Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2002, p. 1230-1236, Vol. 40, No. 4
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1230-1236.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
National Reference Centre for Mycobacteriology, National Microbiology Laboratory, Population and Public Health Branch, Health Canada,1 Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba,3 Tuberculosis and Mycobacteriology Laboratory, Laboratory Branch, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada2
Received 20 November 2001/ Returned for modification 19 December 2001/ Accepted 11 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study we examined 11 mycobacterial strains, which gave unique and identical profiles when analyzed by HPLC and PCR-restriction pattern enzyme analysis (PRA). Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene revealed a perfect identity with an uncharacterized Mycobacterium strain from the GenBank database designated MCRO 17 (GenBank accession no. X93028) and a close relationship to M. elephantis DSM 44368T (GenBank accession no. AJ010747). Ten strains were isolated from sputa of different patients, and the 11th strain was isolated from an axillary lymph node from a 27-year-old male. This patient presented with lymphadenopathy, and after surgical excision, histopathology of the node showed caseating granulomas. Subsequent mycobacterial culture yielded a lightly pigmented mycobacterium that corresponded to the above cluster. The patients resided in various regions of the province of Ontario, Canada.
This paper describes a cluster of mycobacterial species isolated on 11 separate occasions from human specimens, subsequently identified as M. elephantis based on further characterization of the type strain of the species in our laboratories. New characteristics of this species are included.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Case histories of patients associated with the isolated clinical strains of M. elephantisa
|
HPLC. Mycolic acids were extracted and analyzed according to the standardized method (2). Briefly, the fatty acids were saponified with 25% KOH solution in methanol-water (1:1) for 1 h in an autoclave at 121°C. After acidification with 18.5% HCl, the mycolic acids were extracted with chloroform and derivatized to their UV-absorbing p-bromophenacyl esters. A high-molecular-weight internal standard (RIBI ImmunoChem Research Inc., Hamilton, Mont.) was added to each sample before testing. The HPLC hardware consisted of a Waters Corp. (Milford, Mass.) system, including a 717 auto sampler, a 600 E pump, a 486 UV detector, and a Beckman Ultrasphere XL-octyldecyl silane column. For chromatographic data analysis, the HPLC chromatograms were imported into Millennium 32 software (Waters Corp.). For species identification, the chromatographic data were compared with an extensive in-house library of mycobacterial species HPLC profiles as well as with published data (3). As M. elephantis was a very recently established species, its HPLC profile was not available publicly and was determined in-house with M. elephantis DSM 44368T.
PRA. PRA of the hsp65 gene was performed as described previously (19). Briefly, a 439-bp fragment of the 65-kDa heat shock protein gene (hsp65) was amplified by PCR with primers which are conserved throughout the Mycobacterium genus. The fragment produced was digested by two enzymes, BstEII and HaeIII. The restriction fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide. The pattern of restriction was compared to the published algorithm (19) and to the pattern determined in-house for M. elephantis DSM 44368T.
PCR of the nearly complete 16S rRNA gene. Organisms were heat killed by being boiled at 100°C for 10 min and mechanically lysed using the Mini Bead-Beater (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, Okla.) for 2 min. The lysate was centrifuged to precipitate cellular debris, and the supernatant was used for PCR. Genomic DNA was quantitated using the PicoGreen double-stranded DNA quantitation kit (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, Oreg.) with a TD-700 laboratory fluorometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, Calif.). Each reaction mixture contained approximately 10 ng of DNA; 2.5 mM MgCl2; 1x PCR buffer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Baie d'Urfé, Quebec, Canada); 200 µM (each) dCTP, dGTP, dATP, and dTTP; 1,000 pmol of each forward and reverse primer; and 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in a final volume of 50 µl. Primers used were pA (5' AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG 3') (6) and primer 1492 (5' GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T 3') (14). The PCR was performed using the Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp PCR System 2400 with a cycle of 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94, 60, and 72°C for 1 min each; and final extension at 72°C for 10 min, and the mixture was held at 4°C. The PCR product was purified using a MicroCon centrifugal filter device (Millipore Corporation, Nepean, Ontario, Canada) and quantified using UV absorbance at 260 nm.
16S rRNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. The ABI Prism BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) was used for the sequencing of the PCR product. A combination of universal primers was chosen to sequence the nearly complete gene (6). The sequencing reaction and template preparation were performed in accordance with the directions of the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems). The sequencing product was purified using the recommended Centricep columns (Princeton Separations, Adelphia, N.J.). Samples were run on an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The sequencing output was analyzed using the accompanying DNA Sequence Analyzer computer software (Applied Biosystems). The Lasergene program (version 4.01; DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, Wis.) was used for sequence assembly, sequence alignment, and phylogenetic analysis. Multiple sequence alignments were determined using the Clustal method algorithm. Analysis was performed by comparing sequences with the sequences of reference strains determined in our laboratory and select sequences obtained from GenBank.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Bactec 12B radiometric broth macrodilution sensitivity testing was performed on isolate 01-17 according to the method used for M. avium complex (9, 17). The following drugs were tested, with their MICs indicated in Table : amikacin, capreomycin, clarithromycin, clofazamine, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, ethionamide, isoniazid, kanamycin, ofloxacin, rifabutin, rifampin, and streptomycin (Table 3).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Antimicrobial sensitivity results for strain 01-17 determined by the Bactec 12B radiometric broth macrodilution method
|
|
|
|---|
Phenotypic and biochemical profiles were determined for 7 of the 11 clinical strains and are indicated in Table 2, along with the results of M. elephantis per the work of Shojaei et al. (16) and those determined for M. elephantis DSM 44368T in our laboratory. Characteristics of M. elephantis were also compared with those of other species having phenotypic and molecular similarities. Test results were identical for the two colony types of M. elephantis DSM 44368T and correlated well with those for the clinical strains.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Phenotypic characteristics of the M. elephantis cluster in comparison with the type strain of the species and closely related speciesa
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Mycolic acid pattern comparison of M. elephantis strain 01-19 with both colony types of M. elephantis DSM 44368T, obtained by HPLC analysis. The relative retention time is indicated for each peak. INT, high-molecular-weight internal standard.
|
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. PRA patterns obtained from digestion of the amplified hsp65 gene. Lanes 1 and 2, M. elephantis DSM 44368T colony 1; lanes 3 and 4, M. elephantis DSM 44368T colony 2; lanes 5 and 6, clinical strain 00-254; lanes 7 and 8, M. tuberculosis; lanes S, DNA ladder, 25 bp; lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7, BstEII digestion; lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8, HaeIII digestion. Numbers at left are molecular sizes in base pairs.
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of M. elephantis, clinical and type strains, with its closest genotypic and phenotypic relatives, based on the 16S rRNA gene. M. scrofulaceum is included due to its reported similarity with MCRO 17 (18). Multiple sequence alignments were determined from bp 54 to 1470 of the E. coli 16S rRNA gene by using the Clustal method algorithm in the Megalign component of the Lasergene program, version 4.01. The tree was rooted using Nocardia asteroides as the outgroup sequence. Sequences were determined in our laboratory unless indicated by a GenBank accession number.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Alignment of variable regions within the 16S rRNA gene. (A) Regions of variability among strains of M. elephantis; (B) other regions of variability between M. elephantis and its closest genotypic relative, M. pulveris. Numbers in parentheses indicate the base position on the E. coli 16S rRNA gene.
|
|
|
|---|
The MCRO strains were described by Springer et al. as part of an evaluation of difficult-to-identify clinical isolates of mycobacteria the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences of which were determined to help clarify their identity (18). MCRO 17 was described as most closely resembling M. scrofulaceum based on biochemical test results. Another strain, MCRO 20, described as most closely resembling M. flavescens, was found to have a sequence identical to that of MCRO 17 in regions A and B, corresponding to E. coli 16S rDNA positions 129 to 267 and 430 to 500, respectively. It is unknown whether the full gene was sequenced and found to be identical to that in MCRO 17. The sequence of MCRO 20 is not present in GenBank. Regions A and B of both MCRO 17 and MCRO 20 were determined to be "unique and identical" and "related to a group of thermotolerant rapid-growers which show an insertion of 2 nucleotides in helix 10" (18).
According to their biochemical profiles, the clinical isolates studied most closely resembled M. flavescens, as both are scotochromogenic, nitrate positive, and tolerant of 5% NaCl. Furthermore, they were both urease and pyrazinamidase positive, which would classify this organism as M. flavescens based on the work-flow chart for scotochromogens as previously described (10), which include the five most common species, M. gordonae, M. scrofulaceum, M. xenopi, M. flavescens, and M. szulgai. The growth pattern, of intermediate-rate growth, contributes further to the phenotypic similarities with M. flavescens. However, sequence-based data confirm that the strains were not M. flavescens, even in light of the questionable integrity of this species (15).
Several observations were made once the type strain of M. elephantis was obtained and studied in our laboratories. First, two colony types were equally present. This phenomenon has been observed in our laboratory with several other reference strains of mycobacteria, such as M. branderi, M. gilvum, M. obuense, and M. neoaurum, among others. We have also determined the 16S rRNA gene sequences of their various colony types and found them to be identical within the same species. While we anticipated that the same would occur with M. elephantis, this was not the case. M. elephantis DSM 44368T designated colony 1 appeared nonchromogenic on 7H10 medium, domed, and matte and acquiring a lobular center and a pale yellow pigmentation with age. The 16S rDNA sequence of this colony type showed nine base pair variations and two deletions in comparison with GenBank accession no. AJ010747. M. elephantis DSM 44368T designated colony 2 was pale yellow, smooth, and domed, like the clinical strains. The 16S rDNA sequence of this colony type showed five variations in comparison with the GenBank sequence. Shojaei et al. included cloning of the PCR product in their protocol (4), which may explain the variations between the GenBank submission of the M. elephantis type strain and that determined in our laboratory for the same strain. All sequencing performed in our laboratory was determined directly from the PCR product, thereby averaging out random Taq errors. The clinical strains showed only one variation from the sequence determined for M. elephantis DSM 44368T colony type 2. All clinical strains were sequenced once, and all presented the same sequence, while the two colony types of M. elephantis DSM 44368T were individually sequenced twice and with the same results as described above.
Based on biochemical testing, the clinical strains are phenotypically similar to the species M. flavescens. However, the strains are more distantly related to this species based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, having a 96.8% similarity. Sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene reveals that M. elephantis is most closely related to M. pulveris. There are 17 base differences between M. pulveris and the clinical strains of M. elephantis, 3 of them situated in the first 500 bases of the gene, as observed when using RIDOM (http://www.ridom.de/) for sequence comparisons. Phenotypically, clinical strains of M. elephantis differ in characteristics from the type strain described in reference 16 by presenting pale yellow colonies and tolerating 5% NaCl. Repeat biochemical testing performed in our laboratory showed that the type strain did tolerate 5% NaCl.
All strains, with the exception of 01-17 from the lymph node, were isolated from sputum specimens. None of the specimens were positive for acid-fast bacilli on the initial smear. The patients who yielded these respiratory isolates were generally elderly with preexisting nonmycobacterial disease. Since none of these patients had repeat isolation of the strain, the clinical relevance is difficult to ascertain. The lymph node isolate, however, is significant. The isolation of a nontuberculous mycobacterium from a sterile site is generally considered to be clinically relevant (24). Lymphadenitis caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria is not uncommon, with M. avium complex being the most common etiologic agent (12). Recently, there have been reports of novel species of mycobacteria such as M. tusciae, M. heidelbergense, and M. bohemicum causing lymphadenitis (8, 20, 21). The patient with a mycobacterium isolated from the cervical lymph node in this study was a 27-year-old immunocompetent male with extensive, recent tattoos on his skin. It is possible that this procedure could have caused intradermal inoculation of the organism. The histopathology findings of granulomatous changes in the node tissue and the subsequent isolation of a mycobacterium species concur with the diagnosis of mycobacterial lymphadenitis.
Pigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria are normally not known to cause disease. However, M. neoaurum, a pigmented rapid grower, has been associated previously with several cases of catheter-related bacteremia and has been best identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing (25). Definitive identification of these species is difficult without advanced methods such as HPLC or sequencing. New or less commonly isolated species of mycobacteria are likely to be misidentified by conventional methods, and laboratories lacking advanced technology should consider submitting to a reference laboratory nontuberculous mycobacterial strains of clinical significance that are not identified with commercial DNA probes.
The increased use of molecular methods in mycobacteriology laboratories has contributed to the discovery of many new species in this genus in recent years. It is also not unreasonable to predict that sequence-based identification, with the 16S rRNA gene being the most likely target, will establish itself in routine microbiology in the near future. The commercial kit MicroSeq (Applied Biosystems) and the publicly available RIDOM (http://www.ridom.de), both quality-controlled 16S rRNA gene sequence databases, have been developed in anticipation of this event.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»