This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, L. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2002, p. 1892-1901, Vol. 40, No. 6
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.1892-1901.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

MINIREVIEW

Laboratory Identification of the Microsporidia

Lynne S. Garcia*

LSG & Associates, Santa Monica, California 90402-2908


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
The microsporidia belong to the phylum Microspora within the taxonomic group Protozoa; there are more than 140 genera and 1,200 species that are parasitic in all major animal groups. Already, seven genera (Enterocytozoon, Encephalitozoon, Nosema, Pleistophora, Vittaforma, Trachipleistophora, and Brachiola) and some that are unclassified have been confirmed to cause human infection. Septata intestinalis, an organism that was identified in 1994 as belonging to a new genus, i.e., Septata (Encephalitozoon-like), has been reclassified as Encephalitozoon intestinalis, although there is not universal agreement on this generic change. The genus Microsporidium is essentially a catch-all genus for organisms that have not yet been classified (or may never be classified due to a lack of specimen). Depending on acceptance of these generic designations, there may be seven or nine microsporidial genera.

The microsporidia are obligate intracellular, spore-forming protists with no active metabolic stages outside of the host cell. The life cycle involves a proliferative merogonic stage followed by sporogony, which results in spores containing a tubular extrusion apparatus (polar tubule) for injecting infective spore contents into the host cell (Fig. 1).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Life cycle of microsporidia. Reprinted from reference 9.

Because microsporidia have a membrane-bound nucleus, an intracytoplasmic membrane system, and chromosome separation on mitotic spindles, they are considered to be true eukaryotes. However, they are somewhat unusual in that they have 70S ribosomes, have no mitrochondria or peroxisomes, and have simple Golgi membranes. Also, the microsporidial genome is smaller and less complex than those of other eukaryotes. Several characteristics, including the presence of chitin in the spore wall, suggest a potential link to the fungi.

Microsporidiosis, a disease resulting from infection with these important emerging opportunistic organisms, has been noted in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, as well as in other immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. The first human case was reported in 1959; since then, cases of microsporidiosis in both those who are immunocompromised and those who have no underlying immune problems and are considered to be immunocompetent have been reported (Table 1) (2, 7, 21).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Microsporidia causing human infection


arrow
SPECIMEN COLLECTION
 
It is important to remember that microsporidial spores are quite resistant to environmental conditions and can remain infectious for several years, particularly if they are protected from desiccation. Stool or duodenal drainage specimens can be submitted fresh or preserved in 5 or 10% formalin, or sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin. Biopsy specimens are also acceptable. In cases of disseminated infection, it is recommended that urine (fresh or preserved) be submitted for analysis; other body fluids (sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] fluid, nasal secretion, or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]), conjunctival smears, corneal scrapings, or tissue can also be submitted (Table 2). Formalin fixation is recommended for routine histology, while gluteraldehyde is preferred for electron microscopy. Fresh specimens should be collected for cell culture and for molecular studies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Body sites where microsporidia infecting humans have been detecteda


arrow
LABORATORY METHODS
 
There are a number of methods available for the recovery of microsporidial spores and confirmation of microsporidiosis (Table 3). Most of these methods were developed in order to diagnose infections in the immunocompromised population. Microsporidial infections in the immunocompetent patient may result in self-cure after mild symptoms appear, a situation similar to that seen with cryptosporidiosis and isosporiasis. As awareness of microsporidiosis increases and more-sensitive techniques become available, we may find that these infections are not uncommon in the immunocompetent host. The recommendations for the use of current, less-sensitive methodology suggest that multiple diagnostic methods may be required to diagnose a microsporidial infection, particularly when fecal specimens are examined. Since microsporidial infections often involve multiple body sites, detection of organisms from any clinical specimen should be followed by examination of other body tissues and fluids. In patients for whom disseminated microsporidiosis is suspected, urine specimens should always be examined.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Microsporidia: Recommended diagnostic techniquesa


arrow
LIGHT MICROSCOPY
 
Modified trichrome stains. Smears are prepared using 10 to 20 µl of concentrated specimen (stool specimen or urine or other fluid) that is thinly spread onto the slides. Some laboratories use concave well slides; these are very helpful when examining the stained preparations. It is important to remember to centrifuge the specimen for 10 min at 500 x g prior to smear preparation. There is also some evidence to indicate that pretreatment of fecal specimens (1:1) with 10% KOH may provide a better-quality smear when modified trichrome stains are used. Specimens can be fresh or preserved (with 5 or 10% formalin or with sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin or by using one of the newer single-vial systems). The modified trichrome stain methods are based on the fact that stain penetration of the microsporidial spore is very difficult; thus, the dye content in the chromotrope 2R component of the formula is greater than that used to prepare Wheatley's modification of the Gomori's trichrome stain, and the staining time is much longer (90 min) (11, 12, 19, 20). Several of these stains (e.g., Weber-Green modified trichrome stain [Fig. 2 ] and Ryan-Blue modified trichrome stain [Fig. 3 ]) are available commercially from a number of suppliers. The use of positive control material is highly recommended. Spore detection requires adequate illumination and magnification (oil immersion; total magnification, x1,000).



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Weber-Green modified trichrome staining of microsporidial spores. (A) Spores in stool specimen; (B) higher magnification of the image shown in panel A.



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Ryan-Blue modified trichrome staining of microsporidial spores. (A) Spores in stool specimen; (B) spores in intestinal tract tissue.

The spore wall should stain pinkish to red, with the interior of the spore being clear or perhaps showing a horizontal or diagonal stripe, which represents the polar tube. The background will appear green or blue, depending on the method. Other bacteria, some yeast cells, and some debris will also be evident (stained shades of pink and red); the shapes and sizes of the artifacts may be helpful in differentiating the spores from other structures. Results should be reported only if the positive control smears are acceptable.

The choice of counterstain, with either fast green or aniline blue dyes in the stain formulation, depends on laboratory preference and does not change the color results of the actual microsporidial spores, which stain pink. In addition to the counterstain (green or blue), several modifications of the original chromotrope staining solution have been proposed, including changes in temperature of the staining solution and staining time. Results indicate that staining at 50°C for 10 min or staining at 37°C for 30 min may improve the detection of spores; the background appears to contain less debris, and the spores may stain more intensely (5, 7, 13, 22).

An acid-fast trichrome method stains both acid-fast cryptosporidial oocysts and microsporidial spores in the same smear (Fig. 4) (10). Also, a rapid-hot Gram-chromotrope staining method with a staining time of 5 min is available; the microsporidial spores stain dark violet against a pale-green background (16).



View larger version (213K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Single smear stained by an acid-fast trichrome stain method showing both an Isospora belli oocyst (modified acid-fast positive stain) and microsporidial spores (modified trichrome stain).


arrow
Giemsa stain.
 
Although Giemsa staining of stool can be performed and results in a light-blue staining of microsporidial spores, the spores can be very difficult to differentiate from debris in the smear. However, body fluid cytology preparations or intestinal biopsy specimens containing less debris and artifact material can be stained with Giemsa stain; identification of spores will be much easier with these types of specimens than with preparations from stool (Fig. 5).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Giemsa staining of microsporidial spores in intestinal tract cells. The images show the development of the spores.


arrow
Chemofluorescent (optical brightening) agents.
 
Chemofluorescent (optical brightening) agents are chitin stains that require the use of a fluorescent microscope (8). Depending on the agent used as well as the wavelength, the walls of the microsporidial spores fluorescence. Using Calcofluor White 2MR (American Cyanamid Corp., Princeton, N.J.) and a wavelength of 395 to 415 nm (observation light, 455 nm), the spores appear as bluish-white or turquoise oval halos. It is important to remember that this type of stain is nonspecific; small fungi and some artifact material present in stool may also fluoresce. However, when this approach is used with specimens other than stool, the microsporidial spores tend to be much easier to detect and identify (Fig. 6). Many laboratories tend to use one of the modified trichrome stains as well as the Calcofluor method for clinical specimens. The sensitivity of both methods is relatively good, and small numbers of spores that might be missed by the modified trichrome methods might be seen with the optical brightening agents. Again, clinical specimens other than stool tend to contain less debris and artifact material and are much easier to examine. Other optical brightening agents that can be used include Fungi-Fluor and Cellufluor (both from Polysciences Inc., Warrington, Pa.), Fungiqual A (Medical Diagnostics, Kandern, Germany), and Uvitex 2B (not commercially available; Ciba Geigy, Basel, Switzerland).



View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Calcofluor white staining of microsporidial spores in urine sediment.


arrow
Immunofluorescent reagents.
 
Although immunofluorescent reagents for the detection of microsporidial spores have been used, they are not yet commercially available and most have been limited to Encephalitozoon species spores (Fig. 7) (3, 15). Unfortunately, background staining, cross-reactions with yeast species and bacteria, and overall lower sensitivity than is observed with chromotrope or chemofluorescent staining prevent the polyclonal antibodies from being applicable to routine diagnostic use. Fluorescing microsporidial spores have a darker cell wall, and the polar tubule can be seen as cross or diagonal lines. With the use of an antiserum, it was observed that 9 of 27 patients (30%) who were positive for cryptosporidiosis also had microsporidial spores in the stool (8). Although there is some cross-reactivity with bacteria, immunofluorescent staining is more-sensitive than the routine staining methods currently available.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Encephalitozoon spp. detected with immunofluorescent reagent. (A) Urine sediment; (B) positive control spores.

More specific reagents are in various stages of development and testing; it can be hoped that these will become commercially available in the near future. With the development of monoclonal antibodies to Encephalitozoon intestinalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi, it can also be hoped that diagnostic reagents will become available soon (1, 6). Since E. intestinalis and E. bieneusi are the two most important microsporidian pathogens in humans, the availability of commercial reagents for these organisms would enhance diagnostic capabilities of the routine clinical laboratory.

As clinicians begin to suspect these infections and microbiologists become more familiar with the diagnostic methods, the number of patients who test positive for microsporidial infection may increase dramatically. It is strongly suspected that with the use of more sensitive and specific methods many of these cases will be found in the immunocompetent population, as well as in immunocompromised patients.


arrow
CYTOLOGY
 
Techniques that do not require tissue embedding are becoming more widely used. Touch preparations of fresh biopsy material that are air dried, methanol fixed, and Giemsa stained have been used; however, microscopic examination must be performed using the oil immersion objective (100x objective; total magnification, x1,000). This approach can also be used for smears prepared from conjunctival swabs and for sputum and nasal discharge fluids.

Cytocentrifugation followed by Giemsa staining has also been recommended. Spores have been detected in centrifuged sediment of duodenal aspirate, bile, biliary aspirates, urine, BAL fluid, and CSF. Oil immersion examination of stained smears of duodenal aspirates is recommended for the diagnosis of intestinal microsporidiosis. Because disseminated disease often involves multiple organs, detection of microsporidia in any tissue or fluid should be followed by examination of specimens from other body sites. The examination of urine should always be included in cases of disseminated infection. High-speed centrifugation (at least 1,500 x g for 10 min) may be required to concentrate the spores, particularly if the specimen contains debris, mucus, or other particulate material.

Appropriate stains used for light microscopy can be applied to these clinical specimens. For body fluids that do not contain debris, other fungi or bacteria, the routine Gram stain can be used. The spores are often gram variable and may stain partially gram positive (Fig. 8). Giemsa stain and chemofluorescent stains can also be used for these types of specimens.



View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Cytospin preparation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from a patient with AIDS and intestinal E. bieneusi infection, showing intracellular gram-positive microsporidial spores (Gram stain). Reprinted from reference 19 with permission.


arrow
Urine.
 
Microsporidial spores are often shed sporadically; multiple single or 24-h urine specimens should be submitted for examination. A single negative specimen would not rule out the possibility of infection with the microsporidia.


arrow
Duodenal aspirate.
 
Microscopic examination of centrifuged aspirate sediment obtained by endoscopy can be very helpful in diagnosing intestinal infection. Duodenal aspirate specimens eliminate some of the problems inherent in stool examination, including less debris, ease of high-speed centrifugation, and easier recognition of spores.


arrow
Other body fluids.
 
Specimens of sinonasal washings, sputum, BAL fluid, ascites fluid, CSF, or other body fluids are prepared using high-speed centrifugation and standard smear preparation techniques. Gram, modified trichrome, or Giemsa staining, use of chemofluorescent agents, or immunofluorescent testing (if available) is recommended.


arrow
Conjunctival smears and corneal scrapings.
 
Confirmation of microsporidial conjunctivitis or keratitis can be made from the examination of conjunctival or corneal swab, scraping, or biopsy specimens. The staining method is optional and may include the use of Gram, Giemsa, or modified trichrome stains. In cases of confirmed ocular microsporidiosis, urine and respiratory specimens should also be submitted for examination. For immunocompetent patients who may have localized corneal infection with no disseminated disease, diagnosis can be confirmed using routine histologic methods or electron microscopy.


arrow
ROUTINE HISTOLOGY AND ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
 
Routine histology. There are a number of techniques available for recovery and identification of microsporidia in tissues. Although the organisms have been identified in routine histologic tissue preparations, they do not tend to stain with predictable results. Occasionally, the spores appear as refractile gold bodies in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded routine hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections. Using routine hematoxylin and eosin staining on tissue sections, only experienced pathologists have consistently been able to identify microsporidia (Fig. 9).



View larger version (185K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of eye tissue (note clear spores).

However, with a variety of special staining methods, spores can be easily demonstrated in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. Birefringence is seen in paraffin-embedded tissue sections and results from the presence of chitin in the endospore layer. This property can be observed in sections stained with Gram and modified Warthin-Starry stains and is used to differentiate the spores from lysosomes, intracytoplasmic neuroendocrine granules, karyorrhexic debris, and mucin droplets.

Tissue Gram stains (Brown-Brenn or Brown-Hopps) have been used on routine paraffin-embedded tissue sections and appear to provide reliable results for microsporidial spores of all species; these stains are often the preferred stains for tissue specimens. Mature spores stain gram-positive (violet to purple), with some intensity variations; red spores tend to be immature. The spores may be darkly stained, but with careful examination, the spore wall and horizontal stripe representing the polar tubule can be seen in some spores.

Also, spores can occasionally be seen very well using periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain, silver stains (e.g., Warthin-Starry), acid-fast stains, a chromotrope-based stain, or chemofluorescent agents. The spore has a small, PAS-positive posterior body, the spore coat will stain with silver, and the spores are acid-fast variable (Fig. 10). The Warthin-Starry method stains both developing and mature stages in intestinal tissues (Fig. 11). Warrin-Starry staining also makes the spores appear larger than their actual size. One disadvantage is that the internal structure of the spore, the polar tubule, is much more difficult to see with preparations stained by the Warrin-Starry method (silver staining) than it is with Gram-stained preparations.



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10. PAS staining of eye tissue (note PAS-positive granule at the end of each spore).



View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 11. Warthin-Starry silver staining of eye tissue (note dark spores).

Plastic sections. Regardless of the fixative used, there is evidence to indicate that ultrathin plastic sections stained with methylene blue-azure II-basic fuchsin or toluidine blue may facilitate spore detection.

Electron microscopy. Tissue examination by electron microscopy (EM) is still considered the best approach; however, this option is not available at all laboratories (Fig. 12). The sensitivity of EM may not be equal to that of other methods when examining stool or urine. The identification of microsporidia to the genus level has been based on ultrastructural characteristics. However, in spite of the fact that electron microscopy is considered the gold standard for diagnostic confirmation and species identification, morphology alone will not always allow identification of human microsporidial pathogens to the species level. Antigenic or molecular testing may be required.



View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 12. Transmission electron micrograph of a jejunal biopsy demonstrating numerous septated parasitophorous vacuoles of Encephalitozoon intestinalis, which are located in the Golgi-rich supranuclear cytoplasm. Reprinted from reference 14 with permission.


arrow
MOLECULAR METHODS
 
Molecular studies of the microsporidia have been limited; however DNA sequence studies on a few of the identified human pathogens have been reported (23). Although some nucleic acid-based methods have been developed, commercial products are not yet available (17, 18, 24, 25). PCR detection of E. intestinalis in intestinal biopsy specimens from AIDS patients has been reported (4). Comparison of microscopic and PCR methods for the detection of E. bieneusi spores in stool specimens of HIV-infected patients has not yet confirmed greater sensitivity for molecular tests. However, dilution studies using stool specimens seeded with Encephalitozoon spores indicated that the threshold of spore detection with PCR was 102 spores but that microscopy required 104 and 106 spores per ml (22).


arrow
CELL CULTURE
 
Although not relevant for routine diagnostic laboratories, in the research setting the use of in vitro culture methods continues to provide confirmatory as well as diagnostic information. This approach has been critical for the development of immunologic reagents for diagnosis and species confirmation. In vitro culture has also been used to determine the efficacy of antimicrobial agents on several microsporidia, including Encephalitozoon cuniculi, Encephalitozoon hellem, and E. intestinalis. Although the microsporidia cannot be grown axenically, Encephalitozoon spp., Trachipleistophora hominis, Vittaforma corneae, and Brachiola algerae have been grown in cell culture. A number of cell lines have been used, including monkey and rabbit kidney cell lines (Vero and RK-13), a human fetal lung fibroblasts cell line (MRC-5), and the Madin-Darby canine kidney cell line (MDCK). Unfortunately, one of the most common human microsporidial pathogens, E. bieneusi, has been propagated only in short-term cultures (7, 22).


arrow
SEROLOGIC TESTING
 
A variety of serologic testing methods (carbon immunoassay, indirect immunofluorescent-antibody testing, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, counterimmunoelectrophoresis, and Western blotting) have been used to detect immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M antibodies to microsporidia (primarily E. cuniculi) in animals. Antibodies to E. cuniculi and E. intestinalis have been found in HIV- and non-HIV-infected humans; however, whether this represents true infection, cross-reactivity with other species, or nonspecific reactions is unclear. Unfortunately, due to the lack of success in long-term culture and development of available antigens, there are no serologic assays available for E. bieneusi. Also, whether antibodies to this organism will cross-react with those of E. cuniculi is unknown; serologic evidence of human infection is based primarily on results for E. cuniculi as the parasite antigen. Currently, the available serologic data are interesting, but reliable tests for the diagnosis of human microsporidiosis are not yet available.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Mailing address: LSG & Associates, 512-12th St., Santa Monica, CA 90402-2908. Phone: (310) 393-5059. Fax: (310) 899-9722. E-mail: Lynnegarcia2{at}earthlink.net. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Accoceberry, I., M. Thellier, I. Desportes-Livage, A. Achbarou, S. Biligui, M. Danis, and A. Datry. 1999. Production of monoclonal antibodies directed against the microsporidium Enterocytozoon bieneusi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:4107-4112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Canning, E. U. 1993. Microsporidia, p. 299-370. In J. P. Kreier (ed.), Parasitic Protozoa, vol. 6. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
  4. 3
  5. Croppo, G. P., G. S. Visvesvara, G. J. Leitch, S. Wallace, and D. A. Schwartz. 1998. Identification of the microsporidian Encephalitozoon hellem using immunoglobulin G monoclonal antibodies. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 122:182-186.[Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Del Aguila, C., G. P. Croppo, H. Moura, A. J. Da Silva, G. J. Leitch, D. M. Moss, S. Wallace, S. B. Slemenda, N. J. Peiniazek, and G. S. Visvesvara. 1998. Ultrastructure, immunofluorescence, Western blot, and PCR analysis of eight isolates of Encephalitozoon (Septata) intestinalis established in culture from sputum and urine samples and duodenal aspirates of five patients with AIDS. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1201-1208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Didier, E. S., J. M. Orenstein, A. Aldra, D. Bertucci, L. B. Rogers, and F. A. Janney. 1995. Comparison of three staining methods for detecting microsporidia in fluids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:3138-3145.[Abstract]
  10. 6
  11. Enriquez, F. J., O. Ditrich, J. D. Palting, and K. Smith. 1997. Simple diagnosis of Encephalitozoon sp. microsporidial infections by using a panspecific antiexospore monoclonal antibody. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:724-729.[Abstract]
  12. 7
  13. Garcia, L. S. 2001. Diagnostic medical parasitology, 4th ed., p. 87-97. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  14. 8
  15. Garcia, L. S., R. Y. Shimizu, and D. A. Bruckner. 1994. Detection of microsporidial spores in fecal specimens from patients diagnosed with cryptosporidiosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1739-1741.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Gardiner, C. H., R. Fayer, and J. P. Dubey. 1988. An atlas of protozoan parasites in animal tissues, U.S. Department of Agriculture handbook no. 651. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
  18. 10
  19. Ignatius, R., S. Henschel, O. Liesenfeld, U. Mansmann, W. Schmidt, S. Koppe, T. Schneider, W. Heise, U. Futh, E. O. Riecken, H. Hahn, and R. Ulrich. 1997. Comparative evaluation of modified trichrome and Uvitex 2B stains for detection of low numbers of microsporidial spores in stool specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2266-2269.[Abstract]
  20. 11
  21. Isenberg, H. D. (ed.). 1992. Clinical microbiology procedures handbook, vol. 1 and 2. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  22. 12
  23. Isenberg, H. D. (ed.). 1995. Essential procedures for clinical microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  24. 13
  25. Kokoskin, E., T. W. Gyorkos, A. Camus, L. Cedilotte, T. Purtill, and B. Ward. 1994. Modified technique for efficient detection of microsporidia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1074-1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. 14
  27. Kotler, D. P., and J. M. Orenstein. 1999. Clinical syndromes associated with microsporidiosis, p. 258-292. In M. Wittner (ed.), The microsporidia and microsporidiosis. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  28. 15
  29. Moura, H., F. C. Sodre, F. J. Bornay-Llinares, G. J. Leitch, T. Navin, S. Wahlquist, R. Bryan, I. Meseguer, and G. S. Visvesvara. 1999. Detection by an immunofluorescence test of Encephalitozoon intestinalis spores in routinely formalin-fixed stool samples stored at room temperature. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2317-2322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 16
  31. Moura, H., D. A. Swartz, F. Bornay-Linnares, F. C. Sodré, S. Wallace, and G. S. Visvesvara. 1997. A new and improved "Quick-Hot Gram-Chromotrope" technique that differentially stains microsporidian spores in clinical samples, including paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 121:888-893.[Medline]
  32. 17
  33. Muller, A., K. Stellermann, P. Hartmann, M. Schrappe, G. Fatkenheuer, B. Salzberger, V. Diehl, and C. Franzen. 1999. A powerful DNA extraction method and PCR for detection of microsporidia in clinical stool specimens. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 6:243-246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Raynaud, L., F. Delbac, V. Brousolle, M. Rabodonirina, V. Girault, M. Wallon, G. Cozon, C. P. Vivares, and F. Peyron. 1998. Identification of Encephalitozoon intestinalis in travelers with chronic diarrhea by specific PCR amplification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:37-40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. 19
  37. Ryan, N. J., G. Sutherland, K. Coughlan, M. Globan, J. Doultree, J. Marshall, R. W. Baird, J. Pedersen, and B. Dwyer. 1993. A new trichrome-blue stain for detection of microsporidial species in urine, stool, and nasopharyngeal specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:3264-3269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. 20
  39. Weber, R., R. T. Bryan, R. L. Owen, C. M. Wilcox, L. Gorelkin, G. S. Visvesvara, and The Enteric Opportunistic Infections Working Group. 1992. Improved light-microscopical detection of microsporidia spores in stool and duodenal aspirates. N. Engl. J. Med. 326:161-166.[Abstract]
  40. 21
  41. Weber, R., R. T. Bryan, D. A. Swartz, and R. L. Owen. 1994. Human microsporidial infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:426-461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. 22
  43. Weber, R., D. A. Swartz, and P. Deplazes. 1999. Laboratory diagnosis of microsporidiosis, p. 315-361. In M. Wittner (ed.), The microsporidia and microsporidiosis. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  44. 23
  45. Weiss, L. M., and C. Vossbrinck. 1999. Molecular biology, molecular phylogeny, and molecular diagnostic approaches to the microsporidia, p. 129-171. In M. Wittner (ed.), The microsporidia and microsporidiosis. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  46. 24
  47. Xiao, L., L. Li, H. Moura, I. Sulaiman, A. A. Lal, S. Gatti, M. Scaglia, E. S. Didier, and G. S. Visvesvara. 2001. Genotyping Encephalitozoon hellem isolates by analysis of the polar tube protein gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2191-2196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. 25
  49. Xiao, L., L. Li, G. S. Visvesvara, H. Moura, E. S. Didier, and, A. A. Lal. 2001. Genotyping Encephalitozoon cuniculi by multilocus analyses of genes with repetitive sequences. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2248-2253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2002, p. 1892-1901, Vol. 40, No. 6
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.1892-1901.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Barbosa, J., Rodrigues, A. G., Pina-Vaz, C. (2009). Cytometric Approach for Detection of Encephalitozoon intestinalis, an Emergent Agent. CVI 16: 1021-1024 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espern, A., Morio, F., Miegeville, M., Illa, H., Abdoulaye, M., Meyssonnier, V., Adehossi, E., Lejeune, A., Cam, P. D., Besse, B., Gay-Andrieu, F. (2007). Molecular Study of Microsporidiosis Due to Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon intestinalis among Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients from Two Geographical Areas: Niamey, Niger, and Hanoi, Vietnam. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2999-3002 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Joseph, J., Sharma, S., Murthy, S. I., Krishna, P. V., Garg, P., Nutheti, R., Kenneth, J., Balasubramanian, D. (2006). Microsporidial Keratitis in India: 16S rRNA Gene-Based PCR Assay for Diagnosis and Species Identification of Microsporidia in Clinical Samples.. IOVS 47: 4468-4473 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wang, Z., Orlandi, P. A., Stenger, D. A. (2005). Simultaneous Detection of Four Human Pathogenic Microsporidian Species from Clinical Samples by Oligonucleotide Microarray. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4121-4128 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mathis, A., Weber, R., Deplazes, P. (2005). Zoonotic Potential of the Microsporidia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 423-445 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Notermans, D. W., Peek, R., de Jong, M. D., Wentink-Bonnema, E. M., Boom, R., van Gool, T. (2005). Detection and Identification of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon Species in Stool and Urine Specimens by PCR and Differential Hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 610-614 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rauz, S., Tuft, S., Dart, J. K.G., Bonshek, R., Luthert, P., Curry, A. (2004). Ultrastructural examination of two cases of stromal microsporidial keratitis. J Med Microbiol 53: 775-781 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Conners, M. S., Gibler, T. S., Van Gelder, R. N. (2004). Diagnosis of Microsporidia Keratitis by Polymerase Chain Reaction. Arch Ophthalmol 122: 283-284 [Full Text]  
  • Hoffman, R. M., Marshall, M. M., Polchert, D. M., Helen Jost, B. (2003). Identification and Characterization of Two Subpopulations of Encephalitozoon intestinalis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 4966-4970 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wolk, D. M., Schneider, S. K., Wengenack, N. L., Sloan, L. M., Rosenblatt, J. E. (2002). Real-Time PCR Method for Detection of Encephalitozoonintestinalis from Stool Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3922-3928 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, L. S.