Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2002, p. 1044-1047, Vol. 40, No. 3
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.1044-1047.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
R.M. Alden Research Laboratory, UCLA/Santa Monica Medical Center, Santa Monica,1 Avian and Exotic Animal Hospital, San Diego, California2
Received 12 March 2001/ Returned for modification 1 June 2001/ Accepted 30 December 2001
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The lack of published data on the microbiology of odontogenic abscesses in rabbits has made interpretation of culture reports difficult, and the antibiotic treatment options remain unclear. Less-than-optimum specimen collection techniques that do not exclude normal gingival flora can produce ambiguous culture results. Additionally, because rabbits are coprophagic herbivores, cultures of molar pocket pus instead of the abscess capsule may grow organisms not generally considered to be oral pathogens in other mammals; members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroides fragilis group and environmental contaminants such as Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp. are often isolated from such specimens. Therapy directed against these organisms alone has frequently consisted of an aminoglycoside and has typically been ineffective. In addition, routine culture and identification of oral pathogens have often been unsuccessful (28, 29). And when mixed oral organisms are isolated from these specimens, culture reports of "oral flora isolated" may not preclude such pathogens as the Streptococcus milleri group or Actinomyces israelii. Finally, susceptibility testing of these organisms is problematic and thus not usually performed
In lieu of adequate clinical data, empirical antibiotic therapy has often been directed against established rabbit pathogens such as Pasteurella spp. However, oral delivery of such antibiotics as beta-lactams, macrolides, and clindamycin, which are commonly used in humans and other mammals, can cause fatal enterotoxemia in rabbits. Initial therapies consisting of a fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were also largely ineffective. More recently, therapies have been developed based on earlier osteomyelitis studies (23) using antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate (AIPMMA) beads (15) or injectable penicillins and have been frequently successful. AIPMMA beads are made by adding antibiotic powder to the polymer and monomer as the resin is mixed; beads are formed by extrusion of the resin through a syringe. Beads implanted in the debrided surgical wound deliver very high concentrations of antibiotic locally for an extended period. This technique is used to treat infections such as abscesses and osteomyelitis when systemic therapy is inadequate.
To determine the bacteriology of these abscesses and improve the selection of proper antimicrobial therapy, 12 rabbits with mandibular and maxillary abscesses were selected by the Veterinary Study Group for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. Ten of the rabbits had received no antimicrobial therapy within seven days of surgery. Two additional rabbits were included because they had failed antimicrobial therapy, one with oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and the other with chloramphenicol-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate bead therapy.
The abscesses were excised percutaneously to avoid contamination by gingival flora. Two specimens were obtained from each rabbit: one was a biopsy specimen of the abscess margin or involved bone, and the second was pus obtained by placing a miniswab into the purulent center of the excised abscess. The specimens were immediately placed in anaerobic transport medium (Anaerobe Systems, Morgan Hill, Calif.) and shipped by overnight courier to R. M. Alden Research Laboratory. Upon receipt, the specimens were processed in an anaerobic chamber (Anaerobe Systems). The biopsy material was mixed with 1 ml of brucella broth and ground with a tissue grinder (Sage Products, Inc., Crystal Lake, Ill.). Purulent swabs were vortexed in 1 ml of brucella broth. One drop of each suspension was used to inoculate various media. Media for aerobic culture included sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, RTF (modified Casman) agar, Columbia agar, and rabbit blood agar (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, Calif.). These media were incubated for up to 7 days at 35°C in 5 to 10% CO2. MacConkey agar was incubated for 4 days at 35°C in ambient air. Media for anaerobic culture included supplemented brucella agar, phenylethyl alcohol blood agar, Fusobacterium selective agar (Anaerobe Systems), RTF agar, rabbit blood agar, and chopped meat broth (Hardy Diagnostics). These media were incubated for up to 10 days at 35°C in the anaerobic chamber incubator.
Aerobic organisms were identified with biochemical tests, rapid kits, and other standard methods (19). Anaerobic organisms were identified by standard methods, including special potency antibiotic disks, Rapid ANA II panels (Remel, Inc., Lenexa, Kans.), and prereduced, anaerobically sterilized biochemicals (Anaerobe Systems) (16, 19, 25).
While many different types of media have been used to culture periodontal flora, we found RTF agar (Hardy Diagnostics) to be superior to rabbit blood agar and other blood-containing media, including chocolate agar. RTF agar is manufactured as a rabbit blood agar substitute for culture of Haemophilus spp. Although we did not isolate Haemophilus organisms in this study, most aerobic and anaerobic bacteria produced larger colonies on RTF agar than on the other media.
Susceptibility testing was performed on all isolates against 10 antimicrobials commonly used to treat rabbit infection or equivalents (when the same organism was isolated from both the biopsy and pus specimen, they were considered identical and only one was selected for susceptibility testing). Anaerobes and streptococci were tested by agar dilution and strict aerobes were tested by broth microdilution according to NCCLS guidelines (20, 21). Control strains included B. fragilis ATCC 25285 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213. Three of the 34 organisms did not grow with these methods. Standard laboratory powders were obtained from their respective manufacturers: penicillin and chloramphenicol from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.), ceftriaxone and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole from Roche (Nutley, N.J.), cefazolin from Eli Lilly (Indianapolis, Ind.), metronidazole from Searle (Skokie, Ill.), clindamycin from Pharmacia (Kalamazoo, Mich.), ciprofloxacin from Bayer (West Haven, Conn.), azithromycin from Pfizer (New York, N.Y.), and tetracycline from Bristol-Meyers Squibb (New Brunswick, Conn.).
The cultures from all 12 rabbits yielded potentially pathogenic bacterial species, including Fusobacterium nucleatum (6 rabbits), Streptococcus intermedius (6 rabbits), Peptostreptococcus micros (recently reclassified as Micromonas micros [18]) (5 rabbits), Prevotella heparinolytica (2 rabbits), Actinomyces israelii (2 rabbits), and one each of Streptococcus anginosus, Arcanobacterium haemolyticum, and a beta-hemolytic Streptococcus sp. (not group A, B, C, D, F, or G) (Table 1). Pasteurella multocida was not isolated, although it is a common rabbit pathogen and has been presumed to be present in jaw abscesses. Staphylococcus aureus and oral viridans group streptococci other than the Streptococcus milleri group were not isolated, and although rabbits are coprophagic, members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and the B. fragilis group were also not isolated. Staphylococcus warneri, Neisseria weaverii, and Achromobacter (Alcaligenes) xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans were isolated from two specimens in small quantities. These organisms have not been found to be significant pathogens in other periodontal studies of otherwise healthy individuals (1, 12) and were considered probable skin, oral, or environmental contaminants in this study. While rabbit pus is considered by some to be a poor specimen for culture, in approximately one-half of the abscesses the purulent center yielded a greater variety or quantity of organisms than cultures of the margin in qualitative culture of these specimens.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria isolated from rabbit mandibular and maxillary abscesses
|
Susceptibility results are found in Table 2. Of all potential pathogens tested, 100% were susceptible to clindamycin and chloramphenicol; 96% were susceptible to penicillin, ceftriaxone, and cefazolin (MIC
2 µg/ml); 86% were susceptible to azithromycin (MIC
0.5 µg/ml) and tetracycline; 54% were susceptible to metronidazole and ciprofloxacin (MIC
1 µg/ml), and only 7% were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (MIC
2/38 µg/ml). All strains of the Streptococcus milleri group were susceptible to clindamycin, penicillin, and ceftriaxone, although occasional resistance in humans has been reported (9, 27). Although metronidazole was largely effective against anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci in this study, it was ineffective against anaerobic gram-positive bacilli and streptococci. (Because they were considered probable contaminants, Staphylococcus warneri, N. weaverii, and Achromobacter (Alcaligenes) xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans were not included in this statistical analysis, although their susceptibilities are included in Table 2.)
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. In vitro susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from rabbit mandibular and maxillary abscesses
|
Our study shows that the etiologic agents of rabbit periodontal infections consist of a mixture of anaerobic gram-negative rods, especially F. nucleatum; anaerobic gram-positive non-spore-forming rods, predominantly Actinomyces spp.; and aerobic gram-positive cocci, particularly the Streptococcus milleri group. These culture results are consistent with the bacteria reported in human (1, 8, 17, 22, 26) and other mammalian (11, 12) periodontal disease studies, and it is therefore important to direct antibiotic therapy for odontogenic abscesses in rabbits against these types of oral pathogens. Specifically, although oral antibiotics such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and older fluoroquinolones such as enrofloxacin are commonly used in rabbit veterinary practice, our results and previous studies (4, 9) have shown that they are only marginally effective against many oral anaerobes and gram-positive aerobes.
For empirical therapy when an adequate culture cannot be performed, veterinary clinicians should consider the potential susceptibilities of the types of oral microbes isolated in our study, as well as of those reported in human (3-7, 27) and other mammalian (13, 14) studies. New methods of nonoral delivery of clindamycin, ceftiofur, and penicillins are currently under investigation. One clinician has observed that therapy with AIPMMA clindamycin and/or ceftiofur beads resulted in no recurrence in 97 of 104 (93%) rabbits within 90 days of implantation (J. Jenkins, unpublished observation). Although all of the potential pathogens in this study were susceptible to chloramphenicol, its success in AIPMMA beads has been observed to be only marginal by members of the Veterinary Study Group. Another therapy using a combination of injectable benzathine and procaine penicillins is under study by other clinicians and shows variable yet promising results (E. Hine, personal communication).
Members of the Veterinary Study Group are as follows: Jeffrey R. Jenkins; Katherine Quesenberry, Sean Aiken, Carol Canny, Laurie Hess, et al., Animal Medical Center, New York, N.Y.; Richard Nye and Chris Ellis, Midwest Bird & Exotic Animal Hospital, Westchester, Ill.; Elizabeth Hine, Northwest Veterinary Clinic, El Paso, Tex.; and Jennifer Koga, Adobe Animal Hospital, Los Altos, Calif. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»