This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Grundmann, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Grundmann, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2002, p. 1821-1823, Vol. 40, No. 5
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1821-1823.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Rapid PCR-Based Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Screening Swabs

D. Jonas,1* M. Speck,1 F. D. Daschner,1 and H. Grundmann2

National Reference Center of Hygiene, Institute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany,1 Department of Microbiology, University Hospital, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom2

Received 9 April 2001/ Returned for modification 13 August 2001/ Accepted 13 February 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
A PCR identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), obviating the need for subculture on agar media, was investigated. The combination of MRSA detection by mecA femB PCR with prior enrichment in selective broth was tested for 439 swabs. PCR identified 36 MRSA-positive samples, in concordance with conventional methods.


arrow
TEXT
 
Accurate and rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in clinical specimens is essential for timely decisions on isolation procedures and effective antimicrobial chemotherapy. Numerous approaches that improve turnaround time for the identification of MRSA have been described. Fluorescence tests (14), PCR assays (4), or penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) antibody agglutination tests have been described elsewhere (12). Yet, these require subculture on solid media, and many are unable to determine species and methicillin susceptibility at the same time. A simultaneous test of methicillin resistance and species confirmation by a mecA femB duplex PCR has been proposed elsewhere (16). The mecA gene encodes the extra PBP2a, which is unique to methicillin-resistant staphylococci. The femB gene codes for an enzyme important in cross-linking peptidoglycan in various different Staphylococcus spp. The specificity of the femB PCR primers used for DNA amplification of the species S. aureus has been demonstrated previously (8).

This study describes the performance of this technique in a clinical setting of moderate MRSA endemicity where large numbers of screens need to be processed on a daily basis. Moreover, the robustness of the test was investigated by determining the number of false-positive readings due to coamplification of femB and mecA from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (R-CNS) coexisting at the sample site (C. M. Vandenbroucke-Grauls and J. G. Kusters, Letter, J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1599, 1996).

Specimens. Over a period of 3 months 439 swabs were obtained from patients (throat, nose, groin, perineum, wound, and drainage) during routine screening in a German tertiary-care hospital.

Selective enrichment broth. Swabs were incubated overnight at 35°C in 5 ml of a selective enrichment broth consisting of Mueller-Hinton broth (Becton-Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) supplemented with NaCl to a final concentration of 7% (wt/vol) and 2 µg of oxacillin (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany)/ml, representing half of the breakpoint concentration that defines oxacillin-methicillin-resistant S. aureus (13). This lower concentration of oxacillin was chosen similarly to a previously published method, in which 4 µg of methicillin/ml was used in order to prevent culture failure due to a low inoculum of resistant staphylococci (16). After centrifugation of 1 ml for 5 min at 10,000 x g, the supernatant was discarded and bacterial sediment was resuspended in the remaining broth, around 50 µl.

For conventional identification aliquots of 5 and 10 µl were subcultured on mannitol-agar containing 7.5% NaCl (Heipha, Heidelberg, Germany) and on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 4% NaCl and 6 µg of oxacillin (Heipha)/ml, respectively. Agar plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 h (13). S. aureus was identified by Staphytect Plus-Test DR 850 M (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany). This latex agglutination test detects the clumping factor, protein A, and the capsular polysaccharide types 5 and 8.

Duplex PCR. Two microliters of bacterial suspension was mixed with 20 µl of Gene Releaser (Hybaid, Heidelberg, Germany) and overlaid with mineral oil (Sigma, Munich, Germany). Bacterial DNA was released by a temperature-cycling protocol according to the manufacturer's recommendation, which was repeated once. The DNA lysate was kept at 80°C for transfer to the PCR master mix, which was held at the same temperature (hot start). Five microliters of this DNA lysate was transferred with filter-plugged pipette tips to 20 µl of PCR amplification mix. The duplex PCR for detection of MRSA was performed essentially as described previously (16). Primers (Pharmacia Biotech) used for detection of the mecA gene were MecA1 (5'-GTA GAA ATG ACT GAA CGT CCG ATA A) and MecA2 (5'-CCA ATT CCA CAT TGT TTC GGT CTA A), yielding a 310-bp amplicon (6), while the femB gene was detected with the primers FemB1 (5'-TTA CAG AGT TAA CTG TTA CC) and FemB2 (5'-ATA CAA ATC CAG CAC GCT CT), leading to an S. aureus-specific 651-bp PCR product (9).

The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 50°C, and 60 s at 72°C, with a final extension step at 72°C for 2 min. Ten-microliter aliquots were loaded onto agarose gel electrophoresis gels (1% agarose, 1x Tris-buffered EDTA; 90 V for 90 min) and stained with 10 µg of ethidium bromide/ml after electrophoresis.

Findings. Duplex PCR generated staphylococcus-specific amplification products in 147 of 439 swabs. Sixty-four yielded a mecA product but no femB product, indicating R-CNS; 47 yielded a femB product but no mecA product, as expected for MSSA; and 36 produced both products, indicating the presence of MRSA (Table 1). Two hundred ninety-two PCRs remained negative, which was also confirmed by the absence of any visible growth in the enrichment broth and on the solid medium.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Comparison of MRSA detection results for clinical specimens by culture identification and mecA femB duplex PCR

Results obtained by conventional subculture on solid medium with subsequent species identification and testing for heteroresistance on oxacillin plates were in complete concordance with the PCR findings. Neither oxacillin-susceptible, coagulase-negative staphylococcal species nor any other bacterial growth could be demonstrated.

In order to determine whether femB-positive MSSA and mecA-positive staphylococci other than S. aureus (R-CNS) would lead to simultaneous amplification of both DNA target sequences independently present in different organisms, sterile selective broth was seeded with a mixed inoculum. Ten CFU of R-CNS was cocultured with 103 or 104 CFU of S. aureus type strain ATCC 29213 as well as MSSA, isolated from the enrichment broth on patient screening. The results of the subsequent PCR are shown in Fig. 1. Even in the cases where the MSSA inoculum exceeded the 10 CFU of R-CNS by 3 orders of magnitude (lanes 3 and 4), only a mecA amplicon, and no femB PCR product, could be identified.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Specificity of the selective enrichment broth. Ten CFU of methicillin-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococci was seeded with 1,000 (lanes 1 and 2) and 10,000 (lanes 3 and 4) CFU of MSSA. Strains used were S. aureus ATCC 29213 (lanes 1 and 3) and one of the 47 MSSA isolates previously recovered from the selective enrichment broth (lanes 2 and 4). The duplex PCR was performed, and products were separated on an agarose gel. Lane 5, marker; lane 6, MRSA-positive control with the 651-bp femB and 310-bp mecA amplicons.

Conclusions. Early detection of MRSA permits timely implementation of preventive infection control strategies and reduces costs (3). Standard procedures in clinical microbiology lead to difficulties in attempting to identify MRSA within time frames that allow routine grouping of newly admitted patients. Conventional processing of screening samples takes 2 or 3 days before definitive MRSA identification can be achieved. Duplex PCR for mecA and femB provides reliable and unequivocal results for MRSA identification within 18 h (16). The specificity of the femB primers used for identification of S. aureus has been demonstrated previously (8). The potential coamplification of femB and mecA from mixed cultures consisting of R-CNS and MSSA is a theoretical weakness inherent in this method, as it would mimic a false-positive MRSA result (Vandenbroucke-Grauls and Kusters, letter). However, as our experiments showed, MSSA was outcompeted by R-CNS in the enrichment broth, even when exceeding the inoculum of R-CNS by 3 orders of magnitude. This also applied when we used MSSA isolates that previously persisted in enrichment broth containing 2 µg of oxacillin/ml. This finding does not come as a surprise, as the competitive exclusion principle states that competition under limiting conditions always favors the outgrowth of a single genotype (7).

The expenses and workload of a single PCR exceed the demands of testing one clinical specimen for the presence of MRSA. Yet, if the daily number of MRSA screening tests increases, the workload per PCR decreases and finally outweighs the expenses for molecular reagents. In our experience processing 20 swabs requires 1 h of hands-on time. Moreover, the sensitivity of this technique, which neither starts with nor requires single, visually questionable colonies, can be superior to that of routine diagnostic procedures. Another proposed test for presumptive MRSA identification using a concurrent identification of S. aureus and cloxacillin resistance via a soft salt-mannitol-cloxacillin agar test had a low sensitivity of 72.7% (11), compared to the sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) of the method described herein. MRSA can sometimes be overlooked in culture, because some strains grow as nonpigmented colonies or are clumping factor negative, if tested on slides with rabbit plasma (19). The heterogeneous expression of methicillin resistance can make it difficult to determine the resistance phenotype definitively (5, 9, 15). Therefore, detection of the mecA gene remains the "gold standard" (1).

Evaluation data for the identification of the mecA gene product PBP2a by means of latex agglutination are promising (2, 10, 17). Yet, this method detects PBP2a in R-CNS as well (10), which requires identification to the species level (18).

This study strengthens the assertion that the duplex PCR offers a fast and accurate means of MRSA identification after selective enrichment, obviating the need for prior isolation of bacterial colonies on solid media. No misleading PCR results were observed, even if the specificity of the method was challenged with mixed inocula of MSSA and R-CNS. The benefit of accuracy and speed in simultaneous identification of species and methicillin susceptibility could make this method a valuable diagnostic tool, especially in hospitals in areas where MRSA is endemic.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Kevin Towner, Public Health Laboratory, University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom, for helpful discussions.

This work was supported by the ARC program of the British Council and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-5445. Fax: 49-761-270-5485. E-mail: djonas{at}IUK3.UKL.uni-Freiburg.de. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Bignardi, G. E., N. Woodford, A. Chapman, A. P. Johnson, and D. C. Speller. 1996. Detection of the mec-A gene and phenotypic detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline or low-level methicillin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37:53-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Cavassini, M., A. Wenger, K. Jaton, D. S. Blanc, and J. Bille. 1999. Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1591-1594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Cox, R. A., C. Conquest, C. Mallaghan, and R. R. Marples. 1995. A major outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus caused by a new phage-type (EMRSA-16). J. Hosp. Infect. 29:87-106.[CrossRef][Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Deplano, A., and M. J. Struelens. 1998. Nosocomial infections caused by staphylococci, p. 431-468. In N. Woodford and A. P. Johnson (ed.), Molecular bacteriology: protocols and clinical applications. Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.
    5. 5
  5. Frebourg, N. B., D. Nouet, L. Lemee, E. Martin, and J. F. Lemeland. 1998. Comparison of ATB Staph, Rapid ATB Staph, Vitek, and E-test methods for detection of oxacillin heteroresistance in staphylococci possessing mecA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:52-57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Geha, D. J., J. R. Uhl, C. A. Gustaferro, and D. H. Persing. 1994. Multiplex PCR for identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in the clinical laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1768-1772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Hardin, G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292-1297.[Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Jonas, D., H. Grundmann, D. Hartung, F. D. Daschner, and K. J. Towner. 1999. Evaluation of the mecA femB duplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:643-647.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Kobayashi, N., H. Wu, K. Kojima, K. Taniguchi, S. Urasawa, N. Uehara, Y. Omizu, Y. Kishi, A. Yagihashi, and I. Kurokawa. 1994. Detection of mecA, femA, and femB genes in clinical strains of staphylococci using polymerase chain reaction. Epidemiol. Infect. 113:259-266.[Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Louie, L., S. O. Matsumura, E. Choi, M. Louie, and A. E. Simor. 2000. Evaluation of three rapid methods for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2170-2173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Mir, N., M. Sanchez, F. Baquero, B. Lopez, C. Calderon, and R. Canton. 1998. Soft salt-mannitol agar-cloxacillin test: a highly specific bedside screening test for detection of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:986-989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Nakatomi, Y., and J. Sugiyama. 1998. A rapid latex agglutination assay for the detection of penicillin-binding protein 2'. Microbiol. Immunol. 42:739-743.[Medline]
    13. 13
  13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
    14. 14
  14. Qadri, S. M., Y. Ueno, H. Imambaccus, and E. Almodovar. 1994. Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Crystal MRSA ID System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1830-1832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Salisbury, S. M., L. M. Sabatini, and C. A. Spiegel. 1997. Identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 107:368-373.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Towner, K. J., D. C. Talbot, R. Curran, C. A. Webster, and H. Humphreys. 1998. Development and evaluation of a PCR-based immunoassay for the rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Med. Microbiol. 47:607-613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. van Griethuysen, A., M. Pouw, N. van Leeuwen, M. Heck, P. Willemse, A. Buiting, and J. Kluytmans. 1999. Rapid slide latex agglutination test for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2789-2792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. van Leeuwen, W. B., C. van Pelt, A. Luijendijk, H. A. Verbrugh, and W. H. F. Goessens. 1999. Rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates by the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3029-3030.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Wichelhaus, T. A., S. Kern, V. Schafer, and V. Brade. 1999. Rapid detection of epidemic strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:690-693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2002, p. 1821-1823, Vol. 40, No. 5
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1821-1823.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kassem, I. I., Esseili, M. A., Sigler, V. (2008). Occurrence of mecA in Nonstaphylococcal Pathogens in Surface Waters. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3868-3869 [Full Text]  
  • Buhlmann, M., Bogli-Stuber, K., Droz, S., Muhlemann, K. (2008). Rapid Screening for Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by PCR and Associated Costs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2151-2154 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Spence, R. P., Wright, V., Ala-Aldeen, D. A. A., Turner, D. P., Wooldridge, K. G., James, R. (2008). Validation of Virulence and Epidemiology DNA Microarray for Identification and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1620-1627 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hata, E., Katsuda, K., Kobayashi, H., Nishimori, K., Uchida, I., Higashide, M., Ishikawa, E., Sasaki, T., Eguchi, M. (2008). Bacteriological Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Humans and Bulk Milk. J DAIRY SCI 91: 564-569 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bannoehr, J., Ben Zakour, N. L., Waller, A. S., Guardabassi, L., Thoday, K. L., van den Broek, A. H. M., Fitzgerald, J. R. (2007). Population Genetic Structure of the Staphylococcus intermedius Group: Insights into agr Diversification and the Emergence of Methicillin-Resistant Strains. J. Bacteriol. 189: 8685-8692 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bourbeau, P. P., Riley, J. A., Shoemaker, B. C., Jones, K. S. (2007). Use of CultureSwab Plus Swabs with Amies Gel Agar for Testing of Naris Specimens with the GeneOhm MRSA Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2281-2283 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • de San, N., Denis, O., Gasasira, M.-F., De Mendonca, R., Nonhoff, C., Struelens, M. J. (2007). Controlled Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA Assay for Detection of Colonization by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Diverse Mucocutaneous Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1098-1101 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Drews, S. J., Willey, B. M., Kreiswirth, N., Wang, M., Ianes, T., Mitchell, J., Latchford, M., McGeer, A. J., Katz, K. C. (2006). Verification of the IDI-MRSA Assay for Detecting Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Diverse Specimen Types in a Core Clinical Laboratory Setting.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3794-3796 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stoakes, L., Reyes, R., Daniel, J., Lennox, G., John, M. A., Lannigan, R., Hussain, Z. (2006). Prospective Comparison of a New Chromogenic Medium, MRSASelect, to CHROMagar MRSA and Mannitol-Salt Medium Supplemented with Oxacillin or Cefoxitin for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 637-639 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brown, D. F. J., Edwards, D. I., Hawkey, P. M., Morrison, D., Ridgway, G. L., Towner, K. J., Wren, M. W. D., on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis, (2005). Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 1000-1018 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Loeffler, A., Boag, A. K., Sung, J., Lindsay, J. A., Guardabassi, L., Dalsgaard, A., Smith, H., Stevens, K. B., Lloyd, D. H. (2005). Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among staff and pets in a small animal referral hospital in the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 692-697 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kaplan, S., Marlowe, E. M., Hogan, J. J., Doymaz, M., Bruckner, D. A., Simor, A. E. (2005). Sensitivity and Specificity of a Rapid rRNA Gene Probe Assay for Simultaneous Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Detection of mecA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3438-3442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Paule, S. M., Pasquariello, A. C., Hacek, D. M., Fisher, A. G., Thomson, R. B. Jr, Kaul, K. L., Peterson, L. R. (2004). Direct Detection of Staphylococcus aureus from Adult and Neonate Nasal Swab Specimens Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. J. Mol. Diagn. 6: 191-196 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huletsky, A., Giroux, R., Rossbach, V., Gagnon, M., Vaillancourt, M., Bernier, M., Gagnon, F., Truchon, K., Bastien, M., Picard, F. J., van Belkum, A., Ouellette, M., Roy, P. H., Bergeron, M. G. (2004). New Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Specimens Containing a Mixture of Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1875-1884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hardy, K. J., Hawkey, P. M., Gao, F., Oppenheim, B. A. (2004). Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the critically ill. Br J Anaesth 92: 121-130 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Levi, K., Towner, K. J. (2003). Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Blood with the EVIGENE MRSA Detection Kit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3890-3892 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Safdar, N., Narans, L., Gordon, B., Maki, D. G. (2003). Comparison of Culture Screening Methods for Detection of Nasal Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a Prospective Study Comparing 32 Methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3163-3166 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Grundmann, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Grundmann, H.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»