Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2002, p. 1339-1345, Vol. 40, No. 4
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1339-1345.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, University of Antwerp UIA, Antwerp, Belgium,1 Organon Teknika BV, Boxtel, The Netherlands2
Received 20 August 2001/ Returned for modification 11 October 2001/ Accepted 24 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the past, diagnosis of infection with this organism was usually based on serology because culture is slow and insensitive (14, 22). Therefore, nucleic acid amplification techniques have been introduced. PCR of fragments of the P1 gene or the 16S rRNA gene was shown to be considerably more sensitive than culture for the detection of M. pneumoniae (9, 17, 20, 39).
Amplification methods often lack appropriate controls. A human ß-globin-specific amplification may be used to assess the presence of nucleic acids in the processed sample (1, 24, 31). For the detection of inhibitors, the use of an internal control (IC) to be amplified with the same primer set as the target sequence is straightforward since it avoids the use of different primer sets. ICs are now gradually being more widely used (10, 16, 19, 30, 41).
Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA; Organon Teknika, Boxtel, The Netherlands) is targeted at RNA. It makes use of the simultaneous enzymatic activities of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (AMV-RT), RNase H, and T7 RNA polymerase under isothermal conditions. One advantage of NASBA compared with PCR is that it is a continuous, isothermal process which does not require a thermocycler. The constant temperature maintained throughout the amplification reaction allows each step of the reaction to proceed as soon as an amplification intermediate becomes available. Thus, the exponential kinetics of the NASBA process, which are caused by multiple transcription of RNA copies from a given DNA product, are intrinsically more efficient than DNA amplification methods, which are limited to binary increases per cycle (38). The products of NASBA are single stranded and thus can be applied to detection formats that use probe hybridization without any denaturation step. Furthermore, the detection of microorganisms by an rRNA-based amplification technique might be more sensitive than PCR because of the presence of multiple RNA copies, and it also implies biological activity. It may be a useful complement to culture in order to establish if the M. pneumoniae infection is productive or to follow an antibiotic therapy. NASBA also has some disadvantages. NASBA is an RNA amplification procedure. RNA integrity and amplification inhibitors are the main causes of concern for NASBA, RT-PCR, and other RNA amplification procedures as well. The stability of the RNA may be affected during collection, processing, and storage of specimens prior to isolation. The addition of RNase inhibitors to the clinical specimens, such as guanidine thiocyanate (GuSCN), is required to preserve RNA integrity. The specificity of the reactions might be lower. The enzymes used are not thermostable, and the reaction temperature may not exceed 42°C without compromising the reaction. However, the specificity is increased by additional hybridization with target-specific probes by enzyme-linked gel assay (ELGA), electrochemiluminescence detection, or even real-time detection. Furthermore, the length of the amplified RNA target sequence should be in the range of 120 to 250 nucleotides. Shorter and longer sequences will be amplified less efficiently. This might be more important for RNA amplification assays.
The NASBA technique has already been successfully applied for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (21), human cytomegalovirus (13), citrus tristeza virus (23), human papillomavirus (36), human hepatitis C virus (34), malaria parasites (37), Chlamydia trachomatis (25), Campylobacter jejuni (42), and Mycobacterium leprae (44) and for the detection and identification of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (43).
We previously described the use of NASBA for the typing of M. pneumoniae strains and isolates (27). In the study described here we used the NASBA technique for the detection of M. pneumoniae RNA, constructed an IC for the assay, optimized the sample preparation procedure for detection of M. pneumoniae RNA in clinical specimens, and compared its performance with that of PCR on a number of clinical samples.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial species and strains
|
Respiratory specimens. Throat swabs, bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL), nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs), sputum specimens, and bronchial aspirates (BAs) were obtained from the University Hospital Microbiology Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, and tested either as individual specimens or as pools of 10 specimens. All were previously tested and were found to be negative for M. pneumoniae by PCR (17).
Fifteen specimens (2 BAs, 11 NPAs, 1 BAL specimen, 1 sputum specimen) from pediatric hospitalized patients who had acute lower respiratory tract infections and who were previously found to be positive for M. pneumoniae by PCR (17) were also tested.
Preparation of WT RNA and IC RNA. Constructs for the production of both wild-type (WT) and IC RNA were made in transcription vector pG3O, a pGEM 3 derivative with an altered multiple-cloning site and a unique BamHI site at position 2095 (25).
For the generation of WT RNA, cDNA from part of the 16S rRNA from M. pneumoniae strain PI 1428, obtained by RT-PCR with adapted versions of NASBA primers OT2156 and OT2157 (27), which contain an EcoRI site and a Csp45I site, respectively, was inserted into plasmid pG3O, resulting in plasmid pG3O Mp 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA).
For the production of the IC RNA, M. pneumoniae 16S rDNA in pG3O Mp was modified by insertion of a 134-bp fragment of HIV-1 pv22 (26) comprising nucleotides 1015 to 1146 from the 5' noncoding region (25).
Both plasmids were transformed in E. coli DH5
. Nucleotide sequence analysis did not reveal any mutations in the primer or probe annealing sites. These plasmids were used for large-scale generation of runoff transcripts after linearization with BamHI (Pharmacia Biotech). In vitro RNA was generated from these two constructs with T7 RNA polymerase (Pharmacia Biotech), as described previously (32). Plasmid DNA was removed by treatment with DNase I (Pharmacia Biotech). The RNA was quantitated spectrophotometrically and was stored in lysis buffer at -80°C.
Optimization of specimen treatment procedure. Twenty aliquots of 100 µl each from a sputum specimen pool were divided into four groups. Sample group 1 was treated with 66 U of protease (Sigma-Aldrich NV, Bornem, Belgium), suspended in RNase- and DNase-free H2O, at 37°C for 30 min, sample group 2 was treated with 33 U of protease at 37°C for 30 min, and sample group 3 was treated with 30 U of proteinase K (Boehringer Mannheim, Brussels, Belgium) at 37°C for 30 min. N-Acetyl-L-cysteine was added to a final concentration of 2.5 g/liter to the samples in sample group 4. The samples were incubated at 37°C for 15 min and vortexed at 5-min intervals.
The first sample of each group served as a negative control. To the second, third, fourth, and fifth samples of each group, 2 x 104, 2 x 105, 2 x 106, and 2 x 107 molecules of in vitro-generated WT RNA were added, respectively. Nucleic acids were extracted, and NASBA was performed.
Optimal pH of lysis buffer. Twelve aliquots of 100 µl of a sputum specimen pool were treated with 66 U of protease, suspended in RNase- and DNase-free H2O at 37°C for 30 min, and divided into six groups. A total of 900 µl of GuSCN lysis buffer at pH 7.2, 6.8, 6.4, 6.2, 6.0, and 5.6 was added to each of these groups, respectively. A total of 2 x 104 molecules was added to the first tube of each group, and, 2 x 105 molecules of in vitro-generated WT RNA was added to the second tube of each group. Nucleic acids were extracted, and NASBA was performed.
NASBA inhibitors in clinical specimens. Eight 100-µl aliquots were prepared from each of 10 sputum specimens. Five CCU of M. pneumoniae was added to samples 1 to 4, and 50 CCU was added to samples 5 to 8. Subsequently, 66 U of protease suspended in RNase- and DNase-free H2O was added to each sample. Samples 1 and 5 were incubated for 30 min at 25°C, samples 2 and 6 were incubated for 60 min at 25°C, samples 3 and 7 were incubated for 30 min at 37°C, and samples 4 and 8 were incubated for 60 min at 37°C. Nucleic acids were extracted, and NASBA was performed.
Three aliquots of 100 µl each were prepared from each of 10 throat swab specimens, 10 NPAs, 10 BAL specimens, and 10 BAs. The first aliquot served as a negative control, 5 CCU of M. pneumoniae was added to the second aliquot, and 50 CCU of M. pneumoniae was added to the third aliquot. The samples were treated with 66 U of protease and suspended in RNase- and DNase-free H2O for 30 min at 25°C. Nucleic acids were extracted, and NASBA was performed.
Nucleic acid extraction. Nucleic acids were extracted as described by Boom et al. (4). Briefly, 100 µl of a clinical specimen, 100 µl of a protease-treated specimen, or 100-µl aliquots of a bacterial culture was added to 900 µl of GuSCN lysis solution (4.7 M GuSCN [pH 6.2; Sigma-Aldrich NV], 46 mM Tris-HCl [Merck, Darmstadt, Germany], 20 mM EDTA [pH 6.2; Sigma-Aldrich NV], 1.2% [wt/vol] Triton X-100 [Sigma-Aldrich NV]), and the contents were mixed vigorously for rapid lysis. Seventy microliters of activated silica (1 g/ml of suspension in 0.1 M HCl; Organon Teknika) was added. The nucleic acid-silica complex was washed twice with GuSCN washing solution (5.25 M GuSCN, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.2]), twice with 70% (vol/vol) ethanol, and once with acetone. After the complex was dried at 56°C, the nucleic acids were eluted from the silica with 100 µl RNase- and DNase-free H2O and were stored at -80°C.
Primers and probes. The 16S rRNA-directed primers OT2156 (Mycoplasma 16S rRNA upstream primer; 5' GATCCTGGCTCAGGATTAA 3') and OT2157 (Mycoplasma 16S rRNA downstream primer; 5' AATTCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGGTCCTTTCAACTTTGATTCA 3') were used (27). Horseradish peroxidase-labeled oligonucleotide probe pd96 (Mycoplasma 16S rRNA probe; 5' CGGGTGAGTAACACGTATCC 3') was constructed, and the probe hybridized with both M. pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium amplification products.
NASBA. NASBA reactions were performed as described by Ovyn et al. (27). In negative control reactions, target nucleic acid was replaced by RNase- and DNase-free water. The amplification products were identified by a rapid nonradioactive in-solution hybridization assay (ELGA), as described by Ovyn et al. (27).
Analytical sensitivity study. The analytical sensitivity of the NASBA-based M. pneumoniae 16S amplification assay was studied with serial 10-fold dilutions of suspensions of M. pneumoniae PI 1428 in SP4 medium, dilutions of in vitro-generated WT 16S rRNA in water, and dilutions of M. pneumoniae PI 1428 and in vitro-generated WT 16S rRNA added to untreated and protease-treated samples of pools of respiratory specimens. The nucleic acid extracts of the protease-treated samples spiked with 10-fold dilutions of M. pneumoniae PI 1428 were also used to perform PCR, as described by Ieven et al. (17).
Determination of the optimal IC concentration. Serial 10-fold dilutions of IC RNA were added to M. pneumoniae-negative specimens to define the minimal number of molecules that could be detected. A 5-fold larger number was then added to serial 10-fold dilutions of in vitro-generated WT RNA to test for competition between the IC and WT RNA.
RNA degradation. The RNA degradation caused by lysis buffer produced with GuSCN from two different sources was monitored. Lysis buffers were prepared by using GuSCN either from Sigma-Aldrich NV or from ICN Biomedicals NV, Asse, Belgium. M. pneumoniae PI 1428 cells were added to both versions of the lysis buffer, and the resulting specimens were stored at -80°C or at room temperature for different periods of time prior to extraction.
|
|
|---|
Analytical sensitivity of the M. pneumoniae 16S rRNA NASBA primers compared with that of PCR primers. The analytical sensitivity of the M. pneumoniae 16S rRNA NASBA primers tested with dilutions of in vitro-generated WT and IC RNA were 10 and 102 molecules, respectively (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (75K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Sensitivity of NASBA assay. Lane 1, free probe; lanes 2 to 5, 10-fold serial dilutions of target RNA with 10, 100, 1,000, and 10,000 molecules, respectively; lanes 6 to 9, the same 10-fold serial dilutions used in lanes 2 to 5, respectively, with IC RNA; lanes 10 to 13, 10-fold serial dilutions of target RNA after nucleic acid extraction with 2 x 102, 2 x 103, 2 x 104, and 2 x 105 molecules, respectively; lanes 14 to 17, the same 10-fold serial dilutions used in lanes 10 to 13, respectively, with IC RNA after nucleic acid extraction; lanes 18 to 21, 10-fold dilutions of M. pneumoniae PI 1428 at 0.5, 5, 50, and 500 CCU, respectively. FP, free probe.
|
However, the analytical sensitivity of the assay could be remarkably improved by appropriate pretreatment of the respiratory specimens. All respiratory specimens became more liquid by all methods tested, but only the treatment with 66 U of protease at 25°C for 30 min followed by extraction with lysis buffer at pH 6.2 improved the sensitivity to 5 CCU or 2 x 104 molecules for M. pneumoniae or in vitro-generated WT RNA, respectively, in vitro and added to different clinical specimens (Table 2). The only exception was BA, for which protease treatment resulted in a sensitivity of 50 CCU. When PCR was applied to the nucleic acid extracts of the protease-treated samples spiked with M. pneumoniae PI 1428, there was no difference in sensitivity between the two assays.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Detection limits of NASBA in spiked clinical specimens
|
The intrarun coefficients of variation for the detection of 50, 500, and 5,000 CCU were 26.4, 8.1, and 4.6, respectively; the interrun coefficients of variation for the same inputs were 34.8, 10.7, and 13.9, respectively.
The limits of detection of M. pneumoniae RNA and M. pneumoniae whole cells were not influenced by the addition of 106 molecules of the IC (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (119K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Suitability of the assay for biological samples. Lane 1, free probe; lanes 2 to 5, 10-fold serial dilutions of target RNA were added to untreated sputum and nucleic acid was extracted with lysis buffer (pH 7.2) and 2 x 104, 2 x 105, 2 x 106, and 2 x 107 molecules, respectively; lanes 6 to 9, the same 10-fold serial dilutions used in lanes 2 to 5, respectively, were added to treated sputum and nucleic acid was extracted with lysis buffer (pH 6.2); lanes 10 to 13, 10-fold serial dilutions of M. pneumoniae PI 1428 were added to sputum and the optimized treatment procedure was used. A total of 106 molecules of IC RNA was added to these last four samples: 0.5, 5, 50, and 500 CCU, respectively. FP, free probe.
|
None of 100 PCR-negative clinical specimens was NASBA positive, while 3 specimens contained inhibitors and the IC produced no signal.
RNA degradation. M. pneumoniae stored at room temperature for 60 min in lysis buffer prepared with GuSCN from ICN Biomedicals NV was not detectable by NASBA, whereas for suspensions prepared with GuSCN from Sigma-Aldrich NV, the reaction was positive even after storage for up to 240 min at room temperature (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. M. pneumoniae RNA degradation. , detection level with GuSCN from Sigma-Aldrich NV; , detection level with GuSCN from ICN Biomedicals NV.
|
|
|
|---|
The cross-reactivity does not limit the ability to diagnose a Mycoplasma infection and has no influence on the antibiotic therapy; it may only influence epidemiological data. This may be avoided by confirmation of a positive result by a second hybridization with an M. pneumoniae-specific probe (27) and an M. genitalium-specific probe. Furthermore, confirmation of all positive findings by reanalysis by reextraction of the original specimen and an independent amplification reaction and detection is always recommended. The second analysis may specifically be targeted to M. pneumoniae and M. genitalium. Some commercial DNA hybridization kits for M. pneumoniae also show cross hybridization with M. genitalium (11).
By use of primers OT2156 and OT2157 (Fig. 1), the detection limits for M. pneumoniae were 10 molecules of in vitro-generated WT RNA and 100 molecules of IC RNA. Although the guanidine extraction procedure is known to be efficient, it resulted in a loss of 2 to 3 logs when applied to RNA in water and to RNA or M. pneumoniae cells added to clinical specimens. To increase the sensitivity of detection, several specimen treatment procedures were tested.
Treatment of clinical specimens with 66 U of protease for 30 min at 25°C and the use of GuSCN lysis solution at pH 6.2 rather than pH 7.2 was found to be optimal. The lower pH during nucleic acid extraction possibly allows better adhesion of the RNA to the activated silica. Thus, the detection limit for M. pneumoniae cells in clinical specimens was reduced to 5 CCU, or 50 to 500 cells.
A similar sensitivity was found when the results obtained by the 16S rRNA NASBA and the P1 PCR with protease-treated samples were compared. While E. coli and Bacillus subtilis have 7 and 10 rRNA operons, respectively, mollicutes have only 1 or 2 (5). More operons may be responsible for more transcription and thus more 16S rRNA molecules. Furthermore, fast-growing organisms may contain 104 rRNA molecules per cell, but it is generally accepted that slowly growing organisms have fewer rRNA molecules. For M. pneumoniae, the amount of rRNA molecules would be comparable to that for M. tuberculosis, which is about 10 molecules per cell. The P1 adhesin gene is an intriguing target for PCR because of its repetitive nature within the M. pneumoniae genome. Approximately 8% of this genome is composed of repetitive DNA elements with regions homologous to the P1 adhesin gene (15). For molecular biological detection of M. pneumoniae, both targets may have the same advantage.
The detection limits of the various M. pneumoniae molecular amplification assays described in the literature are the smallest numbers of organisms measured according to the number of CFU (1 CFU has been shown to correspond to 160 organisms [14] and 10 to 1,000 organisms [28]), the number of CCU (1 CCU corresponds to 10 to 100 organisms [3]), the number of cells, or the quantity of DNA, which makes comparison of the analytical sensitivities of the different assays very difficult. Abele-Horn et al. (1), for example, reported that the detection limit of their assay was 3,000 genome copies, 30 pg of DNA, 19 CFU, or 1.9 x 103 organisms. Since the number of rRNA molecules present per M. pneumoniae cell is unknown and we wanted to calculate the analytical sensitivity of our assay, we decided to use in vitro-generated WT RNA, which might be a more objective method for calculation of the sensitivity of our assay.
The use of ICs is indispensable for the reliable detection of microorganisms in clinical specimens by PCR, RT-PCR, or NASBA since inhibitors may still be present in some clinical specimens and give rise to false-negative or invalid results (7, 17, 29, 35). Therefore, IC RNA was constructed for the M. pneumoniae NASBA assay. The IC is a modified amplicon that has been made longer and that is added to each reaction tube. The primer binding sites are identical to those of the target, and therefore, they are amplified by the same reagents as the real target, but they are easily differentiated from it because they are longer. By adding the control at the very start of the process, the efficacy of the sample processing procedure can be assessed. During the amplification procedure there is competition between the IC RNA and the WT RNA, and the amount of IC to be added to the specimens should be carefully titrated. When the IC is added to negative specimens, only the IC amplicon will be visible on the gel; when the IC is added to weakly positive specimens, both the amplicons from the IC RNA and the WT RNA will be visible; and when the IC is added to strongly positive specimens, only the amplicon of the WT will be visible. In the case of inhibition, no amplicon will be visible at all. The IC used in our NASBA was detected in 97 of 100 M. pneumoniae-negative samples but in none of the M. pneumoniae-positive samples. This results from the minimal amount of IC added and from the fact that WT RNA is preferentially amplified because of its shorter length. In the present study, false-negative (invalid) results were observed with very viscous samples. This could result from the glycoproteins that adhere to the activated silica, producing clumps and making the silica inaccessible for RNA.
The method studied detected M. pneumoniae in the 15 respiratory specimens that previously tested positive by PCR.
In our hands, the GuSCN from ICN Biomedicals NV was found to be unsuitable for RNA extraction. The lysis buffer used mainly contains GuSCN, a chaotropic reagent, which inhibits all nuclease activity and which destroys (sub)cellular components. The differences seen with the GuSCNs from the different companies may be caused by inefficient inhibition of RNA-degrading enzymes, by a lower yield of nucleic acid after isolation, or by the presence of an unknown inhibitor in the eluate. The inhibitor may be introduced by the purification procedure itself: the inhibitor may be present in the GuSCN, may be bound to the silica and eluted with the nucleic acids, and may inhibit the enzymes during the amplification procedure. Samuelson et al. (33) reported problems with an unexplained inhibitory factor with the RNAce Purification system (Bioline), a commercially available extraction kit based on the same chemistry as the procedure described by Boom et al. (4), when low dilutions of the eluate were processed. The present study and other studies (6, 33) suggest that quality control of the buffers used for storage of clinical material is critical, particularly when RNA is to be analyzed. Most RNA degradation is likely to occur during transportation of the specimens. Bruisten et al. (6) studied the stability of HIV-1 RNA in whole blood, plasma, and serum before and after the addition of lysis buffer and concluded that the specimens could be kept at 4°C, provided that the transportation time was as short as possible. Furthermore, those investigators suggested that specimens should be processed on the day of sampling and stored at -70°C, thus stabilizing the RNA for at least 6 months.
Despite the limited number of known M. pneumoniae-positive samples available for investigation, the NASBA assay described here is a promising assay for the detection of M. pneumoniae in respiratory specimens.
In summary, it was shown that the NASBA-based 16S rRNA assay, combined with a nonradioactive hybridization procedure (ELGA), provides a sensitive and specific method for the detection of M. pneumoniae. The complete procedure, including protease pretreatment of the specimens, applied to a group of 12 samples takes less than 7 h to perform and can detect between 50 and 500 cells in a 100-µl specimen.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»