Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2002, p. 2297-2299, Vol. 40, No. 6
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2297-2299.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Detection of Mycobacterium avium in Blood Samples of Patients with AIDS by Using PCR
Vívian de F. Sumnienski Rodrigues,1,2 Fernanda C. Queiroz Mello,3 Marta Osório Ribeiro,2 Leila Fonseca,3 Afrânio Lineu Kritski,3 Maria Lucia Rossetti,2 and Arnaldo Zaha1*
Centro de Biotecnologia do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul,1
Laboratório de Biologia Molecular, Laboratório Central de Saúde Pública do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre,2
Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Serviço de Pneumologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil3
Received 26 November 2001/
Returned for modification 22 January 2002/
Accepted 4 April 2002

ABSTRACT
Sixty-nine blood samples from 47 patients infected with human
immunodeficiency virus were analyzed by using PCR to detect
Mycobacterium avium. The sensitivity can be up to 95.7%, depending
on the detection method used and the number of blood samples
analyzed from each patient. The procedure can be helpful in
the diagnosis of mycobacterial disease.

TEXT
The
Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) has been increasingly
recognized as an important group of organisms causing severe
opportunistic infections in patients in the final stages of
AIDS (
1,
3,
5,
8). MAC has been responsible for 96% of these
infections (
12). Species identification of the isolated mycobacteria
in AIDS patients and rapid and accurate diagnosis of the infection
are important due to the existence of antimicrobial drugs that
are able to suppress symptomatic infection (
9). PCR has been
the most rapid and sensitive method for identifying MAC infection
(
6) and has the potential to reduce the time taken for the identification
and species determination of
M. avium to a few days. DNA fragments
specific for the genus
Mycobacterium and for the species
M. avium can be amplified by using primers derived from the 16S
rRNA gene (
10,
13,
14,
16). In this work, we report the results
of experiments using a technique in which DNA from blood samples
of AIDS patients was purified and used for the detection of
the genus
Mycobacterium and the species
M. avium.
Blood specimens.
Sixty-nine samples from 47 AIDS patients of the Hospital of the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, a national reference center for AIDS, and of the Public Hospitals of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were analyzed. The samples were collected in the period between 1996 and 1999. Fourteen out of 47 patients had more than one aliquot (5 ml) of whole blood collected in a period of 24 h, the number of samples collected being dependent on the seriousness of disease. The samples were collected at time intervals of between 8 and 12 h. Of these patients, six had two samples collected and eight had three samples collected during this period. This was possible because the patients were hospitalized. All samples were prepared by the lysis centrifugation technique.
Each aliquot was inoculated in Löwenstein-Jensen medium, and 500 µl was used for DNA purification followed by PCR amplification. The "gold standard" used was based on the clinical diagnosis for mycobacteremia caused by M. avium. The clinical diagnosis was based on the symptoms presented by the patients and on the isolation of the organism by microbiological methods and according to therapeutic criteria (resolution of the process during the treatment).
Isolation and DNA detection procedures.
The DNA was purified with DNAzol (Gibco BRL and Life Technologies, Rockville, Md.). The DNAzol procedure developed by Chomezynski et al. (4) is based on the use of a guanidine detergent lysing solution that hydrolyzes RNA and allows the selective precipitation of DNA from a cell lysate. DNA was amplified by PCR with the primers derived from the 16S rRNA sequence, mycgen-f (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3'), mycgen-r (5'-TGCACACAGGCCACAAGGGA-3'), and mycav-r (5'-ACCAGAAGA CATGCGTCTTG-3'), which have been described by Böddinghaus et al. (2). A product of 1,030 bp resulting from amplification with the primers mycgen-f and mycgen-r is indicative of the genus Mycobacterium, and a smaller fragment of 180 bp amplified by the mycgen-f and mycav-r primers is specific for M. avium. The samples were tested with specific primers for Mycobacterium tuberculosis derived from IS6110 as described by Hermans et al. (7). Amplified DNA was analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel, subsequently transferred over the course of 2 h to nylon membranes by using a vacuum blotter system, and hybridized with specific probes for 3 h. The probes were produced by PCR, purified by using MicroSpin S-300 HR columns (Pharmacia Biotech, San Francisco, Calif.), and labeled with peroxidase by using the ECL direct system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Hybridization was detected by using a reagent that decayed to hydrogen peroxide, the substrate for peroxidase, and a second reagent that was involved in light production (luminol).
The specificity of the primers for M. avium was confirmed by using DNAs from other mycobacteria and fungi that can cause symptoms similar to those of mycobacteriosis. Human DNA was also tested. No amplification was observed with DNA from the other organisms analyzed. DNA sequencing with a Thermo Sequenase radiolabeled terminator cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) showed that the sequence of the amplified fragment was identical to the sequence deposited in GenBank (M29572) by Stahl and Urbance (17). The analytical sensitivity was determined by amplification of the DNA extracted from blood specimens spiked with different amounts of M. avium previously grown in Löwenstein-Jensen medium. The limit of detection by PCR following hybridization was approximately 40 CFU with the species-specific primers and 3,000 CFU with the genus-specific primers.
DNA amplification in blood samples.
Among the 69 blood samples analyzed, 41 were culture positive for mycobacteria and 28 were negative. Although the clinical diagnoses have confirmed mycobacterial disease in all 41 cases, 19 were characterized as infections with M. avium, 16 as infections with M. tuberculosis, and 6 as coinfections with both mycobacteria. The DNA fragment that identifies the genus Mycobacterium (1,030 bp) was observed in 29.3% of the culture-positive samples and after the hybridization step was observed in 68.3% of the samples. The DNA fragment that identifies the species M. avium (180 bp) was observed in 60% of the samples and after hybridization was observed in 84% of the samples. Detection of the fragment that identifies M. tuberculosis (245 bp) was possible in 95.4% of the M. tuberculosis-positive samples both with agarose gel and by hybridization. All culture-negative samples were also negative by the method described in this work (Table 1). The low analytical sensitivity in detecting the genus Mycobacterium is in agreement with the results obtained by Kulski and Pryce (11). Four samples (16%) were false negatives, probably because the number of bacilli in the samples was below the limit of detection. We also found one false-positive result, in which an M. tuberculosis-positive sample was detected as M. avium positive after PCR and hybridization. In the coinfection cases indicated by PCR analysis, the culture identified only M. tuberculosis, while the patients presented symptoms indicating coinfection with M. tuberculosis and M. avium. It is possible that the overgrowth of M. tuberculosis covered the M. avium colonies, since the latter are smooth and translucent while M. tuberculosis colonies are bigger and dry (15).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Analysis of 69 blood samples by PCR and hybridization compared with culture and clinical diagnosis results
|
On the other hand, the results can be analyzed by comparison
of the molecular diagnoses (PCR and hybridization) of each of
the 47 patients with culture results associated with clinical
diagnosis. Fourteen patients had more than one blood sample
analyzed, totaling 36 samples that were individually analyzed
by PCR. Thirty-three were identified as mycobacteria positive
by PCR. We observed that in 14.3% of the patients (two patients),
mycobacterial disease was confirmed only when more than one
sample was analyzed. These results show the importance of collecting
more samples in a period of 24 h, because different bacteremia
peaks occur in AIDS patients. One of the patients from whom
only one sample was analyzed presented a negative result by
molecular biology techniques, while the culture and clinical
diagnosis were positive for
M. avium. It is possible that the
diagnosis would have been confirmed by PCR if more than one
sample had been analyzed. Another patient was positive for
M. tuberculosis by culture and clinical diagnosis, but the PCR
result was positive for
M. avium, characterizing a false result
in the PCR. Three patients coinfected with
M. avium and
M. tuberculosis had positive results for both mycobacteria by the method described
in this work. The results obtained in this study show that when
each sample is analyzed individually, 91.3% are in accordance
with the gold standard and that when each patient is considered,
95.7% are in agreement (Table
2).
In this work, we show that it is possible to detect the presence
of mycobacteria by PCR followed by hybridization and that sensitivity
is increased when more than one blood sample is analyzed from
each patient. The developed diagnostic methodology presented
here is expected to be incorporated into the routine procedures
of clinical analysis laboratories, mainly those belonging to
the public health systems, in developing countries. The procedure
is rapid (1 day) and can be of remarkable importance in diagnosing
mycobacterial disease and defining the most adequate treatment
for patients.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Patricia Izquierdo Cafrune and Andréia Rosane
de Moura Valim for help in the preparation of the manuscript.
We thank Marilene H. Vainstein and Irene S. Schrank for critical
reading of the manuscript.
Vívian de F. Sumnienski Rodrigues received a scholarship from CAPES. This research was supported by FAPERGS.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centro de Biotecnologia/UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500, Prédio 43421, CEP: 91501-970-Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Phone: 55 51 3316-6054. Fax: 55 51 3316-7309. E-mail:
zaha{at}dna.cbiot.ufrgs.br.


REFERENCES
1
- Beggs, M. L., R. Stevanova, and K. D. Eisenach. 2000. Species identification of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates by a variety of molecular techniques. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:508-512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
- Böddinghaus, B., T. Rogall, T. Flohr, H. Blöcker, and E. C. Böttger. 1990. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1751-1759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
- Chaisson, R. E., R. D. Moore, D. D. Richman, J. Keruly, and T. Creagh. 1992. Incidence and natural history of Mycobacterium avium-complex infection in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease treated with zidovudine. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 146:285-289.[Medline]
4
- Chomezynski, P., K. Mackey, R. Drews, and W. Wilfinger. 1997. Dnazol: a reagent for the rapid isolation of genomic DNA. BioTechniques 22: 550-553.[Medline]
5
- Devallois, A., M. Picardeau, K. S. Goh, C. Sola, V. Vincent, and N. Rastogi. 1996. Comparative evaluation of PCR commercial DNA probes for detection and identification to species level of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2756-2759.[Abstract]
6
- Fries, J. W., R. J. Patel, W. F. Piessens, and D. F. Wirth. 1990. Genus and species-specific DNA probes to identify mycobacteria using the PCR. Mol. Cell. Probes 4:87-105.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
- Hermans, P. W., A. R. Schuitema, D. Van Soolingen, C. P. Verstynen, E. M. Bik, J. E. Thole, A. H. Kolk, and J. D. Van Embden. 1990. Specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1204-1213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
- Horsburgh, R. C., Jr. 1999. The pathophysiology of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex disease in AIDS. J. Infect. Dis. 179:461-465.[CrossRef]
9
- Iralu, J. V., V. K. Sritharan, W. S. Pieciak, D. F. Wirth, J. H. Maguire, and R. H. Barker. 1993. Diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium bacteremia by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1811-1814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
- Klemen, H., A. Bogiatzis, M. Ghalibafian, and H. H. Popper. 1998. Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of atypical mycobacteria and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 7:310-316.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
- Kulski, J. K., and T. Pryce. 1996. Preparation of mycobacterial DNA from blood culture fluids by simple alkali wash and heat lysis method for PCR detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1985-1991.[Abstract]
12
- Pechère, J. C. (ed.). 1996. Intracellular bacterial infections, 1st ed. British Library, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
13
- Rossi, M. C., A. Gori, G. Zehender, G. Marchetti, G. Ferrario, C. De Maddalena, L. Catozzi, A. Bandera, A. D. Esposti, and F. Franzetti. 2000. A PCR-colorimetric microwell plate hybridization assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium from culture samples and Ziehl-Neelsen-positive smears. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1772-1776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
- Roth, A., U. Reischl, A. Streubel, L. Naumann, R. M. Kroppenstedt, M. Habicht, M. Fischer, and H. Mauch. 2000. Novel diagnostic algorithm for identification of mycobacteria using genus-specific amplification of the 16S-23S rRNA gene spacer and restriction endonucleases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1094-1104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
- Runyon, E. H. 1974. Ten mycobacterial pathogens. Tubercle 55:235-240.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
- Sansila, A., P. Hongmanee, C. Chuchottavorn, S. Rienthong, D. Rienthong, and P. Palittapongarnpim. 1998. Differentiation between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium by amplification of the 16S-23S ribosomal DNA spacer. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2399-2403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
- Stahl, D. A., and J. W. Urbance. 1990. The division between fast- and slow-growing species corresponds to natural relationships among the mycobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 172:116-124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2002, p. 2297-2299, Vol. 40, No. 6
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2297-2299.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Jacob, B., DeBey, B. M., Bradway, D.
(2006). Spinal Intradural Mycobacterium haemophilum Granuloma in an American Bison (Bison bison).. Vet Pathol
43: 998-1000
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Naughton, J. F., Mealey, K. L., Wardrop, K. J., Oaks, J. L., Bradway, D. S.
(2005). Systemic Mycobacterium avium Infection in a Dog Diagnosed by Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Buffy Coat. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association
41: 128-132
[Abstract]
[Full Text]