JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martín-López, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Méndez-Álvarez, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martín-López, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Méndez-Álvarez, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2002, p. 1569-1570, Vol. 40, No. 4
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1569-1570.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Detection of Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates Harboring the ica Gene Cluster Needed for Biofilm Establishment


   LETTER
Top
 Letter
References
 
The incidence of chronic nosocomial infections by gram-positive bacteria has drastically increased during the last years in association with the more frequent use of in-dwelling medical devices (1, 2). Infections derived from the use of invasive methods, e.g., catheters, are mainly due to staphylococci, especially those strains which produce an extracellular slime and constitute a biofilm, making clinical treatment extremely difficult (4, 5, 7, 9-12). The biofilm development process requires polysaccharidic intercellular adhesin, which is synthesized by the enzymes encoded by the intercellular adhesion cluster (ica) (6, 13, 14).

A great variety of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis strains carry the ica cluster, and some of them constitute biofilm. Loss of the ica locus results in an incapacity to produce polysaccharidic intercellular adhesin and to develop biofilms (1). Staphylococcal infections produced by ica carriers can be more problematic due to the presence of methicillin and mupirocin resistance genes (5, 9, 12). The rapid detection of the ica locus in hospital staphylococcal isolates, together with the simultaneous detection of antibiotic resistance genes, will allow the development of prevention methods to reduce the bacterial capacity to invade the in-dwelling medical devices.

We have analyzed 65 clinical isolates, 7 from catheter samples and 58 clinical isolates randomly selected. The catheter isolates were recovered from the Oncology Medical Service, which follows a specific protocol to avoid catheter colonization, which explains the small number of isolates. The isolates, including S. aureus (60, 2 of them from catheter samples) and S. epidermidis (5, all from catheter samples), recovered during a one-year period, were analyzed by PCR to determine the presence or absence of the genes that confer constitutive methicillin resistance (mecA) and high mupirocin resistance (ileS-2) and a fragment of a gene that identifies S. aureus at the species level (femB) and to detect the presence of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica). Detection of femB, mecA, and ileS-2 genes was performed by applying a triplex PCR method that has been previously described (8). PCR detection of the ica cluster was performed by amplification of a DNA region partially covering the icaA and icaB genes. For S. epidermidis, we used the previously described primers icaAB-F and icaAB-R (3), which yielded a 546-bp fragment, while for S. aureus we designed a pair of primers from the sequence available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information gene bank (locus AF086783): icaA-S (5' AAA CTT GGT GCG GTT ACA GG 3') and icaA-E (5' TCT GGG CTT GAC GTT G 3') (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Amplification with this pair of primers generated a 750-bp fragment.

From the 58 clinical isolates randomly selected, 5 (8.6%) methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates (MRSA) and 1 (1.7%) methicillin-resistant and highly mupirocin-resistant S. aureus isolate (MMRSA) were negative for icaAB, while the other 52 (89.7%) isolates were positive for icaAB (Table 1). Fifty-six of these 58 isolates showed mecA (96.5%), 52 presented icaAB (89.7%), and 40 isolates (61.5%) were characterized by harboring both icaAB and mecA. Eleven of the 58 isolates (16.9%) carry both resistance genes mecA and ileS-2 in addition to the ica cluster, and only 2 of 58 (3.5%) lacked the femB marker. Regarding the seven catheter isolates, two S. aureus isolates showed the icaAB marker but were negative for both resistance markers, i.e., mecA and ileS-2, while only one S. epidermidis isolate presented the icaAB cluster (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Frequency of detection of femB, mecA, ileS-2, and icaAB loci

 
Our results showed a very high percentage of the ica cluster in nosocomial MRSA and MMRSA isolates. The proportion of ica carriers was slightly lower (42.9%) in the case of catheter isolates, but it reached 89.6% in the case of isolates recovered from mucous membranes and skin.

Frebourg et al. (3) have reported that a high proportion of clinical isolates harboring the ica locus also carry the mecA gene. Here, we observed that 68.9% of the MRSA isolates harbor both loci, ica and mecA. Of these isolates, 18.6% showed a higher virulence potential, since they also presented high mupirocin resistance encoded by the ileS-2 gene.

Therefore, we suggest simultaneous PCR detection of the ica locus and antibiotic resistance genes as a rapid and effective method to be used for discrimination between potentially virulent and nonvirulent isolates, which would be especially relevant for detection of isolates with high capacity to invade in-dwelling medical devices.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by grants 1999/074 and 2001/020 from the Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deportes, Canarian Autonomous Government, and FUNCIS PI 40/00, Canarian Autonomous Government, to F.C.M. and S.M.A. S.M.A. was supported by FIS contract 99/3060 (Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain).


   REFERENCES
Top
 Letter
 References
 

  1. Cramton, S. E., C. Gerke, N. F. Schnell, W. W. Nichols, and F. Götz. 2000. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 67:5427-5433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Dickinson, G. M., and A. L. Bisno. 1989. Infections associated with indwelling devices: concepts of pathogenesis; infections associated with intravascular devices. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:597-601.[Free Full Text]
  3. Frebourg, N. B., S. Lefebvre, S. Baert, and J. F. Lemeland. 2000. PCR-based assay for discrimination between invasive and contaminating Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:877-880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Götz, F., C. Heilmann, and S. E. Cramton. 2000. Molecular basis of catheter associated infections by staphylococci. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 485:103-111.[Medline]
  5. Jones, S. M., M. Morgan, T. J. Humphrey, and H. Lappin-Scott. 2001. Effect of vancomycin and rifampicin of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Lancet 357:40-41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. McKenney, D., J. Hübner, E. Muller, Y. Wang, D. A. Goldmann, and G. B. Pier. 1998. The ica locus of Staphylococcus epidermidis encodes production of the capsular polysaccharide/adhesin. Infect. Immun. 66:4711-4720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. O'Gara, J. P., and H. Humphreys. 2001. Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: importance and implications. J. Med. Microbiol. 50:582-587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Pérez-Roth, E., F. Claverie-Martín, J. Villar, and S. Méndez-Álvarez. 2001. Multiplex PCR for simultaneous identification of Staphylococcus aureus and detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4037-4041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Raad, I., R. Darouiche, R. Hachem, M. Sacilowski, and G. P. Bodey. 1995. Antibiotics and prevention of microbial colonization of catheters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2397-2400.[Abstract]
  10. Raad, I. 1998. Intravascular-catheter-related infections. Lancet 351:893-898.
  11. Stewart, P. S. 2001. Multicellular resistance: biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 9:204.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Stewart, P. S., and J. W. Costerton. 2001. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358:135-138.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Von Eiff, C., C. Heilmann, and G. Peters. 1999. New aspects in the molecular basis of polymer-associated infections due to staphylococci. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:843-846.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Ziebuhr, W., C. Heilmann, F. Götz, O. Meyer, K. Wilms, E. Straube, et al. 1997. Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) and phase variation in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Blood culture strains and mucosal isolates. Infect. Immun. 65:890-896.[Abstract]
Juana Victoria Martín-López
Eduardo Pérez-Roth
Félix Claverie-Martín
Laboratorio de Biología Molecular,
Unidad de Investigación Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

Oscar Díez Gil
Ninivé Batista
Servicio de Microbiología Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

Manuel Morales
Servicio de Oncología,
Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria,
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

Sebastián Méndez-Álvarez*
Laboratorio de Biología Molecular,
Unidad de Investigación
Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria
and
Departamento de Biología Celular y Microbiología,
Universidad de La Laguna
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

* Phone: 34-922-600080-600545,
Fax: 34-922-600562,
E-mail: smendez{at}hcan.rcanaria.es

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2002, p. 1569-1570, Vol. 40, No. 4
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1569-1570.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martín-López, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Méndez-Álvarez, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martín-López, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Méndez-Álvarez, S.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS