Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2002, p. 821-825, Vol. 40, No. 3
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.821-825.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Oral Biology,1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry,3 Division of Epidemiology and Biometrics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio2
Received 6 August 2001/ Returned for modification 18 October 2001/ Accepted 27 November 2001
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A unique bacterial cause of chronic periodontitis has not been identified, but, rather, a number of bacterial species have been associated with the disease. A small number of species have been consistently associated with periodontitis, including Bacteroides forsythus. In several recent clinical studies, levels of B. forsythus have been shown to be associated with periodontitis (7, 8) and with progression of the disease in human adults (15, 16). These studies were designed to detect if a species is found at elevated levels in sites of disease activity and if it is more widely distributed throughout the dentition in individuals with periodontitis than in healthy individuals. An alternative and straightforward approach, determining if the presence of B. forsythus in the oral cavity is correlated with periodontal health status, has not been reported. This approach would be helpful because it addresses the question of whether B. forsythus is a commensal opportunist or a pathogen in the classic sense, and this has implications for risk prediction and prevention of periodontitis.
Comparatively little attention has been paid to the identification of health-associated and potentially beneficial bacterial species that may reside in the gingival sulcus. Health-associated bacterial species have been recognized on a number of other mucosal surfaces in the body and have been used to treat or prevent disease (1, 3, 9, 13). Symbiotic organisms may benefit the host by various biological mechanisms, such as through the exclusion of pathogenic species or the promotion of antiallergenic processes.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship of the presence of B. forsythus and a recently identified phylotype, oral clone BU063 (11), to periodontal health status.
|
|
|---|
Detection of B. forsythus and oral clone BU063. DNA was isolated from the plaque samples and was amplified by PCR with universal prokaryotic primers specific for regions in the 16S and 23S genes, as described previously (10). PCRs were performed with 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase in a total volume of 100 µl in buffer containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 3 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.2 mM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 2 to 4 µl of template DNA. Each sample was subjected to 25 to 27 cycles (denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 42°C for 2 min, and primer extension at 72°C for 3 min) in an automated thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer). In a second, nested amplification, a previously designed oligonucleotide specific for the B. forsythus 16S rRNA gene (TGCGATATAGTGTAAGCTCTACAG) (4) was paired with a second universal 23S primer (GGTACTTAGATGTTTCAGTTC) and used to amplify the intergenic spacer region from B. forsythus and oral clone BU063. Two microliters of product from the first amplification was added as template DNA. The PCR conditions were the same as those for the first amplification except that the annealing step was performed at 52°C and anti-Taq antibody was added to each reaction mixture in an amount sufficient to inhibit the Taq polymerase until denaturation of the template. DNA fragments were separated by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel in TBE (0.1 M Tris-borate [pH 8.3], 2 mM EDTA) (see Fig. 1). The gels were stained with ethidium bromide and were photographed under UV light. The samples were scored as positive or negative for the presence of B. forsythus or oral clone BU063 on the basis of the presence of two bands running at 1.61 kb (B. forsythus) and 1.48 kb (oral clone BU063). All second amplifications were repeated, and if the results were not in agreement, they were repeated again. The presence of DNA was confirmed for all negative samples by use of universal prokaryotic primers.
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. PCR amplification of ISR rDNAs of B. forsythus and oral clone BU063. The lane labeled "Bf" contains DNA amplified from B. forsythus strain ATCC 43037, and the last lane labeled with a minus sign contains a negative (no-template) control. The B. forsythus DNA template yielded a fragment of 1.61 kb, and oral clone BU063 yielded a fragment of 1.48 kb. Lanes 1 through 5 contain DNA amplified from clinical samples; lane 2 was scored as positive for B. forsythus, and lanes 1, 3, and 5 were scored as positive for BU063.
|
Statistical methods. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the prevalences of B. forsythus, P. gingivalis, and oral clone BU063 in healthy individuals and individuals with periodontitis, to examine differences due to race and sex, and to examine cocolonization with these species. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for detection of P. gingivalis, B. forsythus, and BU063 in the periodontitis group versus the healthy group and to examine cocolonization with these species or phylotypes.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The sequences of the 16S and 23S ribosomal intergenic spacer region for both B. forsythus and BU063 are available for electronic retrieval from GenBank (accession numbers AF466818 and AF466819).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of the rDNA ISR between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes for B. forsythus and oral clone BU063. Genes are shown as boxes, and noncoding regions are shown as lines. The same tRNA genes are present in both organisms, but noncoding regions differ in both size and sequence.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Prevalence of B. forsythus, P. gingivalis, and oral clone BU063, a newly identifed phylotype closely related to B. forsythus, in subjects with periodontitis and healthy subjects. Actual percentages are shown inside the bars. The data for P. gingivalis have been reported previously (5). The total sample size was 293 subjects, with samples obtained from 121 subjects with periodontitis ( ) and 172 healthy, age-matched controls ( ). Differences in the prevalences of all three species in orally healthy individuals and individuals with periodontitis were significant by chi-square analysis (P < 0.0001).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Presence of bacteria and periodontal health status
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Likelihood of infection with multiple species
|
|
|
|---|
For bacterial identification, amplification of ribosomal targets that include the ISR provides two advantages over assays limited to the 16S rRNA gene. First, there are usually enough variations in ISRs, but not 16S rRNA genes, to differentiate strains of a species, as, for example, in P. gingivalis (12). Second, unlike 16S rRNA genes, ISRs show considerable interspecies size variations. So, even closely related bacteria (e.g., B. forsythus and oral clone BU063) generate different-sized PCR products from the same primers. This is useful when amplifying DNA from complex populations such as those found in the oral cavity, where novel species or species considered nonoral may be encountered. If the 16S rRNA gene, but not the ISR, from an unknown species were amplified with a primer targeted to a known species, the two PCR products would be the same size and would therefore not be distinguishable by agarose gel electrophoresis. Similarly, hybridization probes that can bind to closely related species would not discriminate between those species.
The association of B. forsythus and Bacteroides phylotype BU063 with periodontitis was examined by analyzing samples from subjects with periodontitis and a group of healthy, aged-matched controls. Previously published data on the prevalence of P. gingivalis (5) were also included for comparison. By use of a sensitive assay to analyze whole-mouth samples, highly significant differences in the presence of these organisms were found between healthy and diseased subjects (Table 1; Fig. 3).
The prevalences of B. forsythus and P. gingivalis were high in subjects with periodontitis and low in healthy subjects (Fig. 3). This is consistent with previous reports linking the levels of these organisms to disease (7, 8, 15, 16). In the present study, subjects with periodontitis were 9.9 times more likely than their healthy counterparts to be infected with B. forsythus. For comparison, the odds for the presence of P. gingivalis in the same population were quite similar, at 10.9. (This number differs slightly from the previously published value [5] because only part of the sample from the original study was included in the present investigation.) These data suggest that B. forsythus may not be a normal or desirable member of the oral flora. In a previous report, not all strains of P. gingivalis were associated with periodontitis (6), probably accounting for the presence of the organism in some healthy subjects. A similar phenomenon may explain the presence of B. forsythus in at least some healthy subjects.
In contrast to B. forsythus and P. gingivalis, uncultivated oral clone BU063 was associated with periodontal health. It was found in more than half of healthy subjects but in only 11% of subjects with periodontitis. The odds for finding oral clone BU063 were 0.1 in subjects with periodontitis compared to their healthy counterparts. So, while B. forsythus is highly associated with periodontal disease, its closest known relative, BU063, is associated with periodontal health. Studies comparing these two closely related organisms may prove useful for determining how B. forsythus functions in the disease process. Oral clone BU063 may also prove useful for therapy involving the replacement of pathogenic flora with beneficial species. Similar beneficial relationships have been exploited as therapies for other mucosal surfaces such as the digestive tract and urogenital system (1, 3, 13). Periodontal therapy has almost exclusively been focused on the eradication of pathogenic bacteria, but the oral cavity is not a sterile environment, and establishment of a healthy flora may be essential to stabilization of the ecosystem. Oral clone BU063 will have to be cultured for these studies, but attempts to grow it under standard culture conditions, including conditions with N-acetylmuramic acid, which is required by B. forsythus, have not yet been successful.
The two Bacteroides species, B. forsythus and oral clone BU063, were found together less often than would be expected by chance, suggesting a mechanism of exclusion. In subjects with periodontitis, the odds ratio for finding B. forsythus and BU063 in the same sample indicates that either species was only 0.05 times as likely to be found when the other species was present as when it was not present (Table 2). This difference in cocolonization was highly significant by chi-square analysis (P < 0.0001). To a lesser extent, the two Bacteroides species were also unlikely to be found together in healthy subjects (Table 2). This could mean that BU063 is overgrown or pushed out by B. forsythus in subjects with periodontitis and that BU063 provides some protection from acquisition of B. forsythus. This is consistent with data indicating that oral clone BU063 is common in early childhood and is less prevalent as subjects reach adulthood (X. Chu, A. L. Griffen, and E. J. Leys, unpublished data), and the distribution of B. forsythus with respect to age in children is the opposite, increasing with age (X. Chu, A. L. Griffen, and E. J. Leys, International Association for Dental Research Abstracts, J. Dent. Res. 79:621, 2000).
In contrast to the exclusion seen between B. forsythus and BU063, colonization with either of these bacteria and the periodontal pathogen P. gingivalis was independent, as shown in Table 2; the odds ratio for finding P. gingivalis in the presence or absence of B. forsythus was 1.00, and for oral clone BU063 it was 0.81. This independence of colonization between both Bacteroides species and P. gingivalis helps to rule out more general environmental factors as an explanation for the exclusion between the Bacteroides species. Previous investigators have reported a strong association within subjects for the presence and levels of B. forsythus and P. gingivalis at various oral sites (14), but on the basis of our findings, individual subjects are independently colonized with these organisms.
In conclusion, the presence of B. forsythus in the oral cavity was strongly associated with periodontitis, and the opposite was true for its health-associated, nearest genetic neighbor, oral clone BU063. In addition, a specific exclusionary mechanism between the two Bacteroides species may occur since they were found together significantly less often than was expected. Comparisons between these two organisms may prove useful for studies that determine how B. forsythus functions in the disease process. In addition, further study of oral clone BU063 may provide insight into the natural history of periodontal health and may suggest preventive or therapeutic interventions for periodontitis.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»