Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2002, p. 4536-4543, Vol. 40, No. 12
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4536-4543.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139,1 Zoological Pathology Program, University of Illinois, Maywood, Illinois 60153,2 John G. Shedd Aquarium, Chicago, Illinois 60605,4 Dolphin Quest, Oahu, Hawaii 96795,5 Department of Molecular Genetics, The Forsyth Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 021153
Received 14 June 2002/ Returned for modification 18 August 2002/ Accepted 30 August 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gastric ulcers have been reported in cetaceans for several decades (8, 33, 37, 38). Parasitic infections have been associated with some lesions, but in other cases no clearly defined etiologies have been identified. We previously described a novel urease-positive Helicobacter sp. cultured from the main stomachs of stranded Atlantic white-sided dolphins that died on the beach in Cape Cod, Mass., and a beluga whale from Mystic Aquarium, Conn. (23, 24). Since then, additional strains of this species were cultured from the feces of a Pacific white-sided dolphin, and an Atlantic bottlenose dolphin from various aquaria in the United States (23). Based on morphological, biochemical, and growth characteristics, as well as 16S rRNA gene analysis, the bacteria are classified as a Helicobacter sp. for which we propose the name Helicobacter cetorum sp. nov.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summary of the five cetaceans, with culture and PCR results for Helicobacter infection presented by animal number and sample site
|
Biochemical characterization of bacterial isolates. To further characterize the bacterial isolates, biochemical and phenotypic tests commonly employed to characterize helicobacters were performed using a previously described protocol (21, 26).
DNA extraction and PCR analysis from gastric fluids and fecal samples. Fecal samples and gastric fluids for PCR analysis were collected from the three collection animals (MIT 00-7128, MIT 01-5903, and MIT 01-6202). The gastric fluid was collected by endoscopy by using a CF-140L Video colonoscope measuring 168 cm (Olympus America, Melville, N.Y.) and divided into aliquots in individual dram vials. The endoscope and its channels were rinsed sequentially in dilute chlorhexidine, 70% alcohol, and water between each sampling. The fecal samples were collected as described above, and the samples were placed in empty sterile tubes. DNA was extracted from the fecal samples and gastric fluids with a modified Mini QIAamp DNA kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, Calif.). The DNA extraction and PCR was done according to a previously described protocol (10, 23).
DNA extraction and PCR analysis from cultured bacteria. DNA was extracted from cultured bacteria with the High-Pure PCR template preparation kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.). The Helicobacter sp.-specific primer pair C97 and C05 was used to generate 16S rRNA gene amplicons of 1,200 bp (Table 2) (17, 23). Then, 10 µl of the DNA preparation was used for PCR. The PCR mixture (100 µl) contained 1x Taq polymerase buffer, 0.5 µM concentrations of each of the two primers, 200 µM concentrations of each deoxynucleotide, and 200 µg of bovine serum albumin/ml, and 2.5 µl of Taq polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was also added. Amplification conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 58°C for 2 min, and elongation at 72°C for 3 min. Thirty-five cycles were completed before a final elongation step at 72°C for 8 min. A 15-µl aliquot of the PCR product was examined by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel separation matrix. The DNA was stained with ethidium bromide, and viewed under a UV light by using the Bio-Rad Gel Pack (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. PCR primers used
|
Amplification of 16S rRNA cistrons by PCR and purification of PCR products from cultured bacteria. The 16S rRNA cistrons from the gastric mucosa culture isolates (MIT 99-5656 and MIT 99-5657) and fecal culture isolates (MIT 00-7128, MIT 01-5903, and MIT 01-6202) were amplified with universal bacterial primers F24 and F25 (Table 2) (10). Hot start PCR was performed in thin-walled tubes with a Perkin-Elmer 9700 Thermocycler. Next, 1 µl of the DNA template was added to a reaction mixture (50 µl, final volume) containing 20 pmol of each primer, 40 nmol of deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 1 U of Taq 2000 polymerase (Stratagene) in buffer containing Taqstart antibody (Sigma). In a hot-start protocol, samples were preheated at 95°C for 8 min, followed by amplification under the following conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 45 s, annealing at 60°C 45 s, and elongation for 1.5 min with an additional 5 s for each cycle. A total of 30 cycles were performed, followed by a final elongation step at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR amplicons were examined by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel. DNA was stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under short-wavelength UV light. PCR products were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen).
16S rRNA gene sequencing and data analysis. Purified DNA from PCR was sequenced with an ABI Prism cycle-sequencing kit (BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase FS [Perkin-Elmer]). The primers used for sequencing were previously described (10, 16). Quarter-dye chemistry was used with 80 µM concentrations of primers and 1.5 µl of PCR product in a final volume of 20 µl. Cycle sequencing was performed with an ABI 9700 DNA sequencer with 25 cycles of denaturation at 96°C for 10 s and annealing and extension at 60°C for 4 min. Sequencing reactions were run on an ABI 377 DNA sequencer. Sequence data were entered into RNA, a program set for data entry, editing, sequence alignment, secondary structure comparison, similarity matrix generation, and dendrogram construction for 16S rRNA in Microsoft QuickBasic for use with PC computers and were aligned as previously described (31). Our database contains >1,000 sequences obtained in our laboratory and >500 retrieved from GenBank. Dendrograms were constructed by the neighbor-joining method (36).
Electron microscopy. Strain MIT 99-5665, which was also isolated from the same animal as type strain MIT 99-5656, was examined by electron microscopy by previously described methods (Fig. 1) (24).
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Transmission electron micrograph of novel cetacean microaerobic bacteria isolated from Atlantic white-sided dolphin. It is a fusiform Helicobacter sp., with the proposed name H. cetorum, with bipolar flagella. Bar, 0.5 µm (24).
|
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The GenBank accession numbers for the strains used in the present study are listed in Table 1 (see also Fig. 4). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of H. cetorum MIT 99-5656 was deposited in GenBank under accession number AF292378.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Dendrogram depicting the phylogenetic location of the H. cetorum constructed on the basis of the 16S rRNA sequence similarity values. The sequences from the Atlantic white-sided dolphins (MIT 99-5656 and MIT 99-5657), beluga whale (MIT 00-7128), a Pacific white-sided dolphin (MIT 01-5903), and an Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (MIT 01-6202) are identified with arrows. The number in parentheses after the MIT accession number is the GenBank accession. The scale bar is equal to a 3% difference in nucleotide sequences, as determined by measuring the lengths of the horizontal lines connecting two species.
|
|
|
|---|
Microaerobic culture and biochemical characterization of the novel Helicobacter sp. Helicobacter sp. was cultured from the glandular mucosa in two stranded animals (MIT 99-5656 and MIT 99-5657) and from the feces of the three collection animals: the beluga whale (MIT 00-7128), the Pacific white-sided dolphin (MIT 01-5903), and an Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (MIT 01-6202) (9, 23). Cultures on solid media were visible after incubation for 2 to 4 weeks under microaerobic conditions as a thin, spreading film. Once pure cultures of the fusiform phenotype were isolated, subsequent passages yielded growth on blood agar plates by 2 to 5 days at 37°C. By light microscopy, the morphological phenotypes of the bacteria were all gram negative, motile, and fusiform. Table 3 lists the biochemical features of the five isolates of the Helicobacter sp. from the cetaceans compared to other gastric Helicobacter species. All isolates were urease, catalase, and oxidase positive. The novel Helicobacter isolates were negative for nitrate reduction, alkaline phosphatase hydrolysis, and indoxyl acetate hydrolysis. All isolates grew under microaerophilic conditions at 37 and 42°C but not at 25°C. All isolates were susceptible to cephalothin (Table 3). However, isolates collected from the wild stranded Atlantic white-sided dolphins were sensitive or intermediate to nalidixic acid, but the isolates from the three captive animals were all resistant.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Biochemical characteristics of cetacean H. cetorum compared to other gastric Helicobacter spp.
|
PCR analysis of the novel Helicobacter isolate and RFLP. The five culture isolates (two from gastric tissue and three from fecal samples) yielded a 1,200-bp PCR product with Helicobacter-specific primers (Fig. 2). The matching patterns observed for all five bacterial 16S rRNA gene PCR products subjected to RFLP analysis with HhaI and AluI digestion indicates that the five cetacean helicobacter types are the same. Fragment sizes were as predicted by 16S rRNA sequence data (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (106K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining demonstrating 1,200-bp PCR target sequence with Helicobacter-specific primers (arrow). Lane 1, reagent control; lane 2, Helicobacter-positive control (H. hepaticus); lanes 3 and 4, MIT 99-5656 and MIT 99-5657 represent DNA from the main stomach of stranded Atlantic white-sided dolphins; lane 5, MIT 00-7128 DNA from beluga whale feces; lane 6, MIT 01-5903 DNA from Pacific white-sided dolphin feces; lane 7, MIT 01-6202 DNA from Atlantic bottlenose dolphin feces.
|
![]() View larger version (113K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. PCR-RFLP patterns of the 1,200-bp species-specific Helicobacter PCR product from cultures. Lanes 1 through 5 show results for DNA digested by the restriction enzymes HhaI and AluI as indicated. Lanes 1 and 2, MIT 99-5656 and MIT 99-5657 DNA from Atlantic white-sided dolphin stomach tissues; lanes 3 to 5, MIT 00-7128 (beluga whale), MIT 01-5903 (Pacific white-sided dolphin), and MIT 01-6201 (Atlantic bottlenose dolphin) DNA, respectively, obtained from fecal isolates.
|
Electron microscopy. The bacteria isolated from the wild, stranded Atlantic white-sided dolphin (MIT 99-5656) measured 0.6 by 4 µm and are slightly spiral with bipolar sheathed flagella that are laterally located at the end of the bacteria (Fig. 1) (24).
Histopathology. The gastric biopsy from the glandular main stomach (second gastric chamber) of the Pacific white-sided dolphin (MIT 01-5903) revealed two, small, discrete aggregates of lymphocytes with few admixed plasma cells in the lamina propria and mild compression and distortion of the surrounding glands (Fig. 5). Scattered lymphocytes and plasma cells were noted throughout adjacent lamina propria. Multifocal glands both immediately adjacent and distant to the lymphoid aggregates contained rare to numerous, up to 4 µm long, ca. 1 µm wide, loosely coiled spiral bacteria evident on both H&E- and Steiner-stained slides (Fig. 6). These lesions mimic the lesions previously described in the main stomach of stranded dolphins (24). The biopsy of the nonglandular stomach (first gastric chamber) was within normal limits.
![]() View larger version (160K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Photomicrograph of main stomach (antrum) tissue of a Pacific white-sided dolphin (MIT 01-5903). Mucosal erosion with mononuclear cell (primarily lymphocytic) infiltrates in the lamina propria, with some formation of pseudofollicles (H&E staining; magnification, x25).
|
![]() View larger version (125K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Photomicrograph of the main stomach (antrum) tissue of a Pacific white-sided dolphin (MIT 01-5903). Numerous ca. 2-µm by 5- to 8-µm curved and spiral argyrophilic bacteria are evident in the surface mucous layer (Steiner staining; magnification, x250).
|
|
|
|---|
The PCR results for the feces and gastric fluid from the three captive cetaceans were positive for H. cetorum as were fecal cultures. It has been reported that direct detection of Helicobacter spp. in feces can be limited by fecal inhibitors, such as bile, which may lead to false-negative results (25, 27, 28). The ability to culture the bacteria from the feces suggests that fecal-oral transmission may be important in the epizootiology of this infection in cetaceans. In other species, such as H. pylori, fecal shedding, as well as waterborne routes of transmission, have been postulated as modes of transmission (1, 12, 30; A. P. West, A. P., M. R. Miller, and D. S. Tompkins, Letter, J. Clin. Pathol. 43:609, 1990). Results from ferrets that have been used as an animal model to study the mode of transmission of gastric helicobacters support the concept of fecal-oral transmission (3). These studies suggest that hypochlorhydria and rapid gastrointestinal transit time in Helicobacter mustelae-infected ferrets is an important factor that promotes fecal shedding (15, 18, 19).
All three captive dolphins had different clinical presentations. The beluga whale (MIT 00-7128) manifested intermittent inappetance, and lethargy and endoscopy revealed esophageal and forestomach ulcers. The clinical history of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (MIT 01-6202) included chronic regurgitation with evidence of gastric inflammation based on cytology of gastric fluid. Endoscopic examination of the bottlenose dolphin revealed esophageal and forestomach ulcers. The main stomach (second chamber) was not visualized in either of these two animals. The Pacific white-sided dolphin (MIT 01-5903) had a clinical history of chronic regurgitation and weight loss. The endoscopic examination of the Pacific white-sided dolphin revealed linear erosions of the esophageal mucosa, which were attributed to reflux of gastric juices subsequent to chronic regurgitation. Although chronic regurgitation is historically attributed to abnormal behavior, the histopathological findings, including the presence of spiral bacteria in glandular tissue in these dolphins, are consistent with those associated with gastric Helicobacter infection in other species and provide an alternative hypothesis to clinical signs displayed in these animals (13, 14).
Cetaceans have a three-chambered stomach composed of the nonglandular forestomach and the glandular main and pyloric stomachs (22, 34, 37). In wild and captive cetaceans, ulcers have been reported in both the nonglandular and the glandular stomachs (37, 38). Technical limitations usually prevent routine endoscopic examination of the second chamber (i.e., the main stomach) in cetaceans. Our previous studies indicated that helicobacters colonize the glandular main and pyloric stomach in dolphins but do not colonize the nonglandular forestomach (24).
Similar to cetaceans, pigs have a well-demarcated glandular and nonglandular portion in their stomach (7, 11). In swine, gastric ulcers are identified in the nonglandular pars esophagea (7). Although the etiopathogenesis of gastric ulcer disease in pigs remains unclear, investigators have recently suggested that gastric lesions in the nonglandular stomach in pigs may be related to the presence of helicobacters in the glandular stomach (2, 32, 35).
Since the first report of a novel gastric helicobacter in dolphins in 1999, Helicobacter spp. have been detected by PCR analysis in more than 30 different wild and captive dolphins around the United States. Wild species include Atlantic bottlenose dolphins, Atlantic white-sided dolphins, and common dolphins. Captive species include Atlantic bottlenose dolphins, Pacific white-sided dolphins, and a beluga whale. In several of these cases, RFLP analysis of the Helicobacter sp.-specific PCR products was performed, and the patterns generated were similar to the patterns seen with H. cetorum (C. G. Harper and J. G. Fox, unpublished data) (23, 24). Most of the animals with known clinical histories had signs consistent with gastrointestinal disease. Clinical signs varied, but each case included at least one of the following: gastric lesions or ulcers noted on endoscopy, lethargy, inappetance, or regurgitation. To date, we are unable to conclude that H. cetorum is the etiological agent responsible for the development of gastric ulcer disease in cetaceans due to the limited access to gastric biopsies for detailed histopathology, and the inability to fulfill Koch's postulates in cetaceans. However, based on culture and histopathological analysis of inflamed gastric tissue of cetaceans, H. cetorum appears to be associated with gastritis. Analysis of additional animals and eradication of H. cetorum in infected animals, with subsequent remission of gastric disease and clinical signs, are necessary for establishing whether H. cetorum plays a role in gastric ulcer disease in cetaceans.
The proposed species H. cetorum differs from named species by several different criteria. First, it is the first named species isolated from aquatic mammals. Second, unlike other gastric Helicobacter spp., H. cetorum is negative for alkaline phosphatase and intermediate in susceptibility to nalidixic acid. Finally, the lateral location of the flagella in H. cetorum is seen only with one other helicobacter, H. mustelae, whose rod-shaped morphology easily distinguishes it from H. cetorum, as well as from other gastric helicobacters (29).
Description of Helicobacter cetorum. sp. nov. Helicobacter cetorum (ce.to'rum) L. plur. gen. n. cetorum of cetaceans (whales, dolphins). Cells are fusiform with no periplasmic fibers and measure 0.6 by 4 µm. Bipolar single flagella account for the motility of the bacterium. Older cultures contain large coccoid forms. Growth on agar plates appears as a thin, spreading film; distinct colonies are present. Microaerobic growth occurs at 37 and 42°C but not at 25°C. Brucella agar plates containing 1% glycine do not support growth. No growth is seen under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Cells are positive for urease, catalase, oxidase, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activities. Tests for indoxyl acetate hydrolysis, nitrate reduction, and alkaline phosphatase hydrolysis are negative. The bacteria have intermediate sensitivity to nalidixic acid but are sensitive to cephalothin. Cells were isolated from the stomachs and feces of adult captive cetaceans. The type strain, MIT 99-5656, from an Atlantic white-sided dolphin has been deposited with the American Type Culture Collection as ATCC BAA-540 and the beluga isolate (MIT 00-7128) has been deposited as ATCC BAA-429.
We thank Hans G. Trüper for advice in naming the novel helicobacter, H. cetorum. We also thank the Marine Mammal teams from the John G. Shedd Aquarium, Dolphin Quest, the Mystic Aquarium, and the New England Aquarium for their sample collection and consistent support. We also acknowledge Jay Sweeney, Jeffrey Boehm, Laurence Dunn, Charlie Potter, and Marie Pinkerton for their expertise and collaboration.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»