Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Van Horn, K. Articles by Kumon, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Van Horn, K. Articles by Kumon, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2002, p. 2476-2479, Vol. 40, No. 7
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2476-2479.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of 15 Motility Media and a Direct Microscopic Method for Detection of Motility in Enterococci

Kenneth Van Horn,^1* Clara Tóth,² Reiko Kariyama,³ Ritsuko Mitsuhata,³ and Hiromi Kumon³

Microbiology, Westchester Medical Center, and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595,¹ Division of Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Computer Sciences, St. Thomas Aquinas College, Sparkill, New York 10976,² Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, Okayama 700-8558, Japan³

Received 26 December 2001/ Returned for modification 4 March 2002/ Accepted 29 April 2002

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Isolation of motile, vanC enterococci has yet to be a major infection control concern; however, rapid detection still is important. We evaluated 15 motility media from three manufacturers and a 2-h direct microscopic method for accurate detection of 89 enterococcal strains, including 72 vanC enterococcal strains. Resistance genes were confirmed by a multiplex PCR method with the vanC gene detected in all motile enterococci. Motility in the 72 vanC enterococci was detected at 30°C within 72 h in BD Biosciences motility nitrate medium and in Remel motility B medium, motility B medium supplemented with methyl--D-glucopyranoside (investigational), motility S medium, motility test medium, and motility test medium with tetrazolium indicator. Motility was also observed for all vanC enterococci with the 2-h direct (30°C incubation) microscopic detection method. All Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates were observed to be nonmotile in all media and by the direct microscopic method. Since differences between the various motility media tested were observed, the medium used for detection of enterococcal motility must be selected carefully.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Intrinsically vancomycin-resistant enterococci, which have vanC genes, have been reported to cause human clinical infection (10, 12) and can be recovered from surveillance cultures used to detect enterococci with acquired vanA and vanB vancomycin resistance (12, 14). The vanC enterococci, Enterococcus gallinarum, Enterococcus casseliflavus, and Enterococcus flavescens, have yet to be implicated in nosocomial outbreaks, but possibly could be transmitted from patient to patient without causing infection. Rapid, accurate identification of these enterococci is important in preventing the implementation of costly infection control measures. The reliability of automated identification systems to accurately identify the vanC enterococci has been a concern (2, 7, 11; K. Ramotar, W. Woods, L. Larocque, and B. Toye, Abstr. 98th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C359, 1998). Conventional motility and pigment production tests to help to identify the vanC enterococci have been described by Facklam and Collins (5) and are recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (9). However, the reliability of these tests has also been questioned (13, 15; Ramotar et al., Abstr. 98th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.). Many formulations of motility media are available, and most were originally designed to detect motility in enteric gram-negative bacilli (1). Facklam and Collins (5) described a modified Difco motility medium that was used to characterize strains of motile enterococci. New identification tests to help identify the vanC enterococci include the methyl--D-glucopyranoside (MDG) test (4, 6, 7, 13) and gene amplification by PCR to detect the specific vanC1, vanC2, and vanC3 genes (2, 3, 8, 12). The MDG test is currently available from a limited number of manufacturers, and the PCR method remains an investigational or research tool. Therefore, in this study, we determined the abilities of various motility media and a direct microscopic method to accurately detect motility in vanC enterococci. We also evaluated an investigational motility medium that included MDG. The van gene type was verified by PCR for all enterococci tested.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Organisms. Eighty-nine enterococcal strains were tested, including 41 E. gallinarum, 31 E. casseliflavus, 11 E. faecium, and 6 E. faecalis strains. All strains were recent isolates obtained from diverse inpatient and outpatient populations, isolated from either clinical or surveillance specimens. All isolates were identified by conventional biochemical tests methods as described by Facklam and Collins (5). All isolates were freshly grown (18 to 24 h) on Trypticase soy-5% sheep blood agar (BD Biosciences, Cockeysville, Md.) prior to testing.

PCR detection of vancomycin resistance genes. Gene amplification by PCR of the resistance genes to confirm the identification of each isolate was performed as previously described (8; S. Elsayed, N. Hamilton, D. Boyd, M. Mulvey, R. Kariyama, R. Mitsuhata, and H. Kumon, Letter, J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2367-2368, 2001). A cell suspension was prepared in 50 µl of 7.5% Chelex 100 to achieve the turbidity of a no. 3 McFarland standard and heated for 10 min at 100°C, and 2.5 µl of a centrifuged supernatant was used for PCR. A novel primer combination with optimized concentrations of vanA, vanB, vanC1, vanC2/C3, E. faecalis-specific, E. faecium-specific, and rrs primers was added to the reaction mixtures (S. Elsayed et al., Letter). The multiplex PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 µl containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.2 mM each deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP [dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP]), and 0.625 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Shuzo Co., Kusatsu, Japan). DNA amplification included thermal cycling with initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 54°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min), and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min in a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (PE Biosystems, Tokyo, Japan). PCR products were analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.

Motility tests. Fifteen types of motility media from three manufacturers were tested along with a direct wet mount method described previously (14). The motility media included the following: from BD Biosciences, motility indole lysine sulfide (MILS), motility indole ornithine (MIO), motility nitrate (MN), motility test medium (MTM) with triphenyl-tetrazolium chloride indicator (MTM-TTC), and sulfide indole motility (SIM); from Remel (Lenexa, Kans.), motility B (MOTB), motility B with TTC (MOTB-TTC), motility B and MDG (MOTB-MDG [investigational]), motility GI (MOT GI), MIO, motility S (MOTS), MTM, and MTM-TTC; and from PML (Tualatin, Oreg.), MIO and MTM-TTC. A heavy suspension of each strain was prepared in Trypticase soy broth. Each medium was inoculated with a single stab of an inoculating needle seeded with the organism suspension. Each medium type was inoculated in duplicate, with one tube incubated at 30°C and one tube incubated at 37°C. Tubes were examined independently by two microbiologists for motility according to the manufacturer's instructions at 24, 48, and 72 h. For the direct wet mount method, one drop from a Pasteur pipette (approximately 50 µl) of each organism suspension was added to duplicate Trypticase soy broth tubes: one incubated at 30°C and one incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Enterobacter aerogenes (motile) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (nonmotile) were used as controls for all motility tests. Following incubation, 50 µl from each tube was examined independently by two microbiologists via dark-field microscopy at magnifications of x400 and x1,000. Positive motility was identified by observing coccoid cells or chaining cocci that clearly exhibited rapid, directional, darting motility compared to the negative controls' nonmotile, vibrating, nondirectional motion of each cell, characteristic of Brownian movement. The positive control was observed to ensure that the Trypticase soy broth supported motility within the time course of incubation.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
All 41 E. gallinarum strains tested were confirmed by PCR to have the vanC1 gene. Two strains were found to additionally possess the vanA gene, and one strain was found to additionally possess the vanB gene. All 31 E. casseliflavus strains identified by a positive pigment test were confirmed by PCR to have the vanC2/3 gene. All vanC2/3 enterococci in this study fermented ribose and were considered to be E. casseliflavus. Of the 11 E. faecium strains, the vanA gene was detected in 9 and the vanB gene was detected in 2. Of the six E. faecalis strains, the vanA and vanB genes were detected in four and two strains, respectively.

The percentage of motile enterococci detected at 30°C by the 15 motility media and the microscopic method is listed in Table 1. The 11 E. faecium and 6 E. faecalis strains were identified as nonmotile by all 15 motility media and the microscopic method. The Remel MOTB-MDG and Remel MTM-TTC were the only medium-based methods to detect motility in all 72 PCR-confirmed vanC enterococcal strains after 24 h of incubation. Additionally within the 72-h incubation period, the Remel MOTB, Remel MOTS, Remel MTM, and BD MN detected motility in all 72 PCR-confirmed vanC enterococci. Motility was detected in 71 of the 72 (99%) PCR-confirmed vanC enterococci within 72 h in the Remel MDTB-TTC, BD SIM, and BD MTM-TTC. Several formulations of media tested from the various manufacturers were considered to be unreliable for detection of enterococcal motility. These included the Remel MIO, which detected motility in 39 of 72 (54%) vanC enterococci; the BD MILS, which detected motility in 54 of 72 (75%) vanC enterococci; and the PML MTM-TTC, which detected motility in 54 of the 72 (75%) vanC enterococci. (For these results, all detection was done at 30°C.) The direct microscopic wet mount detected all 72 motile enterococci after 2 h of incubation. Acid production from MDG in the MOTB-MDG was positive for all strains, with only 2 strains of E. casseliflavus requiring incubation longer than 24 h (one strain requiring 48 h, and one requiring 72 h), as shown in Table 1.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Detection of motility at 30°C in E. casseliflavus and E. gallinarum by 15 motility media and a direct microscopic method

Two motility medium formulations, MTM-TTC and MIO, were available from all three manufacturers, but yielded varied results based on the manufacturer. The Remel MTM-TTC formulation yielded the best results, with motility detected in 100% of the PCR-confirmed vanC enterococci at 30°C after 24 h. The BD MTM-TTC formulation detected motility in 71 of the 72 (99%) PCR-confirmed vanC enterococci. The PML MTM-TTC only detected motility in 54 (75%) strains at 30°C after 72 h of incubation. The second motility medium formulation, MIO, which was available from all three manufacturers, also yielded varied results. The PML MIO detected motility in 70 of the 72 (97%) PCR-confirmed vanC enterococci, and the BD MIO detected motility in 65 of the 72 (90%) PCR-confirmed vanC enterococci. The Remel MIO detected motility in only 39 of the 72 (54%) strains.

Incubation was performed for all tests at both 30 and 37°C. Our data (not shown) were virtually identical for the two incubation temperatures, showing no significant difference (Student's t test, P = 0.994) in overall detection of motility based on incubation temperature.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
A multiplex PCR was used to detect resistance genes in the enterococci tested; however, the vanC2 and vanC3 genes are highly homologous and were not differentiated in this study. Fermentation of ribose was used to differentiate E. casseliflavus from E. flavescens. Although no typing methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, were performed, the isolates tested were considered to be heterogeneous in origin due to the diverse patient populations from which they were isolated and the lack of reports of nosocomial spread or outbreaks of vanC enterococci.

All formulations of media except the PML MTM-TTC, BD MILS, and Remel MIO were able to reliably detect motility (>90% detected) in the vanC enterococci tested and were considered acceptable in this study for detection of motility in the vanC enterococci. These results correlate well with those obtained by Cartwright et al. (2), who used the Facklam method (5) and PCR for vanC confirmation.

Our data for the two motility media MTM-TTC and MIO obtained from all three manufacturers indicate that the manufacturing of the medium may play a major role in the ability or reliability of a particular medium to detect motility in vanC enterococci. The manufacturer's formulation may have contributed to the nonmotile strains previously reported (13, 15; K. Ramotar, W. Woods, L. Larocque, and B. Toye, Abstr. 98th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C359, 1998). These authors, citing the Facklam procedure (5), failed to detect motility in several strains and concluded that the motility characteristic was not stable and that testing with motility media was unreliable. It is possible that some of the nonmotile strains were tested in media obtained from a manufacturer whose medium we observed to be less reliable for the detection of enterococcal motility. Our data for the PML MTM-TTC are similar to those obtained by Ramotar et al. (Abstr. 98th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.) and indicate that this medium formulation may be unreliable for the detection of motility in enterococci. In another report, an unspecified PML motility test medium was reported to detect all motile enterococci (12). The varied results reported with one manufacturer's product may be due to lot variations in the preparation of the medium. We observed during the inoculation step that the PML MTM-TTC product appeared thicker than the other motility medium products tested and may have contained excess agar or may have become dehydrated prior to our inoculation, each of which could adversely affect motility.

Rapid detection of the vanC enterococci is considered important in helping to prevent institution of expensive infection control practices associated with isolation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The 2-h microscopic method is a simple test to set up, and the motility of the enterococci is easily observable by a trained microbiologist. Combined with the detection of colony pigment, enterococcal isolates can be rapidly identified as the motile enterococci E. casseliflavus and E. gallinarum. One rapid agar-based method has been reported to yield reliable detection of motility in vanC enterococci in 4 h (6). All other agar-based methods required 24 to 72 h of incubation. In this study, our data confirm that the 2-h direct microscopic method is acceptable for rapid detection of motility in enterococci (14), especially where PCR may not be available to confirm identification.

The MDG test has also been reported to be a reliable method for detection of the vanC enterococci (4, 6, 13), but requires at least 24 h of incubation. Our data with Remel's investigational medium, motility B medium with MDG, support these previous data. Combined with the MOTB, a reliable motility test according to our data, this investigational medium may be more practical and reliable for detection of a wider variety of strains of vanC enterococci, including any strains that may exhibit true nonmotile characteristics.

All tests were incubated at both 30 and 37°C, since the MDG test had been incubated at 35 to 37°C in previous reports (4, 6, 13). Also, a rapid 4-h motility test that detected all but one motile strain when incubated at 35°C has been reported (6), and the data compare favorably with our data, in which there was no significant difference (Student's t test, P = 0.994) in overall detection of motility based on temperature of incubation. All vanC strains were MDG positive at both 30 and 37°C. Incubation temperature does not appear to play a major role in observation of motility in enterococci when a motility medium or direct microscopic method is used.

Various formulations of motility media from different manufacturers as well as the direct microscopic wet mount test are reliable for detection of motility in E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. The MDG test combined with a motility medium is also reliable for detection of vanC enterococci. Elucidation of true nonmotile enterococcal strains may require further investigations, such as flagellar studies.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiology, Westchester Medical Center, Grasslands Rd., Valhalla, NY 10595. Phone and fax: (914) 493-7502. E-mail: vanhornk{at}wcmc.com.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Atlas, R. M. 1997. Handbook of microbiological media, 2nd ed. CRC Press, New York, N.Y.
2
2. Cartwright, C. P., F. Stock, G. A. Fahle, and V. J. Gill. 1995. Comparison of pigment production and motility tests with PCR for reliable identification of intrinsically vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1931-1933.[Abstract]
3
3. Clark, N. C., L. M. Teixeira, R. R. Facklam, and F. C. Tenover. 1998. Detection and differentiation of vanC-1, vanC-2, and vanC-3 glycopeptide resistance genes in enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2294-2297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Devriese, L. A., B. Pot, K. Kersters, S. Lauwers, and F. Haesebrouck. 1996. Acidification of methyl--D-glucopyranoside: a useful test to differentiate Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum from Enterococcus faecium species group and from Enterococcus faecalis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2607-2608.[Abstract]
5
5. Facklam, R. R., and M. D. Collins. 1989. Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:731-734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Hanson, K. L., and C. P. Cartwright. 1999. Comparison of simple and rapid methods for identifying enterococci intrinsically resistant to vancomycin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:815-817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Iwen, P. C., D. M. Kelly, J. Linder, and S. H. Hinrichs. 1996. Revised approach for identification and detection of ampicillin and vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species by using MicroScan panels. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1779-1783.[Abstract]
8
8. Kariyama, R., R. Mitsuhata, J. W. Chow, D. B. Clewell, and H. Kumon. 2000. Simple and reliable multiplex PCR assay for surveillance isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3092-3095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th ed. Publication no. M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
10
10. Ruoff, K. L., L. de la Maza, M. J. Murtagh, J. D. Spargo, and M. J. Ferraro. 1990. Species identities of enterococci isolated from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:435-437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Sader, H. S., D. Biedenbach, and R. N. Jones. 1995. Evaluation of Vitek and API 20S for species identification of enterococci. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:315-319.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Toye, B., J. Shymanski, M. Bobrowska, W. Woods, and K. Ramotar. 1997. Clinical and epidemiologic significance of enterococci intrinsically resistant to vancomycin (possessing the vanC genotype). J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3166-3170.[Abstract]
13
13. Turenne, C. Y., D. J. Hoban, J. A. Karlowsky, G. G. Zhanel, and A. M. Kabani. 1998. Screening of stool samples for identification of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates should include the methyl--D-glucopyranoside test to differentiate nonmotile Enterococcus gallinarum from E. faecium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2333-2335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Van Horn, K. G., and K. M. Rodney. 1998. Colonization and microbiology of the motile enterococci in a patient population. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31:525-530.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
15. Vincent, S., R. G. Knight, M. Green, D. F. Sahm, and D. M. Shlaes. 1991. Vancomycin susceptibility and identification of motile enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2335-2337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2002, p. 2476-2479, Vol. 40, No. 7
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2476-2479.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Van Horn, K. Articles by Kumon, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Van Horn, K. Articles by Kumon, H.