JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perez, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freydiere, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perez, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freydiere, A. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2003, p. 1130-1134, Vol. 41, No. 3
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.3.1130-1134.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Four Chromogenic Media and Hektoen Agar for Detection and Presumptive Identification of Salmonella Strains in Human Stools

J. M. Perez,1 P. Cavalli,2 C. Roure,3 R. Renac,1 Y. Gille,3 and A. M. Freydiere2*

Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Pointe à Pitre/Abymes, 97159 Pointe à Pitre, Guadeloupe,1 Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Debrousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69322 Lyon Cedex 5,2 Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69317 Lyon Cedex 4, France3

Received 5 September 2002/ Returned for modification 15 October 2002/ Accepted 9 December 2002


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Several chromogenic media have been developed to enhance the specificity of Salmonella detection. We compared the performance of four commercial chromogenic media—namely, ABC medium (Lab M. Ltd., Bury, United Kingdom), COMPASS Salmonella agar (Biokar Diagnostics, Beauvais, France), CHROMagar Salmonella agar (CHROMagar Company, Paris, France), and SM ID agar (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France)—with conventional Hektoen medium. Nine hundred sixteen stool samples from inpatients at three hospitals were cultured, in parallel, on the five media, both by direct inoculation and after selective enrichment in selenite broth. Sixty-four Salmonella strains with 12 serotypes were isolated on at least one medium. After 48 h of incubation, sensitivity before and after enrichment was 62.5 and 89.1% with ABC medium, 77.1 and 93.8% with COMPASS agar, 66.7 and 89.1% with CHROMagar, 68.8 and 85.9% with SM ID agar, and 85.4 and 98.4% with Hektoen agar, respectively. Broth enrichment and prolonged incubation (48 versus 24 h) increased the sensitivity of all five media. Only one strain was not isolated on Hektoen agar. The number of false-positive isolates was higher with all five media after enrichment in selenite broth and after incubation for 48 h compared to 24 h. The specificity of the four chromogenic media was better than 91% after incubation for 24 h (77.7% with Hektoen agar) and better than 84% after incubation for 48 h (74.8% with Hektoen agar). This higher specificity reduces the need for confirmatory tests, thereby cutting technical time and reagent requirements. Both COMPASS agar and CHROMagar Salmonella, which after simple additional tests showed close efficiencies (96 and 97%, respectively), can be recommended as single-plate media of choice for the detection and presumptive identification of salmonellae in stools.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Conventional methods for Salmonella spp. detection in stools are based on nonselective and selective enrichment, followed by biochemical and serological identification. Conventional selective media for Salmonella isolation have very poor specificity, and the numerous false-positive results necessitate time-consuming complementary tests.

Two main approaches to Salmonella colony identification have been developed in the last decade: (i) screening tests applied to Salmonella-like colonies on common selective media, such as the C8 esterase test (2, 5, 9, 16, 18, 20, 27) and the OBIS Salmonella test (13; A. M. Freydiere, J. M. Perez, P. Cavalli, and V. Raverot, Abstr. 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C 173, p. 189, 2001), and (ii) chromogenic media.

Several agar media containing chromogenic substrates for Salmonella-specific enzymes have recently been developed. Rambach agar (9, 26) and Salmonella detection and identification medium (SM ID agar) (6, 17; M. C. Poupart, M. Mounier, F. Denis, J. Sirot, C. Couturier, and F. Villeval, Abstr. 5th Eur. Congress Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., abstr. 1254, 1991) were the first media of this type. Rambach agar uses a chromogenic substrate for ß-galactosidase (X-Gal), in conjunction with propylene glycol, which is fermented by Salmonella spp. to generate acid (26). SM ID agar is based on similar principles and incorporates X-Gal and glucuronic acid (Poupart et al., 5th ECCMID). SM ID agar is less specific than Rambach agar (6, 17), but Rambach agar fails to detect Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and S. enterica serovar Paratyphi A (9, 26). ABC medium, a more recent product, uses a combination of two chromogenic substrates to detect salmonellae on the basis of their alpha-galactosidase production (23). Finally, several chromogenic media have been produced to detect Salmonella esterase activity (4, 10, 22; C. Roure, J. M. Perez, P. Cavalli, and A. M. Freydiere, Abstr. 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C 170, p. 188, 2001).

The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of four commercial chromogenic media—namely, ABC medium, COMPASS Salmonella agar, CHROMagar Salmonella agar, and SM ID agar—in comparison with conventional Hektoen agar for Salmonella detection in human stool specimens. We also examined the value of a preenrichment step and prolonged incubation.

(This work was presented in part [results for 539 stool samples] at the 101st General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.)


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Stool specimens. From September 1999 to April 2002, 916 stool samples from inpatients at three hospitals (Hôpital de l'Antiquaille and Hôpital de La Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France, and Hôpital de Pointe à Pitre, Pointe à Pitre, Guadeloupe, France) were prospectively tested. Patients comprised 66% infants and children (0 to 1 year, 25%; 1 to 15 years, 41%) and 34% adults, and all patients were admitted with a complaint of diarrhea or with unexplained fever.

A total of 543 specimens were studied at the Pointe à Pitre hospital, and 373 were studied at the Antiquaille hospital, using exactly the same protocol for inoculation, interpretation of cultures, and identification. (same conventional method, same biochemical test panels, same method of inoculation, and same reading procedure).

Media. Four commercial chromogenic media (Table 1) —namely, ABC medium (Lab M. Ltd., Bury, United Kingdom), COMPASS Salmonella agar (Biokar Diagnostics, Beauvais, France), CHROMagar Salmonella (CHROMagar Company, Paris, France), and SM ID agar (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France)—were used as recommended by the manufacturers. These media are claimed to allow the detection and identification of salmonellae. Specific enzymes are detected by their effect on chromogenic substrates incorporated in the agar, and rapid tests (microscopic examination and oxidase activity) are applied directly to colonies to assist identification.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Principles of the chromogenic plates evaluated in this study for detection and presumptive identification of Salmonella species and colony colors of Salmonella and other Enterobacteriaceae

 
Hektoen enteric agar (bioMerieux) was the standard primary plating medium used for routine screening for Salmonella and Shigella spp. in the three participating laboratories.

Medium preparation. SM ID and Hektoen agar plates were supplied ready to use. The other three chromogenic media were supplied as powders in preweighed batches and were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions in the different participating laboratories.

Each batch of medium was tested for sterility, culture response, and chromogenic reactions with the following reference strains: Salmonella serovar Enteritidis ATCC 13076, Salmonella serovar Typhimurium ATCC 14028, and Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 13048. Plates were stored at 4°C in the dark for up to 4 weeks.

Selenite broth (bioMerieux) was used for sample enrichment.

Inoculation. Stool specimens were streaked in a single session onto the five media, both directly and after selective enrichment in selenite broth, as follows. Briefly, 1 g of solid stool (or 1 ml of liquid stool) was suspended in 10 ml of 0.85% saline, and the same amount of the same specimen was inoculated into selenite broth. Ten microliters of each suspension was streaked, with a calibrated loop, onto each medium. After incubation for 24 h at 36°C (enrichment procedure), 10 µl of selenite broth was streaked in the same way. All plates were incubated for 24 and 48 h at 36°C.

Readings. The Hektoen agar plates and the chromogenic plates were read by two independent technicians, after 24 then 48 h.

On Hektoen agar, blue-gray colonies with a black center (lactose negative, H2S positive) and blue-green colonies (lactose negative) were identified biochemically as described below.

On the four chromogenic media, each colony corresponding to a Salmonella sp., according to the respective manufacturer's definitions (see Table 1), was subcultured as described below.

A false-positive colony was a colony that looked like Salmonella on the agar plate but that was not Salmonella upon further biochemical characterization.

Reference identification. Each suspected Salmonella strain isolated on the four different chromogenic agar plates was picked and subcultured in one of the four compartments of an SM ID agar plate. When the color and morphology of the colonies in the four compartments were similar, the colonies from a single chromogenic medium were fully identified by biochemical testing. When the colonies in the four compartments differed, each was subjected to biochemical identification.

Thus, for each suspected Salmonella strain isolated either on Hektoen agar or on the chromogenic media, a reference identification procedure was performed by standard biochemical methods (API 20E strip [bioMerieux] for Enterobacteriaceae and API 20NE strip [bioMerieux] for nonfermenters), and isolates confirmed as salmonellae were identified serologically by agglutination (Bio-Rad, Marnes la Coquette, France).

Statistical analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of the different media were analyzed with McNemar's test as recommended by Ilstrup (12).


   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Salmonella detection. Sixty-four Salmonella strains were isolated on at least one medium and corresponded to 12 serotypes (Tables 2 and 3): serotype Areclavanetz (n = 2), serotype Enteritidis (n = 27), serotype Hadar (n = 3), serotype Houtenae (n = 3), serotype Infantis (n = 2), serotype Mississippi (n = 1), serotype Mons (n = 2), serotype Panama (n = 16), serotype Paratyphi A (n = 1), serotype Rubislaw (n = 1), serotype Typhimurium (n = 5), and serotype Virchow (n = 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Comparison of media for detection of Salmonella, before enrichment and after 24 and 48 h of incubation, from 916 stool specimens from inpatients of three hospitals

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Comparison of five selective media for detection of Salmonella, after enrichment and 48 h of incubation, from 916 stool specimens from inpatients of three hospitals

 
Salmonellae were detected in 2 of the 373 stools tested in Lyon (0.5%) and in 62 of the 543 stools tested in Guadeloupe (11.4%).

An enumeration of the Salmonella colonies performed on the different positive stools showed that 8% of the positive stools yielded <104 CFU/ml and might have been undetected by direct plating of 10 µl per plate after the initial 1:10 dilution of the fecal material.

Enrichment and prolonged incubation (48 h versus 24 h) increased the sensitivity of all the media tested (64 versus 48 isolates in total).

Salmonella isolates were subsequently streaked on the media on which they were not initially detected, and the expected colonial appearance was consistently obtained on these subcultures. The serovar did not appear to influence the sensitivity of any of the media tested. Interestingly, however, one serovar Enteritidis strain that was isolated before enrichment on four of the five media (not on ABC medium) was not isolated on any of the media after enrichment.

Without enrichment, after 24 h of incubation, between 45.8 and 62.5% of all the Salmonella isolates were detected, according to the medium. Hektoen agar was significantly more sensitive than the other four media (62.5 and 85.4% after incubation for 24 and 48 h, respectively), while the sensitivities of the four chromogenic media were not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05).

With enrichment and a 48-h incubation period, Hektoen agar again had the highest sensitivity (98.4%), although the sensitivity of COMPASS agar (93.8%) was not significantly different (P = 0.361). SM ID agar had the lowest sensitivity (85.9%).

Specificity. The specificity of the four chromogenic media after incubation for 24 h was 91%, compared to 77.7% with Hektoen agar (Table 2). With enrichment and a 48-h incubation period (Table 3), ABC medium had the highest specificity (98%; P > 0.0001) and Hektoen agar had the lowest specificity (74.8%). The difference in specificity between COMPASS agar and CHROMagar Salmonella was not significantly different (P = 0.124). Except for ABC medium, prolongation of the incubation period from 24 to 48 h considerably increased the number of false-positive results, especially with COMPASS agar (from 16 to 109) and CHROMagar Salmonella agar (from 30 to 112).

The enrichment procedure increased the number of false-positive isolates (other than coliforms) on Hektoen medium and partially inhibited yeasts on COMPASS agar, CHROMagar Salmonella agar, and SM ID agar. The false-positive rates obtained with the different media after incubation for 48 h are reported in Table 4. With COMPASS agar and CHROMagar Salmonella agar, the two main genera yielding false-positive results were Candida and Pseudomonas. Both were easily ruled out by complementary tests (direct examination for Candida and instantaneous oxidase test for pseudomonads) (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4. Distribution of non-Salmonella genera yielding Salmonella-like colonies on different media before and after enrichment and after 48 h incubationa

 
The best overall performance among the five media according to a measure of efficiency (Tables 2 and 3) was shown by ABC medium, which was closely followed by COMPASS agar and CHROMagar Salmonella agar.


   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Some new chromogenic media for the detection and presumptive identification of salmonellae have been compared individually with conventional media (7, 10, 15, 23). The results of these studies are difficult to compare with each other, owing to the use of various reference media and different strain and sample panels. We therefore compared the performance of four chromogenic media and conventional Hektoen medium in the same conditions and with the same clinical stool specimens, with and without selective enrichment in selenite broth.

The final Salmonella isolation rates in Lyon (0.5%) and Guadeloupe (11.4%) were similar to those obtained in previous studies in the same areas with undiluted stools (1, 17), showing that the dilution of the stools did not influence the overall performance of the media.

Although 8% of the Salmonella spp. strains might have not been detected by direct plating due to our methodology, the review of two recent studies comparing CHROMagar Salmonella agar and Hektoen agar demonstrates that the inoculum size cannot explain solely the variability of the direct plating sensitivities from one study to another. As a matter of fact, with 27 Salmonella strains isolated, Eigner et al. (7), who used an undefined inoculum, reported direct plating sensitivities of 85 versus 59%, respectively. With 20 Salmonella isolates, Gaillot et al. (10), using an inoculum of 50 µl of liquid stool or of stool liquefied in saline solution, reported direct plating sensitivities of 95 versus 80%, respectively. With 69 Salmonella strains isolated, this present study using an inoculum of 10 µl of an initial 1:10 dilution of the fecal material reports direct plating sensitivities of 66.7 versus 85.4% for CHROMagar Salmonella and Hektoen agars, respectively. Moreover, this variability of the results from one study to another demonstrates the necessity to standardize the different methodologies in the future.

In contrast to other authors (7, 10, 15, 17), we found that the chromogenic media tested here (except for COMPASS agar) were less sensitive than Hektoen agar. Some of the Salmonella isolates in our study may not have expressed the specific enzyme activities detected by the chromogenic media. This was the case in a recent study performed in Burkina Faso (24), in which nine strains (including strains belonging to the two most commonly isolated serovars, namely, Enteritidis and Typhimurium) out of 20 Salmonella strains isolated on ABC medium did not express alpha-galactosidase activity. These results also suggest that the enzyme expression by salmonellae may vary according to the geographical origin of the strain. However, in our study, all the isolates generated the specific colony color after subculture on the different media. Competing flora may also affect the sensitivity of chromogenic media. Recently, Nye et al. (19) showed that the sensitivity of ABC medium was adversely affected by even small amounts of competing flora. In contrast, species discrimination by the chromogenic media tested here was considerably better than with Hektoen agar.

Our results underline the importance of sample enrichment prior to plating and of prolonged incubation (48 versus 24 h) for recovery of salmonellae on both conventional and chromogenic media (3; Roure et al., 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.). Forward and Rainnie (8) and Kelly et al. (14) recently reported similar results and recommended that selenite enrichment broth be used systematically to maximize sensitivity for serovar Enterica.

Forward and Rainnie advised against direct plating and recommended inoculating only selenite enrichment broth, on day 1 (8). However, enrichment broth may be toxic for some Salmonella strains (21), as was the case for one of the isolates found in this study. Moreover, direct plating identified serovar Enterica in about 50% of cases, 1 day earlier than would have been possible if only selenite enrichment broth had been inoculated on day 1.

The higher specificity of chromogenic media compared to Hektoen agar confirms previous findings (7, 10, 23, 28). This reduces the need for biochemical identification and thereby saves technical time and reagent requirements.

As in previous studies (7, 10, 15; Roure et al., 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.), the two main microorganisms yielding false-positive results on CHROMagar Salmonella and COMPASS agars were Candida spp. and pseudomonads. Although these genera can readily be distinguished from salmonellae by microscopic examination and rapid oxidase testing, respectively, the addition of antifungal and antipseudomonal agents to these media might increase their specificity. Recently, Eigner et al. (7) tested a modified CHROMagar Salmonella formula containing cefsulodin and amphotericin B and found that pseudomonads and yeasts were effectively inhibited. Similar results have also been obtained in our laboratory with a new formula of COMPASS agar containing antifungal and antipseudomonal agents (data not shown).

Except for ABC medium, which detects alpha-galactosidase activity, all the chromogenic media recently developed for presumptive Salmonella identification detect esterase activity (4, 10, 22; Roure et al., 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.). Detection of esterase activity has been widely used in spot tests applied directly to colonies (e.g., the MUCAP test from Biolife and a home-made C8 esterase test) (2, 5, 9, 16, 18, 20, 27) and in panels such as API Z and Rapidec Z (bioMerieux) (11, 25, 29; D. Monget, 8 May 1980, United Kingdom patent application 2,050,418). However, detection of this activity on agar medium during bacterial growth was hindered by technical difficulties (22). The sensitivities of CHROMagar Salmonella agar (7, 10) and COMPASS agar (Roure et al., 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol.) are better than those of other chromogenic media, such as Rambach agar, which does not detect serovars Typhi or Paratyphi A.

Most chromogenic media have been designed to detect frequently isolated microorganisms such as E. coli (50 to 80% of urinary tract pathogens) and Candida albicans (60% of human pathogenic fungi). In contrast, chromogenic media for presumptive identification of salmonellae are mainly designed to exclude the numerous microorganisms with similar colony characteristics. Thus, such media must above all be selective and specific. In our hands, ABC medium had the best diagnostic performance of the four chromogenic media tested. However, the use of this medium is restricted by the recent detection of Salmonella strains which do not produce alpha-galactosidase activity (24) and the adverse effect of the competing flora on sensitivity (19).

Although we did not conduct a comparative cost analysis, the chromogenic media tested here, before enrichment and with a 24-h incubation period, identified 50% of all the Salmonella isolates, with a specificity exceeding 93%, thereby reducing the need for confirmatory tests and providing rapid and economic screening. Moreover, although there was a noteworthy decrease in the specificity of some chromogenic media after enrichment and prolonged incubation (48 h), all the chromogenic media still had higher specificities than Hektoen agar after 48 h and therefore remained more economical than the latter medium.

Although ABC medium showed the best diagnostic performance of the four chromogenic media tested in this study (efficiency of 98%), the high prevalence of strains which did not produce alpha-galactosidase in some geographical locations (24) placed limitations on the use of this medium. Thus, both COMPASS agar and CHROMagar Salmonella agar, which after simple additional tests showed close efficiencies (96 and 97%, respectively), can be recommended as single-plate media of choice for Salmonella detection and presumptive identification.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Lab M. Ltd., Biokar Diagnostics, CHROMagar Microbiology Company, and bioMerieux for providing the corresponding media. We are also grateful to the technicians of the participating laboratories, F. Vandenesch for his helpful advice, Anne Frangin and Jacqueline Deloumeaux for their help with the statistical analysis, and David Young for editing the manuscript.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Debrousse, 29 Rue Soeur Bouvier, 69322 Lyon Cedex 05, France. Phone: (33) 4 72 38 58 16. Fax: (33) 4 72 38 55 35. E-mail: am.freydiere{at}chu-lyon.fr. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Adjide, C. C., J.-M. Perez, M. Nicolas, R. Renac, and B. Juminer. 1998. Epidémiologie descriptive des Salmonella isolées au CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre/Abymes (1992-1995). Med. Mal. Infect. 28:418-422.
  2. Aguire, P. M., J. B. Cacho, L. Folgueira, M. Lopez, J. Garcia, and A. C. Velasco. 1990. Rapid fluorescence method for screening Salmonella spp. from enteric differential agars. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:148-149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Chang, C.-T., C.-Y. Yuo, H.-C. Shen, A.-M. Li, C.-Y. Chen, J.-L. Chou, and S.-P. Huang. 1999. Recovery of salmonella by using selenite brilliant green sulfa enrichment broth. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:4120-4123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cooke, V. M., R. J. Miles, R. G. Price, and A. C. Richardson. 1999. A novel chromogenic ester agar medium for detection of salmonellae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:807-812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dealler, S. F., J. Collins, and A. L. James. 1992. A rapid heat resistant technique for presumptive identification of Salmonella on desoxycholate-citrate agar. Eur. J. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 11:249-252.
  6. Dusch, H., and M. Altwegg. 1993. Comparison of Rambach agar, SM ID medium, and Hektoen enteric agar for primary isolation of non-typhi salmonellae from stool samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:410-412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Eigner, U., R. Reissbrodt, R. Hammann, and A.-M. Fahr. 2001. Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium for the isolation and presumptive identification of Salmonella species from stool specimens. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:558-565.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Forward, K., and B. Rainnie. 1997. Use of selenite enrichment broth for the detection of Salmonella from stool: a report of one year experience at a provincial public health laboratory. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 29:215-217.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Freydiere, A. M., and Y. Gille. 1991. Detection of salmonellae by using Rambach agar and by a C8 esterase spot test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2357-2359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gaillot, O., P. Di Camillo, P. Berche, R. Courcol, and C. Savage. 1999. Comparison of CHROMagar Salmonella medium and Hektoen enteric agar for isolation of salmonellae from stool samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:762-765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Greene, L. C., P. C. Appelbaum, and J. A. Kellogg. 1984. Evaluation of a two-hour method for screening pathogens from stool specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 20:285-287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ilstrup, D. M. 1990. Statistical methods in microbiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 3:219-226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Inoue, K., K. Miki, K. Tamura, and R. Sakazaki. 1996. Evaluation of L-pyrrolidonyl peptidase paper strip test for differentiation of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, particularly Salmonella spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1811-1812.[Abstract]
  14. Kelly, S., M. Cormican, L. Parke, G. Corbett-Feeney, and J. Flynn. 1999. Cost-effective methods for isolation of Salmonella enterica in the clinical laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Maddocks, S., T. Olma, and S Chen. 2002. Comparison of CHROMagar Salmonella medium and xylose-lysine-desoxycholate and Salmonella-Shigella agars for the isolation of Salmonella strains from stool samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2999-3003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Manafi, M., and R. Sommer. 1992. Comparison of three rapid screening methods for Salmonella spp.: ' MUCAP test, MicroScreen Latex and Rambach agar. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 14:163-166.
  17. Monnery, L., A. M. Freydiere, C. Baron, A. M. Rousset, S. Tigaud, M. Boude-Chevalier, H. de Montclos, and Y. Gille. 1994. Evaluation of two new chromogenic media for detection of Salmonella in stools. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:257-261.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Munoz, P., M. D. Diaz, E. Cercenado, M. Rodriguez-Creixems, J. Berenguer, and E. Bouza. 1993. Rapid screening of Salmonella from stool cultures. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 100:404-406.[Medline]
  19. Nye, K. J., D. Fallon, D. Frodsham, B. Gee, C. Graham, S. Howe, S. Messer, T. Turner, and R. E. Warren. 2002. An evaluation of the performance of XLD, DCA, MLCB, and ABC agars as direct plating media for the isolation of Salmonella enterica from faeces. J. Clin. Pathol. 55:286-288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Olsson, M., A. Syk, and R. Wollin. 1991. Identification of Salmonella with the 4-methylumbelliferyl caprylate fluorescence test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2631-2632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Patil, M. D., and N. M. Parhad. 1986. Growth of salmonellas in different enrichment media. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 61:19-24.[Medline]
  22. Perry, D. F., and C. Quiring. 1997. Fundamental aspects of enzyme/chromogenic substrate interactions in agar media formulations for esterase and glycosidase detection in Salmonella, p. 63-70. In P. Colin, J. M. LeGoux, and G. Clement (ed.), Salmonella and salmonellosis proceedings. Zoopôle, Ploufragan, France.
  23. Perry, J. D., M. Ford, J. Taylor, A. L. Jones, R. Freeman, and F. K. Gould. 1999. ABC medium, a new chromogenic agar for the selective isolation of Salmonella spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:766-768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Perry, J. D., G. Riley, F. K. Gould, J. M. Perez, E. Boissier, R. T. Ouedraogo, and A. M. Freydiere. 2002. Alafosfalin as a selective agent for the isolation of Salmonella from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3913-3916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Persaud, C. A., and S. J. Eykyn. 1994. Stool culture: are you getting value for money? J. Clin. Pathol. 47:790-792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rambach, A. 1990. New plate medium for facilitated differentiation of Salmonella spp. from Proteus spp. and other enteric bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:301-303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ruiz, J., M. C. Valera, M. A. Sempere, M. L. Lopez, J. Gomez, and J. Oliva. 1991. Presumptive identification of Salmonella enterica using two rapid tests. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10:649-651.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Ruiz, J., M. L. Nunez, J. Diaz, I. Lorente, J. Perez, and J. Gomez. 1996. Comparison of five plating media for isolation of Salmonella species from human stools. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:686-688.[Abstract]
  29. Teti, G., N. M. Burdash, C. Zamboni, C. Fava, F. Tomasello, and P. Mastroeni. 1984. Evaluation of a rapid method to exclude the presence of certain enteric pathogens in stool specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 20:1049-1052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2003, p. 1130-1134, Vol. 41, No. 3
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.3.1130-1134.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perez, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freydiere, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perez, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Freydiere, A. M.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS