Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2002, p. 3112-3113, Vol. 40, No. 8
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.3112-3113.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| LETTER TO THE EDITOR |
|
|
|---|
We have some serious doubts regarding these conclusions.
First, it is hard to imagine that the IS900 ISH results shown in the figures of the article in question can be interpreted as truly positive. Staining patterns for infectious diseases should be interpreted in the histopathological context of infected cells. For Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, an intracellular bacterium, this means an intracytoplasmic granular staining pattern of infected immune cells in which the cell nucleus is still visible (1). In contrast to this staining pattern, the phosphatase reaction deposit in the representative figure on IS900 hybridization in the Sechi study is a large rounded dot that exceeded the size of a single cell. Such deposits are typical in sections with (little) cracks as can be observed in these illustrations. Hybridization of other types of intracellular bacteria, such as Chlamydia pneumoniae, has been described as granula restricted to the cytoplasm (2, 3).
Second, if the authors' interpretation regarding the high rate of positive IS900 hybridization signals is correct, a large amount of genomic DNA should be present given the enormous strong signal of this staining, and hence, at least some of the IS900-targeted PCRs should have been positive. However, the authors did not find any positive IS900 PCR results. It is not likely that their assumption of a low sensitivity of the IS900-targeted PCR due to the occurrence of nicks in the DNA caused by formalin fixation is correct. At least a control PCR assay on the integrity of the DNA should have been included to confirm this possible artifact, which was attributed to the pretreatment of the material. Such a control, for instance, one of the human housekeeping genes (4), would also provide evidence for the presence or absence of PCR inhibitors. The conclusions drawn on the basis of the described IS900 PCR protocol are therefore not justified.
With this single unconfirmed and questionable observation, we believe that the IS900 ISH results in this study should be interpreted with great care and, consequently, do not contribute to the answer of the important scientific questions related to the possible involvement of (cell wall-deficient) Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in the etiology of CD. Multidisciplinary studies are needed with congruous and conclusive results to examine the true nature of the etiology of CD.
|
|
|---|
|
Paul J. M. Roholl*
Laboratory of Pathology and Immunobiology
Arnold Herrewegh
|
||||||
| * E-mail: p.roholl{at}rivm.nl. |
|
|
|---|
Regarding the first point of Dr. Roholl et al., on the interpretation of the staining patterns, what he states is true (intracellular bacteria have an intracytoplasmic granular staining pattern), but we would like to observe that, in other works, a pattern similar to what we observed was reported (3); Hulten et al. stated that "spheroplasts are present both as single organisms or in large fluorescent aggregates" and that "These sections showed dark purple dots or larger purple aggregates corresponding to single spheroplast or groups of several organisms, respectively." That is, the intracellular bacterium Chlamydia pneumoniae, to which Dr. Roholl refers, has a different pattern inside cells, whereas mycobacteria grow as aggregates due to the complexity of their cell wall. Moreover, the presence of spheroplast forms of mycobacteria could be an explanation of the negative results with acid-fast mycobacterial staining.
Indeed, we obtained several examples of positive hybridization in samples from Crohn's patients, and although in one of the published pictures (4), a little crack can be observed, there are other examples of positive hybridization with no cracks at all and hybridization "as granula restricted to the cytoplasm," as shown in Fig. 1.
![]() View larger version (99K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Example of a IS900-positive hybridization within an ileum tissue sample of a Crohn's disease patient.
|
Regarding the second point of discussion, PCR negativity, we increased the number of patients studied up to 100 patients (analyzing 108 samples [unpublished data]). We found 7% of the tissue samples gave positive results by IS900 PCR analysis. The explanation that we used in interpreting the results (degradation of DNA in paraffin-embedded tissue samples) is accepted in several works (1). The control proposed by Dr. Roholl would provide evidence for the presence of PCR inhibitors, but it would not be definitive. The major problem with our PCR was the length of the fragment amplified. To amplify an internal region of IS900, we used the same primers used to prepare the probe. The amplified fragment is larger than 100 bp, which is the maximum size recommended in this type of experiments. Discrepancies, experimental difficulties, and laboratory-to-laboratory variation have plagued PCR detection of M. paratuberculosis (2). We wanted to add new techniques to search for the presence of this microorganism in the intestinal tissues of Crohn's disease patients.
|
|
|---|
|
L. A. Sechi M. Mura S. Zanetti Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
F. Tanda
G. Fadda
|
||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»