This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manayani, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sridharan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manayani, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sridharan, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2002, p. 1069-1070, Vol. 40, No. 3
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.1069-1070.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Molecular and Conventional Methods for Typing of Enteroviral Isolates

Darly Joseph Manayani,1 R. V. Shaji,2 G. John Fletcher,1 Thomas Cherian,3 N. Murali,3 N. Sathish,1 Tilak Solomon,4 Chandran Gnanamuthu,4 and Gopalan Sridharan1*

Department of Clinical Virology,1 Department of Haematology,2 Department of Child Health ,3 Department of Neurology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore-632004, India4

Received 2 July 2001/ Returned for modification 17 November 2001/ Accepted 21 December 2001


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Twenty-eight enteroviral isolates obtained from various clinical specimens were typed by Lim-Benyesh-Melnick (LBM) pool-based neutralization, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and partial sequencing of the VP1 region of the enteroviral genome. Sequencing was found to be a good alternative to LBM typing, while PCR-RFLP was inadequate for identification of enteroviral isolates.


arrow
TEXT
 
Identification of enterovirus (EV) serotypes is useful to differentiate polioviruses from nonpolio enteroviruses, to study the association of EV types with certain diseases, to identify newer EVs, and for epidemiological surveillance (8). The conventional method for typing of enteroviruses is neutralization with type-specific sera (8) or with an intersecting pool of hyperimmune equine sera, the Lim-Benyesh-Melnick (LBM) pool (5, 6). These methods, in addition to being tedious, time-consuming, and expensive, may fail to resolve the serotype when there is aggregation of EV strains, antigenic variations, or multiple serotypes of EV in the specimen (8). These disadvantages associated with conventional methods have led to the development of molecular methods like PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) (3, 4) and sequencing of the EV genome for typing of EVs (9, 10, 11). This paper reports the results of a comparison of the LBM pool with PCR-RFLP or partial sequencing of the VP1 region of EV genome for typing of EV isolates.

(This research forms part of the Ph.D. thesis work of D. J. Manayani.)

Twenty-eight EV isolates tested were obtained from cerebrospinal fluid, brain biopsy, throat, and rectal swab specimens in primary monkey kidney (PMK) or rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) cell cultures between September 1998 and August 2000 from patients attending the Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India. Stock strains of poliovirus serotypes 1, 2, and 3 and coxsackievirus B (CB) serotypes 3, CB5 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.), and CB4 (courtesy Gagandeep Kang, Wellcome Research Laboratory, Vellore, India) were also tested. The LBM pools (A to H) (Staten Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark) were used as recommended by the supplier.

The 304-bp nested PCR product generated using universal EV primers from the 5' noncoding region (5' NCR) (1, 2, 7) of EV isolates was subjected to restriction enzyme (RE) analysis with three enzymes, BglI, StyI, and Asp700 (XmnI) (Boehringer Mannheim Roche, Mannheim, Germany) (4).

For sequencing, the RNA was extracted from the infected-cell culture supernatant of the RD cell line by using the QIAamp viral RNA kit (Qiagen Gmbh, Hilden, Germany). The primer pairs 012 and 011 or 040 and 011 generated amplicons of approximately 450 bp that span the VP1-2A region of the EV genome (10). Following cycle sequencing with fluorescent dideoxy-chain terminators, the products were sequenced with an automated genetic analyzer (ABI 310 analyzer; PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Sequences (GenBank) that match the VP1 sequence of the isolates were identified using BLAST. The percent identity score of the VP1 sequence of EV isolates with the GenBank EV sequences that showed maximum identity, as well as the next closest identity, was calculated using ClustalW (12). If the pairwise identity scores of VP1 sequences of the test strain were 75% or more with respect to any particular EV GenBank sequence, then it was identified as the homologous serotype (11).

The results of typing of the 28 EV isolates are shown in Table 1. Of 27 isolates tested, 26 (96%) were serotyped by the LBM pool-based neutralization. Primers from the VP1-2A region amplified all 28 EV isolates, and 27 (96%) of them could be assigned a serotype by sequencing. The pairwise identity score for EV isolates from this study with the respective homologous GenBank sequences ranged from 78 to 89%; with the exception of one isolate, the pairwise identity scores to the closest heterologous sequences were in the range of 50 to 68%. Excluding the one untypeable isolate, identical results were obtained both by LBM pool typing and by partial sequencing of VP1 for 22 (85%) of 26 tested isolates.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Typing of EV isolates by molecular and serological methods

Of the 28 clinical isolates, 11 were untypeable by PCR-RFLP; in the remaining 17, the assigned serotype or type complex was different from the serotype assigned by the other two methods (Table 1). The term "type complex" refers to an RE digestion pattern indicative not of a single serotype but of two or more serotypes. Isolates from different sites of the same individual had the same RE digestion pattern.

This study showed that there was a high degree of agreement between conventional serotyping and typing by sequencing. We were able to assign a serotype for 26 of 27 clinical isolates by sequencing, and in 22 of them the serotype assignment was identical to that obtained by conventional typing. Discordant typing results were obtained for four isolates. This discordance between serotyping by LBM pool and sequencing could occur due to antigenic variations or viral aggregation (11). Typing of isolates with discordant results by using monospecific sera has shown sequencing to be the accurate method of typing (11). In the study reported here, typing with monospecific sera was not carried out. The isolate that could not be typed by sequencing was also not typeable by conventional methods and may represent a unique type. Serial subcultures to achieve a sufficient concentration of virus for conventional typing delayed the typing results. On the other hand, typing data were available following PCR and sequencing within a few days. Thus, PCR and subsequent sequencing offers the dual advantage of rapidity and the ability to detect previously undescribed serotypes.

This study showed greater agreement between PCR sequencing and conventional typing than did that of Oberste et al. (11). Also, we were able to obtain sequencing data with the use of primers 011 and 012, compared to the five primer pairs used by Oberste et al. (11). These differences are most probably because fewer serotypes were represented in our set of clinical samples than were present in the other study (11). Since regional laboratories may have to deal with fewer serotypes of EV, it is possible that they could obtain typing data for most isolates by using fewer primer pairs for sequencing.

In contrast to the results with PCR and sequencing, the results of typing by PCR-RFLP were disappointing. We used a different primer pair in the nested round for PCR-RFLP than was used by Kuan (4). However, our primer pairs spanned the same 5' NCR, generating a slightly larger PCR product (304 versus 297 bp) (4). Also, half of the prototype strains did not match the specific patterns described by Kuan (4). Variations may occur in the 5' NCR of EVs (13), and this possibly will occur even in prototype strains due to repeated subculturing, which may explain the differences in findings. Despite the lack of correlation in type assignment between PCR-RFLP and conventional typing, this method could still be used for outbreak investigations, where comparison of isolates and differentiation between outbreak strains and nonoutbreak strains is the primary objective.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Clinical Virology, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore-632 004, India. Phone: 91-416-222102, ext. 2312 or 2070. Fax: 91-416-232035. E-mail: g_sridharan{at}yahoo.com. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Gama, R. E., P. R. Horsnell, P. J. Hughes, C. North, C. B. Bruce, W. Al-Nakib, and G. Stanway. 1989. Amplification of rhinovirus specific nucleic acids from clinical samples using the polymerase chain reaction. J. Med. Virol. 28:73-77.[Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Hyypia, T., P. Auvinen, and M. Maaronen. 1989. Polymerase chain reaction for human picornaviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 70:3261-3268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Kammerer, U., B. Kunkel, and K. Korn. 1994. Nested PCR for specific detection and rapid identification of human picornaviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:285-291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Kuan, M. M. 1997. Detection and rapid differentiation of human enteroviruses following genomic amplification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2598-2601.[Abstract]
    5. 5
  5. Melnick, J. L., and I. L. Wimberly. 1985. Lyophilized combination pools of enterovirus equine sera. New LBM pools prepared from reserves of antisera stored frozen for two decades Bull. W. H. O. 63:543-550.
    6. 6
  6. Melnick, J. L. 1996. Enteroviruses: polioviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses and newer enteroviruses, p. 655-712. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, R. M. Chanock, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Monath, B. Roizman, and S. E. Straus (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa.
    7. 7
  7. Mori, J., and J. P. Clewley. 1994. Polymerase chain reaction and sequencing for typing rhinovirus RNA. J. Med. Virol. 44:323-329.[Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Muir, P., U. Kammerer, K. Korn, M. N. Mulders, T. Poyry, B. Weissbrich, R. Kandolf, G. M. Cleator, and A. M. van Loon for the European Union Concerted Action on Virus Meningitis and Encephalitis. 1998. Molecular typing of enteroviruses: current status and future requirements. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:202-227.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Oberste, M. S., K. Maher, D. R. Kilpatrick, and M. A. Pallansch. 1999. Molecular evolution of the human enteroviruses: correlation of serotype with VP1 sequence and application to picornavirus classification. J. Virol. 73:1941-1948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Oberste, M. S., K. Maher, D. R. Kilpatrick, M. R. Flemister, B. A. Brown, and M. A. Pallansch. 1999. Typing of human enteroviruses by partial sequencing of VP1. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1288-1293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Oberste, M. S., K. Maher, M. R. Flemister, G. Marchetti, D. R. Kilpatrick, and M. A. Pallansch. 2000. Comparison of classic and molecular approaches for the identification of untypeable enteroviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1170-1174.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Zheng, Z. M., P. J. He, D. Caulfield, M. Neumann, S. Specter, C. C. Baker, and M. J. Bankowski. 1995. Enterovirus 71 isolated from China is serologically similar to the prototype E71 BrCr strain but differs in the 5'-noncoding region. J. Med. Virol. 47:161-167.[Medline]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2002, p. 1069-1070, Vol. 40, No. 3
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.1069-1070.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Nix, W. A., Oberste, M. S., Pallansch, M. A. (2006). Sensitive, Seminested PCR Amplification of VP1 Sequences for Direct Identification of All Enterovirus Serotypes from Original Clinical Specimens.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2698-2704 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Park, S.-W., Lee, C.-S., Jang, H.-C., Kim, E.-C., Oh, M.-d., Choe, K.-W. (2005). Rapid Identification of the Coxsackievirus A24 Variant by Molecular Serotyping in an Outbreak of Acute Hemorrhagic Conjunctivitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 1069-1071 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Oberste, M. S., Maher, K., Pallansch, M. A. (2004). Evidence for Frequent Recombination within Species Human Enterovirus B Based on Complete Genomic Sequences of All Thirty-Seven Serotypes. J. Virol. 78: 855-867 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manayani, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sridharan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manayani, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sridharan, G.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»