Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2002, p. 1958-1962, Vol. 40, No. 6
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.1958-1962.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biology,1 Institute of Immunology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland2
Received 27 November 2001/ Returned for modification 22 January 2002/ Accepted 1 March 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
While viral infection can occur though either respiratory secretions or contaminated blood or blood products, the precise viral load required to initiate infection is unknown. Consequently, B19 contamination of pooled blood products is of major significance, primarily due to the high physicochemical tolerance of B19 to many of the treatments used in plasma processing allied to the extremely high levels of viremia in acutely infected, and often asymptomatic, individuals (>1012 genome equivalents/ml) (15). These factors combine to present significant challenges to manufacturers in terms of the production of B19-free material. Indeed, in the absence of official regulations to control the safety of blood or blood products with respect to B19 presence, individual manufacturers have established minipool screening protocols to minimize B19 contamination (1).
While serological diagnosis of viral infection is now well standardized and widely available (6, 12), only a limited number of methods for the extraction and detection of B19 nucleic acid in single or pooled blood products have, as yet, been described (1, 3, 11, 19, 24). These assays primarily utilize either digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled UTP incorporation into newly synthesized amplicons during PCR to facilitate detection or quantitative PCR technology such as Taqman chemistry (1, 24). Despite numerous advantages, application of these systems to B19 DNA detection in either individual or pooled plasma units may be limited by irreproducibility of DIG-UTP incorporation, low sensitivity, and cost factors.
Nonetheless, the availability of these methodscombined with reliable methods for antibody detection and the introduction of international-standard preparations for the quantitation of B19 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and, more recently, B19 DNAis leading to further improvements in the situation in which manufacturers had depended on the presence of high levels of B19 IgG alone, in pooled plasma products, as an indicator of product safety (9, 13, 15, 17). Furthermore, a recent report has shown that 1 IU of B19 DNA equals 0.65 genome equivalent (1). Despite these advances, a recent study has highlighted problems with both specimen preparation and lack of test system standardization for the detection of B19 DNA (17). Moreover, it has been shown that B19 can persist, at low levels, in immunocompetent individuals for up to 6 to 40 months postinfection (2, 14), implying that ultrasensitive B19 DNA detection is not be suitable for plasma screening due to detection of viremic, though noninfectious, plasma units. Furthermore, the recent observation that preparations of a pooled plasma product (Solvent/Detergent Treated Viplas/SD), containing less than 104 genome equivalents/ml, did not lead to seroconversion in healthy, B19-seronegative volunteers while under evaluation in a phase IV clinical trial has led to the consensus that this level of B19 contamination may be a safe viral load which is incapable of transmitting B19 infection to blood product recipients (4).
Here, we report the development of a robust and reliable microplate detection system for the detection of biotinylated PCR product using dinitrophenyl (DNP)-labeled probes, in combination with antibody-enzyme conjugate, for the detection of B19 DNA in serum or plasma at a sensitivity of 1.6 x 103 IU/ml, which may have a utility in plasma screening.
|
|
|---|
Specimen preparation and B19 DNA amplification. Undiluted or diluted (10-4 to 10-10 in phosphate-buffered saline) specimens (100 µl) were digested with 2 µl of proteinase K (20 mg/ml) at 56°C for 1 h, and this was followed by boiling and centrifugation (13,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C) to remove precipitated protein. Specimens were also extracted with the QiAmp Blood kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) as described by the manufacturer (where indicated). DNA extraction was performed in a laboratory separate from that in which PCR reagent preparation and nucleic acid amplification were carried out. Template DNA present in the supernatant (5 µl) was added to the following mixture: 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 50 mM KCl, 0.1%(vol/vol) Triton X-100, 2.0 mM MgCl2, a 200 µM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Promega, Madison, Wis.), 1 M betaine (which enhanced the PCR) (Sigma, Poole, United Kingdom) (data not shown), a 1.0 µM concentration of each oligonucleotide primer (Table 1) (5, 7) specific for regions within the NS1 coding region of the B19 genome, and 1.25 U of Taq polymerase (Promega) in a total volume of 50 µl. Amplification was as follows: 95°C for 6 min followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, terminating in 72°C for 5 min. Ten microliters of each PCR product was subjected to 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml; Sigma) for 30 min at 100 V. Amplicon visualization was performed using an Eagle-Eye II gel documentation system (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Nucleotide sequences of oligonucleotide primers and their relative positions in the B19 genomea
|
Serology. B19 IgG and IgM immunoassays were obtained from Biotrin (Dublin, Ireland) and were used as previously described (12) and in accordance with manufacturers' instructions. Briefly, all immunoassays utilized conformationally intact B19 capsid antigens (VP1 and VP2) for antibody capture, except the Western blot immunoassay for B19 IgG, which contains denatured B19 capsid proteins (12).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. PCR-ELISA quantitation using the WHO B19 DNA international standard. Half-log dilutions were extracted by proteinase K (solid line) or spin column (dashed line) methodologies, subjected to PCR using primers F1 and R1, and analyzed by ELISA. Absorbance at 450 and 630 nm is plotted versus the log amount of B19 DNA. The PCR-ELISA cutoff (0.159) is indicated by the horizontal black line and was calculated as the mean plus 2 standard deviations [0.107 + 2(0.026)] following replicate analysis of 20 B19-DNA-negative specimens. A level of 8 IU of B19 DNA was reliably detectable following proteinase K extraction. Amplicon detection by agarose gel electrophoresis detection is also shown (inset). It can be seen that a minimum of 200 IU of B19 DNA only can be detected by this approach. PD, primer dimer.
|
Specimen evaluation. PCR-ELISA analysis of pooled plasma specimens (PS1 to -30) detected high levels of viremia in specimens PS1 to -5 (Fig. 2). All other pooled plasma specimens tested contained either low levels of B19 DNA or levels which were below the sensitivity of the test system. Subsequently, the levels of B19 DNA present in specimens PS1 to -5 were quantified and found to contain between 8.0 x 107 and 5.0 x 108 IU of B19 DNA/ml, in addition to B19 IgG levels of 59.5 to 86.5 IU/ml, which were significantly higher than the immunoassay cutoff (3 IU/ml) (Table 2). No B19 IgM was detectable in these pools (Table 2) or any other pooled plasma specimen. All specimens tested were positive for B19 IgG in all commercial immunoassay systems, including microplate enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescent, Western, and immunoblot assays. No specimen reactivity was observed against denatured VP2 when tested by Western blotting; however, all specimens were VP1 positive by this method. The B19 IgG level (mean ± standard deviation) in all plasma pools tested was found to be 64.7 ± 17.5 IU/ml (n = 30).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Qualitative detection of B19 DNA in 30 pooled plasma specimens by PCR-ELISA. Five pools (PS1 to PS5) were found to have high levels of B19 DNA, the levels of which were subsequently quantified in terms of B19 DNA (in international units per milliliter) (see text). Eleven pools (PS6 to PS15) appeared to contain low levels of B19 DNA. In 14 pools (PS17 to PS30), any B19 DNA present was below the PCR-ELISA cutoff of 1.6 x 103 IU/ml.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. B19 virological and serological status of pooled plasma and individual specimens
|
|
|
|---|
Although the use of commercial extraction kits is thought to reduce the presence of PCR inhibitors, especially for the determination of viral load in plasma pools (18), the data presented here demonstrate that proteinase K digestion alone is sufficient to quantitatively release B19 DNA from pooled and individual plasma specimens treated with citrate. Extraction of specimen DNA is of paramount importance to ensure quantitative release of target DNA, and a number of methods for DNA extraction based on efficiency, convenience, reproducibility, and the presence of inhibitors have been investigated (25). These authors found that treatment of serum specimens by rapid heating fulfilled the criteria for routine diagnosis while other extraction methods, such as lysis treatment and commercial DNA extraction kits, failed to yield higher levels of extracted DNA based on quantitative PCR results. Our observations for citrate-treated plasma are in agreement with those found by Zerbini et al. (25), who found that specimen treatment with proteinase K was more efficient for B19 DNA isolation than commercial kits. This observation should be of significant utility in the large-scale screening of plasma by blood product manufacturers.
A sensitivity limit of 350 to 3,500 copies of B19 DNA has been reported (7) when single-round PCR with optimized primer pairs and ethidium bromide detection has been used following agarose gel electrophoresis. Using these primers, in combination with a modified PCR procedure and ELISA-based amplicon revelation, a minimum of 8 IU of B19 DNA was detectable in the present study, which represents a significant improvement over this previous work. Although Durigon et al. (7) showed that nested PCR improved sensitivity by up to 100-fold, this option is not entirely suitable for large-scale plasma screening, due to contamination risks.
In the last decade a number of quantitative PCR assays have been developed to detect B19 DNA in individual serum and plasma specimens; however, few have directly addressed either the issue of plasma pool contamination or assay compatibility with the recently introduced WHO B19 DNA international standard. Furthermore, these assays may exhibit inappropriate sensitivity for pooled plasma screening. For instance, Zerbini et al. (24) reported reliable detection of 60 B19 genome equivalents (1.2 x 104 /ml) using DIG-labeled PCR product detection, which is above the B19 level (104 genome equivalents/ml) thought to represent a noninfectious dose. Conversely, other authors have reported assay sensitivities of 168 and 100 B19 copies/ml, respectively, the use of which may lead to discarding viremic, though noninfectious, plasma units (10, 19). Although dot blot hybridization assays using colorimetric substrates (EnVison) have been developed (26) which can detect 3 x 103 copies (10 fg) of B19 DNA (while the addition of chemiluminescent substrates increased the sensitivity to 6 x 102 genome copies [2 fg]), these test formats may not be readily automated for large-scale specimen processing.
Whole-virus detection using receptor-mediated hemagglutination has been proposed as a strategy for the detection of B19 in plasma (16, 23). However, due to documented false negativity in the presence of B19 IgG and IgM and the absence of precise sensitivity of detection in terms of genome equivalents per milliliter (23), this method does not sufficiently guarantee blood product safety, in terms of the absence B19 contamination. The mean plasma B19 IgG level of 75.2 IU/ml observed in pooled plasma specimens PS1 to -5 strongly suggests that antibody presence in plasma does not interfere with B19 DNA extraction or, conversely, that B19 presence in plasma pools does not interfere with B19 antibody detection in serological assays. Since the individual donations screened were all B19 IgG negative, it is not possible to predict if free virus interferes with antibody detection in specimens obtained from individual donors. However, it should be noted that specimen IDS5, which was also B19 IgM positive, contained 100 times less B19 DNA than all other individual specimens tested. This observation may reflect virus diminution as the humoral response is mounted. The presence and absence of IgG reactivity against linear epitopes of VP1 and VP2, respectively, are consistent with results obtained following the serological evaluation of individual serum samples by Western blot analysis (12). These results suggest that the potential protective nature of B19 IgG present in plasma pools primarily comprises antibody reactivity directed against both conformational and VP1-unique region epitopes on B19 antigens.
The introduction of a WHO B19 DNA international standard represents a significant advance in the improvement of blood product safety and will serve to diminish ambiguity between results from different organizations currently using either various assay formats or quantitative terminology to express B19 DNA levels (i.e., genome equivalents per milliliter, copies per milliliter, and PCR-detectable units per milliliter [17]). Although there is no definitive information regarding the precise B19 viral load in plasma which can transmit infection to recipients, it has been reported that levels greater than 107 genome equivalents/ml, in three individual lots of pooled plasma (Solvent/Detergent Treated Viplas/SD), resulted in B19 seroconversion in 19 recipients (4). Consequently, there is now an impetus to identify and remove individual high-titer B19 plasma donations from plasma pools, and a number of companies have introduced minipool screening to address this problem.
In conclusion, the currently recommended maximum level of 104 genome equivalents/ml of B19 DNA in plasma pools as a safe viral load suggests that the B19 PCR-ELISA presented here, which is calibrated against the international standard and has a cutoff of 8 IU of B19 DNA (1.6 x 103 IU of B19 DNA/ml), has an application for the rapid screening of plasma donations or minipools for parvovirus B19 DNA, thereby leading to an improvement in blood product safety.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»