Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2003, p. 619-622, Vol. 41, No. 2
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.619-622.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Multiple Patterns of Resistance to Fluconazole in Candida glabrata Isolates from a Patient with Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Receiving Head and Neck Radiation
Spencer W. Redding,1* William R. Kirkpatrick,2 Stephen Saville,2 Brent J. Coco,2 William White,1 Annette Fothergill,3 Michael Rinaldi,3 Tony Eng,4 Thomas F. Patterson,2 and Jose Lopez-Ribot2
Department of General Dentistry,1
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases,2
Department of Pathology,3
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center and The South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, Texas 78229-39004
Received 12 August 2002/
Returned for modification 18 September 2002/
Accepted 8 November 2002

ABSTRACT
Candida glabrata has emerged in recent years as a significant
cause of systemic fungal infection. We have previously reported
on the first three patients receiving radiation for head and
neck cancer to develop oropharyngeal candidiasis due to
C. glabrata.
The goal of this study was to track the development of increased
fluconazole resistance in
C. glabrata isolates and to evaluate
previously described genetic mechanisms associated with this
resistance from one of these three patients. The patient was
a 52-year-old man with squamous cell carcinoma treated with
radiation. At week 7 of his radiation, he developed oropharyngeal
candidiasis, which was treated with 200 mg of fluconazole daily
for 2 weeks. Serial cultures from this and three subsequent
time points yielded
C. glabrata. Isolates from these cultures
were subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing, DNA karyotyping,
and evaluation of the expression of genes previously associated
with
C. glabrata resistance to fluconazole,
CgCDR1,
CgCDR2,
and
CgERG11. Two strains (A and B) of
C. glabrata were identified
and found to display different patterns of resistance development
and gene expression. Strain A developed resistance over a 2-week
period and showed no overexpression of these genes. In contrast,
strain B first showed resistance 6 weeks after fluconazole therapy
was discontinued but showed overexpression of all three genes.
In conclusion, development of resistance to fluconazole by
C. glabrata is a highly varied process involving multiple molecular
mechanisms.

INTRODUCTION
Candida glabrata has emerged in recent years as a significant
cause of fungal infections (
17). The role of
C. glabrata in
oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) is somewhat controversial. When
cultured from patients with OPC, this organism is most often
detected along with
C. albicans (
17).
C. glabrata comprises
between 5 and 10% of all oral isolates recovered from human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients with OPC. In the past,
most investigators felt that
C. glabrata was simply a commensal
organism and did not contribute to infection (
7). However, OPC
infections with mixed
C. albicans and
C. glabrata in HIV patients
tend to be more clinically severe and require larger doses of
fluconazole for clinical cure than infections with
C. albicans alone (
16).
OPC infections due solely to C. glabrata have been described. Hoegl et al. reported two such OPC infections in a female HIV-positive drug abuser over a 6-year period (9). Canuto et al. evaluated 179 HIV-positive patients in two Spanish hospitals for risk factors associated with the isolation of fluconazole-resistant oral Candida and found that 14% of all the OPC infections were caused by C. glabrata (2). C. glabrata may be emerging as a potential pathogen in elderly populations. Lockhart et al. reported that 29% of patients older than 80 years were colonized orally with C. glabrata. If these patients wore dentures, the colonization rate increased to 58%. Studies are being done to investigate the rates of OPC due to C. glabrata in the elderly (9).
We have previously reported on the epidemiology and clinical course of OPC in patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. While C. albicans was the primary pathogen, C. glabrata was found to be a relatively common colonizing organism in these patients (15). Recently, we described the first three patients to develop OPC due to C. glabrata. In one of these patients the C. glabrata isolates developed increased microbiological resistance after short-term exposure to fluconazole (18).
Several mechanisms for the development of azole resistance in C. albicans have been described. Increased efflux of azole medications from fungal cells has been correlated with the upregulation of multidrug efflux transporter genes, the ATP binding cassette transporters CDR1 and CDR2, and the major facilitator MDR1 (19, 20). ERG11, the gene that codes for the target enzyme of azole medications, lanosterol demethylase, is upregulated along with the development of azole resistance (10). CDR1, MDR1, and ERG11 upregulation has also been demonstrated when C. dubliniensis develops resistance to fluconazole (14). More recently resistance mechanisms have been investigated for C. glabrata. Sanglard et al. have shown upregulation of CDR1 and CDR2 when fluconazole MICs rise (21, 22). Marichal et al. have shown an eightfold increase in ERG11 expression in an azole-resistant C. glabrata strain (12).
The goal of this study was to track the epidemiology, using DNA typing, of the development of fluconazole-resistant C. glabrata and to evaluate the previously described genetic mechanisms associated with this resistance on isolates from a patient who developed OPC while receiving radiation to treat head and neck cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
The patient was receiving ionizing radiation for head and neck
cancer and was participating in a clinical study where patients
were given preemptive fluconazole therapy (100 mg/day orally
for the duration of radiation) if they had oral culture positive
for colonization by
C. albicans at any time during their radiation
therapy. Oral specimens were obtained from the patient and cultured
every week for the duration of his radiation treatment. OPC
was verified by clinical presentation of white plaques, positive
KOH slide, and positive culture. Specimens were collected by
using an oral swab and a swish sample of 10 ml of normal saline
instilled in the mouth for 10 s and then collected in a sterile
container. These samples were plated on blood agar, RPMI medium,
and CHROMagar Candida (CHROMagar Co., Paris, France) chromogenic
medium. The colony color on chromogenic medium was recorded.
Yeasts were identified using standard techniques including analysis
of germ tube formation, growth at 37 and 42°C, and identification
by API-20C (bioMériux, Marcy-1'Etoile, France). For all
cultures, three to five yeast colonies from primary plates were
selected and stored on Sabouraud dextrose slants for antifungal
susceptibility testing and DNA typing.
Broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing to fluconazole was performed by the Fungus Testing Laboratory, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. The NCCLS-approved method for fungal drug susceptibility, involving a broth microdilution method with RPMI 1640 medium (Angus Buffers, Niagara Falls, N.Y.) buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS (3-[N-morpholino]propanesulfonic acid) with an inoculum of 0.5 x 103 to 2.5 x 103 cells per ml, was used (13). Specifically, five colonies of each isolate were selected, placed in medium with MOPS, and diluted to the desired concentration using spectrophotometric techniques. Serial dilutions of drugs were made from 0.03 to 128 µg/ml, the yeast cell inoculum was added, and the mixture was incubated at 35°C for 48 h. Following incubation, the growth in each well was scored as follows: 0, optically clear; 1+, slightly hazy; 2+, prominent reduction in turbidity compared with that of the drug-free control (80% inhibition end point); 3+, slight reduction in turbidity compared with that of the drug-free control; 4+, no reduction in turbidity compared with that of the drug-free control. As recommended by Espinel-Ingroff et al., the MIC of azoles is defined as the lowest concentration in which the growth score was 2+ (80% inhibition) or less following 48 h of incubation (6). The intralaboratory reproducibility of this method has been shown to be >95% within a fourfold concentration range. Thus, significant changes in the MICs are considered to occur when the MIC increases twofold or more for serial isolates tested in parallel.
Strain identity was established by electrophoretic karyotyping (EK). Chromosomal DNA from each isolate was prepared in agarose plugs and separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with a CHEF-DRIII instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). Briefly, yeast DNA in 0.75% agarose plugs was resolved on a 1% agarose gel by contour-clamped homogenous electric field (CHEF) gel electrophoresis in 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA buffer at 14°C. The running conditions for EK were as follows: block I, 120 s 4.5 V/cm 22 h; block II, 300 s 4.5 V/cm 5 h; block III, 300 s 3.4 V/cm 23 h. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide (1 µg/ml) and photographed (5). Fingerprints were considered highly similar when all visible bands showed the same migration distance for each isolate. Variations in the intensity and shape of bands among isolates were not considered differences. The presence or absence of more than one distinct band was considered a difference (11).
The expression patterns of the known C. glabrata resistance-associated genes Cg CDR1, Cg CDR2, and Cg ERG11 were determined by Northern blot analyses. Each of the clinical isolates was mechanically disrupted in TRI reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio) using a mini-beadbeater (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, Okla.), and total RNA was precipitated from the resulting supernatant with isopropyl alcohol. Approximately equal amounts of RNA obtained from each isolate were resolved on formaldehyde-agarose gels and subsequently transferred to Nytran supercharged membranes by using a Turboblotter (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.) as specified by the manufacturer.
DNA probes for the C. glabrata genes Cg CDR1, Cg CDR2, and Cg ERG11 were PCR amplified from genomic DNA prepared from one of the strain A isolates using primers designed from their GenBank database entries (accession numbers AF109723, AF251023 and LF40389, respectively). Hybridizations were performed by the method of Church and Gilbert (3), with all blots washed to high stringency (40 mM Na2HPO4-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at 65°C) and exposed to X-ray film at room temperature overnight.

RESULTS
The patient was a 52-year-old man diagnosed with squamous cell
carcinoma of the floor of the mouth, stage T4N2bM0, treated
with 5,910 cGy of radiation over a 9-week period. At visits
3 through 6, his oral cultures grew
C. glabrata and/or
C. krusei but he exhibited no clinical disease. He was not given fluconazole
because he had not been culture positive for
C. albicans. At
visit 7 he presented with white plaques on his oral mucosa that
were KOH positive, and swab and swish cultures were plated on
CHROMagar Candida to help with identification. The predominant
growth on his swab plate and the only growth on his swish plate
were lavender colonies consistent with
C. glabrata. There were
a few beige colonies on the swab culture consistent with
C. krusei. The predominant organism was confirmed to be
C. glabrata.
The patient was given 200 mg of fluconazole per day based on
screening results from CHROMagar Candida containing various
concentrations of fluconazole. CHEF karyotypes showed two
C. glabrata strains (A and B), both of which had 48-h fluconazole
MICs of 8.0 µg/ml (Fig.
1). At visit 8, there were no
clinical signs of OPC but colonization cultures were again positive
primarily for
C. glabrata with a few colonies of
C. krusei.
The fluconazole MICs for
C. glabrata strains A and B were now
32.0 and 8.0 µg/ml, respectively. Fluconazole therapy
was continued. Visit 9 was made at the conclusion of radiation
therapy. At that visit, there was no sign of OPC and the fluconazole
therapy was discontinued. Colonization cultures showed the same
pattern of
C. glabrata and
C. krusei as seen at visit 8. Fluconazole
MICs for strains A and B were now 64.0 and 8.0 µg/ml,
respectively. Visit 10 was a 6-week follow-up after radiation
therapy, and the fluconazole therapy had been discontinued.
The colonization culture grew only
C. glabrata. Fluconazole
MICs for strains A and B were both 64.0 µg/ml (Fig.
2).
As with antifungal susceptibility, strains A and B showed very
different expression patterns of Cg
CDR1, Cg
CDR2, and Cg
ERG11.
Expression did not change in the serial isolates of strain A
even after the fluconazole MICs rose from 8.0 to 64 µg/ml.
Strain B showed no change in gene expression of Cg
CDR or Cg
CDR2 from visits 7 to 9, when the fluconazole MIC remained at
8.0 µg/ml. Expression of Cg
ERG11 appeared to drop at
visit 9. However, at visit 10 strain B showed overexpression
of all three genes tested, corresponding to the increased fluconazole
resistance from 8 to 64 µg/ml (Fig.
3).

DISCUSSION
C. glabrata has recently emerged as a significant systemic pathogen,
and there are increasing numbers of reports that it causes oral
disease. It has been shown typically to have increased fluconazole
MICs compared with
C. albicans, and these MICs can rise rapidly
when the organism is exposed to fluconazole (
17,
18).
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the molecular mechanisms involved in the development of resistance by C. glabrata after fluconazole treatment of an oral infection in a patient receiving radiation for head and neck cancer. This patient could be said to have had a mixed infection since a few colonies of C. krusei grew on the swab culture. However, C. glabrata predominated on the swab culture and was present alone on the swish culture. Also, this patient responded to a dose of fluconazole (200 mg/day) that is well suited to treat an organism generally considered to be susceptible or dose-dependent susceptible to fluconazole, as is the case for C. glabrata, but not well suited to treat an inherently fluconazole-resistant organism such as C. krusei. Therefore, we feel that this infection was caused by C. glabrata and the patient was colonized by C. krusei. However, we cannot rule out the possibility of a mixed infection.
Matched sets of susceptible and resistant isolates are required to evaluate molecular mechanisms of resistance. EK was used to show the strain relatedness of susceptible and resistant isolates in this patient since it is the most reliable technique to type C. glabrata (1, 4). Two isogenic strains were cultured that persisted over time and became resistant after exposure to fluconazole.
The two strains displayed increased microbiological resistance after short-term exposure to fluconazole, but in two very different patterns. After 2 weeks of fluconazole treatment, the MIC for strain A increased from 8.0 to 64.0 µg/ml but the MIC for strain B remained constant at 8.0 µg/ml. At a 6-week follow-up, the resistance of strain A remained stable (MIC, 64.0 µg/ml) but the MIC for strain B was now also at 64.0 µg/ml. Interestingly, even with these rises in MIC, the patient responded to 200 mg of fluconazole per day and did not relapse with the increase in MIC. NCCLS document M27-A has proposed interpretive breakpoints for Candida tested against fluconazole, with MICs below 16 µg/ml indicating susceptibility and MICs above 32.0 µg/ml indicating resistance (13). It is possible that strain B was the predominant strain in the clinical infection and remained susceptible while the infection was being treated, showing a rise in the fluconazole MIC only a long time after the infection had responded to therapy. The risk of developing OPC falls after radiation therapy has been completed. Also, most of the patient data evaluated for the NCCLS breakpoints were obtained from patients with HIV or other immunocompromising conditions. Patients receiving head and neck radiation alone are not generally immunosuppressed and may be better able to clear OPC at modestly increased doses of fluconazole.
Resistance to fluconazole can be induced by the following mechanisms: (i) accumulation of the drug in the cell can be impaired; (ii) the ERG11 content of the cell can be elevated; (iii) point mutations in ERG11 may decrease the affinity for fluconazole; and (iv) the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway may be altered (23). We evaluated three genes that have been previously described to be upregulated in resistant isolates of C. glabrata, Cg CDR1, Cg CDR2, and Cg ERG11. Like the MIC patterns, the patterns of gene expression were very different between the two strains. Surprisingly, strain A showed no upregulation of Cg CDR1, Cg CDR2, and Cg ERG11 when the fluconazole MIC rose to 64 µg/ml. Other mechanisms apparently are in operation for this strain. However, we specifically limited our examination to these three genes, since they are, so far, the only ones to have been definitively associated with the development of fluconazole resistance in C. glabrata. Another factor is that while MDR1 is a major player in the development of fluconazole resistance in C. albicans, to our knowledge neither it nor any other member of the major facilitator superfamily has yet been described in C. glabrata (as indicated by current entries in the GenBank database). That such homologues exist and may be involved in acquired fluconazole resistance in some instances in C. glabrata is not in doubt. However, this is also likely to be true for many of the "drug" efflux pumps which have been characterized in C. albicans but remain to be discovered in C. glabrata. We feel that identifying the C. glabrata homologue of every one of these genes and examining their expression profile is beyond the scope of this study and still may not reveal the nature of the fluconazole resistance which developed in strain A. Other resistance mechanisms may include ERG11 point mutations and ergosterol pathway alterations. We hope to evaluate strain A for these potential other mechanisms in the future. In contrast, strain B was much more consistent with patterns for C. glabrata found by other investigators, since overexpression of all three genes in this strain closely matched the rise in MIC. Interestingly, expression of Cg ERG11 appeared to drop after the 2-week treatment with fluconazole but then the gene became overexpressed after 6 weeks of no fluconazole exposure.
It is difficult to determine the clinical significance of the development of resistance in these C. glabrata isolates. Infection was controlled with a fluconazole dose of 200 mg/day, which was consistent with the baseline MIC. If, as mentioned above, strain B was the pathogenic strain, the genes upregulated when this strain developed resistance appeared to be involved in the clinically important mechanisms in this patient.
In conclusion, we have evaluated the epidemiology of the development of resistance to fluconazole by two different strains of C. glabrata in a patient with OPC who was receiving radiation for head and neck cancer. We have also investigated the expression of three genes previously described as important for the development of this resistance, Cg CRD1, Cg CDR2, and Cg ERG11. Our results showed highly varied patterns since one strain showed no overexpression of the three genes tested with the development of resistance whereas the other strain showed overexpression of all three. This patient is only one patient infected with two strains of C. glabrata, and it is premature to speculate about the relative importance of our findings to the understanding of the resistance mechanisms operant in this organism. It is clear that development of resistance to fluconazole by C. glabrata is a highly varied process involving multiple molecular mechanisms, some of which remain to be determined.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a grant from Pfizer, Inc., Public
Health Service grant 5-R01-DE11381-6 from the National Institutes
of Health, and the Dental Oncology Education Program.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of General Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78229-3900. Phone: (210) 567-3656. Fax: (210) 567-3662. E-mail:
redding{at}uthscsa.edu.


REFERENCES
1 - Barchiesi, F., L. Di Francesco, D. Arzeni, F. Caselli, D. Gallo, and G. Scalise. 1999. Electrophoretic karyotyping and triazole susceptibility of Candida glabrata clinical isolates. Eur. J. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:184-187.
2 - Canuto, M. M., F. G. Rodero, V. O. Ducasse, I. H. Aguado, C. M. Gonzalez, A. S. Sevillano, and A. M. Hildalgo. 2000. Determinants for the development of oropharyngeal colonization or infection by fluconazole-resistant Candida strains in HIV-infected patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:593-601.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Church, G. M., and W. Gilbert. 1984. Genomic sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:1991-1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Di Francesco, L., F. Barchiesi, F. Caselli, O. Cirioni, and G. Scalise. 1999. Comparison of four methods for DNA typing of clinical isolates of Candida glabrata. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:955-963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Doebbling, B. N., R. F. Lehmenn, R. J. Hollis, L. C. Wu, A. F. Widmer, A. Voss, and M. A. Pfaller. 1993. Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with isoenzyme profiles as a typing system for Candida tropicalis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 16:377-383.[Medline]
6 - Espinel-Ingroff A., C. W. Kish, Jr., T. M. Kerkering, R. A. Fromtling, K. Bartizal, and J. N. Galgiani. 1992. Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:3138-3145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Fidel, P. L., J. A. Vazquez, and J. D. Sobel. 1999. Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:80-96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Hoegl, L., E. Thoma-Greber, M. Röcken, and H. Korting. 1998. Persistent oral candidosis by non-albicans Candida strains including Candida glabrata in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient observed over a period of 6 years. Mycoses 41:335-338.[Medline]
9 - Lockhart, S. R., S. Joly, K. Vargas, J. Swails-Wenger, and D. R. Soll. 1999. Natural defenses against Candida colonization breakdown in the oral cavities of the elderly. J. Dent. Res. 78:857-868.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Lopez-Ribot, J. L., R. K. McAtee, L. Lee, W. R. Kirkpatrick,. T. C. White, D. Sanglard, and T. F. Patterson. 1998. Distinct patterns of gene expression associated with the development of fluconazole resistance in serial Candida albicans isolates from HIV infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2932-2937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Magee, P. T., L. Bowdin, and J. Staudinger. 1992. Comparison of molecular typing methods for Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2674-2679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Marichal, P., H. Vanden Bossche, F. C. Odds, G. Nobels, D. W. Warnock, V. Timmerman, C. Vanbroeckhoven, S. Fay, and P. Mosel-Larsen. 1997. Molecular characterization of an azole-resistant Candida glabrata isolate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2229-2237.[Abstract]
13 - National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard. NCCLS document M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
14 - Perea, S., J. L. Lopez-Ribot, B. L. Wickes, W. R. Kirkpatrick, O. P. Dib, S. P. Bachmann, S. M. Keller, M. Martinez, and T. F. Patterson. 2002. Molecular mechanisms of fluconazole resistance in Candida dubliniensis isolates from human immunodeficiency virus infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1695-1703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Redding, S. W., R. C. Zellars, W. R. Kirkpatrick, R. K. McAtee, M. A. Caceres, A. W. Fothergill, J. L. Lopez-Ribot, C. W. Bailey, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson. 1999. Epidemiology of oropharyngeal Candida colonization and infection in patients receiving radiation for head and neck cancer. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3896-3900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Redding, S. W., W. R. Kirkpatrick, O. P. Dib, A. W. Fothergill, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson. 2000. The epidemiology of non-albicans Candida in oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV patients. Spec. Care Dent. 20:178-181.[CrossRef]
17 - Redding, S. W. 2001. The role of yeasts other than Candida albicans in oropharyngeal candidiasis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 14:673-677.[Medline]
18 - Redding, S. W., W. R. Kirpatrick, B. J. Coco, L. Sadkowski, A. W. Fothergill, M. G. Rinaldi, T. Y. Eng, and T. F. Patterson. 2002. Candida glabrata oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients receiving radiation treatment for head and neck cancer. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1879-1881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Sanglard, D., K. Kuchler, F. Ischer, J. L. Pagani, M. Monod, and J. Bille. 1995. Mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans isolates from AIDS patients involve specific multidrug transporters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2378-2386.[Abstract]
20 - Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, L. Koymans, and J. Bille. 1997. Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC-transporter gene. Microbiology 143:405-416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, D. Calabrese, P. Majcherczyk, and J. Bille. 1999. The ATP binding cassette transporter gene Cg CDR1 from Candida glabrata is involved in the resistance of clinical isolates to azole antifungal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2753-2765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, and J. Bille. 2001. Role of ATP-binding-cassette transporter genes in high-frequency acquisition of resistance to azole antifungals in Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1174-1183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Sanglard, D., and J. Bille. 2002. Action of and resistance to antifungal agents, p. 349-383. In R. A. Calderone (ed.), Candida and candidiasis. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2003, p. 619-622, Vol. 41, No. 2
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.619-622.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Hollis, R. J., Boyken, L., Tendolkar, S., Kroeger, J., Diekema, D. J.
(2009). Variation in Susceptibility of Bloodstream Isolates of Candida glabrata to Fluconazole According to Patient Age and Geographic Location in the United States in 2001 to 2007. J. Clin. Microbiol.
47: 3185-3190
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tumbarello, M., Sanguinetti, M., Trecarichi, E. M., La Sorda, M., Rossi, M., de Carolis, E., de Gaetano Donati, K., Fadda, G., Cauda, R., Posteraro, B.
(2008). Fungaemia caused by Candida glabrata with reduced susceptibility to fluconazole due to altered gene expression: risk factors, antifungal treatment and outcome. J Antimicrob Chemother
62: 1379-1385
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gygax, S. E., Vermitsky, J.-P., Chadwick, S. G., Self, M. J., Zimmerman, J. A., Mordechai, E., Adelson, M. E., Trama, J. P.
(2008). Antifungal Resistance of Candida glabrata Vaginal Isolates and Development of a Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR-Based Azole Susceptibility Assay. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3424-3426
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vermitsky, J.-P., Self, M. J., Chadwick, S. G., Trama, J. P., Adelson, M. E., Mordechai, E., Gygax, S. E.
(2008). Survey of Vaginal-Flora Candida Species Isolates from Women of Different Age Groups by Use of Species-Specific PCR Detection. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 1501-1503
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shin, J. H., Chae, M. J., Song, J. W., Jung, S.-I., Cho, D., Kee, S. J., Kim, S. H., Shin, M. G., Suh, S. P., Ryang, D. W.
(2007). Changes in Karyotype and Azole Susceptibility of Sequential Bloodstream Isolates from Patients with Candida glabrata Candidemia. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 2385-2391
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J.
(2007). Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
20: 133-163
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Posteraro, B., Tumbarello, M., La Sorda, M., Spanu, T., Trecarichi, E. M., De Bernardis, F., Scoppettuolo, G., Sanguinetti, M., Fadda, G.
(2006). Azole Resistance of Candida glabrata in a Case of Recurrent Fungemia.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 3046-3047
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rogers, P. D., Vermitsky, J.-P., Edlind, T. D., Hilliard, G. M.
(2006). Proteomic analysis of experimentally induced azole resistance in Candida glabrata. J Antimicrob Chemother
58: 434-438
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Uko, S., Soghier, L. M., Vega, M., Marsh, J., Reinersman, G. T., Herring, L., Dave, V. A., Nafday, S., Brion, L. P.
(2006). Targeted Short-Term Fluconazole Prophylaxis Among Very Low Birth Weight and Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics
117: 1243-1252
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Olson, J. A., Adler-Moore, J. P., Smith, P. J., Proffitt, R. T.
(2005). Treatment of Candida glabrata Infection in Immunosuppressed Mice by Using a Combination of Liposomal Amphotericin B with Caspofungin or Micafungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 4895-4902
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sanguinetti, M., Posteraro, B., Fiori, B., Ranno, S., Torelli, R., Fadda, G.
(2005). Mechanisms of Azole Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Candida glabrata Collected during a Hospital Survey of Antifungal Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 668-679
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Borst, A., Raimer, M. T., Warnock, D. W., Morrison, C. J., Arthington-Skaggs, B. A.
(2005). Rapid Acquisition of Stable Azole Resistance by Candida glabrata Isolates Obtained before the Clinical Introduction of Fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 783-787
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vermitsky, J.-P., Edlind, T. D.
(2004). Azole Resistance in Candida glabrata: Coordinate Upregulation of Multidrug Transporters and Evidence for a Pdr1-Like Transcription Factor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3773-3781
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barchiesi, F., Spreghini, E., Maracci, M., Fothergill, A. W., Baldassarri, I., Rinaldi, M. G., Scalise, G.
(2004). In Vitro Activities of Voriconazole in Combination with Three Other Antifungal Agents against Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3317-3322
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barker, K. S., Crisp, S., Wiederhold, N., Lewis, R. E., Bareither, B., Eckstein, J., Barbuch, R., Bard, M., Rogers, P. D.
(2004). Genome-wide expression profiling reveals genes associated with amphotericin B and fluconazole resistance in experimentally induced antifungal resistant isolates of Candida albicans. J Antimicrob Chemother
54: 376-385
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Tendolkar, S., Hollis, R. J., Diekema, D. J.
(2004). Geographic Variation in the Susceptibilities of Invasive Isolates of Candida glabrata to Seven Systemically Active Antifungal Agents: a Global Assessment from the ARTEMIS Antifungal Surveillance Program Conducted in 2001 and 2002. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 3142-3146
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brun, S., Berges, T., Poupard, P., Vauzelle-Moreau, C., Renier, G., Chabasse, D., Bouchara, J.-P.
(2004). Mechanisms of Azole Resistance in Petite Mutants of Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 1788-1796
[Abstract]
[Full Text]