Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van der Zee, A. Articles by Schellekens, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van der Zee, A. Articles by Schellekens, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2002, p. 1124-1125, Vol. 40, No. 3
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.1124-1127.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Novel PCR-Probe Assay for Detection of and Discrimination between Legionella pneumophila and Other Legionella Species in Clinical Samples

Top Letter References

 
In recent years, several PCR-based methods for detection of Legionella DNA have been described, but all PCR assays commonly lacked the ability to discriminate between Legionella pneumophila and other Legionella species (1-3, 5). A recent study indicated that Legionella species other than pneumophila may be important in the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (4) and that their prevalence may have been underestimated due to inadequate diagnostic methods presently in use. To improve Legionella detection we designed a novel PCR-probe assay. The primer set, LEG1 (5'-TACCTACCCTTGACATACAGTG-3') and LEG2 (5'-CTTCCTCCGGTTTGTCAC-3'), was derived from the 16S rRNA gene sequence and used to amplify a 200-bp DNA fragment specific for all Legionella species. Probes LSPP-B (5'-GGTTGCGCTCGTTACG-3') and LPN-B (5'-GAGTCCCCACCATCACATG-3') were selected to discriminate L. pneumophila from other Legionella species (with the exception of Legionella londonensis, which has a probe sequence identical to that of L. pneumophila).

The performance of the PCR-probe assay was investigated using a pool of negative clinical material spiked with 2.5 µl of positive control containing 2.5 or 1 L. pneumophila cell. As sensitivity and hybridization controls, 1-, 5, and 10-fg quantities of Legionella bozemanii, and Legionella tucsonensis chromosomal DNA were included. An inhibition control was included in each reaction. A negative control was included in each run. The PCR reaction mixture contained 10 pmol (each) of primers LEG1 and LEG2, 200 µM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 3 mM MgCl₂, and 0.625 U of AmpliTaq Gold polymerase in 1x PCR buffer (Perkin-Elmer), in a final reaction volume of 25 µl. Samples were preheated for 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 60°C, and 30 s at 72°C, with a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. Hybridization of the PCR product was carried out by spotting 3 µl of the sample on Hybond-N membrane (Amersham, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). and hybridizing with Legionella species- and L. pneumophila-specific 5' biotinylated probes at 61°C (Fig. 1). PCR products were detected only when Legionella species were used as template and not with sequence-related organisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Lactobacillus casei, and Acinetobacter baumannii. The detection limit was at least 1 bacterial cell, 0.2 CFU, or 5 fg of chromosomal DNA per reaction.

View larger version (49K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Performance of PCR-probe assay in detection of Legionella species other than L. pneumophila. PCR was performed on the equivalent of 100 cells of two different clinical isolates of L. pneumophila (lanes 1 and 2), L. tucsoniensis (lane 3), L. birminghamiensis (lane 4), Legionella haekeliae (lane 5), Legionella brunensis (lane 6), Legionella jordanis (lane 7), Legionella jamestowniensis (lane 8), L. bozemanii (lane 9), Acinetobacter baumanii (lane 10), L. casei (lane 11), and P. aeruginosa (lane 12). Lane M, marker DNA (sizes given at right). The PCR products were hybridized to probes LSPP-B and LPN-B at 61°C, as shown at the left.

The clinical specificity of the PCR-probe assay was assessed using proteinase K-treated and boiled bronchoalveolar fluid or sputum samples from 100 hospitalized patients with pneumonia. Pneumonia was due to unknown (52%) or well-defined (48%) causes. Among the known causes was a diagnosis of infection with Aspergillus fumigatus, Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydia psittaci, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, L. pneumophila, Moraxella catarrhalis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. fluorescens, Serratia marcescens, Streptococcus pneumoniae, cytomegalovirus, of respiratory syncytial virus. Five patients were positive in the PCR-probe assay for Legionella. In three cases the PCR products also hybridized to the L. pneumophila-specific probe LPN-B. Those patients all had a positive culture for Legionella. The other 2 of 100 samples were positive for Legionella species other than pneumophila. The PCR products were sequenced, and after alignment to Genbank database sequences, these samples were identified as Legionella species with 98% homology to Legionella waltersii and 97% homologies to Legionella birminghamensis and Legionella maceachernii, respectively. No alternative etiologic agent was found in patients diagnosed with infection by Legionella species other than L. pneumophila. A collaborate prospective study is intended to present a future validation of the PCR-probe assay and to investigate the role of Legionella species other than L. pneumophila in causing pneumonia.

 
We gratefully acknowledge Hennie Maas (National Institute of Public Health and Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands) for providing type strains of Legionella.

Top Letter References

 

1
1. Ballard, A. L., N. K. Fry, L. Chan, S. B. Burman, J. V. Lee, T. G. Harrison, and K. J. Towner. 2000. Detection of Legionella pneumophila using a real-time PCR hybridization assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4215-4218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Cloud, J. L., K. C. Caroll, P. Pixton, M. Erali, and D. R. Hillyard, 2000. Detection of Legionella species in respiratory specimens using PCR with sequencing confirmation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1709-1712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Jonas, D., A., Rosenbaum, S., Weyrich, and S., Bhakdi, 1995. Enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of PCR-amplified DNA of Legionellae in bronchoalveolar fluid. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1247-1252.[Abstract]
4
4. McNally, C., B., Hackman, B. S., Fields, J. F., and Plouffe, 2000. Potential importance of Legionella species as etiologies in community aquired pneumonia (CAP). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 38:79-82.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Weir, S. C., S. H., Fischer, F., Stock, and J. G. Vee, 1998. Detection of Legionella by PCR in respiratory specimens using a commercially available kit. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 110:295-300.[Medline]

						Anneke van der Zee Harold Verbakel Caroline de Jong Raymond Pot Anneke Bergmans Marcel Peeters Laboratory of Medical Microbiology St. Elisabeth Hospital 5000AS Tilburg, The Netherlands Peter Schneeberger Laboratory of Medical Microbiology Bosch Medical Centre 5211NL Den Bosch, The Netherlands Joop Schellekens National Institute of Public Health  and Environment 3720BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2002, p. 1124-1125, Vol. 40, No. 3
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.1124-1127.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Diederen, B. M. W., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M., Peeters, M. F. (2008). Utility of Real-Time PCR for Diagnosis of Legionnaires' Disease in Routine Clinical Practice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 671-677 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bencini, M. A., van den Brule, A. J. C., Claas, E. C. J., Hermans, M. H. A., Melchers, W. J. G., Noordhoek, G. T., Salimans, M. M. M., Schirm, J., Vink, C., van der Zee, A., Jansen, R. (2007). Multicenter Comparison of Molecular Methods for Detection of Legionella spp. in Sputum Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 3390-3392 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Diederen, B. M. W., de Jong, C. M. A., Marmouk, F., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., Peeters, M. F., Van der Zee, A. (2007). Evaluation of real-time PCR for the early detection of Legionella pneumophila DNA in serum samples. J Med Microbiol 56: 94-101 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Diederen, B. M. W., Peeters, M. F. (2006). Evaluation of Two New Immunochromatographic Assays (Rapid U Legionella Antigen Test and SD Bioline Legionella Antigen Test) for Detection of Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Antigen in Urine.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2991-2993 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Diederen, B. M. W., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., Peeters, M. F. (2006). Evaluation of Vircell Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay for Detection of Antibodies against Legionella pneumophila.. CVI 13: 361-364 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roig, J., Rello, J. (2003). Legionnaires' disease: a rational approach to therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 1119-1129 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van der Zee, A. Articles by Schellekens, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van der Zee, A. Articles by Schellekens, J.