional reagents required for the nested reaction from those of the first round within the one tube in a manner that allows them to be introduced into the amplification mix when required without opening the tube. For example, nested reaction reagents have been suspended in modified pipette tips within the reaction tube (26) or dried in the lid, stabilized in a trehalose matrix (34). These procedures have their disadvantages. Annealing temperature-differentiated nested reactions can produce nonspecific amplification products from the activity of the outer primers during the nested amplification cycles. Physical devices used to separate the nested reaction reagents can be awkward and complicated to use, and although overcoming contamination of the second nested reaction, increase the risk of contamination from other sources while preparing and dispensing the reactions.
Additional complexity results from the increased genome variation within RNA viruses caused by the lack of genomic error correction during replication. Even focusing on the more conserved, functionally constrained regions rarely eliminates sequence diversity among strains at the primer target sites. The broad specificity for all strains required in investigative methods usually requires either separate amplification reactions specific for each strain type or the inclusion of a cocktail of primers that encompass the known primer target variation in one reaction.
We describe here a very simple method for performing single-tube nested-PCR amplification wherein the nested reaction reagents are located in the cap as a "hanging drop" to be introduced by centrifugation after the first-round RT-PCR amplification step. Walsh et al. have recently reported a similar method to detect respiratory syncytial virus, but only the two amplification reactions are included, with the preliminary RT step being performed separately (31). In the method reported here all three steps are included in the one tube. Further, the present study presents "universal" inner and outer primer cocktails designed from the GenBank-registered sequences of NLV (types 1 and 2), SLV, and astrovirus strains, and the component titrations used to optimize the method for the four viruses. Genome regions similar to those already published were targeted so that sequence comparison of future positives could be made with published strain genotypes (1, 25, 35). Universality of the primer sets was obtained by use of a combination of multiple primers and primers with mixed bases. To evaluate the method, RNA extracts of known positive material, 197 randomly chosen fecal samples from symptomatic children and adults, and 122 samples from 12 suspected outbreaks were examined for evidence of viral presence.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical samples. Fecal samples were obtained from outbreaks notified to health authorities within South Australia or were randomly selected from specimens routinely submitted for microbiological testing to the Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science (IMVS), and Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Women's and Children's Hospital (WCH), both in Adelaide, Australia. The former (IMVS) represents samples collected from diarrheal cases, both pediatric and adult, presenting to community medical practices, whereas the latter (WCH) represents samples collected from diarrheal cases presenting to a pediatric hospital.
RNA extraction. A 100-µl aliquot of a 10% fecal suspension in Dulbecco phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) (7) was extracted by using the Qiagen RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, with RLT buffer, to obtain 50 µl of RNA sample.
Primer design. From alignments of complete and large partial sequences of genomes obtained from GenBank for NLV-1, NLV-2, SLV, and astrovirus constructed by using GeneBase 1.0 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium), primers were chosen to target four nonoverlapping sites suitable for nested amplification. The polymerase-encoding and the capsid-encoding regions were chosen for the caliciviruses (NLV-1, NLV-2, and SLV) and the astrovirus, respectively, based on a previously published sequence to enable comparative analysis (1, 30, 35). Using both primers with mixed bases and additional variant primers, primer cocktails accommodating all known variation at the target site were selected and manufactured (Table 1). More primers were required to cover the published target sequence diversity among strains for NLV-1 and SLV than was necessary for NLV-2 and astrovirus. The complete cocktail of primers for each outer and inner primer pair were then used together for each of the four amplifications targeting the four viruses.
|
After a number of RT and PCR enzyme combinations (see Results) were tested, the final method details were determined to be as follows. A separate reaction was performed for each of the four virus types, each containing the complete set of outer and inner primers for each virus, as listed in Table 1. The primary RT-PCR step was based on the Titan One Tube RT-PCR System (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Basel, Switzerland), modified to facilitate the second amplification reaction. The primary RT-PCR mix contained (i) 5 µl of Titan 5x PCR buffer that contains MgCl2 (1.5 mM final concentration), (ii) 200 µM concentrations of each dNTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.), (iii) 5 mM dithiothreitol (Titan), (iv) 10 U of RNase inhibitor (Ambion, Inc., Austin, Tex.), (v) 2 pmol of each forward and reverse outer primer (Table 1), (vi) 1 µl of enzyme mix (Titan), and (vii) 2.5 µl of RNA extract in a final aqueous volume of 25 µl and was overlaid with paraffin oil. The secondary PCR mix (25 µl) containing (i) 2.5 µl of GeneAmp 10x PCR Buffer II (Applied Biosystems, Inc. [ABI], Foster City, Calif.) and 5.5 mM MgCl2 (ABI) to yield 3.5 mM MgCl2 during secondary amplification, (ii) 200 µM concentrations of each dNTP, (iii) 10 pmol of each forward and reverse inner primer (Table 1), and (iv) 1.25 U of AmpliTaq Gold (ABI) was located in the cap. In practice, to reduce contamination risk, enzyme-reagent mixes were made and dispensed in a "no DNA/RNA" clean room, and the PCR tubes were closed before transfer to a second clean room for the addition of the RNA sample into the primary RT-PCR mix under the oil. Only each respective sample and PCR tube were open at any one time. Using a PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, Mass.), primary RT-PCR amplification consisted of first-strand cDNA synthesis at 50°C for 30 min, immediately followed by denaturation (94°C for 2 min) and 40 cycles of amplification (94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 45 s) without a heated lid. A final incubation (68°C for 5 min) was included to ensure that all amplification products were full length, and the tubes were then held at 12°C. After centrifugation at
8,000 x g for 15 s to combine the primary and nested amplification mixes (final volume, 50 µl) under the oil, the tubes were returned to the thermocycler for the nested amplification. The tubes were never left overnight between the two amplification cycles. Amplification conditions identical to that for the primary amplification were used except that the preamplification denaturation at 94°C was extended to 10 min to activate the AmpliTaq Gold.
After completion of the amplification, 10 µl of the amplification product was electrophoresed in 2% agarose (analytical grade; Promega Corp, Madison, Wis.) in 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0). Bands were visualized by staining with 0.25 mg of ethidium bromide/liter and then inspected under UV light. The amplicon product size was estimated by mobility comparison with 500 ng of HpaII-digested pUC19 DNA marker (GeneWorks, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia). Products of the predicted size were verified by sequencing in both forward and reverse directions by using the PRISM Ready Reaction DyeDeoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing Big Dye II Kit (ABI), after the amplicons had been purified by using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Sequencing reactions were purified by using isopropanol precipitation according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and DNA sequencing was performed on a 3700 DNA sequence analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequence alignments, error correction, and similarity analysis (unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages [UPGMA]) were performed by using GeneBase 1.0.
Controls. For each of the four viruses, positive RNA extracts were diluted to 10 times the titrated amplification endpoint and then stored as frozen aliquots to be used in each assay as a positive control. Two "no RNA" water controls were included in every assay batch: one inoculated when the reagents were dispensed and one inoculated after the RNA extracts had been added. In addition, all extracts were tested for inhibition in a separate amplification reaction spiked with 2.5 µl of an NLV-2-positive sample extract, diluted to 10 times the titrated amplification endpoint. If inhibition was detected, the sample was repeat tested at a 1:10 dilution or greater until inhibition could not be detected. The sample extract was then retested for the presence of calicivirus and astrovirus at that dilution.
Stability at -70°C. An RNA extract from a known NLV-2-positive sample was divided into aliquots and frozen at -70°C. The titrated nested RT-PCR endpoint of the fresh extract was 10-4. Twelve sets of PCR tubes were dispensed with outer and inner amplification reagents as described above, and the tubes were stored at -70°C. Each month for 12 months an NLV-2 RNA aliquot and a set of PCR tubes were thawed, and the RNA aliquot was diluted serially to 10-5. Each 10-fold dilution, plus negative controls, was then inoculated into the thawed PCR tubes and amplified as normal to determine the nested RT-PCR endpoint.
Enzyme immunoassays. The presence of rotavirus and adenovirus was detected by using an in-house enzyme immunoassay on 50 µl of a 10% fecal suspension in phosphate-buffered saline that was clarified by centrifugation (1,000 x g for 5 min) (15).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nested amplification step. The efficiency of the nested amplification step after the primary RT-PCR was similarly determined. Expand High Fidelity PCR System enzyme mix (Roche), AmpliTaq (ABI), or AmpliTaq Gold were tested as the enzyme in the nested reagent mix in the single-tube RT-PCR with serially diluted NLV-2 RNA. Nested product was obtained at lower template dilutions when AmpliTaq Gold was used compared with the other two (data not shown).
A typical amplification of serially diluted NLV-2 RNA from both single and nested RT-PCR is presented in Fig. 1. Typically, a 100-fold increase, but occasionally a 1,000-fold increase, of sensitivity was observed with the addition of the nested step. The nested RT-PCR yielded products from both outer and inner primers when the number of target templates was high. It was also common to obtain a third intermediate product as well, the result of amplification with an outer and inner primer pair. At a high dilution, near the endpoint dilution, where target templates were few, only the second amplification product was visible.
|
Comparison with two-tube nested RT-PCR. Although the high contamination risk of two-tube nested RT-PCR was thought to preclude the technique from routine diagnostic use, a comparison was performed to determine the relative sensitivity of the "hanging-drop" single-tube nested method with traditional two-tube nested amplification. Using fresh 10-fold serial dilutions of an RNA extract from a sample containing astrovirus, the sensitivity was compared in 12 replicates, with no more than four replicates being tested on any one day. Both methods gave an identical sensitivity with 10 of the replicates, and each outperformed the other by one 10-fold dilution for one replicate each. In addition, extracts from 12 samples known to contain NLV-2 were similarly tested. Identical sensitivity was obtained with six of the samples, and each method outperformed the other by one dilution in three extracts. Therefore, the mean sensitivity of the two nested amplification methods is equivalent.
Stability at -70°C. The amplification endpoint dilution with freshly extracted RNA and nonfrozen reagents was 10-4. The identical amplification endpoint was obtained after both RNA and dispensed reagents were frozen for periods of 1 to 12 months, indicating that no loss of reagent potency occurred during this time.
Clinical evaluation. A clinical evaluation method was used to examine fecal samples from both outbreak and sporadic diarrheal cases. Twelve outbreaks were reported between April 1999 and February 2001, resulting in 122 samples being collected for testing. A causative agent was detected in 10 of the outbreaks; NLV-2 was detected in 8 outbreaks, and NLV-1 and rotavirus were detected in 1 outbreak each. (Table 2). In one other outbreak, only 1 of 28 specimens was rotavirus positive, but this was not considered to be the cause of the outbreak. No etiological agent could be determined for the remaining outbreak. In total, 70 of 122 (57%) of outbreak samples were positive, but 60 of 81 (74%) of specimens from the NLV-2 outbreaks were positive.
|
|
|
Insufficient product was produced in two NLV-2- and four astrovirus-positive samples (all from sporadic cases) to enable sequencing to be performed. The phylogenetic analysis of the remainder is presented in Fig. 3. The sequences obtained from all positive samples within each of the nine NLV-associated outbreaks were identical, supporting a causal association for each outbreak. The NLV-2 strains detected in both sporadic and outbreak samples were all closely related to the Camberwell strain, with one exception (sporadic) which was more similar to the Bristol and Lordsdale strains. The sole outbreak-associated NLV-1 strain was related to the Southampton strain. The astrovirus strains were predominantly genotype 1 (16 with identical sequence) and less frequently genotypes 2 and 3. A cluster of four strains (represented by A63253 and A76087) were unrelated to currently well-characterized genotypes. The SLV strains, although fewer in number, were much more diverse and related to the Manchester, London, and Plymouth strains. One strain (S976355) appeared to be novel.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The optimized higher concentration of second-round "nested" primers compared to that for first round primers, in order to preferentially favor the formation of nested product during nested amplification, has been reported elsewhere (26).
Primer homology. An additional advantage was recognized when fecal extracts from some of the sporadic cases were tested. It was occasionally observed that only product from outer primers or only intermediate-length product from an inner and outer primer pair was generated after nested amplification, implying that some primers had failed to bind and prime a true nested amplification. Such samples may have been erroneously reported as negative by a nonnested RT-PCR method. Exhaustive attempts had been made to design universal primer sets for each virus. However, because of the frequency with which mutational substitutions can be introduced into the genome during replication, the primer target sequences in strains will continue to change. The sequencing of the primer target regions within these variant new strains and the incorporation of additional target sequence variation into the primer sets will ensure the spectrum of detectable strain variability remains broad.
Clinical samples. That 9 of the 12 outbreaks examined were caused by NLV is a clear indication of the importance of monitoring for this virus in outbreak samples and is consistent with published reports that NLV is the most common cause of gastroenteritis outbreaks (6, 10, 12, 16, 21).
In the samples from sporadic cases, the high prevalence of rotavirus observed in cases presenting to the hospital compared to those presenting to the community health centers, with the opposite true for astrovirus, was unexpected. The latter high prevalence of astrovirus and low prevalence of rotavirus in cases presenting to community health centers was not seasonal or age related, based on the small sample size reported here. Given that both groups ultimately represent community-acquired infection, a possible explanation for differing prevalence rates is that although astrovirus infection is common in the community, the disease severity is such that patients are managed by their local health practitioners (32). In comparison, rotavirus infection may be more severe, and patients are more likely to require hospitalization. The high prevalence of rotavirus as a cause of severe gastroenteritis is well documented (9, 11, 33), and the increasing recognition of the role of calicivirus and astrovirus has been reported (13, 16, 27, 28), with astrovirus commonly being associated with a less severe illness. High prevalence rates for astrovirus have also been previously reported, but usually in regions where unsanitary living conditions are common (5, 18). However, published surveys are typically hospital based, which may bias the prevalence rates toward agents that cause more severe symptoms. In a study of outbreaks of gastroenteritis in U.S. daycare centers, astrovirus was implicated in 6 of 81 (7%) of outbreaks, and 52% of infected children were asymptomatic. Both prevalence the rate and the symptom severity were higher in children under 12 months of age (20). Such a finding suggests that disease severity in symptomatic astrovirus infections may be less severe.
In this survey, a viral etiological agent was detected in 43% of samples. Based on the presence of a first-round product compared to only the nested product as a crude comparison of single-round amplification and nested amplification, the use of nested amplification in this survey more than doubled the detection rates for calicivirus and astrovirus. This finding suggests that published prevalence rates, which are commonly based on normal nonnested amplification methods, significantly underestimate the actual rate of viral carriage. Finally, the present study suggests the frequent presence of a range of viruses in patients with gastroenteritis but whether they are causally related is unclear. A prospective case control study of hospital- and community-acquired diarrhea by these methods is currently being performed in order to investigate the association with disease.
The benefit of sequence-based phylogenetic analysis was evident in this study. Sequence identity among strains detected in the outbreaks confirmed a causal association. The high level of sequence similarity detected in NLV-2 strains from both outbreak and sporadic episodes suggests that a single dominant epidemic strain is currently circulating within the community examined here and most likely being disseminated by direct or indirect human-to-human spread. Strains of the same clonal origin, based on high sequence similarity, have been reported to have attained dominance in both the United States and Europe during 1995 and 1996 (24). Interestingly, the domination was reported to be short-lived, with a greater variety of NLV strains again being detected during the following season. Whether a similar loss of domination, as evidenced by increasing sequence diversity among detected strains causing infection, occurs in this community remains to be seen. In contrast, the SLV strains appear to be much more genetically diverse, although the number of strains detected is small. This suggests that the transmission routes and origin of such strains is more diverse. A level of strain clonality is also evident among the astrovirus strains, with identical genotype 1 sequence in 38% of the astrovirus strains detected.
In summary, a novel, but very simple and robust nested RT-PCR method has been successfully evaluated for four clinically relevant viruses causing gastroenteritis. The sensitivity and broad reactivity of this approach is suggested by the high rates of viral detection in fecal samples from 10 outbreaks and from an uncontrolled survey of sporadic infection. The method will be useful for detecting these viruses in both sporadic and outbreak gastroenteritis but may also be applicable to the testing of food and environmental samples either implicated in outbreaks or thought to be contaminated and pose an infectious risk. The additional sensitivity obtained from the nested amplification would be especially useful in such specimens, where virion numbers can be very low. A higher than expected prevalence rate for astrovirus was detected in fecal samples from nonhospital sources, which requires further examination with a comprehensive prospective controlled study of community-acquired gastroenteritis to properly assess comparative prevalence rates and disease severity.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|