Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2003, p. 5778-5780, Vol. 41, No. 12
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5778-5780.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
False Identification of Coccidioides immitis: Do Molecular Methods Always Get It Right?
B. Cherie Millar,1 Xu Jiru,1 Michael J. Walker,2 James P. Evans,2 and John E. Moore1*
Northern Ireland Public Health Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast BT9 7AD,1
Regional Mycology Reference Laboratory, The Royal Group of Hospitals, Belfast BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom2
Received 17 February 2003/
Returned for modification 17 April 2003/
Accepted 13 May 2003

ABSTRACT
rRNA sequence analysis of a partial region of the 18S and 5.8S-internal
transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of
Chrysosporium keratinophilum highlights its potential molecular misidentification as
Coccidioides immitis. Molecular identification of medically important fungi
should not be based solely on sequence analysis of the 18S rRNA
gene but should be confirmed by sequence analysis of an additional
rRNA gene locus, such as the ITS region(s).

TEXT
Recently, several groups have advocated the use of molecular
methods for the identification of medically important fungi,
employing only the 18S rRNA gene locus as the PCR target for
sequence analysis (
3,
5). Choosing the 18S rRNA gene locus has
been popular due to (i) the extensive number of entries to GenBank
of 18S rRNA sequence data, (ii) the highly conserved nature
of this gene, and (iii) the taxonomic and phylogenetic importance
of the 18S rRNA. However, we have recently noted a potential
problem with the molecular identification of an isolate of
Chrysosporium keratinophilum: the organism could have been mistakenly identified
as
Coccidioides immitis, with important downstream implications
as described below. A white filamentous fungal isolate that
had undergone few phenotypic, colonial, or mycological observations
was submitted as a known fungus as part of a national laboratory
quality control scheme. This isolate was forwarded for molecular
identification by using a combination of the 18S and 5.8S rRNA
gene loci, as well as with the internal transcribed spacer 1
(ITS1) and ITS2 regions. All gene loci were amplified by PCR
(
3,
4), and the resulting amplicons were subsequently sequenced
in accordance with the method of Millar et al. (
6). The resulting
novel partial 18S rRNA sequence (GenBank accession number
AY234824)
was aligned with closely matching sequences with the aid of
the BLASTn tool and showed a 99.8% identity (434 of 435 bases)
with
Coccidioides immitis (GenBank accession number
X58571)
(Fig.
1A). Further analysis of the 5.8S rRNA-ITS2 region (GenBank
accession number
AY234823) showed a sole 100% identity (458
of 458 bases) with
Chrysosporium keratinophilum (GenBank accession
number
AJ131681), whereas a
Coccidioides sp. (
Coccidioides posadasii;
GenBank accession number
U18360) had an 84.7% identity score,
with only 416 of 491 bases identical out of the 458 bases analyzed.
Thirty-three gaps were noted within the query sequence (Fig.
1B). Subsequently, phenotypic examination of the filamentous
fungus confirmed the isolate to be
Chrysosporium keratinophilum,
in accordance with previously published characteristics (
1).
Until now, there has been no sequence information on the 18S
rRNA gene of
Chrysosporium keratinophilum, and hence those identification
methodologies which rely solely upon this target could have
potentially misidentified the unknown fungus as its closest
phylogenetic neighbor with a high identity score.
In the present scenario, the effects of making an incorrect
identification through the singular use of the 18S rRNA PCR
sequencing approach would have been profound, whereby the presence
of a relatively harmless soil-living fungi,
Chrysosporium sp.,
could have been misidentified as the fungal pathogen,
Coccidioides immitis. More recently, there has been much concern over the
potential dangers of
Coccidioides immitis as a bioterrorism
agent (
2). Should clinical specimens, particularly sputum, be
examined for this agent in potential bioterrorism attack situations,
molecular methods may be an attractive means of screening, thereby
reducing the need for propagating large biomasses of infectious
conidia in biosafety level 3 facilities.
In conclusion, one should note that the 18S rRNA gene database is complete neither for medically important fungi nor for environmental fungi and that laboratory identification for which this gene locus is employed as the sole means of identification may present potential misidentifications. We therefore recommend employment of a polyphasic approach, namely, a combination of phenotypic examination and characterization of the fungal isolate in series with a molecular approach that uses the rRNA gene loci. Although conventional mycological techniques would clearly differentiate Coccidioides immitis from Chrysosporium keratinophilum, phenotypic examination of cultures is potentially dangerous to the laboratory worker. Danger also exists when the numbers of specimens examined would constitute loading the laboratory with considerable numbers of fungal spores of a category 3 fungal agent. Because of these factors, diagnostic laboratories may wish to switch to a molecule-based identification method. In such cases, as with the former, an additional rRNA gene locus, such as the 28S or the ITS1 or ITS2 regions, should be sequenced in addition to the 18S rRNA gene; the resulting identifications should then be compared before definitive identifications are made for unknown fungal isolates.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Northern Ireland Public Health Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast BT9 7AD, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 28 9026 3554. Fax: 44 28 2589 2887. E-mail:
jemoore{at}niphl.dnet.co.uk.


REFERENCES
1 - Campbell, C. K., E. M. Johnson, C. M. Philpot, and D. W. Warnock. 1996. Identification of pathogenic fungi. Public Health Laboratory Service, London, United Kingdom.
2 - Dixon, D. M. 2001. Coccidioides immitis as a select agent of bioterrorism. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91:602-605.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Einsele, H., H. Hebart, G. Roller, J. Loffler, I. Rothenhofer, C. A. Muller, R. A. Bowden, J. van Burik, D. Engelhard, L. Kanz, and U. Schumacher. 1997. Detection and identification of fungal pathogens in blood by using molecular probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1353-1360.[Abstract]
4 - Lott, T. J., R. J. Kuykendall, and E. Reiss. 1993. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the 5.8S rDNA and adjacent ITS2 region of Candida albicans and related species. Yeast 9:1199-1206.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - McIlhatton, B. P., C. Keating, M. D. Curran, M. F. McMullin, J. G. Barr, J. A. Madrigal, and D. Middleton. 2002. Identification of medically important pathogenic fungi by reference strand-mediated conformational analysis (RSCA). J. Med. Microbiol. 51:468-478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Millar, B., J. Moore, P. Mallon, J. Xu, M. Crowe, R. McClurg, D. Raoult, J. Earle, R. Hone, and P. Murphy. 2001. Molecular diagnosis of infective endocarditisa new Duke's criterion. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 33:673-680.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2003, p. 5778-5780, Vol. 41, No. 12
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5778-5780.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Bialek, R, Konrad, F, Kern, J, Aepinus, C, Cecenas, L, Gonzalez, G M, Just-Nubling, G, Willinger, B, Presterl, E, Lass-Florl, C, Rickerts, V
(2005). PCR based identification and discrimination of agents of mucormycosis and aspergillosis in paraffin wax embedded tissue. J. Clin. Pathol.
58: 1180-1184
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brandt, M. E., Gaunt, D., Iqbal, N., McClinton, S., Hambleton, S., Sigler, L.
(2005). False-Positive Histoplasma capsulatum Gen-Probe Chemiluminescent Test Result Caused by a Chrysosporium Species. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 1456-1458
[Abstract]
[Full Text]