Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2002, p. 2666-2667, Vol. 40, No. 7
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2666-2667.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Ralstonia pickettii Traced in Blood Culture Bottles
Névine Boutros,1* Nevriye Gonullu,2 Anne Casetta,1 Michèle Guibert,1 Didier Ingrand,1 and Léa Lebrun1
Department of Microbiology, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France,1
Istanbul University, Institute for Experimental Medical Research, Istanbul, Turkey2
Received 27 November 2001/
Returned for modification 9 February 2002/
Accepted 6 March 2002

ABSTRACT
Over a 9-month period, 14 strains of
Ralstonia pickettii were
isolated from various biological samples inoculated in a blood
culture medium. Molecular epidemiological investigation confirmed
the relatedness of the strains. The source of the contamination
proved to be the blood culture bottle caps.

TEXT
Ralstonia pickettii (formerly
Pseudomonas picketti and
Burkholderia pickettii) is a nonfermenting gram-negative bacillus of relatively
low virulence that is often associated with pseudobacteremia
or asymptomatic colonization of patients. Contamination of water
supplies, skin disinfectants, and saline solutions used either
for patient care (
1,
2,
3,
5,
7,
8) or for laboratory diagnosis
(
4,
9) have previously been incriminated. We report on a new
source of contamination caused by
R. pickettii in biological
samples of patients hospitalized in different units of Antoine
Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France.
Between March and November 2000, 14 strains of R. pickettii were isolated from various biological samples (five pleural fluid, three ascitic fluid, three pus, and two biopsy samples and one blood sample) inoculated in an enrichment broth (Vital system; BioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) generally used for blood culture. All samples except the blood sample were inoculated in the microbiology laboratory in both aerobic and anaerobic bottles by removing the caps to open the bottles, a procedure chosen to protect laboratory technicians from the risk of contamination through needle-stick injuries. Growth of R. pickettii was detected in 12 anaerobic bottles and 2 aerobic bottles after 48 to 72 h of incubation in the Vital system at 37°C. All strains were identified by use of the API NE identification system (BioMérieux). Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were determined by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) and were interpreted according to the standards of the Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. The clonalities of the strains were established by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, as described previously (6), with primers P3 (5'-AGACGTCCAC-3') and P15 (5'-AATGGCGCAG-3') (Genset, Paris, France). Briefly, DNA extraction was performed with chloroform and isopropanol after cell lysis with lysozyme and proteinase K. The extracted DNA was amplified in a Trio-Thermoblock system (Biometra). The amplification products were then analyzed by electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and detected by UV transillumination. For pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), DNA embedded in agarose plugs was digested with the SpeI restriction enzyme (4). Separation of the DNA fragments was carried out on a 1.2% agarose gel in a CHEF-DR III system (Bio-Rad). The separated fragments were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by UV transillumination.
An epidemiological investigation was undertaken to elucidate the source of contamination, since isolation of these strains did not correlate with the medical status of any of the samples from patients. This investigation evaluated patients, disinfectants, and enrichment broth media. Antiseptic solutions could not be incriminated, as different disinfectants were used in the different clinical units. Cultures of the enrichment broth media from five unopened bottles were made by flooding 5 ml of broth on chocolate agar and incubating the rest of the broth, and the cultures remained negative after 5 days of incubation at 30°C. Since all except one of the positive samples were from anaerobic bottles inoculated in the microbiology laboratory, the contamination could have originated from our inoculation protocol. For this reason, cultures of 15 caps of unused bottles, chosen at random from bottles from five different lots, were made by imprinting the caps for 1 min on chocolate agar medium before incubation at 30°C. After 48 h of incubation, a pure growth of R. pickettii was obtained from seven bottle caps originating from three different lots (Fig. 1).
All of the
R. pickettii isolates detected had the same antibiotic
susceptibility patterns as the strains obtained from the biological
fluids tested. They were susceptible to ureidopenicillins, cefotaxime,
imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
They were resistant or had decreased susceptibilities to aminopenicillins,
aztreonam, cefotetan, aminoglycosides, colistin, and fosfomycin.
The patterns obtained by RAPD analysis and PFGE for strains
isolated from the biological samples and those recovered from
the bottle caps were highly similar (the patterns differed by
three bands or less). Our results showed that RAPD analysis,
which is less time-consuming than PFGE (2 days versus 5 days),
was an adequately discriminatory technique for detection of
an outbreak. Representative products obtained by RAPD analysis
with primer P3 for eight strains isolated from various biological
samples and for three strains isolated from different lots of
blood culture bottle caps are shown in Fig.
2. Additionally,
we confirmed the previous observations of Maroye et al. (
6)
that antibiotyping is very helpful in the initial discrimination
of isolates when there is a suspicion of an outbreak.
The manufacturer was rapidly alerted following the discovery
of this contamination. Its investigation incriminated the water
used to cool the bottles after sterilization as the source of
contamination. Residual drops of water remaining between the
plastic clip and the rubber cap were contaminated with
R. pickettii.
Therefore, contamination of the anaerobic blood culture medium
with this aerobic microorganism had probably been promoted by
the increased negative pressure created when the bottles were
opened to inoculate the biological samples. In addition,
R. pickettii is resistant to some antiseptics and is able to survive
in an oligotrophic environment (
9). The manufacturers were quick
to disseminate to users strict recommendations concerning this
issue, cautioning them not to open bottles before inoculation.
This was quite important because in France, the bottles are
used not only for cultivation of blood but also as enrichment
broth for cultivation of samples other than blood. Since we
have changed our inoculation protocols, we have observed no
new cases of
R. pickettii contamination.
In all cases cultures of specimens yielding R. pickettii should always be interpreted with caution and evaluated with the clinical data for each patient. As Labarca et al. (2) noted previously, when an outbreak of R. pickettii occurs, contamination of solutions should be suspected. An epidemiological investigation should be initiated promptly, and the first step should be to collect unopened bottles to culture the solutions in those bottles. All previous reports associated R. pickettii epidemics with extrinsic contamination of disinfectants, saline solution, sterile water, narcotic solutions, and other solutions used for patient care (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8) or to laboratory contamination (4, 9). Plastic vials contaminated with the water used to cool the vials after the moulding cycle had been suspected previously (3), but to our knowledge, this is the first time that the caps of the bottles were identified as the source of contamination with R. pickettii. In conclusion, the data presented here show that epidemiological investigations concerning contamination with R. pickettii should not be limited to water supplies, skin disinfectants, and saline solutions used for patient care or for laboratory diagnosis but should also include all manufactured products.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Bénédict Savary for producing the photograph
in Fig.
1 and the manufacturer for helping us to elucidate this
problem.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157 rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92141 Clamart Cedex, France. Phone: (33) 01 45 37 46 31. Fax: (33) 01 46 32 67 96. E-mail:
nevine.boutros{at}abc.ap-hop-paris.fr.


REFERENCES
1
- Gardner, S., and S. T. Shulman. 1984. A nosocomial common source outbreak caused by Pseudomonas pickettii. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 3:420-422.[Medline]
2
- Labarca, J. A., W. E. Trick, C. L. Peterson, L. A. Carson, S. C. Holt, M. J. Arduino, M. Meylan, L. Mascola, and W. R. Jarvis. 1999. A multistate nosocomial outbreak of Ralstonia pickettii colonization associated with an intrinsically contaminated respiratory care solution. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:1281-1286.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
- Lacey, S., and S. V. Want. 1991. Pseudomonas pickettii infections in a paediatric oncology unit. J. Hosp. Infect. 17:45-51.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
- Luk, W. K. 1996. An outbreak of pseudobacteraemia caused by Burkholderia pickettii: the critical role of an epidemiological link. J. Hosp. Infect. 34:59-69.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
- Maki, D. G., B. S. Klein, R. D. McCormick, C. J. Alvarado, M. A. Zilz, S. M. Stolz, C. A. Hassemer, J. Gould, and A. R. Liegel. 1991. Nosocomial Pseudomonas pickettii bacteremias traced to narcotic tampering. JAMA 265:981-986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
- Maroye, P., H. P. Doermann, A. M. Rogues, J. P. Gachie, and F. Mégraud. 2000. Investigation of an outbreak of Ralstonia pickettii in a paediatric hospital by RAPD. J. Hosp. Infect. 44:267-272.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
- McNeil, M. M., S. L. Solomon, R. L. Anderson, B. J. Davis, R. F. Spengler, B. E. Reisberg, C. Thornsberry, and W. J. Martone. 1985. Nosocomial Pseudomonas pickettii colonization associated with a contaminated respiratory therapy solution in a special care nursery. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22:903-907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
- Roberts, L. A., P. J. Collignon, V. B. Cramp, S. Alexander, A. E. McFarlane, E. Graham, A. Fuller, V. Sinickas, and A. Hellyar. 1990. An Australia-wide epidemic of Pseudomonas pickettii bacteraemia due to contamined "sterile" water for injection. Med. J. Aust. 152:652-655.[Medline]
9
- Verschraegen, G., G. Claeys, G. Meeus, and M. Delanghe. 1985. Pseudomonas pickettii as a cause of pseudobacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:278-279.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2002, p. 2666-2667, Vol. 40, No. 7
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2666-2667.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Daxboeck, F., Stadler, M., Assadian, O., Marko, E., Hirschl, A. M, Koller, W.
(2005). Characterization of clinically isolated Ralstonia mannitolilytica strains using random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) typing and antimicrobial sensitivity, and comparison of the classification efficacy of phenotypic and genotypic assays. J Med Microbiol
54: 55-61
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Greub, G., Raoult, D.
(2004). Microorganisms Resistant to Free-Living Amoebae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
17: 413-433
[Abstract]
[Full Text]