JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, K.
Right arrow Articles by Stender, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, K.
Right arrow Articles by Stender, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2003, p. 889-891, Vol. 41, No. 2
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.889-891.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Direct Identification of Staphylococcus aureus from Positive Blood Culture Bottles

Kenneth Oliveira,1 Stephen M. Brecher,2 Annette Durbin,2 Daniel S. Shapiro,3 Donald R. Schwartz,3 Paola C. De Girolami,4 Joanna Dakos,4 Gary W. Procop,5 Deborah Wilson,5 Chad S. Hanna,6 Gerhard Haase,7 Heidrun Peltroche-Llacsahuanga,7 Kimberle C. Chapin,8 Michael C. Musgnug,8 Michael H. Levi,9 Cynthia Shoemaker,9 and Henrik Stender10*

Applied Biosystems, Bedford,1 Boston VA Healthcare System, West Roxbury,2 Lahey Clinic, Burlington,8 AdvanDx, Concord,10 Boston Medical Center,3 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts,4 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio,5 New York University School of Medicine, Bellevue Hospital, New York,6 Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York,9 University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany7

Received 15 May 2002/ Returned for modification 26 September 2002/ Accepted 12 November 2002


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes targeting Staphylococcus aureus 16S rRNA is a novel method for direct identification of S. aureus from positive blood culture bottles. The test (S. aureus PNA FISH) is performed on smears made directly from positive blood culture bottles with gram-positive cocci in clusters (GPCC) and provides results within 2.5 h. A blinded comparison of S. aureus PNA FISH with standard identification methods was performed in collaboration with eight clinical microbiology laboratories. A total of 564 routine blood culture bottles positive for GPCC recovered from both aerobic and anaerobic media from three different manufacturers (ESP, BACTEC, and BacT/Alert) were included in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of S. aureus PNA FISH were 100% (57 of 57) and 99.2% (116 of 117), respectively, with 174 GPCC-positive ESP blood culture bottles, 98.5% (67 of 68) and 98.5% (129 of 131), respectively, with 200 GPCC-positive BACTEC blood culture bottles, and 100% (74 of 74) and 99.1% (115 of 116), respectively, with 190 GPCC-positive BacT/Alert blood culture bottles. It is concluded that S. aureus PNA FISH performs well with commonly used continuously monitoring blood culture systems.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
Identification of Staphylococcus aureus in blood cultures begins with presumptive identification of gram-positive cocci in clusters (GPCC) in the Gram-stained smear of blood culture bottles that signal a positive result, whereas final identification must await subculture and overnight incubation (1, 8). This delayed identification often results in empirical antibiotic therapy administered to patients with GPCC-positive blood cultures, although the majority of GPCC-positive blood cultures are later identified as coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, a common blood culture contaminant. Direct identification of S. aureus in GPCC-positive blood culture bottles may provide important diagnostic information, which would allow the selection of an appropriate course of treatment in a timely manner.

Immunological, tube coagulase, and stable-endonuclease methods routinely used for identification of S. aureus following subculture have been applied directly to GPCC-positive blood culture bottles, but with variable sensitivities and specificities (6, 9, 10). In addition, molecular techniques, such as hybridization protection (3), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (5), and PCR (2) have been described for identification of S. aureus directly from positive blood cultures. In general, all studies have been performed on just a single blood culture medium and, therefore, do not address the potential for interference from different blood culture media, which in fact might explain the variable results. Furthermore, none of the studies involve blood culture media supplemented with charcoal, such as that used in the FAN BacT/Alert medium (bioMerieux, Hazelwood, Mo.), or resins, such as that in the BACTEC Plus medium (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.). Those supplements may interfere with assays for direct identification of positive blood culture organisms.

FISH with a peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe to target 16S rRNA of S. aureus is a novel method for the rapid and specific identification of S. aureus directly from GPCC-positive blood cultures. S. aureus PNA FISH had a 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity compared to conventional methods when tested with the BacT/Alert blood culture system and FAN medium (7). The aim of the present study was to perform a blinded comparison of S. aureus PNA FISH with conventional methodology on blood cultures representing the ESP medium (Trek Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Westlake, Ohio), BACTEC medium (Becton Dickinson), and BacT/Alert medium (bioMerieux). Routine positive blood culture bottles in which gram-positive cocci in clusters were observed in Gram-stained smears were randomly collected at each of eight clinical microbiology laboratories. For the study, one smear for future testing was prepared from each blood culture shortly after the Gram-staining results were known. The smears are stable at room temperature for several weeks and were collected over a 1- to 2-week period. For the most part, smears were transported to Boston Probes (now Applied Biosystems) for blinded analysis by S. aureus PNA FISH, although the majority of smears from two clinical microbiology laboratories were tested on site. S. aureus PNA FISH was performed as previously reported (7). Briefly, one drop of hybridization solution with a fluorescein-labeled PNA probe targeting S. aureus 16S rRNA was added to each smear. Coverslips were placed on the smears to ensure even coverage with hybridization solution, and the slides were subsequently incubated for 90 min at 55°C. Following hybridization, the coverslips were removed by submerging the slides into prewarmed wash solution in a water bath at 55°C and washed for 30 min. Each smear was finally mounted by using one drop of mounting fluid and covered with a coverslip. Microscopic examination was conducted by using a fluorescence microscope with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-Texas Red dual band filter set and a 60x or 100x objective. Multiple clusters of bright fluorescent cocci were usually apparent immediately upon examination of the slides. When just a few fluorescent organisms morphologically consistent with S. aureus were observed, bright field was applied to examine the smears for organisms morphologically consistent with staphylococci. The presence of fluorescent and nonfluorescent cocci was reported as positive for S. aureus, but the possibility of a mixed culture was noted.

The results were compared to those obtained at the eight clinical microbiology laboratories as part of the routine identification of positive blood culture bottles by their respective standard methods.

The comparative results for each blood culture system are presented in Tables 1 to 3. Table 1 summarizes data for ESP blood culture bottles from two different clinical microbiology laboratories. The data in Table 2 are based on BACTEC blood culture bottles from three clinical microbiology laboratories and include three bottles with resin and two bottles with Myco/F Lytic which all gave results in agreement with conventional identification. Table 3 summarizes data on BacT/Alert blood culture bottles obtained from three clinical microbiology laboratories. Two of these sites used the charcoal-containing FAN medium, and one site used the standard medium without charcoal. Data on the FAN medium alone showed 100% sensitivity (52 of 52) and 98.9% specificity (89 of 90). All bottles represent both aerobic and anaerobic media.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Reaction of S. aureus PNA FISH with 174 GPCC-positive blood culture bottles from the ESP system compared to identification by standard methodsa

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Reaction of S. aureus PNA FISH with 190 GPCC-positive blood culture bottles from the BacT/Alert system compared to identification by conventional methodsa

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Reaction of S. aureus PNA FISH with 200 GPCC-positive blood culture bottles from the BACTEC system compared to identification by standard methodsa

 
In summary, results obtained with four blood culture samples (0.7%) by S. aureus PNA FISH disagreed with conventional identification. Two of the isolates were not available for retest and one false-negative isolate was positive by retest with S. aureus PNA FISH, whereas another false-negative isolate remained negative by S. aureus PNA FISH. Interestingly, this isolate was positive by Staphaurex (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) but negative by DNase test and therefore may not be S. aureus. Six samples (1.1%) were reported as mixed culture by S. aureus PNA FISH, but S. aureus was not found by conventional methods. However, in two of these cases, multiple blood cultures from the same patients were positive for S. aureus, indicating that at least some of these "false positives" are true positive samples that also contained CoNS. One GPCC-positive FAN BacT/Alert sample gave a very weak and variable fluorescent signal by S. aureus PNA FISH and was reported as inconclusive. The blood culture bottle was not available for retesting, but the isolate yielded a clear negative result by PNA FISH, which was in agreement with the routine identification. The remaining 558 (98.2%) GPCC-positive blood cultures gave clear test results in agreement with identification by conventional methods.

A summary of the performance data for S. aureus PNA FISH with blood culture media from the three different manufacturers is listed in Table 4. The two mixed cultures that were supported by multiple other S. aureus-positive blood cultures and the two false negatives that were resolved by retesting and DNase testing are resolved in the data listed in Table 4. In general, high sensitivity and specificity is associated with molecular techniques and in particular with PNA probes (4). The high predictive values obtained by S. aureus PNA FISH enables GPCC-positive blood cultures to be definitively reported as S. aureus or non-S. aureus in less than 3 h after the initial Gram stain results become available.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4. Performance characteristics for S. aureus PNA FISH on three types of blood culture medium

 
As indicated above, some of the false-positive results were likely a result of mixed cultures where true S. aureus-positive blood samples also contained CoNS, but they may have been missed on culture plates because of similar appearance or mixed growth with CoNS or because S. aureus may be overlooked following subculture if the number of CoNS colonies is much greater than the number of S. aureus colonies. To support this hypothesis, we prepared artificially spiked blood culture bottles with various ratios of S. aureus to Staphylococcus epidermidis. Results by S. aureus PNA FISH showed that S. aureus could by detected down to a ratio of 1 to 10,000.

This study has shown that S. aureus PNA FISH is compatible with commonly used blood culture media, including ESP, BACTEC, and BacT/Alert media, where GPCC-positive blood cultures were identified as S. aureus or non-S. aureus with 98.5 to 100% sensitivity and 98.5 to 99.2% specificity.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Bruce Hanna, NYU School of Medicine, Bellevue Hospital, for his helpful comments in the review of the manuscript.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: AdvanDx, 222 Partridge Ln., Concord, MA 01742. Phone: (781) 405-1654. E-mail: Henrik.Stender{at}AdvanDx.com. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Baron, E. J. 1998. Processing and interpretation of blood cultures, p. 58-62. In H. D. Isenberg (ed.), Essential procedures for clinical microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  2. Benito, M. J., M. M. Rodriguez, M. G. Cordoba, E. Aranda, E., and J. J. Cordoba. 2000. Rapid differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus from staphylococcal species by arbitrarily primed-polymerase chain reaction. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 31:368-373.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Davis, T. E., and D. D. Fuller. 1991. Direct identification of bacterial isolates in blood cultures by using a DNA probe. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2193-2196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Egholm, M., O. Buchard, L. Christensen, C. Behrens, S. M. Freier, D. A. Driver, R. H. Berg, S. K. Kim, B. Norden, and P. E. Nielsen. 1993. PNA hybridizes to complementary oligonucleotides obeying the Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding rules. Nature 365:556-568.
  5. Kempf, V. A. J., K. Trebesius, and I. B. Autenrieth. 2000. Fluorescent in situ hybridization allows rapid identification of microorganisms in blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:830-838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McDonald, C. L., and K. Chapin. 1995. Rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus from blood culture bottles by a classic 2-hour tube coagulase test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:50-52.[Abstract]
  7. Oliveira, K., G. W. Procop, D. Wilson, J. Coull, and H. Stender. 2002. Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures by fluorescence in situ hybridization using PNA probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:247-251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Pezzlo, M. 1998. Interpretation of aerobic bacterial growth on primary culture media, p. 51-57. In H. D. Isenberg (ed.), Essential procedures for clinical microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  9. Rappaport, T., K. P. Sawyer, and I. Nachamkin. 1988. Evaluation of several commercial biochemical and immunological methods for rapid identification of gram-positive cocci directly from blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:1335-1338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Speers, D. J., T. R. Olma, and G. L. Gilbert. 1998. Evaluation of four methods for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus from blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1032-1034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2003, p. 889-891, Vol. 41, No. 2
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.2.889-891.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, K.
Right arrow Articles by Stender, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, K.
Right arrow Articles by Stender, H.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS