Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2002, p. 4666-4669, Vol. 40, No. 12
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4666-4669.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242,1 The Jones Group/JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa 52317,3 Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111,4 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, China Medical College Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan2
Received 27 June 2002/ Returned for modification 5 August 2002/ Accepted 25 September 2002
|
|
|---|
4 µg/ml), 37 (95%) were high level resistant (MIC,
16 µg/ml). These isolates were also cross resistant to the newer fluoroquinolones, including levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and garenoxacin (BMS 284756). Sitafloxacin was most active against these ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP isolates with MICs for 67% of the isolates being
2 µg/ml. The molecular epidemiology of these multiresistant isolates was investigated by automated ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Ribotyping identified 18 different strains among the 39 ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP isolates. The majority (67%) of these isolates were contained in six ribogroups which were further confirmed by PFGE. The distribution of the six major strains of ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP within Taiwan included one (ribogroup 255.3-PFGE type E) with a nationwide distribution and several institution-specific strains. Interhospital cooperation appears necessary, with strict infection control practices coupled with restriction of fluoroquinolone and extended-spectrum ß-lactam use to control both the major epidemic strain and the more diverse strains observed within individual institutions. |
|
|---|
Paterson et al. (10) described the epidemiology of ciprofloxacin resistance and its relationship to ESBL production among K. pneumoniae strains. They found 15 (18%) of 83 ESBL-KP isolates having concomitant resistance to ciprofloxacin. Furthermore, they reported that 33% of ESBL-KP strains from Taiwan were ciprofloxacin resistant. An epidemiological link between ESBL production and ciprofloxacin resistance among Klebsiella spp. was also reported by Brisse et al. (4). Clearly the spread of K. pneumoniae with resistance to both quinolones and broad-spectrum ß-lactams would severely limit treatment choices. Although earlier data suggested that ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP may be a problem in Taiwan (10), the sample was not representative of the entire nation. We have addressed this potential problem in the context of a nationwide survey of ESBL-KP in Taiwan (12) and describe herein the frequency and molecular epidemiology of ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP in that country.
|
|
|---|
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
MIC results for selected antimicrobials were determined by broth microdilution as defined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (8, 9). The ESBL phenotype was confirmed by using the Etest ESBL strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) with a reduction of
3 log2 dilutions for either cefotaxime or ceftazidime by clavulanic acid (4 µg/ml) as a positive test according to criteria defined by the NCCLS (9). Isolates for which MICs of ciprofloxacin were >2 µg/ml were selected for additional testing with the following Etest strips: ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, garenoxacin (formerly BMS 284756 or T-3811), and sitafloxacin. Interpretive criteria for the marketed agents tested were those published by the NCCLS (9). Quality control was performed with Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. All results were within published control limits (9).
Ribotyping.
All isolates with resistance to ciprofloxacin (MIC,
4 µg/ml) were ribotyped with the RiboPrinter microbial characterization system (Qualicon, Inc., Wilmington, Del.) as described by Pfaller et al. (11). Briefly, this automated process included bacterial cell lysis, cleavage of DNA with the restriction enzyme EcoRI, size separation by gel electrophoresis, and modified Southern blotting. A pattern of the restriction fragments containing rRNA genetic information was created through hybridization with a chemiluminescently labeled DNA probe containing the rRNA operon (rrnB) from E. coli. The chemiluminescent patterns were then electronically imaged and stored in the computer. The ribotype pattern for each isolate was compared to other patterns in the database. The isolates were thereby characterized and assigned to a specific ribogroup based on both band position and signal intensity. Isolates were considered to belong to the same ribogroup if their ribotype patterns yielded a similarity coefficient of
0.93.
PFGE. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), as a second strain typing method, was used to confirm genetic relatedness of representative isolates within specific ribogroup clusters as described by Pfaller et al. (11). Whole chromosomal DNA in agarose was digested with SpeI, and the restriction fragments were separated in a CHEF DRII apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.). After electrophoresis, the gels were stained with ethidium bromide, illuminated under UV light, and photographed. All bands had to match exactly to classify isolates as indistinguishable. Patterns differing by one to three bands were designated as highly related subtypes. Isolates with more than six bands different were considered different PFGE types. Among isolates subjected to PFGE, none differed by four to six bands (possibly related). Isolates were designated nontypeable if repeated attempts to prepare DNA failed.
|
|
|---|
4 µg/ml). These 39 isolates were obtained from 14 hospitals including hospitals N02 (6 isolates), N03 (6 isolates), N04 (6 isolates), M02 (10 isolates), and M04 (2 isolates), and there was one isolate each from hospitals N09, M01, M03, M05, E01, and S01 to S04. The frequency of ciprofloxacin resistance among hospitals submitting more than five ESBL-KP strains was 6 of 9 isolates submitted from N03 (67%), 6 of 22 from N02 (27%), 1 of 5 from M03 (20%), 1 of 6 from E01 (17%), 10 of 100 from M02 (10%), and 1 of 23 from M01 (4%).
Antimicrobial susceptibility.
The MIC distribution of different quinolones for the 39 ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP isolates is shown in Table 1. Among the 39 isolates, 37 exhibited high-level ciprofloxacin resistance (MIC,
16 µg/ml). Cross-resistance between ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and gemifloxacin (resistant,
1 µg/ml), as well as garenoxacin (resistant,
8 µg/ml), was common. MICs of all of these agents were
4 µg/ml, and the MICs at which 50% of the isolates tested were inhibited were all
32 µg/ml. Sitafloxacin was the most active of the fluoroquinolones against these ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP isolates with MICs being
2 µg/ml for 67% of isolates (possible susceptibility).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. MIC distribution of different fluoroquinolones against 39 ESBL-KP isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin (MIC, 4 µg/ml)
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Geographic distribution and antimicrobial resistance profile of the six major molecular strain types of ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP in Taiwan
|
![]() View larger version (115K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. SpeI-digested PFGE gel photo of ESBL-KP isolates within ribogroup 255.3 in Taiwan. Lanes 1 and 17, molecular size markers of lambda DNA ladder (in kilobases). Isolates, except in lanes 2, 5, and 11, were resistant to ciprofloxacin. PFGE type E patterns are shown in lanes 7 to 10 and 12 to 16. The isolates represented in this gel are 123, 122, 154, 5, 6, 99, 102, 133, 140, 135, 112, 166, 218, 216, and 202 (lanes 2 to 16, respectively).
|
![]() View larger version (114K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. SpeI-digested PFGE gel photo of ESBL-KP isolates within ribogroups 746.6 (lanes 2 to 5), 96.3 (lanes 10 and 11), 109.3 (lanes 12 and 13), and 95.5 (lanes 14 and 15). Lanes 1 and 16, lambda ladder molecular mass standards (in kilobases). Isolates, except in lanes 2, 5, 6, and 7, were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Strains of four PFGE types are shown: type F (lanes 2 to 5), type J (lanes 10 and 11), type L (lanes 12 and 13), and type M (lanes 14 and 15). Isolates in lanes 8 and 9 represent unique PFGE types. The isolates represented in this gel are 7, 26, 58, 190, 8, 9, 155, 157, 158, 159, 208, 217, 136, and 147 (lanes 2 to 15, respectively).
|
The geographic distribution of ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP in Taiwan is striking and encompasses the entire country. The molecular typing studies indicate that the majority of the isolates with this multiresistant phenotype (ESBL and quinolone resistance) fall into one of six major molecular strain types. Furthermore, the clustering of these strain types indicates the presence of one epidemic strain with nationwide distribution (255.3-E) and other strains with more limited dissemination. Overall, the molecular and phenotypic data indicate the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant ESBL-KP in Taiwan that is likely the consequence of high utilization of quinolones coupled with breaks in local infection control practices. Additionally, one must also consider the fact that clonal spread of ESBL-KP without quinolone resistance has also been described previously for Taiwan (12), and thus, the spread of ESBLs alone may also play a role in the emergence of quinolone resistance in K. pneumoniae as has been suggested by Brisse et al. (4) and Yuan et al. (14). Similar to our findings, intra- and interhospital spread of ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP has been reported before (4, 10, 14).
Although molecular evidence for nationwide distribution of an epidemic clone of ciprofloxacin-resistant ESBL-KP isolates has been presented, it is notable that, in the hospital with the highest frequency of ciprofloxacin resistance among ESBL-KP isolates (N03 [67%]), no evidence of clonal spread was detected. This pattern is highly suggestive of the emergence of resistance within several different strains of the same species due to the pressure of local quinolone use rather than faulty infection control. Thus, the key to controlling this nationwide epidemic of multiresistant K. pneumoniae must involve (i) improved infection control in all Taiwanese hospitals and (ii) limiting quinolone and extended-spectrum ß-lactam usage to specific indications in an effort to minimize drug selection pressure.
In conclusion, emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant ESBL-KP was identified in Taiwan. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of isolates has identified a nationwide epidemic clone, as well as institution-specific strains and unique strains. Given the clinical importance and expanding indications of the quinolones in the treatment of serious infections, it is imperative that this expansion of resistant strains be limited. These findings suggest not only that control efforts must not be confined to individual hospitals but also that interhospital cooperation in ensuring rigorous infection control efforts be combined with restricted quinolone and extended-spectrum ß-lactam usage. The emergence of quinolone resistance among already broadly resistant K. pneumoniae (ESBL) highlights the importance of ongoing resistance surveillance at the local and national level.
This investigation was made possible by an education-research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. W.-L. Yu was a fellowship grant recipient of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»