Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2002, p. 1134-1139, Vol. 40, No. 4
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1134-1139.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pathology,1 Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology,5 Department of Medicine,3 Baylor College of Medicine, and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Services ,2 Infection Control, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas4
Received 21 May 2001/ Returned for modification 19 August 2001/ Accepted 2 December 2001
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Early in 1999, we noticed that a number of isolates from clinical specimens at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) in Houston, Texas, although identified as M. szulgai by both cellular fatty acid (CFA) analysis and 16S rRNA gene sequencing, were not typical in phenotypic characteristics because they were nonpigmented. Since these nonpigmented strains were all isolated from paucibacillary specimens (e.g., from BACTEC 12B broth medium only), we were concerned that the laboratory was introducing a contaminant during processing or that a hospital procedure was introducing the organism (9, 13, 14). We also considered the possibility that this was a novel organism associated with disease. Our genotypic, phenotypic, and epidemiologic investigations of these clinical strains as well as stock strains and one type strain are the subject of this report.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Characteristics of M. szulgai study isolates and associated patients
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Characteristics of stock strains of M. szulgai
|
16S rRNA gene sequence analysis was performed. The nucleotide sequence of about 500 bp of the 16S rRNA gene was determined (MicroSeq 16S rRNA gene kit 500; PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). This sequence was compared to those of the 52 mycobacterial type strains in the MicroSeq database by MicroSeq analysis software (PE Applied Biosystems) and to the sequences in the GenBank database. Neighbor-joining analysis was performed (MicroSeq analysis software).
The CFA were analyzed by the Hewlett-Packard HP 5890 II microbial identification system (MIDI, Inc., Newark, Del.). We performed randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. In brief, the isolates were suspended in 0.9% sterile saline to a turbidity that matched that of a 3.0 McFarland standard and were stored at -20°C. Before they were used, the isolates were thawed and boiled for 10 min. Several primers were tested for the arbitrary primed PCR, and a 10-mer (5'-TGGTCGCGGC) was chosen for the analysis based on its higher yield in number of bands. Fifty-microliter reaction mixtures containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 3 mM MgCl2, 60 pmol of primer, 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wis.), and 1 µl of template were run in a thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, Mass.) with the following program: 94°C for 5 min; 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 37 °C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; and 72°C for 10 min.
Epidemiological investigation. To determine the prevalence of isolates, all positive mycobacterial cultures obtained at the VAMC between 1995 and 2000 were reviewed. To determine if a particular person, laboratory procedure, or reagent was associated with the outbreak, the names of all personnel involved, the procedures employed, and the specimen type, receiving date, processing batch, and lot number for each reagent used were reviewed. The following reagents used in processing were cultured: phosphate buffer (BBL, Sparks, Md.), water (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, Ill.), N-acetyl-L-cysteine-NaOH (used for specimen digestion; Alpha-Tec Systems, Vancouver, Wash.), and the antimicrobial supplement PANTA (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems). The BACTEC 460 apparatus, including the sampling needles, was inspected.
The hospital water system was also investigated. The hospital receives water from two tanks, both of which are filled with city water. The first tank is the main tank for the hospital water supply, while the second tank is a reservoir. Fifteen thousand gallons of water from the second tank flows into the main tank daily. Four liters of water from each tank was collected. The water was concentrated by one of two methods. Either it was centrifuged for 30 min at 4,000 x g or it was filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size membrane. The pellet or the filter wash was obtained and decontaminated with 1.5% NaOH; the specimen was then inoculated on 7H11 plates (BBL) and BACTEC 12B vials (Becton Dickinson). Tap water and ice water from four patient wards were cultured similarly.
Patient records were reviewed for evidence of clinical diseases and therapeutic intervention. The nursing units involved, patient room numbers, admittance and discharge dates, and patient risk factors were recorded and reviewed.
|
|
|---|
All strains showed certain similar characteristics and conformed to the description of M. szulgai (4, 10). All strains were slow growing. Both the pigmented and nonpigmented strains isolated from patient specimens required 3 to 4 weeks of culture to become positive. Ten days after subculture, pinpoint colonies (0.1 mm diameter) were seen. At 2, 3, and 4 weeks, the colony sizes were 0.2, 0.5 to 1, and 1 to 2 mm, respectively. Urease and nitrate reduction test results were positive. The CFA patterns of all tested strains (21 nonpigmented and 4 pigmented) were similar, with C16:0 (42%) and C18:1
9c (30%) predominating, but other fatty acids (3 to 6%) (C14:0, C16:1
7c, and C16:1
5c) were also detected. All isolates were identified as M. szulgai by the CFA analysis software. All colonies were moist; however, for any one strain, some colonies were irregular while others were smooth and entire.
However, some strains were yellow at 37°C and were photochromogens at 25°C whereas others were nonpigmented (buff) at both 37 and 25°C (Table 1). The buff strains had no pigmentation after 2 h (not even when left for 2 days with exposure to light).
A total of 40 isolates were sequenced, including 32 VAMC outbreak isolates, seven stock strains, and the type strain. There were three genotypic clusters, as shown in the dendrogram (Fig. 1) and as listed in Tables 1 and 2. Cluster I included all of the 27 nonpigmented (pseudoepidemic) strains analyzed, including the isolate from the hospital water tank. Cluster II included two pigmented strains isolated from 1999 to 2000, four stock strains, and the M. szulgai type strain. In cluster II, there were five pigmented strains, three of which were isolated from 1999 to 2000 and two of which were stock strains. Cluster II differed from cluster I by only 0.19%; the difference was a T-to-C base pair mutation at position 462. The single strain (isolated in 1996) in genogroup cluster III was pigmented and was the only strain associated with disease.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Dendrogram of sequence data for 27 nonpigmented M. szulgai, 12 pigmented M. szulgai, and some mycobacterial type strains in the MicroSeq database, with Mycobacterium fortuitum subsp. fortuitum as an out-group. GSA, gene sequence analysis. The dendrogram was generated by the neighbor joining (N Join) method, with the horizontal line at the top representing a 3.727% genetic difference.
|
![]() View larger version (100K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. RAPD-PCR patterns of nine nonpigmented M. szulgai strains, nine pigmented M. szulgai strains, and one ATCC 35799 strain. Lane 1, 1-kb DNA ladder (Life Technologies, Inc.); lane 2, strain ATCC 35799; lanes 3 to 5, 10, and 11, pigmented M. szulgai strains in 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis group I; lanes 6, 8, and 9, pigmented M. szulgai strains in 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis group II; lane 7, pigmented M. szulgai strain in 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis group III; lanes 12 to 20, nonpigmented M. szulgai strains.
|
Of the 31 nonpigmented (pseudoepidemic) patient isolates, 24 were obtained from sputum, three were from bronchial wash, three were from urine, and one was from stool (Table 1). There were 30 different collection and processing dates. Only two of the specimens were consecutive and were processed on the same day; however, one was a urine sample and the other was a sputum sample. We concluded that contamination due to laboratory error was unlikely.
From 1995 through 2000, approximately 2,697 specimens per year were processed for mycobacterial culture in the VAMC microbiology laboratory. Pigmented M. szulgai strains were isolated from 0 to 5 patients each year from 1995 to 2000. The unusual nonpigmented (pseudoepidemic) strains were isolated from 1 patient in December 1998, 11 patients in 1999, and 19 patients in 2000 (Fig. 3). Figure 4 shows that the number of pseudoepidemic M. szulgai isolates increased, while the total number of acid-fast bacillus (AFB) cultures processed during 1999 (Fig. 4A) and 2000 (Fig. 4B) did not. There was a statistically significant increase of M. szulgai isolates collected in September 2000 as compared with the numbers collected in other months (P < 0.01) and a lesser increase increase in August 1999, possibly indicating better growth of the organism in warm weather.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Numbers of M. szulgai isolates collected at the Houston VAMC from 1995 to 2000.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Seasonal changes in the numbers of nonpigmented M. szulgai isolates collected and of total AFB cultures processed in 1999 (A) and 2000 (B).
|
We examined the tap water and ice water from this ward and several other wards as well as water from the hospital water storage tanks. No M. szulgai strain was found in any cultures from the nursing units. However, the pseudoepidemic strain was recovered from the second hospital water storage tank.
|
|
|---|
Although M. szulgai is an uncommon cause of human diseases, it has been most commonly associated with pulmonary disease (1, 4, 7, 15). Other diseases, such as osteomyelitis, also have been reported in connection with this organism (6). In 1996, there was one case of lung infection caused by M. szulgai at the VAMC. The patient had a clinical presentation similar to tuberculosis, had six positive AFB smears and seven positive cultures from sputum, and was successfully treated with a four-drug tuberculosis treatment regimen (isoniazid, ethambutol, rifampin, and pyrazinamide). In contrast, all patients harboring the nonpigmented pseudoepidemic M. szulgai strain had negative AFB smears and only a single positive specimen, isolated from a single medium (BACTEC vials). Most of the patients were immunocompromised, and there was no primary disease associated with the pseudoepidemic strain of M. szulgai. Similarly, there was no disease associated with the pigmented strains of M. szulgai isolated during the 1997 to 2000 study period.
Neither CFA nor 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis could uniquely differentiate pseudoepidemic strains from other strains. However, in this study, the RAPD-PCR patterns of the nonpigmented M. szulgai isolates were identical and were distinct from those of the pigmented strains, suggesting that a single unique clone was responsible. Furthermore, the RAPD pattern indicated that the pigmented strains were varied; they were found in three different genotypic clusters with at least four different RAPD patterns and thus did not represent a single source. The RAPD pattern was particularly valuable in distinguishing the six pigmented strains that were in the same 16S rRNA genogroup (cluster I) as the pseudoepidemic strains. Although 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis is excellent for bacterial identification (3, 12), it was not definitive in recognizing these pseudoepidemic strains. However, both the buff phenotype and a common RAPD-PCR pattern were uniquely associated with the pseudoepidemic strains.
Several characteristics made these pseudoepidemic strains difficult to investigate and evaluate. First, the strains of M. szulgai were nonpigmented, and pigment production has been considered a necessary characteristic before an identification of M. szulgai can be made. Because of this unusual phenotype, the strains could have been misidentified as Mycobacterium terrae or Mycobacterium triviale by conventional methods. Second, the strains were isolated over a period exceeding 2 years and were not associated with laboratory procedures, methodological changes, or reagents. Third, the pseudoepidemic strains originally could not be connected to an environmental source. They appeared abruptly in December 1998 but were unconnected to any known geographic location or water supply. The initial search for an environmental source within the hospital was negative, a finding that could have been due to the low concentration of organisms. In addition, the water tests were not performed at the peak period in August and September, when more organisms might be expected. At the time of the investigation, we found that the hospital water tanks were 2 years past their scheduled maintenance time for descaling and cleaning. Subsequently, we have made sure that the tanks get regular preventive maintenance cleaning, since M. szulgai could be just an indicator organism, signaling the presence of other pathogens of a more serious nature, such as Legionella spp. There have been no further isolations of M. szulgai at the VAMC.
We found an unusually high rate of M. szulgai isolations at the VAMC in recent years. The identical RAPD-PCR patterns and phenotypes of the 31 pseudoepidemic strains indicated that they were from a single source. Isolation of the identical strain from one of the hospital water supply tanks suggested that the pseudoepidemic of M. szulgai at the VAMC between 1998 and 2000 most likely originated from hospital water, which transiently inoculated or colonized our patients. The precursor source has not been determined, but nonpigmented M. szulgai strains occasionally have been isolated elsewhere in Texas (K. C. Jost, Texas State Health Laboratory, personal communication). We do not have a clear explanation as to why the strains first appeared in December 1998 or why there were increased isolations in September 2000 and from patients in a single nursing unit (unit 4A). However, our extensive investigation has proved valuable in that it focused attention on the probability of our stored water supply being a source of waterborne contaminants. In addition, the description of this unique strain increases the known characteristics associated with this species and makes correct identification in other laboratories more likely. Although no disease was associated with this cluster of isolates, the event was costly because, since most of the patients were immunocompromised and candidates for a mycobacterial disease, we could not easily discount the isolations. The identification of M. szulgai in a respiratory specimen as a nonpathogen and the analysis of the pseudoepidemic strains subsequently prevented unnecessary diagnostic workups and treatments.
Kristina Hulten was supported by a postdoctoral grant from the Swedish Society for Medical Research.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»