Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2002, p. 1249-1253, Vol. 40, No. 4
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1249-1253.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology,1 Department of Medicine and Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595,2 Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 372373
Received 3 December 2001/ Returned for modification 3 January 2002/ Accepted 23 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adaptation of a real-time qPCR method for enumeration of B. burgdorferi organisms in mouse tissues (12) to human skin samples allowed us to address the impact of the quantity of spirochetes on the clinical and laboratory features of Lyme disease patients with erythema migrans (EM).
|
|
|---|
Signs and symptoms were recorded as present or absent. If present, the severities of the symptoms were characterized by the patients by use of an 8-cm-long visual analogue scale, as described previously (9). For symptomatic patients, a symptom severity index was calculated by using the cumulative symptom score divided by the number of symptoms present.
Skin biopsy and culture. Skin biopsy specimens (diameters, 2 mm) were obtained from the advancing border of primary EM lesions as described elsewhere (19). The biopsy specimens were placed in incomplete Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly (BSK) medium (this preparation of BSK medium lacks rabbit serum and bovine serum albumin but contains rifampin [40 µg/ml]) for later laboratory processing. Tissues were transferred to 0.5 ml of incomplete BSK medium and were ground in a microtissue grinder (Spectrum Medical Industries, Los Angeles, Calif.). One-half of this suspension was added to a 7-ml screw-cap tube containing 6 ml of complete BSK medium (with rabbit serum and 35% bovine serum albumin solution but without antibiotics). The tube was tightly capped and incubated at 33°C for the duration of culture. Cultures were first examined by dark-field microscopy at 2 weeks and were incubated for at least 8 weeks. The remaining suspension plus the skin fragment itself was processed for PCR amplification.
DNA extraction and standard PCR conditions. DNA was extracted separately from both skin tissue and its suspension medium by use of a commercial kit (IsoQuick; ORCA Research, Bothell, Wash.), as reported previously (8). Each extracted sample was resuspended in 50 µl of water, and corresponding skin and supernatant samples were combined prior to PCR amplification (a total of 100 µl per biopsy specimen). Five microliters of DNA suspension was used for conventional PCR, and 2 µl of DNA suspension was used for each qPCR amplification.
A 353-bp region of the B. burgdorferi flagellin gene (flaB) was amplified by a nested PCR protocol previously described by Barbour et al. (3). First-round PCR amplification was performed in 25-µl reaction mixtures containing 5 µl of DNA and 100 µM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim), and 20 pmol of each primer in a DNA engine thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, Mass.). For second-round PCR, 1 µl of the first-round reaction mixture was added to 24 µl of the second-round master mixture. The thermal cycling profile of both the first- and the second-round PCRs consisted of one 3-min cycle at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s. To avoid cross-contamination and sample carryover, pre- and post-PCR sample processing and PCR amplification were performed in separate rooms and all fluid transfers were carried out with plugged pipette tips to eliminate aerosols. DNA from isolate B31-MI was used as a positive control, and sterile water was used as the template for negative control amplifications, which were included with each PCR run. Amplified DNA products were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer.
Quantification of B. burgdorferi DNA in skin biopsy samples by qPCR. A B. burgdorferi-specific 222-bp fragment of the recA gene from patient skin biopsy specimens was amplified and quantified on a LightCycler real-time PCR instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), as described previously (12, 23). PCR was performed in glass capillaries in a final volume of 10 or 20 µl containing 1x LightCycler Master Mixture (Roche), 3 mM MgCl2, 1 µM each primer, and 2 µl of DNA template. The forward and reverse primers were nTM17.F (5'-GTG GAT CTA TTG TAT TAG ATG AGG CTC TCG-3') and nTM17.R (5'-GCC AAA GTT CTG CAA CAT TAA CAC CTA AAG-3'), respectively (12). The amplification program consisted of heating at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 45 cycles of heating at 20°C/s to 95°C with a 1-s hold, cooling at 20°C/s to 60°C with a 4-s hold, and heating at 20°C/s to 72°C with 10-s hold. The fluorescent product was collected at 80°C at the last step of each cycle to minimize signals from nonspecific products. A melting curve was acquired by heating the product at 20°C/s to 95°C, cooling it at 20°C/s to 60°C, and slowly heating it at 0.2°C/s to 95°C, with fluorescence collection at 0.2°C intervals. Specific and nonspecific PCR products were distinguished by melting curve analysis, since the melting temperature (Tm) of the nonspecific products was below 80°C, whereas the Tm of recA-specific amplicons was approximately 84°C. Data were analyzed with the LightCycler software provided by the manufacturer. Only data from the log-linear portion of the amplification were chosen for analysis. Since 1/2 of the total skin biopsy material was processed for DNA extraction and 1/50 (2 µl out of 100 µl) of the DNA prepared from each skin biopsy specimen was used as the template for qPCR, the spirochete number obtained for each qPCR was multiplied by 100 to obtain the total number of spirochetes in the entire 2-mm skin biopsy specimen. All qPCR-negative samples were diluted (1:5 or 1:10) and/or spiked with the DNA equivalent of 100 spirochetes and were subjected to another PCR amplification to determine whether potential PCR inhibitors were present.
An external standard set for B. burgdorferi-specific recA was developed as follows. Genomic DNA was prepared from a cultured B. burgdorferi clinical isolate, strain B356. The concentration of recA (number of copies per microliter) in purified genomic DNA was estimated as the DNA concentration determined by measurement of the optical density at 260 nm, assuming that the genome size is 1.5 Mbp and that there is one copy of recA per genome. This was further confirmed by a PCR-based limited-dilution assay. DNA templates containing 10 to 105 copies of B. burgdorferi-specific recA were included in each qPCR in order to generate a standard curve.
Determination of B. burgdorferi genotype. Genotyping of the B. burgdorferi isolates was accomplished by a nested PCR protocol as described previously (8). Briefly, first-round PCR amplification of the 16S-23S ribosomal DNA spacer was carried out with primers PA and P95. One microliter of the first-round amplification mixture was used for a second round of PCR with primers PB and P97. Ten microliters of the nested PCR product was digested overnight at 65°C with TruI (MBI Fermentas, Hanover, Md.). The resultant digestion products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 2.4% agarose gels.
Serology. Acute- and convalescent-phase serum specimens were tested by polyvalent (immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.), in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer.
Statistical analysis.
For categorical variables, P values were determined by the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. For continuous variables that were normally distributed, Student's t test was used. If data were nonnormally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. A one-way analysis of variance or a Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare three groups. The Spearman rank correlation was used to assess associations between skewed or ordinal variables. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to test whether candidate variables were predictive of the number of spirochetes from EM lesions. All tests were two tailed. Analysis was performed with several statistical packages (Minitab [version 12.1] and True Epistat [version 5.1] from Epistat Services, Richardson, Tex., and SPSS [version 10.0] from SPSS, Chicago, Ill.). P values
0.05 were considered significant.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Clinical characteristics of 50 adult patients with EM
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Comparison of laboratory methods for detection of B. burgdorferi in EM lesions of 50 patients
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Spirochete burden in individual 2-mm EM lesion biopsy specimens. The number of B. burgdorferi organisms present in a 2-mm skin biopsy specimen from individual patients was determined by qPCR. Data are presented for 40 specimens which yielded positive values by qPCR.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Comparison of patient signs and symptoms with the median spirochete number
|
Serology. Twenty-six patients (52%) were seropositive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on presentation (Table 4). Seropositivity was not significantly associated with the number of spirochetes in the 2-mm sample of the EM lesion (P = 0.16).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Seropositivity and skin culture positivity as a function of median spirochete number
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Correlation of B. burgdorferi RFLP type recovered in skin biopsy specimen culture and spirochete number
|
|
|
|---|
Among the three detection methods, qPCR was the most sensitive (positivity rate, 80%), followed by nested PCR (positivity rate, 64%) and culture (positivity rate, 54%) (also see reference 16). The sensitivities of the last two diagnostic modalities are comparable to those that we previously reported in 1992 (19), in which the sensitivity of conventional PCR sensitivity with 2-mm EM biopsy specimens was 59%, whereas the sensitivity of culture was 57%. The higher sensitivity of qPCR over that of nested PCR may be attributed to the fact that sample amplification and quantitative analysis were monitored in real time by a fluorometric assay with the double-stranded DNA-specific dye SYBR Green I. Amplicon detection was performed at the end of each cycle, not at the end point of amplification, as was done for nested PCR. The apparent discrepancy between the two PCR amplification methods was most likely due to inherent differences in amplicon detection technology and not to target amplification differences, as noted previously (11, 24). Both PCR amplification procedures targeted single-copy chromosomal genes with comparable specificities and sensitivities. The estimated sensitivities ranged from 1 to 10 copies of the target gene (flaB) for nested PCR and a single copy for qPCR. Real-time detection of qPCR amplification products by continuous fluorescence, followed by Tm analysis, is a more streamlined approach than conventional nested PCR, which involves two consecutive amplification reactions and which requires an additional gel electrophoresis step for detection after the completion of amplification (24, 25).
The 2-mm skin biopsy samples which were positive by both PCR methods had an average of 3,381 ± 544 spirochetes per biopsy specimen. In contrast, specimens in which spirochetes were not detected by conventional PCR but which were qPCR positive had an average of 1,580 ± 784 spirochetes per biopsy specimen (P = 0.13). This suggests that the lower number of spirochetes in these samples was likely a contributing factor in the failure of conventional PCR. Similarly, the number of spirochetes in culture-positive specimens was more than double that detected in culture-negative biopsy specimens (3,940 versus 1,642 spirochetes [P = 0.019]). A total of 16 samples (40%) which were qPCR positive yielded no growth of B. burgdorferi in culture. The presence of nonviable spirochetes in the specimens could account for this discrepancy. In three of the culture-positive skin specimens, spirochetes were not detectable by qPCR. The presence of PCR inhibitors in these specimens was ruled out because addition of B. burgdorferi DNA to the samples yielded positive PCR amplifications. The explanation for the culture-positive, qPCR-negative results for some specimens is not known, but it may be attributable to low spirochete numbers or sampling error. It should be noted that the data presented here are based on the results of tests with single 2-mm biopsy specimens taken from the leading edges of EM lesions. It is possible that heterogeneity in spirochete density may exist throughout a lesion. This should not have an impact on comparisons of culture yield and PCR positivity since all assays were performed with material from the same 2-mm biopsy specimen.
EM lesions, which are characteristic of early Lyme disease, expand rapidly over time (4, 14). Several studies have shown that the sizes of EM lesions directly correlate with the duration of the lesion (4, 13). We have previously reported that an inverse relationship between the recovery of B. burgdorferi from a skin specimen and EM lesion duration exists (13). The present study suggests that the explanation for this observation is that the number of spirochetes is significantly greater in skin lesions of shorter duration (P = 0.015) and, consequently, of smaller diameter (P = 0.006). Apparently, the number of organisms in the skin is reduced over time even in untreated patients, making recovery of spirochetes in culture less likely. The exact mechanism for the reduction of spirochete numbers in patient skin is unclear but may be related to elimination of spirochetes by the host immune system since development of a serologic response to B. burgdorferi has also been shown to be related to the duration of infection (1).
Differential dissemination of B. burgdorferi genotypes via blood has been reported previously (26). Highly significant associations between the presence of a particular RFLP type in skin (RFLP type 1) and the presence of spirochetemia (P < 0.001) or multiple EM lesions (P = 0.045) were observed. In the present study, there was a significant correlation between the RFLP type of the infecting spirochete and the number of spirochetes in the skin, with the highest number of organisms being present in patients with type 1 infections (P = 0.008). Whether the hematogenous dissemination observed in association with type 1 B. burgdorferi skin infections is caused by high spirochete numbers in the EM lesions merits further investigation.
No association between patient symptoms and the number of spirochetes detected by qPCR in the EM lesions was found, suggesting that the number of spirochetes in skin is not, per se, the cause for patient complaints. In a prior study, aside from a history of fever or chills, symptoms were not significantly associated with the particular B. burgdorferi genotype (RFLP type) causing the cutaneous infection (26). Clinical disease manifestations may depend on as yet unknown pathogenic factors that certain strains of B. burgdorferi may express or on host genetic determinants associated with the inflammatory response to B. burgdorferi.
In summary, this study is the first to measure the number of spirochetes in EM lesions of untreated adult Lyme disease patients. Larger numbers of B. burgdorferi organisms were significantly associated with shorter-duration, smaller skin lesions and infection with RFLP type 1 B. burgdorferi but not with the number or severity of symptoms. Culture positivity of skin biopsy specimens was significantly associated with skin lesions containing higher numbers of spirochetes. The duration of EM and the presence of RFLP subtype 1 B. burgdorferi were found to be independently associated with the number of spirochetes that could be detected by qPCR.
We gratefully acknowledge the investigators in the Lyme Disease Study Group, including L. Frank Cavaliere, Maria Aguero-Rosenfeld, Diane Holmgren, Kathy O'Keefe, Susan Bittker, Denise Cooper, Charles Pavia, Mohammed Bagheri, Jennifer Geiger, Anne Hardick, Matthew Harris, Pamela Jakubowicz, Doug Melman, Jonathan Nelson, Alexander Nicolaides, Daniel Radin, Jeffrey Rebish, and Karen Stolman.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»