Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2002, p. 2313, Vol. 40, No. 6
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2313.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| LETTER TO THE EDITOR |
| LETTER |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One hundred sixteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The serological cure rate increased from 8.3% in the first 3 months to 71.4% after 2 years or more of follow-up. The median time of serological cure was 18.5 months (standard deviation = 3 months), and 28.6% of cured patients continued to have a titer of 1:320 or higher 2 years or more after the infection. In a univariate analysis of prognostic variables, the serologically cured patients were on average younger (26.0 years versus 29.4 years) and female (44.4% versus 30.6%) and received three or more antibiotics instead of monotherapy or double therapy (43.2% versus 33.3%) than the one who did not achieve a serological cure (P > 0.2). Patients receiving doxycycline in the treatment regimen were more likely to have a serological cure than patients who did not receive doxycycline (51.1% versus 27.5%) (P < 0.05). The initial titer levels and Brucella bacteremia did not affect the serological cure (P > 0.5). In a Cox regression analysis, none of the variables studied were significantly associated with a serological cure (P > 0.1).
This study is the first to examine the persistence of Brucella antibodies in patients with a previous history of acute brucellosis. In Saudi Arabia, a seroprevalence survey of Brucella antibodies among a population of over 23,000 individuals revealed a prevalence rate of 15% for any titer and a prevalence rate of 4.5% for titers of 1:320 or more (1). This survey did not differentiate between active infection, past infection, and subclinical exposure. Our finding implies that many clinically cured patients continue to have various levels of Brucella antibodies for a long time after acute brucellosis. This poses a challenge for the diagnosis of brucellosis in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of brucellosis when their symptoms are caused by other infectious or noninfectious diseases. The implication may be overdiagnosis and exposing patients to unnecessary anti-Brucella treatment (3). Until more specific tests are developed that rely on the presence of Brucella antigens or the isolation of organisms, this problem will continue to exist.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Maha Almuneef
Departments of Infection Prevention and Control and Internal Medicine King Fahad National Guard Hospital P.O. B\ ox 22490 Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia
Ziad A. Memish*
|
||||||
|
* Phone: (966-1) 252-0088 ext. 3720 Fax: (966-1) 252-0437 E-mail: memish{at}ngha.med.sa |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|