Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2003, p. 5695-5698, Vol. 41, No. 12
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5695-5698.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Evaluation of S. aureus ID, a New Chromogenic Agar Medium for Detection of Staphylococcus aureus
John D. Perry,* Claire Rennison, Lynne A. Butterworth, Andrew L. J. Hopley, and F. Kate Gould
Department of Microbiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Received 26 June 2003/
Returned for modification 1 August 2003/
Accepted 5 September 2003

ABSTRACT
S. aureus ID (bioMérieux, La Balme Les Grottes, France)
is a new chromogenic agar medium designed to enable the isolation
of staphylococci and the specific identification of
Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus produces green colonies on this medium due
to production of

-glucosidase. To evaluate this medium, a total
of 350 wound swabs were cultured onto S. aureus ID, CHROMagar
Staph. aureus, and conventional media routinely used in our
laboratory. After 18 to 20 h of incubation, 96.8% of strains
formed green colonies on S. aureus ID compared with 91.1% of
strains forming mauve colonies on CHROMagar Staph. aureus. A
total of 94.3% of strains were recovered within 18 to 20 h with
conventional media. The sensitivity was increased after 48 h
of incubation to 98.7, 96.2, and 95.6% with S. aureus ID, CHROMagar
Staph. aureus, and conventional media, respectively. A total
of 97.4% of green colonies on S. aureus ID were confirmed as
S. aureus compared with 94.4% of mauve colonies on CHROMagar
Staph. aureus. We conclude that S. aureus ID is a highly sensitive
and specific medium for the isolation and identification of
S. aureus from wound swabs.

INTRODUCTION
Staphylococcus aureus is an important and frequent cause of
wound infection and is consequently one of the most common pathogens
sought in clinical microbiology laboratories. Diagnosis of
S. aureus infection is generally performed by culture of wound
swabs onto nonspecific media and confirmation of suspect colonies
by biochemical and/or serological tests. Most commonly, this
involves testing colonies of staphylococci for agglutination
with sensitized latex particles to detect bound coagulase, protein
A, and/or specific capsular antigens (
12,
13). Colonies of
S. aureus may be atypical and difficult to differentiate from coagulase-negative
staphylococci (
3); hence, a large number of agglutination tests
may be required to rule out the presence of
S. aureus. A number
of culture media have been developed to increase the specificity
of
S. aureus detection, including mannitol-salt agar and Baird-Parker
medium (
2,
6,
7). A more recent approach has been the use of
CHROMagar Staph. aureus, which employs chromogenic enzyme substrates
in a selective agar medium, allowing the detection of
S. aureus with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity (
8). S. aureus
ID is another recently described chromogenic medium for the
specific detection of
S. aureus, but there are no reports of
the efficacy of this medium with clinical samples (C. Cotte,
N. Fanjat, C. Ilter, D. Monget, S. Orenga, D. Robichon, and
C. Roger-Dalbert, Abstr. 102nd Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.,
abstr. C23, 2002). On S. aureus ID,
S. aureus forms distinctive
green colonies due to production of

-glucosidase. Other staphylococci
generally form white colonies but occasionally produce pink
colonies due to the hydrolysis of a second chromogenic substrate
for ß-glucosidase.
We performed a comparison of S. aureus ID and CHROMagar Staph. aureus for the detection of S. aureus with 350 clinical samples. These media were compared with nonspecific media routinely used in our laboratory for culture of wound swabs: cystine lactose electrolyte-deficient (CLED) agar, aztreonam blood agar (ATM BA), and nalidixic acid blood agar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Culture media.
S. aureus ID was supplied as prepoured culture plates from bioMérieux,
La Balme Les Grottes, France. CHROMagar Staph. aureus was obtained
as a dehydrated medium from M-Tech Diagnostics, Warrington,
United Kingdom, and was prepared in accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions. CLED agar (CM423; Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom)
was also prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions.
ATM BA was prepared as follows: Columbia agar (CM331; Oxoid) was prepared according to the manufacturers instructions, cooled to 50°C, and supplemented with 5% horse blood and 4 mg of aztreonam (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dublin, Ireland)/liter. Nalidixic acid blood agar was prepared by producing an additional batch of Columbia agar, as described above, and supplementing the medium with 5% horse blood and 30 mg of nalidixic acid (Sigma Chemical Company, Poole, United Kingdom)/liter.
Clinical samples.
A total of 350 consecutive wound swabs referred from general practitioners was used in this study. All swabs were received in charcoal transport medium. Each swab was emulsified in 1 ml of sterile physiological saline (0.85%), and 50 µl of this suspension was inoculated and spread onto each of the five types of media. This procedure ensured that each culture plate received an equivalent inoculum. All culture plates were incubated in air at 37°C for 48 h, except for nalidixic acid blood agar, which was incubated anaerobically for 48 h. Other media such as chocolate agar were occasionally used, depending on the patient's clinical details; however, colonies isolated on these additional media were ignored for the purposes of this study.
All culture plates were interpreted by two laboratory staff members after 18 to 20 h and once again after 48 h of incubation. Media of each particular type were read independently of each other without knowledge of the results obtained on other media. For example, for each batch of culture plates, all of the results obtained on medium A were recorded and concealed before the results from medium B were recorded to minimize bias. The order in which the media were read was changed each day.
Identification of S. aureus.
Mauve colonies on CHROMagar Staph. aureus and green colonies on S. aureus ID were regarded as presumptive S. aureus and were confirmed with Slidex Staph Plus (SSP) latex reagent (bioMérieux UK, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Any colonies resembling staphylococci on either CLED, ATM BA, or nalidixic acid blood agar were also tested with SSP latex reagent. SSP reagent has been shown to have a specificity comparable to that of the tube coagulase test (14). Therefore, any presumptive S. aureus strains which produced the expected colonial appearance on both CHROMagar Staph. aureus and S. aureus ID were regarded as confirmed S. aureus if they demonstrated specific agglutination with SSP reagent.
Any staphylococcus strain resembling S. aureus on any medium that did not produce agglutination with SSP latex reagent was identified by using API 20 STAPH (bioMérieux UK) and the tube coagulase test as previously described (9). Any strain which agglutinated SSP latex reagent but did not produce green colonies on S. aureus ID and/or mauve colonies on CHROMagar Staph. aureus was also identified by using API 20 STAPH and the tube coagulase test and subcultured onto the relevant chromogenic medium.
All other isolated strains (nonstaphylococci) were presumptively identified based on colonial appearance and the results of standard laboratory tests, e.g., Gram stain, catalase, and oxidase. In addition, any nonstaphylococci that produced a green colony on S. aureus ID or a mauve colony on CHROMagar Staph. aureus were identified fully by using the appropriate API identification kits (bioMérieux UK).

RESULTS
One hundred fifty-eight confirmed strains of
S. aureus were
isolated from 350 wound swabs on one or more media within 48
h of incubation. Table
1 shows the number of
S. aureus strains
isolated on each of the respective media. A total of 149 strains
were isolated by ATM BA after 18 to 20 h of incubation, and
two further strains were recovered on ATM BA after 48 h of incubation.
Of the nine strains of
S. aureus that were not recovered on
ATM BA within 18 to 20 h incubation, seven were isolated in
small numbers and there were no more than two colonies isolated
on any other medium. Two strains were isolated in higher yield
on other media (40 to 60 colonies), but both of these cultures
yielded a heavy growth of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa on ATM BA,
which probably accounted for the failure to recover
S. aureus on this medium. All of these unrecovered strains grew well when
respread on ATM BA. All strains of
S. aureus which grew on CLED
or blood agar plus nalidixic acid were also recovered on ATM
BA within 18 to 20 h, indicating that these media offered no
advantage to ATM BA alone for the isolation of
S. aureus.
Figure
1 shows the typical appearance of
S. aureus colonies
on S. aureus ID medium and CHROMagar Staph. aureus. On S. aureus
ID, 153 strains of
S. aureus were recovered as green colonies
after 18 to 20 h of incubation compared with 156 strains after
48 h of incubation. Four of the five strains which were not
recovered within 18 to 20 h on S. aureus ID were present in
small numbers, and there were no more than two colonies isolated
on any other medium. After 48 h of incubation, two of these
strains grew on S. aureus ID, each as a single colony. All four
strains produced characteristic green colonies when respread
on S. aureus ID. One strain was isolated at a higher yield (>50
colonies on all test media) but only generated colored colonies
on either S. aureus ID or CHROMagar Staph. aureus after 48 h
of incubation. This strain of methicillin-resistant
S. aureus (MRSA) retained this characteristic and, when respread on both
chromogenic media, required 48 h of incubation to generate typical
coloration on either medium.
On CHROMagar Staph. aureus, 144 strains were recovered as mauve
colonies after 18 to 20 h of incubation compared with 152 strains
after incubation for 48 h. Six of the 14 strains which were
not recovered within 18 to 20 h were present in small numbers,
as there were no more than two colonies isolated on any other
medium. Two of these strains were isolated as mauve colonies
after 48 h of incubation. Seven of the 14 strains not recovered
on CHROMagar Staph. aureus within 18 to 20 h were isolated at
higher yields on other media (10 to 100 colonies on both S.
aureus ID and ATM BA). It was perhaps notable that five of these
cultures yielded a heavy growth of enterococci (>100 colonies),
which generated deep blue colonies on CHROMagar Staph. aureus.
All strains of
S. aureus that were not recovered as mauve colonies
on CHROMagar Staph. aureus produced characteristic mauve colonies
when respread on this medium after overnight incubation, except
for one strain of MRSA which required 48 h of incubation to
generate color (as mentioned above).
Table 2 shows the number of other strains which grew on the test media, and Table 3 shows the relative specificities of the chromogenic reactions for detection of S. aureus. Coagulase-negative staphylococci grew well on S. aureus ID and usually grew as white colonies, although occasional strains generated pink colonies. Two strains of Staphylococcus sciuri grew as green colonies and were indistinguishable from S. aureus on S. aureus ID, whereas strains of Staphylococcus schleiferi and Staphylococcus simulans resembled S. aureus on CHROMagar Staph. aureus. Micrococcus luteus also produced false-positive reactions on both chromogenic media. Some strains of corynebacteria and hemolytic streptococci occasionally produced small mauve colonies on CHROMagar Staph. aureus. None of these false-positive strains demonstrated specific agglutination when tested with SSP latex reagent. No strains of S. aureus were found in this study which failed to react with SSP reagent.

DISCUSSION
Isolation of
S. aureus from wound samples is usually accomplished
with the use of conventional media such as blood agar. Such
media have the advantage that they may also be useful for the
simultaneous isolation of other pathogens such as streptococci.
The disadvantage of such media is that confirmatory tests are
necessary to differentiate
S. aureus from other staphylococci
(
12). Performing such tests on all colonies resembling staphylococci
can be time-consuming and labor intensive. For example, in one
study (
8), it was calculated that an average of 4.55 latex agglutination
tests were performed on suspect colonies for each strain of
S. aureus actually identified. The use of chromogenic media,
if sufficiently sensitive and specific, can potentially reduce
the number of confirmatory tests that are necessary for the
detection of
S. aureus (
4,
8).
The ideal characteristics of any candidate chromogenic medium are the detection of S. aureus with high specificity and an isolation rate at least comparable to conventional media after 18 to 20 h of incubation. In this study, the chromogenic reactions of both S. aureus ID and CHROMagar Staph. aureus were highly sensitive for S. aureus, and only one strain was detected which failed to generate color after 18 to 20 h of incubation. This strain was confirmed as MRSA, and larger numbers of distinct MRSA strains should be examined to further evaluate the usefulness of both chromogenic media for isolation of MRSA.
Both media were also highly specific (97.4% for S. aureus ID; 94.4% for CHROMagar Staph. aureus), with few other species resembling S. aureus. This specificity increased to 100% when either medium was used in conjunction with SSP latex reagent.
The main difference between the media was in their selectivities, and this was the biggest factor influencing their relative sensitivities. Both chromogenic media were substantially better than ATM BA for the inhibition of coliforms and P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus ID was substantially better than any of the other media for the inhibition of enterococci (Table 2). This latter feature probably accounted for the superior sensitivity of S. aureus ID compared with CHROMagar Staph. aureus after 18 to 20 h of incubation. There were six instances where at least 50 colonies of S. aureus were recovered on both S. aureus ID and ATM BA and no mauve colonies were recovered on CHROMagar Staph. aureus. In five of these instances, the cultures on CHROMagar Staph. aureus yielded greater than 100 colonies of enterococci, which produced a deep blue coloration. It is possible that the presence of the enterococci, and their associated intense blue chromogenic reaction, masked the presence of S. aureus colonies.
In this study, the sensitivity of CHROMagar Staph. aureus was 91.1%, which compares favorably with the study of Carricajo et al. (4), who reported a sensitivity of 92% for CHROMagar Staph. aureus after 24 h of incubation. Gaillot et al. (8) examined the performance of CHROMagar Staph. aureus with 2,000 consecutive clinical samples and reported a sensitivity of 95.5% after 24 h of incubation. The lower sensitivity obtained in the present study may be due to the fact that CHROMagar Staph. aureus was compared with ATM BA, which is more effective for the isolation of S. aureus than blood agar (14) and/or chocolate, as used by Carricajo et al. (4) and Gaillot et al. (8), and also to the fact that some strains of S. aureus may have been missed without the use of S. aureus ID.
We conclude that S. aureus ID is highly effective for the isolation and presumptive identification of S. aureus from wound samples and that it compares favorably with both conventional media and CHROMagar Staph. aureus. Further studies are required to examine the utility of S. aureus ID for the isolation of S. aureus from other types of sample, such as sputum, where S. aureus may present as atypical colonies on culture media (8). The use of S. aureus ID is much less labor intensive than conventional methods and requires fewer reagents for confirmation of suspect colonies of S. aureus. Chromogenic media for S. aureus may be supplemented with appropriate antimicrobials (e.g., oxacillin) for the detection of MRSA (1, 10, 11). S. aureus ID could potentially be supplemented with antimicrobials to facilitate the specific detection of MRSA or vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (5). The fact that S. aureus ID has already been shown to have excellent selectivity, particularly against enterococci, may prove to be advantageous in this context.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was sponsored in part by bioMérieux.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Freeman Hospital, Tyne and Wear NE7 7DN, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 191 2843111, ext. 26691. Fax: 44 191 2231224. E-mail:
john.perry{at}nuth.northy.nhs.uk.


REFERENCES
1 - Apfalter, P., O. Assadian, A. Kalczyk, V. Lindenmann, A. Makristathis, S. Mustafa, M. Rotter, and A. M. Hirschl. 2002. Performance of a new chromogenic oxacillin resistance screen medium (Oxoid) in the detection and presumptive identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 44:209-211.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Baird, R. M., and W. H. Lee. 1995. Media used in the detection and enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 26:15-24.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Baumert, N., C. von Eiff, F. Schaaff, G. Peters, R. A. Proctor, and H. G. Sahl. 2002. Physiology and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants. Microb. Drug Resist. 8:253-260.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Carricajo, A., A. Treny, N. Fonsale, M. Bes, M. E Reverdy, Y. Gille, G. Aubert, and A. M. Freydiere. 2001. Performance of the chromogenic medium CHROMagar Staph aureus and the Staphychrom coagulase test in the detection and identification of Staphylococcus aureus in clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2581-2583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Chang, S., D. M. Sievert, J. C. Hageman, M. L. Boulton, F. C. Tenover, F. P. Downes, S. Shah, J. T. Rudrik, G. R. Pupp, W. J. Brown, D. Cardo, S. K. Fridkin, and the Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Investigative Team. 2003. Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:1342-1347.[Free Full Text]
6 - Chapman, G. H. 1945. The significance of sodium chloride in studies of staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. 50:201-203.[Free Full Text]
7 - Davies, S., P. M. Zadik, C. M. Mason, and S. J. Whittaker. 2000. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: evaluation of five selective media. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 57:269-272.[Medline]
8 - Gaillot, O., M. Wetsch, N. Fortineau, and P. Berche. 2000. Evaluation of CHROMagar Staph. aureus, a new chromogenic medium, for isolation and presumptive identification of Staphylococcus aureus from human clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1587-1591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Kloos, W. E., and T. L. Bannermann. 1995. Staphylococcus and Micrococcus, p. 282-298. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
10 - Kluytmans, J., A. Van Griethuysen, P. Willemse, and P. Van Keulen. 2002. Performance of CHROMagar selective medium and oxacillin resistance screening agar base for identifying Staphylococcus aureus and detecting methicillin resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2480-2482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Merlino, J., M. Leroi, R. Bradbury, D. Veal, and C. Harbour. 2000. New chromogenic identification and detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2378-2380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Personne, P., M. Bes, G. Lina, F. Vandenesch, Y. Brun, and J. Etienne. 1997. Comparative performances of six agglutination kits assessed by using typical and atypical strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1138-1140.[Abstract]
13 - van Griethuysen, A., M. Bes, J. Etienne, R. Zbinden, and J. Kluytmans. 2001. International multicenter evaluation of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:86-89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Wood, W., G. Harvey, E. S. Olson, and T. M. Reid. 1993. Aztreonam selective agar for Gram positive bacteria. J. Clin. Pathol. 46:769-771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2003, p. 5695-5698, Vol. 41, No. 12
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5695-5698.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Han, Z., Lautenbach, E., Fishman, N., Nachamkin, I.
(2007). Evaluation of mannitol salt agar, CHROMagar Staph aureus and CHROMagar MRSA for detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nasal swab specimens. J Med Microbiol
56: 43-46
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shittu, A., Lin, J., Morrison, D., Kolawole, D.
(2006). Identification and molecular characterization of mannitol salt positive, coagulase-negative staphylococci from nasal samples of medical personnel and students.. J Med Microbiol
55: 317-324
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hedin, G., Fang, H.
(2005). Evaluation of Two New Chromogenic Media, CHROMagar MRSA and S. aureus ID, for Identifying Staphylococcus aureus and Screening Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 4242-4244
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kipp, F., Kahl, B. C., Becker, K., Baron, E. J., Proctor, R. A., Peters, G., von Eiff, C.
(2005). Evaluation of Two Chromogenic Agar Media for Recovery and Identification of Staphylococcus aureus Small-Colony Variants. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 1956-1959
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perry, J. D., Davies, A., Butterworth, L. A., Hopley, A. L. J., Nicholson, A., Gould, F. K.
(2004). Development and Evaluation of a Chromogenic Agar Medium for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 4519-4523
[Abstract]
[Full Text]