Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2002, p. 762-767, Vol. 40, No. 3
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.762-767.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Viral Hepatitis and AIDS Study Group, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío ,1 Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Seville,2 Departamento de Parasitologia, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain3
Received 23 March 2001/ Returned for modification 14 August 2001/ Accepted 1 December 2001
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In some cross-sectional and case report studies, an association between HIV-Leishmania coinfection and HIV advanced disease, intravenous drug use, and male gender has been found (12, 21). However, to date, the relationship between these potential risk factors and such coinfection has not been assessed in prospective cohort studies. The implementation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has modified the incidence of most opportunistic diseases related with HIV infection (15, 19). HAART seems to prevent the development of overt kala-azar in patients with subclinical VL (7). Therefore, a decrease in the incidence of this disease would be expected after the introduction of HAART. However, some relapses and "de novo" overt VL cases in patients under HAART and well-suppressed HIV replication have been reported (14; J. L. Casado, R. Lopez-Vélez, and V. Piritado, 7th Conf. Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, abstr. 264, 2000). Because of this, prospective surveys assessing the incidence of VL in patients undergoing HAART are necessary.
This study was undertaken to assess whether the extensive use of HAART has decreased the incidence of symptomatic VL in HIV-infected patients. The impact of other potential risk factors for overt VL was also analyzed.
|
|
|---|
Antiretroviral regimens. Patients received antiretroviral therapy depending on drug availability at each moment and always according to international recommendations. Until 1993, zidovudine was the only antiretroviral drug commercially available. As of that date, both the patients who started the program and those taking monotherapy who showed clinical or immunological evidence of HIV disease progression were offered a dual combination of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) (i.e., zidovudine plus didanosine or zalcitabine). Lamivudine and stavudine were later included as a part of this regimen. Protease inhibitors were not extensively available in our hospitals until January 1997. Thereafter, all patients who received care in our units were offered HAART (i.e., a combination of two nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTI] and at least one protease inhibitor). As of 1999, HAART combinations including NNRTI (i.e., efavirenz or nevirapine) were also prescribed.
Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy was measured as the proportion of pills taken out of the total number of pills prescribed. Patients receiving zidovudine were considered nonadherent, regardless of the data they reported, when we did not find an increase in the mean corpuscular volume that was equal to or greater than 10% of the baseline values.
None of the patients included in this study received specific primary or secondary antileishmanial prophylaxis. Pentamidine was not used as prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.
Diagnosis of symptomatic VL. During the follow-up, a search for Leishmania spp. in a bone marrow aspirate was performed when patients showed unexplained fever, spleen enlargement, or a significant decline in leukocyte, platelet, or red blood cell count. When these symptoms coincided with a finding of Leishmania by Giemsa stain and/or Evans modified Tobie's medium culture, a diagnosis of symptomatic VL was made. A search for Leishmania spp. in samples other than bone marrow (e.g., liver or lymph node) was also performed when the responsible physician considered it appropriate. A more detailed description of the sample processing has been reported elsewhere (21).
Other laboratory methods. HIV-1 RNA in plasma was measured by quantitative PCR (HIV Monitor test kit; Roche Molecular System; Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The detection limit of this assay is 200 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml. CD4+ cell counts were measured by a conventional flow cytometry method.
Statistical study. Continuous variables are expressed as median (range), and the categorical variables are expressed as number of cases (percent). The density of incidence of symptomatic VL was calculated as number of cases per one hundred patient-years. Patient-years for each individual patient were calculated as follows. A period of a year of follow-up was considered the unit; incomplete years were expressed as a fraction of the unit, obtained as the length of follow-up in this specific year measured in days divided by 365.
The relationship between symptomatic VL and the following potential risk factors was assessed: age, sex, intravenous drug use, previous episodes of symptomatic VL, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) clinical category C at entry in the cohort, evolution to CDC clinical category C during the follow-up, CD4+ cell counts at baseline, CD4+ cell count decline below 300 cells/mm3 during follow-up, time showing CD4+ cell counts below 300 cells/mm3, HAART use, time on HAART, low antiretroviral therapy compliance (i.e., adherence below 90% on at least two visits at any time during the follow-up), and time with poor adherence to the regimen.
Survival analysis was performed to study the relationship between VL emergence and these variables. In this study, the event was the development of the first episode of symptomatic VL during the follow-up. The study was censored on 30 June 2000. When a continuous variable included in this study was categorized, the median was selected as the cutoff value. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for all time-to-event analyses. The univariate study of the relationship between the abovementioned potential risk factors and the emergence of symptomatic VL was performed using the long rank test. We also used a Cox's proportional-hazards stepwise regression model to compute the risk hazard (95% confidence interval) and to determine the factors independently associated with the development of symptomatic VL. Cox's models for time-dependent and fixed variables were calculated, and the fittest one was chosen. All factors showing a univariate association level of
0.1 with symptomatic VL were entered into the multivariate analysis. All statistical procedures were carried out with the SPSS statistical package (Chicago, Ill.).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Baseline characteristics of the population studied
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Incidence of symptomatic VL from 1993 to June 2000. pt, patient.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. HIV RNA levels in plasma, pre-HAART and during HAART in patients who developed symptomatic VL while on HAART
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Results of univariate and multivariate analysesa
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to the development of symptomatic VL according to HAART intake (A), classification in CDC clinical category C at baseline (B), and CD4+ cell count during follow-up (C).
|
|
|
|---|
HAART has proven to reduce the frequency of most AIDS-related diseases (15, 19). This is the first study where the effect of HAART on the incidence of symptomatic VL has been quantified. In spite of the protective effect of HAART on overt VL emergence, de novo (14) and relapsing cases of symptomatic VL (Casado et al., abstract) have been reported in patients undergoing such therapy. In this work, all residual cases were observed in patients with uncontrolled HIV infection, due to the fact that antiretroviral therapy had either failed or not been started. Therefore, adequate control of viral replication and the subsequent immune reconstitution seem to prevent the development of symptomatic VL in HIV-infected patients.
The use of HAART could reduce the incidence of VL by two mechanisms. First, it may reduce the rate of evolution from latent Leishmania infantum infection to overt VL. Second, HAART might decrease the incidence of new infections by Leishmania spp. in HIV-infected patients. The first hypothesis is supported by investigations on subclinical VL (7). In addition to an increase in CD4 T-lymphocyte cell counts (13), HAART leads to an enhancement in the levels of Th1 cytokines (16). This fact could explain why patients on HAART are less prone to develop overt kala-azar, since an adequate Th1 response is associated with the control of Leishmania infections (6). To assess the second hypothesis, it would be necessary to perform studies using the leishmanin skin test and/or Leishmania serology. Thus, both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases of Leishmania infection could be analyzed. This matter is essential, since a high proportion of Leishmania infections in HIV-infected patients are subclinical (21). However, the sensitivity of these diagnostic tools is limited in HIV-infected patients due to the impaired cellular and humoral immune responses that these patients show (10, 22).
The protective effect of HAART on the development of symptomatic VL may even have been underestimated in this survey. In fact, 220 (63.4%) of 347 patients who received HAART during the follow-up and who were included in the statistical study in the HAART group had received NRTI previously. Thus, these drug-experienced patients could harbor viruses resistant to the NRTI used as a part of the HAART regimen (11). This fact could have led to a therapeutical failure and to a lesser protective effect of HAART.
Non-HAART regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) do not seem to have significantly influenced the incidence of symptomatic VL. Monotherapy and combination therapies other than HAART were not associated with VL emergence in a statistical analysis restricted to the patients who received only these regimens (data not shown).
The main risk factor for symptomatic VL in HIV-infected patients included in this study was deep immunosuppression. All variables of those analyzed here, which indicate advanced HIV disease, were associated with the emergence of symptomatic VL on the univariate study. However, on the multivariate study, only CDC clinical category C at baseline and CD4+ cell counts below 300 cells/mm3 during the follow-up were selected as independent risk factors. This finding is probably due to the fact that all of the above mentioned variables are colineal.
Leishmania infection is a persistent disorder, although a clinical cure may be achieved using adequate treatment (1, 9). Because of this, a previous diagnosis of symptomatic VL was found to be associated with the development of kala-azar on the univariate analysis. However, when this variable was entered into a Cox's hazard model, it did not remain independently related with symptomatic VL. This fact could be due to the small number of patients with previous VL in this survey. Nevertheless, HAART could also prevent the relapse of symptomatic VL in HIV-infected patients who achieve satisfactory immune and virological responses. According to this, relapses in this study occurred only in patients who showed uncontrolled HIV replication.
The sharing of needles has been reported to be a transmission route for Leishmania infection (3). Consequently, an association between intravenous drug abuse and VL has been found in previous studies (21). However, this relationship was statistically weak (21). Thus, a survey like this that analyzes a small portion of L. infantum infection cases, those with overt symptoms, could not be potent enough to prove such a relationship. Therefore, studies in which the leishmanin skin test and/or Leishmania serology is performed in HIV-seronegative people are more reliable to analyze this issue.
A low adherence to antiretroviral therapy is related to inadequate control of HIV replication, which leads to the emergence of mutant HIV strains (17) and, subsequently, to treatment failure (18). Although in this study an independent association between low antiretroviral treatment compliance and emergence of symptomatic VL has not been found, the level of statistical significance was almost reached. The failure to detect a clear association could be explained by several reasons. First, compliance with the antiretroviral treatment was self-reported by patients; therefore, estimations of adherence were not completely accurate (4). Besides, the compliance with different therapy regimens used during the follow-up (i.e., monotherapy, dual combination, and HAART) was not considered separately. Probably, a low adherence to monotherapy or combined therapy does not lead to the same virological and immunological consequences as a low compliance with HAART. In any case, the fact that low antiretroviral treatment adherence was associated with symptomatic VL on the univariate study could indicate that adherence is a risk factor for the development of symptomatic VL.
The ability of HAART to reduce the incidence of VL is yet another reason to develop programs to make this therapy accessible and to improve adherence. In countries where HIV-Leishmania coinfection is endemic, this approach may have a major impact, since VL causes morbidity and mortality by itself and enhances the effects of HIV infection (5, 23) in HIV-seropositive patients.
|
|
|---|
B elements. J. Immunol. 160:2881-2888.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»