This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shrestha, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Procop, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shrestha, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Procop, G. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2002, p. 2659-2661, Vol. 40, No. 7
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2659-2661.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and the mecA Gene from BacT/ALERT Blood Culture Bottles by Using the LightCycler System

Nabin K. Shrestha,1,2 Marion J. Tuohy,1 Gerri S. Hall,1 Carlos M. Isada,2 and Gary W. Procop1*

Section of Clinical Microbiology,1 Division of Infectious Diseases, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio2

Received 28 December 2001/ Returned for modification 10 February 2002/ Accepted 6 April 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
One hundred BacT/ALERT blood culture bottles growing gram-positive cocci in clusters were cultured and studied by LightCycler PCR for the sa442 and mecA genes. PCR was 100% sensitive and specific for detecting Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistance in S. aureus but was less accurate for methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.


arrow
TEXT
 
Bacteremia with Staphylococcus aureus often indicates a serious medical condition. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), however, may be contaminants. Consequently, when gram-positive cocci in clusters are seen in Gram stains of signal-positive blood culture bottles, two important questions arise. The first is whether the organism is S. aureus or a CoNS. The second question is whether the organism is susceptible to methicillin or not. The first distinction requires 18 to 24 h by conventional techniques. Determination of susceptibility requires an additional 6 to 10 h, if the organism is in pure culture. Earlier clarification of these questions would likely have significant clinical impact. Martineau et al. have identified a DNA segment, the sa442 gene, unique to S. aureus (3). The major determinant of methicillin resistance in staphylococci, the mecA gene, occurs in both S. aureus and CoNS (6, 8). These genes have been used for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in bacterial subcultures on solid media (5) and directly in BACTEC blood culture bottles using the LightCycler system (7).

The BacT/ALERT FA and BacT/ALERT FN bottles used with the BacT/ALERT blood culture system contain carbon particles to adsorb inhibitors of bacterial growth; although useful in this regard, the particles interfere with PCR and fluorescence detection in the LightCycler system. Any attempt to remove the particles may also diminish the amount of target bacteria present and thereby possibly decrease the sensitivity of subsequent PCR. This study was conducted to examine the feasibility of detection of S. aureus and identification of methicillin resistance directly in positive BacT/ALERT (bioMerieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.) bottles using the LightCycler system.

Routine blood culture bottles were incubated in the BacT/ALERT automated continuous monitoring system. Bottle contents that signaled positive were identified, Gram stained, and inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar; if gram-positive cocci in clusters were seen, a 0.5-ml aliquot for PCR was also immediately removed. The charcoal and the bacteria, both suspended in the BacT/ALERT blood culture medium, were separated by differential centrifugation. The aliquot was centrifuged at 850 x g for 2 min to remove the charcoal. The supernatant was centrifuged at 11,500 x g for 5 min. The resulting pellet was resuspended in 200 µl of a lysis buffer (5) containing 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Tween 20, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 1 mM EDTA and incubated in a screw-cap reaction tube at 100°C for 10 min. This was again centrifuged at 850 x g for 2 min, and the supernatant was removed and stored at -20°C for future testing.

The sa442 gene and the mecA gene were amplified on a LightCycler, using previously described primers (3, 5): Sa-442F (5'-GTCGGTACACGATATTCTTCACG-3'), Sa442-R (5'-CTCTCGTATGACCAGCTTCGGTAC-3'), mecA-F (5'-CAAGATATGAAGTGGTAAATGGT-3'), and mecA-R (5'-TTTACGACTTGTTGCATACCATC-3'). We, however, performed the sa442 gene and the mecA gene assays separately, rather than the duplex reaction as previously described (5); this was done because we noted a slightly diminished detection of the mecA gene under duplex reaction conditions (unpublished data). Product detection was accomplished using previously described hybridization probes labeled with fluorescein (fam) and fluorophore molecules (Red 640 and Red 705) (3, 5): Sa442-HP-1 (5'-TACTGAAATCTCATTACGTTGCATCGGAA-[fam]3'), Sa442-HP-2 (5'[Red 705]-ATTGTGTTCTGTATGTAAAAGCCGTCTTG-p3'), mecA-HP-1 (5'-CAGGTTACGGACAAGGTGAAATACTGATT-[fam]3'), and mecA-HP-2 (5'[Red 640]-ACCCAGTACAGATCCTTTCAATCTATAGCG-p3'). All oligonucleotide primers and probes were obtained from BioChem (Salt Lake City, Utah). The sa442 amplification mixture consisted of 3.0 mM MgCl2, a 0.25 µM concentration of each sa442 primer, a 0.2 µM concentration of each sa442 probe, and 2 µl of 10x LightCycler FastStart DNA Master Hybridization Probes mixture (Roche) in a volume of 15 µl. The mecA amplification mix was similar, except that the mecA primers and probes were present at concentrations of 0.5 and 0.2 µM, respectively. Five microliters of template DNA extract was added to obtain a reaction volume of 20 µl for each capillary tube. A suspension of Tris-EDTA and an extract of an MRSA, ATCC no. 33592 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.), were used as the negative and positive controls, respectively.

The reaction protocol was as follows: an initial FastStart DNA Taq polymerase activation phase at 95°C for 10 min; a 45-cycle amplification phase consisting of a 95°C segment for 10 s, a 50°C segment for 10 s, and a 72°C segment for 20 s; a melt phase from 45 to 75°C with a temperature transition rate of 0.1°C/s; and a rapid cooling phase. The presence of amplified DNA was measured by detection of energy emitted at 640 nm (for the presence of the mecA gene) and at 705 nm (for the presence of the sa442 gene). The temperature at which the hybridization probes dissociated from the target sites was determined by melting curve analysis, as provided for by the LightCycler software. This served as an independent indicator of the specificity of hybridization.

The cultures were processed per routine, using colonial morphology and slide coagulase tests. Latex agglutination (Staphaurex; Murex BioTech Ltd., Dartford, England) and tube coagulase tests were performed in ambiguous cases. Susceptibility testing was performed using the Vitek (bioMerieux, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) system. For CoNS, only isolates considered clinically significant were tested for susceptibility (by the Vitek method), as per routine laboratory policy. For the purposes of this study, the remaining CoNS isolates were tested by the Kirby-Bauer oxacillin disk method, according to NCCLS guidelines (4); the Vitek system was used for ambiguous cases. Detection of S. aureus and the mecA gene by real-time PCR was compared with conventional identification and susceptibility testing. The sensitivity and specificity of the real-time PCR assays were determined using the conventional methods as the reference standard.

One hundred consecutive positive bottles analyzed in this manner contained 34 S. aureus and 66 CoNS isolates. Both positive and negative controls reacted appropriately. The real-time sa442 PCR assay was 100% sensitive and 100% specific for detecting S. aureus (Table 1). A single isolate, initially identified as a CoNS by conventional testing, was positive for the sa442 gene and was subsequently confirmed to be S. aureus by further biochemical testing. The PCR assay for the mecA gene was 100% sensitive and 100% specific for detecting methicillin resistance in S. aureus and was 77.4% sensitive and 92.3% specific for detecting methicillin resistance in CoNS (Table 2). The melting temperatures of the sa442 and mecA gene probes were 65.12 ± 1.36°C (mean ± 2 standard deviations; n = 34), and 66.03 ± 0.63°C (mean ± 2 standard deviations, n = 66), respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. sa442 PCR testing of staphylococci from blood culture bottlesa


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Results of mecA PCR testing on methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible staphylococcia

The timely and accurate information provided by these tests would help clinicians identify S. aureus bacteremia, determine methicillin resistance, and thereby modify antimicrobial therapy 24 to 36 h earlier than would be possible otherwise. The mecA assay performed less optimally with the CoNS, and this discrepancy has been noted before (1). This may be because of resistance to methicillin by mechanisms other than the mecA gene and indicates that mecA gene detection may not be accurate enough to guide therapy for CoNS infections.

The sensitivity of PCR could be compromised by the presence of PCR inhibitors or other physical factors. We did not observe PCR inhibition in our small study sample. Blood culture systems differ in their medium compositions and results with other systems may vary. PCR performed directly on aliquots from BACTEC bottles was found to have a sensitivity of 96% for the detection of S. aureus (7). Further testing is necessary to fully understand the significance of PCR inhibition in blood culture systems. In BacT/ALERT bottles, the presence of carbon particles is a significant obstacle to PCR but was overcome in our study by a simple differential centrifugation process. Although other systems are not hampered by the presence of carbon particles, there may be other impediments to PCR that are unique to each culture system that need to be addressed. In our study, PCR also identified an S. aureus isolate that had been misidentified as a CoNS by conventional methods. Altered colonial morphology, possibly due to antimicrobial therapy, caused the misidentification; medical record review revealed that the patient was on therapy for native aortic valve endocarditis known to be caused by S. aureus from previous cultures. This observation suggests that PCR testing may be more sensitive than traditional methods for identifying S. aureus bacteremia in patients on antimicrobial therapy.

Conversely, it is conceivable that misleading results may occur, particularly if a mixture of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and mecA-positive CoNS coincidentally is present within the same blood culture bottle (2). The assay described here would correctly characterize the bottle as containing S. aureus but would inaccurately assign it the status of methicillin resistant. Therefore, we suggest that routine culture with standard agar plates continue to be used to identify cultures that contain mixtures of bacteria.

We conclude that the LightCycler sa442 gene assay accurately detects the presence of S. aureus in BacT/ALERT blood culture bottles and that the mecA gene assay reliably determines methicillin resistance in S. aureus but not in CoNS, which may be resistant by additional mechanisms. The significance of this study is that it demonstrates the feasibility of direct detection of S. aureus and identification of MRSA in another major blood culture system, thereby decreasing the time for obtaining definite identification and key susceptibility results by approximately 36 h.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinical Microbiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation/L40, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195. Phone: (216) 444-5879. Fax: (216) 445-6984. E-mail: procopg{at}ccf.org. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Gradelski, E., L. Valera, L. Aleksunes, D. Bonner, and J. Fung-Tomc. 2001. Correlation between genotype and phenotypic categorization of staphylococci based on methicillin susceptibility and resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2961-2963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Lem, P., J. Spiegelman, B. Toye, and K. Ramotar. 2001. Direct detection of mecA, nuc and 16S rRNA genes in BacT/Alert blood culture bottles. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 41:165-168.[CrossRef][Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Martineau, F., F. J. Picard, P. H. Roy, M. Ouellette, and M. G. Bergeron. 1998. Species-specific and ubiquitous-DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:618-623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. NCCLS. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Eleventh Informational Supplement. M100-S11. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
    5. 5
  5. Reischl, U., H. J. Linde, M. Metz, B. Leppmeier, and N. Lehn. 2000. Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and simultaneous species confirmation using real-time fluorescence PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2429-2433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Ryffel, C., W. Tesch, I. Birch-Machin, P. E. Reynolds, L. Barberis-Maino, F. H. Kayser, and B. Berger-Bachi. 1990. Sequence comparison of mecA genes isolated from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Gene 94:137-138.[CrossRef][Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Tan, T. Y., S. Corden, R. Barnes, and B. Cookson. 2001. Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood cultures by real-time fluorescence PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4529-4531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Ubukata, K., R. Nonoguchi, M. D. Song, M. Matsuhashi, and M. Konno. 1990. Homology of mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus simulans to that of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:170-172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2002, p. 2659-2661, Vol. 40, No. 7
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2659-2661.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kaase, M., Baars, B., Friedrich, S., Szabados, F., Gatermann, S. G. (2009). Performance of MicroScan WalkAway and Vitek 2 for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in a Set of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Diverse Genetic Backgrounds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2623-2625 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ruimy, R., Dos-Santos, M., Raskine, L., Bert, F., Masson, R., Elbaz, S., Bonnal, C., Lucet, J.-C., Lefort, A., Fantin, B., Wolff, M., Hornstein, M., Andremont, A. (2008). Accuracy and Potential Usefulness of Triplex Real-Time PCR for Improving Antibiotic Treatment of Patients with Blood Cultures Showing Clustered Gram-Positive Cocci on Direct Smears. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2045-2051 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Goldmeyer, J., Li, H., McCormac, M., Cook, S., Stratton, C., Lemieux, B., Kong, H., Tang, W., Tang, Y.-W. (2008). Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Determination of Methicillin Resistance Directly from Positive Blood Cultures by Isothermal Amplification and a Disposable Detection Device. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1534-1536 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stamper, P. D., Cai, M., Howard, T., Speser, S., Carroll, K. C. (2007). Clinical Validation of the Molecular BD GeneOhm StaphSR Assay for Direct Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Positive Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2191-2196 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tang, Y.-W., Kilic, A., Yang, Q., McAllister, S. K., Li, H., Miller, R. S., McCormac, M., Tracy, K. D., Stratton, C. W., Han, J., Limbago, B. (2007). StaphPlex System for Rapid and Simultaneous Identification of Antibiotic Resistance Determinants and Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Detection of Staphylococci from Positive Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1867-1873 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cleven, B. E. E., Palka-Santini, M., Gielen, J., Meembor, S., Kronke, M., Krut, O. (2006). Identification and characterization of bacterial pathogens causing bloodstream infections by DNA microarray.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2389-2397 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Buckwalter, S. P., Jones, M. F., Vetter, E. A., Yao, J. D. C., Wengenack, N. L., Rosenblatt, J. E., Cockerill, F. R. III, Smith, T. F. (2006). Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 165-256 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shrestha, N. K., Tuohy, M. J., Padmanabhan, R. A., Hall, G. S., Procop, G. W. (2005). Evaluation of the LightCycler Staphylococcus MGRADE Kits on Positive Blood Cultures That Contained Gram-Positive Cocci in Clusters. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 6144-6146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brown, D. F. J., Edwards, D. I., Hawkey, P. M., Morrison, D., Ridgway, G. L., Towner, K. J., Wren, M. W. D., on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis, (2005). Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 1000-1018 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sinsimer, D., Leekha, S., Park, S., Marras, S. A. E., Koreen, L., Willey, B., Naidich, S., Musser, K. A., Kreiswirth, B. N. (2005). Use of a Multiplex Molecular Beacon Platform for Rapid Detection of Methicillin and Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4585-4591 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Varettas, K., Mukerjee, C., Taylor, P. C. (2005). Anticoagulant Carryover May Influence Clot Formation in Direct Tube Coagulase Tests from Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4613-4615 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Adams, D. N. (2005). Shortcut Method for Extraction of Staphylococcus aureus DNA from Blood Cultures and Conventional Cultures for Use in Real-Time PCR Assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2932-2933 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Warren, D. K., Liao, R. S., Merz, L. R., Eveland, M., Dunne, W. M. Jr. (2004). Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Nasal Swab Specimens by a Real-Time PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5578-5581 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lindholm, L., Sarkkinen, H. (2004). Direct Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci from Routine Blood Cultures by Using AccuProbe Tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5609-5613 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sakai, H., Procop, G. W., Kobayashi, N., Togawa, D., Wilson, D. A., Borden, L., Krebs, V., Bauer, T. W. (2004). Simultaneous Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci in Positive Blood Cultures by Real-Time PCR with Two Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Probe Sets. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5739-5744 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Paule, S. M., Pasquariello, A. C., Hacek, D. M., Fisher, A. G., Thomson, R. B. Jr, Kaul, K. L., Peterson, L. R. (2004). Direct Detection of Staphylococcus aureus from Adult and Neonate Nasal Swab Specimens Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. J. Mol. Diagn. 6: 191-196 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huletsky, A., Giroux, R., Rossbach, V., Gagnon, M., Vaillancourt, M., Bernier, M., Gagnon, F., Truchon, K., Bastien, M., Picard, F. J., van Belkum, A., Ouellette, M., Roy, P. H., Bergeron, M. G. (2004). New Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Specimens Containing a Mixture of Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1875-1884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Murdoch, D R, Greenlees, R L (2004). Rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus from BacT/ALERT blood culture bottles by direct Gram stain characteristics. J. Clin. Pathol. 57: 199-201 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shrestha, N. K., Tuohy, M. J., Hall, G. S., Reischl, U., Gordon, S. M., Procop, G. W. (2003). Detection and Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Isolates by Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5121-5126 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fukushima, H., Tsunomori, Y., Seki, R. (2003). Duplex Real-Time SYBR Green PCR Assays for Detection of 17 Species of Food- or Waterborne Pathogens in Stools. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5134-5146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chapin, K. C., Musgnug, M. C. (2003). Direct Susceptibility Testing of Positive Blood Cultures by Using Sensititre Broth Microdilution Plates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4751-4754 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Klaassen, C. H. W., de Valk, H. A., Horrevorts, A. M. (2003). Clinical Staphylococcus aureus Isolate Negative for the Sa442 Fragment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4493-4493 [Full Text]  
  • Levi, K., Towner, K. J. (2003). Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Blood with the EVIGENE MRSA Detection Kit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3890-3892 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Levi, K., Bailey, C., Bennett, A., Marsh, P., Cardy, D. L. N., Towner, K. J. (2003). Evaluation of an Isothermal Signal Amplification Method for Rapid Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Patient-Screening Swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3187-3191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shrestha, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Procop, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shrestha, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Procop, G. W.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»