Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2002, p. 3449-3454, Vol. 40, No. 9
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3449-3454.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Received 29 January 2002/ Returned for modification 29 March 2002/ Accepted 16 June 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
To detect the presence of any bacterial pathogen in a clinical sample, primers annealing to regions of DNA conserved across a wide range of bacterial genomes have been employed. The design of such universal primers has often focused on the 16S rRNA gene (17). The presence of multiple copies of this gene within the bacterial genome facilitates its amplification by PCR. Further, sufficient sequence variability allows phylogenetic information to be attained for the purposes of microbial identification. However, up to the present, assays which provide for both universal detection and species identification require a second post-PCR processing step, which can be technically cumbersome and slow the time to reporting of results (9, 14).
Universal PCR-based bacterial detection systems have also been hampered by contamination issues. High sequence conservation of the DNA region chosen for PCR primer annealing coupled with the immense amplification power of PCR results in the amplification of exceedingly minor bacterial contaminants, leading to false positives. Attempts to decontaminate PCR materials have involved nearly all known methods to destroy DNA, including UV irradiation, 8-MOP treatment, and incubation with various enzymes, such as DNase, restriction enzymes, or both in combination (2, 4). Thus far, none of these methods has been shown to be entirely effective or reproducible.
Assessment of bacterial contamination can most reliably be made using real-time detection methods to characterize PCR amplification. Briefly, real-time PCR amplifications are reported by the cycle number at which the PCR product accumulates significantly over baseline levels, as detected by interaction with fluorogenic probes (CT) (7). Aside from saving time and labor, this technique has been shown to be more objective and consistent than the traditional methods of amplification detection and starting template quantification involving gel electrophoresis (5, 13). With this more precise technique, Corless et al. found that most decontamination methods decreased PCR sensitivity (4). The implication of this finding was that the decontamination effect of the aforementioned methodologies could at least in part be explained by a retardation of the sensitivity of the PCR amplification system.
The quantitative capacity of real-time PCR has thus redefined the standards by which a decontamination method is measured. Not only will a particular method be required to yield negative for controls under the more precise probe-based real-time system but also the method must be shown to preserve the sensitivity of the PCR assay. In this report, we describe a multiprobe-based real-time PCR system involving the 16S rRNA gene, which allows for simultaneous detection of the presence of eubacterial DNA with species-specific discrimination. In addition, we report a decontamination method for the present PCR system which does not compromise detection sensitivity.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Sensitivity of the Taqman assay using universal primers and probes
|
Design of primers and probes. The 16S rRNA gene sequences from a variety of bacterial species were obtained from GenBank. Sequence data were obtained using the program Entrez (see the list below). The sequences were aligned using the program ClustalW from the European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw.htm). Two regions of highly conserved sequences, separated by both an internal region of highly variable sequence and another adjacent internal region of highly conserved sequence, were selected as the universal primer annealing sites. The internal highly conserved and highly variable sequences were used as the annealing sites of conserved and species-specific TaqMan probes, respectively (Fig. 1).
|
View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Design of primers and probes. The forward (P891F) and reverse (P1033R) primers anneal to highly conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene. An internal highly conserved region was selected as the annealing site of the UniProbe, and the other internal region of highly variable sequence was selected as the annealing sites of a prototype species-specific SAProbe.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Oligonucleotide sequences of primers and probes used in the study
|
The correct size of the PCR product from each assay was verified by running an amplified sample from each reaction tube on agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.
Ultrafiltration of the PCR mix. An ultrafiltration step, using the Amicon Microcon YM-100 centrifugal filter device (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, Mass.) was utilized for filtering the PCR mix prior to addition of template DNA. The PCR mix that underwent ultrafiltration included the PCR master mix and AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase. This filtration device prevents the passage of potential contaminating double-stranded DNA of 125 bp or greater. The PCR mix was spun through the YM-100 device at 100 x g for 30 min.
Post-PCR analysis.
Amplification data were analyzed by the SDS software (PE-Applied Biosystems), which calculates
Rn using the equation Rn(+) - Rn(-). Rn(+) is the emission intensity of the reporter divided by the emission intensity of the quencher at any given time, whereas Rn(-) is the value of Rn(+) prior to PCR amplification. Thus,
Rn indicates the magnitude of the signal generated. The threshold cycle, or CT, is the cycle at which a statistically significant increase in
Rn is first detected. The CT is inversely proportional to the starting amount of target DNA. Amplification plots were generated by plotting
Rn versus CT (5, 15).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The GenBank accession numbers for the sequences determined in this study are as follows: S. aureus, AF015929; S. hominis, AY030318; Enterococcus faecalis, AJ276460; S. epidermidis, L37605; Streptococcus pneumoniae, X58312; Mycoplasma pneumoniae, AF132741; Escherichia coli, AF233451; Haemophilus influenzae, AF224306; Legionella pneumoniae, M59157; Neisseria meningitidis, AF059671; Rickettsia rickettsii, U11021; Borrelia burgdorferi, AF091368; Bacillus anthracis, AF290552; Yersinia pestis, AF366383; Proteus mirabilis, AF008582; and Klebsiella pneumoniae, AF228919.
|
|
|---|
Rn) generated by the sequence detection software (Fig. 1). All 14 bacterial species were correctly amplified and detected, with CT values in the range of 19.2 to 21.8. No amplification (CT > 40) was detected when DNA isolated from C. albicans was used. The assay results were further verified by subjecting reaction products to gel electrophoresis, with visualization of bands of the expected size (162 bp) (data not shown). Theoretical detection limit of TaqMan PCR. The detection limit of the TaqMan assay was determined by amplifying serial dilutions of eubacterial DNA. The minimal detection limit of the TaqMan system was defined as the amount of template DNA at which the relationship between CT and starting template DNA became nonlinear. Serial dilutions of S. aureus DNA (50 ng to 5 fg) were added to PCRs with universal primers (p891F plus p1033R) and probe (UniProbe). The results are shown in Table 3. The standard curve in which CT values were plotted against starting template DNA is linear from 50 ng to 5 pg (Fig. 2). At DNA levels below 5 pg, this relationship became nonlinear, and the CTs were similar to the CT of the no-template control (NTC). This suggested the presence of contaminating eubacterial DNA in the NTC. The minimal detection limit of the assay was thus 5 pg of S. aureus DNA.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Detection limit of the TaqMan assay with or without prefiltration
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Inverse linear relationship of CT versus starting template DNA with and without prefiltration. CTs were generated from PCRs with starting template S. aureus DNA serially diluted 1:10 from 50 ng to 5 fg. In the nonprefiltration curve (squares), nonlinearity is encountered at starting template DNA quantities below 5 pg, suggesting background eubacterial DNA contamination of this amount. With prefiltration (triangle), the detection limit was extended to 50 fg.
|
The efficiency (E) of the prefiltered PCR amplification was calculated to be 1.94 (maximum = 2) based on the following equation: E = e(-1/slope).
The minimum detection limit of the assay with prefiltration was 50 fg of S. aureus DNA (Table 3). Based on the size of the S. aureus genome, which is approximately 2,750 kbp, 50 fg of S. aureus DNA is equivalent to approximately 15 genomes or CFU. This was calculated as follows: 2,750 kb is equal to 1.8 x 106 g/mol; division of this value by Avogadro's number, 6 x 1023, yields 3 fg per S. aureus genome. Comparable results were derived empirically based on counting CFU on plates.
The amplified products were subsequently subjected to gel electrophoresis. Visualization of the bands under UV irradiation confirmed the expected amplicon size (data not shown).
Multiprobe assay. In order to demonstrate the assay's ability to simultaneously detect the presence of any eubacterial DNA as well as one or more species of interest within a single reaction tube, a prototype species-specific probe for S. aureus (SAProbe) was designed. The SAProbe was labeled with a different reporter fluorophore so that its signal could be distinguished from that of the universal probe. Real-time PCR assays were performed with the universal primer set, UniProbe, and SAProbe in a single reaction mix. Template DNA samples from each of three closely related Staphylococcus species, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. hominis, were tested in different reactions. For S. aureus, four strains were tested (ATCC 02131, 15923, 29213, and 43300). The assay correctly detected the presence of eubacterial DNA in all samples under the VIC dye layer. When the detection system was reconfigured to detect the FAM dye layer in the same reaction tubes, only the reaction containing the various strains of S. aureus DNA yielded a positive signal (Table 4).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Sensitivity and specificity of the multiprobing PCR assay
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Comparison of multiprobing PCR results in single versus dual infection
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Comparison of the standard curves for S. aureus DNA using UniProbe and SAProbe. PCRs generating the CTs for the curves contained both UniProbe and SAProbe, as well as S. aureus starting template DNA, which was serially diluted 1:100 from 50 ng to 50 fg. That the lines corresponding to UniProbe (square) and SAProbe (triangle) nearly overlay one another indicates comparable amplification efficiencies and detection limits for the different probes used in the same reaction mixtures.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Comparison of the standard curves for S. aureus and S. epidermidis DNA obtained by using UniProbe. PCRs generating the CTs for the curves contained UniProbe and either S. aureus or S. epidermidis starting template DNA. S. aureus DNA was serially diluted 1:100 from 50 ng to 50 fg, whereas S. epidermidis DNA was diluted from 20 ng to 20 fg. The near equivalency of the lines indicates that UniProbe has equal detection capacity irrespective of whether S. aureus DNA (triangle) or S. epidermidis DNA (square) is used as the starting template.
|
|
|
|---|
With the probe-based PCR system described here, both steps can for the first time be accomplished simultaneously. The probe-based PCR system we have devised is comprised of a universal primer set, a universal probe, and a species-specific probe. In this way, detection of amplification and extraction of sequence information from amplicons can be performed within the confines of the PCR run, eliminating the need for post-PCR manipulations. This innovation reduces overall assay time to about 2 h or less, depending on the PCR instrument used, while conserving the sensitivity and specificity of the assay.
The only present limitation of this system is inherent in the number of fluorophores commercially available and the discriminatory power of the detection instrument itself, which presently can simultaneously differentiate up to four different fluorophores in a single tube (15). Thus, the number of species-specific probes which may be included in an individual reaction (in addition to the universal probe) is restricted.
Simultaneous detection and/or species identification of microorganisms in a given sample has been reported recently with the multiplexing technique, with multiple sets of species-specific primer pairs and probes corresponding to different amplification targets (3). Our novel PCR design in which multiple probes, including a universally conserved one, exploit regions within the same amplification target does confer several advantages over multiplexing. First, possible competition between multiple PCR primer pairs is avoided with multiprobing, which involves only a single pair of primers. Moreover, when technologies advance to allow for more fluorophores, expansion of the multiprobe system for detection of other templates will require only the addition of another probe. This is in contrast to multiplexing, in which both new primers and probes will have to be added to the reaction mixture. In that circumstance, the new primers may not amplify under the original PCR conditions, which will thus require optimization studies to accommodate all the primer pairs. Finally, even if suitable conditions are ultimately attained, amplification efficiencies may be altered such that standard curves for starting template quantification will need to be rederived. Since multiprobing involves only a single target region, quantification of starting template will in principle rely on only one standard curve, if all probes are designed with a similar melting temperature.
With regard to contamination, residual bacterial DNA from various sources has historically prevented widespread use of universal primer sets in PCR-based assays. In our experience, pretreatment of PCR reagents with restriction enzymes followed by heat inactivation did eliminate amplification in the negative controls. However, CT values for positive controls from runs with pretreated reagents were consistently greater than those without pretreatment (data not shown). Whether these findings reflected residual restriction enzyme activity even after heat inactivation, or systemic inhibition of the PCR system by the addition of restriction enzyme, is unknown.
The contamination problem was eventually resolved by passing PCR reagents through Microcon YM-100 centrifugal filter devices (Millipore Corporation). Of note, these filters allow decontamination of all PCR reagents, including UNG, Taq polymerase, primers, and probes, which was not possible using other methods, such as DNase treatment. Although Centricons have been employed for decontamination purposes in the past, heretofore their adequacy in the context of real-time PCR systems had not been studied (16). With prefiltration, the PCR efficiency of the system was not reduced. In addition, with significant reduction in background contamination, the prefiltration step improved the minimum detection limit of the assay from 5,000 to 50 fg of S. aureus DNA. The mean CT of the negative control was 40. In our experience, the CT values of negative controls, although consistently above 35, were variable. These results were not unexpected, since greater sampling errors are encountered at low starting template concentrations (4).
Finally, although the probes used in our real-time PCR system were empirically found to be specific for the organisms tested, there exists the theoretical possibility that the assay will yield a false-positive result when applied more broadly. This is an inherent limitation of design, based on the extent of the sequence search carried out, which in turn is dictated by the intended clinical application of the assay. As such, future studies may require more exhaustive bioinformatic analysis followed by even broader clinical validation of specificity. Nevertheless, the concept of multiprobing in a genomic region comprised of conserved and highly variable stretches remains a valid technique.
In conclusion, we have devised a rapid, highly sensitive and specific molecular assay which allows for the simultaneous detection, quantification, and species identification of bacterial organisms. Further development in the technology of species-specific probes will theoretically expand the number of organisms which can be identified using this method, and future research will address this. In principle, the methodology described here could be coupled with DNA extraction protocols using clinical samples derived from any bodily fluid or tissue and thereby provide an assay for diagnosing numerous diseases of infectious etiology. Such an addition to the clinicians' diagnostic armamentarium will better equip physicians to carry out expedited risk assessment and targeted antibiotic treatment.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»