Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2002, p. 330-334, Vol. 40, No. 2
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.2.330-334.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Infectious Disease Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec and Department of Medical Biology, Université Laval, Québec, Canada,1 Institute of Virology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands ,2 Hoffmann LaRoche, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom3
Received 23 February 2001/ Returned for modification 26 May 2001/ Accepted 3 November 2001
|
|
|---|
38.0°C plus one respiratory and one constitutional symptom) among otherwise healthy adults enrolled in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized oseltamivir treatment study. Combined nasal and pharyngeal swabs were collected at baseline for influenza cultures and picornavirus reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. In addition, acute- and convalescent-serum samples were obtained for serological studies of common respiratory pathogens. From a total of 719 subjects enrolled in the clinical trial within 36 h of the onset of symptoms, 475 (66%) had evidence of recent influenza A or B virus infections by means of culture and/or serological testing. Of the 244 remaining patients, 36 (15%) presented a seroconversion for at least one of the common respiratory viruses or atypical pathogens. An RT-PCR assay for the picornavirus 5" noncoding region (NCR) was positive in a subset of 15 (19%) of 78 patients with flu-like illnesses of undetermined etiology. Sequence analysis of the picornavirus 5" NCR amplicons revealed that 14 (93%) of them had greater homology to rhinoviruses, whereas 1 (7%) was related to enteroviruses. Interestingly, median total symptom scores and oral temperatures of picornavirus-positive patients (n = 15) and placebo-treated influenza virus-positive patients (n = 161) were similar over a 3-week period. We conclude that, among the influenza virus-negative preselected cases of this study, rhinoviruses were relatively frequent pathogens associated with important respiratory and systemic symptoms. |
|
|---|
(This work was presented in part at the Third International Symposium on Respiratory Viral Infections, 1 December 2000, St. Lucia, West Indies [abstr. P4].)
|
|
|---|
38°C with at least one respiratory symptom (cough, sore throat, or nasal congestion) and at least one constitutional symptom (headache, malaise, myalgia, sweat or chills, or fatigue). All patients were allowed to use symptomatic relief medication (acetaminophen) without restriction. Patients recorded their oral temperature and their symptom score, i.e., the presence and severity of all of the above symptoms except malaise on a four-point scale (0, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe) twice daily for up to 21 days. Nasal and pharyngeal swabs were collected at baseline and combined in the same viral transportation medium. The chilled viral transportation media were shipped within 24 h to a central laboratory where they were immediately frozen at -70°C. Acute (day 1)- and convalescent (day 21)-serum samples were also collected for serological testing. Virological and serological testing for influenza virus. The presence of influenza viruses was sought by culture and serology. For culture, tertiary cynomolgus monkey kidney cells were inoculated using 300 µl of nasopharyngeal swab eluates collected at baseline. Influenza virus was detected by a positive hemagglutination of turkey erythrocytes after a 7-day incubation period followed by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) subtyping using reference ferret antisera. Serological testing for influenza A and B virus was performed using an HAI assay. The antigens used at the National Reference Center, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, were influenza A/Auckland/10/97 (H3N2), A/Nanchang/933/95 (H3N2), A/Johannesburg/82/96 (H1N1), and B/Harbin/07/94. A seroconversion was defined by an increase of fourfold or more in HAI titers between acute- and convalescent-serum samples.
Serological testing for other respiratory pathogens. An exploratory examination of serum samples collected from the recruited population who did not have evidence of recent influenza virus infection by either culture or serology was carried out at the Erasmus University Hospital by the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). For the detection of immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, parainfluenza type 1 (PIV-1) PIV-3, and PIV-2, an IgA capture ELISA was used essentially as described previously for influenza A and B virus and RSV (3, 24). ELISA plates were coated with anti-human IgA antibodies and incubated with a 1:100 dilution of paired sera. Capture class-specific immunoglobulins were washed and then incubated with conserved viral antigens. The quantity of bound pathogen-specific IgA was measured following incubation with antigen-specific monoclonal antibodies labelled with horseradish peroxidase. The ratio of absorbance (450 nm) measurements of the convalescent samples to the acute samples was compared with a predefined threshold for seroconversion to each antigen. Detection of IgM-specific antibodies against Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Serion, Wurzburg, Germany) and Chlamydia pneumoniae (Medac, Hamburg, Germany) was performed using commercially available ELISA systems.
RT-PCR assay for picornaviruses. Presence of picornavirus RNA was sought in a subset of randomly selected patients from European countries who tested negative for influenza virus and other respiratory pathogens. Viral RNA was extracted from 140 µl of nasopharyngeal eluates by the use of the QIAmp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The RNA was eluted in 50 µl of Qiagen elution buffer. A one-step RT-PCR assay was developed to amplify a fragment of approximately 400 bp within the 5" NCR of Picornaviridae. Primers were selected from consensus regions of enterovirus and rhinovirus sequences retrieved from GenBank (see Results). The RT-PCR protocol was performed using the C-Therm Polymerase One-Step RT-PCR system (Boehringer Mannheim, Laval, Quebec, Canada), 20 µl of resuspended RNA eluate, 0.4 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 20 U of RNasin (Recombinant Ribonuclease Inhibitor; Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis.), 1.25% dimethyl sulfoxide, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and a 0.3 µM concentration of each of the 5" (5"-CAAGCACTTCTGTTTCCCCGG-3") and 3" (5"-GAAACACGGACACCCAAAGTA-3") primers. The cycling conditions were as follows: 30 min at 60°C and then 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C for 40 cycles, followed by a final extension step of 2 min at 72°C. Amplified products were run on an agarose gel before standard Southern blot hybridization with a 23-bp probe for rhinovirus (5"-GGCAGCCACGCAGGCTGGAACAC-3") labeled at its 3" end with digoxigenin (DIG Oligonucleotide labeling kit; Boehringer Mannheim). Hybridized products were revealed by chemiluminescence using the DIG Luminescent detection kit (Boehringer Mannheim). The sensitivity of the RT-PCR after gel electrophoresis and nonisotopic hybridization was estimated at 500 and 100 copies, respectively, using an RNA standard constructed by cloning an amplified rhinovirus product in the PCR 2.1 plasmid with the TA cloning kit (Invitrogen Corporation, San Diego, Calif.) followed by plasmid transcription with the RNA transcription kit (Stratagene Cloning Systems, La Jolla, Calif.). Because of the important homology between enteroviruses and rhinoviruses within the 5" NCR, positive RT-PCR products were further analyzed by DNA sequencing using a cycle sequencing kit (Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction; Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) and the same two PCR primers.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Overview of laboratory results in a treatment study of influenza-like illness with oseltamivir. *, adenovirus (n = 5), PIV (n = 5), RSV (n = 5), M. pneumoniae (n = 4), C. pneumoniae (n = 10), mixed infections (n = 7).
|
60% but <60% compared to the other group. Using this classification scheme, 14 (93.3%) of the 15 viral strains were identified as rhinoviruses due to a mean nucleotide homology varying from 60.6 to 75.9% compared to the eight rhinovirus control sequences versus a mean homology of 49.8 to 56.6% compared to the eight enterovirus control sequences. However, 1 (6.7%) of the 15 amplified strains gave a faint band after overnight hybridization with the rhinovirus probe and had mean nucleotide homologies of 66.4 and 59.0% compared to control enterovirus and rhinovirus sequences, respectively. Thus, on the basis of sequence analysis, this strain was identified as probable enterovirus.
![]() View larger version (90K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Detection of picornaviruses in nasopharyngeal swab eluates by RT-PCR followed by chemiluminescent hybridization. The upper panel represents the ethidium bromide-stained gel of amplified picornavirus products, whereas the lower panel represents the corresponding hybridization with the rhinovirus probe. Lanes: 1, 100-bp ladder; 2, blank; 3, negative nasopharyngeal sample; 4, positive nasopharyngeal sample; 5 to 13, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1,000, 2,500, 5,000, 10,000, and 25,000 copies of a rhinovirus plasmid, respectively; 14, enterovirus control isolate; 15, rhinovirus control isolate.
|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Median oral temperatures (A) and median total symptom scores (B) over time for 15 picornavirus-positive and 161 placebo-treated influenza virus-positive patients with influenza-like illnesses. Total symptom scores were calculated according to the presence and severity of seven symptoms (cough, sore throat, nasal congestion, headache, myalgia, sweat or chills, and fatigue) on a four-point scale (0, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe). All patients received no antivirals but were allowed to use symptomatic relief medication (acetaminophen).
|
|
|
|---|
The present study also provides useful information regarding the use of a clinical case definition for the diagnosis of influenza during flu outbreaks. Indeed, we found that two-thirds of the otherwise healthy adults enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled study of oseltamivir (20) had a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of influenza by either culture or serology. This illustrates the excellent positive predictive value of a simple case definition for influenza (fever
38°C with at least one respiratory and one constitutional symptom) at a time when influenza AH3N2 viruses were known to be circulating in a community during the 1997-to-1998 winter season. Our group (2) and others (19) have reported similar positive predictive values for influenza virus using slightly different case definitions. In these two studies, the combination of fever (above 38°C) and cough achieved the highest positive predictive value for influenza (close to 80%). Thus, during an influenza epidemic, physicians can theoretically rapidly diagnose influenza on clinical grounds in most adults with a typical flu-like syndrome and use this information to institute specific antiviral therapy. However, many factors may potentially limit the usefulness of this approach, such as the lack of an accurate surveillance system with prompt diffusion of the results; the recent use of antipyretics, which may mask the presence of fever; the age of the patients; and the circulating viral strain(s).
No viral and/or atypical pathogens were identified in a substantial proportion of our influenza virus-negative subjects with a flu-like episode (Fig. 1). Indeed, only 15% of the influenza virus-negative subjects presented a seroconversion for one of the common viral and/or atypical pathogens such as adenovirus, PIV, RSV, M. pneumoniae, and C. pneumoniae. Many reasons can explain the high percentage of undetermined infections in our study. First, suboptimal nonmolecular methods were used for the detection of most respiratory pathogens with the exception of picornaviruses. This may have been of particular importance for RSV which has been previously associated with flu-like syndromes in elderly adults (6). In that context, multiplex RT-PCR assays for many respiratory viruses have been recently developed and shown to be more rapid and sensitive than traditional culture or serological assays (2, 5, 7, 11, 22, 26). Second, we did not search for other viruses (for example, coronaviruses [18]) or bacteria that could have been involved in the flu-like episodes of our patients. Finally, we cannot exclude the presence of coinfections in our patients due to the absence of comprehensive molecular testing and the exclusion of influenza virus-positive samples for subsequent studies.
In summary, the use of a simple case definition during an oseltamivir clinical trial at a time when influenza was known to be circulating in the community was associated with a high positive predictive value for influenza in otherwise healthy adults. Rhinoviruses were common viral pathogens among influenza virus-negative patients with flu-like syndromes, and they were associated with a symptomatology similar to that of influenza viruses in those preselected subjects.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»