JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luna, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cattani, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luna, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cattani, J.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2003, p. 1252-1255, Vol. 41, No. 3
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.3.1252-1255.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Novel Sample Preparation Method for Safe and Rapid Detection of Bacillus anthracis Spores in Environmental Powders and Nasal Swabs

Vicki A. Luna,1* Debra King,1 Carisa Davis,1 Tony Rycerz,1 Matthew Ewert,1 Andrew Cannons,1 Philip Amuso,1,2 and Jacqueline Cattani1

Center for Biological Defense, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida,1 Bureau of Laboratories, Florida Department of Health, Tampa, Florida 336122

Received 2 August 2002/ Returned for modification 16 November 2002/ Accepted 23 November 2002


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
Bacillus anthracis spores have been used as a biological weapon in the United States. We wanted to develop a safe, rapid method of sample preparation that provided safe DNA for the detection of spores in environmental and clinical specimens. Our method reproducibly detects B. anthracis in samples containing <10 spores.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
Bacillus anthracis spores, a recent threat, can remain dormant for years while retaining full virulence (5, 10, 13, 20, 21, 22; S. Endicott, E. Hagerman, and M. Furmanski, Letter, JAMA 284:561-562, 2000). Powders and environmental samples, the most common nonclinical specimens, and nasopharyngeal swabs are submitted to designated laboratories in the national Laboratory Response Network (LRN), which has facilities to work safely on the specimens (6, 19, 23). High numbers of specimen can overwhelm a laboratory's capability and capacity to perform the tests in a timely fashion. From October to December 2001, the Florida Department of Health's three LRN laboratories each received hundreds of samples per day, which revealed the need for a method to render the samples harmless so the DNA could be safely extracted under biological safety level 2 conditions, to alleviate the bottleneck, and to decrease the turnaround time to the final result. Specimens may contain <10 spores, and the isolation and identification of B. anthracis may take days (5, 15). The purpose of this work was to develop a method of sample preparation that would provide safe DNA for the detection of <=10 B. anthracis spores.

Previous studies used sonication probes in open tubes and cartridges to hold samples, a method that necessitated the use of a biological safety level 3 environment and sterilization between each sample preparation (2, 3, 7). Dang et al. demonstrated that DNA from autoclaved spores was usable for PCR assays (9). No one explored the sensitivity of these methods or if combinations of methods could be used.

(A preliminary report of this work has been presented previously [V. A. Luna, M. S. Robeson, M. Ewert, P. Amuso, A. Cannons, C. Davis, L. Heller, D. King, K. K. Peak, A. Rycerz, D. Wingfield, J. Cattani, Abstr. 102nd Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C-256, 2002].)

Spore suspensions of B. anthracis Pasteur (BC 3132) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga., were vortexed for 5 min, centrifuged at 16,000 x g, and washed with PBS (pH 7.4) (Fisher, Pittsburgh, Pa.) containing 0.01% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical, St. Louis, Mo.) (1). This process was repeated three times. The final centrifugation at 300 x g for 1 min produced a supernatant of single, nonaggregated spores. Light microscopy confirmed aggregate dissolution of the spores. Tenfold dilutions were made, and concentrations were confirmed by multiple cultures on blood agar (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) incubated at 30°C for up to 48 h. The bacteria isolated from powders were identified by standard biochemical tests (12, 15) and the API/CH50 and API 20E tests (bioMérieux, St. Louis, Mo.) according to the manufacturer's directions.

Dilutions (106 to 100 CFU) in 300 µl of Trypticase soy broth (TSB) (BD Biosciences, Sparks, Md.) were processed in screw-top, autoclavable 1.5-ml tubes by (i) autoclaving (121°C, 20 min), (ii) sonication (0, 10, 30, or 60 min) in a model 1500 sonicator (Branson Ultrasonics Corp., Danbury, Conn.), (iii) autoclaving and sonication (0, 10, 30, or 60 min), or (iv) sonication, autoclaving, and heat shock (60 or 80°C) for 2 and 10 min followed by 1 h of incubation at 30°C (11, 15). Each protocol was tested with 20 to 30 sets of a series of seven 10-fold dilutions (100 to 106 CFU/sample); after the dilutions were processed, the DNA was concentrated and tested in triplicate. Aliquots (50 µl) plated unto blood agar plates before and after processing were incubated for up to 4 days. The negative controls contained only PBS or TSB.

B. anthracis genomic DNA was extracted either with a MasterPure DNA purification kit (Epicenter, Madison, Wis.) or manually (4). Sample DNA was extracted with MagNaPure (Roche, Indianapolis, Ind.) and concentrated tenfold by using Microcon PCR centrifugal filters (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.).

For the PCR, we used as a target the chromosomal Ba813 (EMBL accession no. U46157) that is present in all B. anthracis isolates and that is used by the LRN (8, 16, 17, 18, 23). We used ABI PRISM 7700 Gene Express (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) to design the following primers and probe: BaFW1 (5'AAT-TTG-AAG-CAT-TAA-CGA-GTT 3'), BaREV2 (5' TTC-TTT-CTG-ACT-TGG-AAT-AGC 3'), and C1 (5' GCC-AGG-TTC-TAT-ACC-GTA-TCA-GCA-A 3'). C1 was labeled with a FAM (6-carboxy-fluorescein) reporter and a TAMRA (6-carboxy-tetramethyl-rhodamine) quencher for direct PCR product detection during the reaction. For tests with the ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detector, each reaction mixture contained 10 µl of template; 0.30 pmol of primers; 0.10 pmol of probe; 25 µl of a master mixture (Applied Biosystems) containing Taq DNA polymerase, Tris-HCl, KCl, MgCl2, and nucleotides; and enough sterile deionized water to achieve a total volume of 50 µl. Amplification conditions were 95°C (10 min) and 50 cycles of 95°C (15 s), 50°C (1 min), and 60°C (1 min). Each LightCycler (Roche) reaction mixture contained 2 µl of template, 0.6 pmol of primers, 0.05 pmol of probe, 2 µl of a master mixture, and enough H2O to obtain a total volume of 20 µl. Amplification conditions were 95°C (4 min); 50 cycles of 95°C (10 s), 50°C (15 s) and 60°C (15 s); and an extension at 40°C (1 min). Prior tests with Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis American Type Culture Collection strains were negative. Positive or negative controls were B. anthracis and water or B. cereus ATCC 11778, respectively. Samples were tested in triplicate. To determine the reproducibility of the optimal preparation method, 22 sets of a series of five dilutions (104 to 100 CFU/sample) were made and processed. Eight to 10 µl of DNA from each dilution was used as a template and tested ten times.

Dry, sterile, synthetic-tipped swabs (Copan Diagnostics Inc., Corona, Calif.) were used by four adult volunteers on different days to self-collect 171 nasopharyngeal secretion specimens. The nasal secretion-soaked swabs received either 10 µl of PBS or 5.5 to 10 µl of suspension to yield <=10 to 15,000 spores/sample and then were placed into 300 µl of TSB and processed by the optimal method. Aliquots (50 µl) were cultured and held for 3 days.

Sterile synthetic swabs were dipped into one of three solutions: PBS, PBS with 0.01% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich), or PBS with 0.01% Tween 20 and 0.03% lecithin (Sigma-Aldrich). The swabs, coated with 0.0025 to 0.005 g of powder (baking powder, baking soda, cornstarch, flour, or talcum) and 5.5 to 10 µl of spore suspension (<=10 to 15,000 spores), were placed into 300 µl of TSB (with a minimum of 200 samples per powder), processed, and tested in triplicate. Chi-square statistical tests analyzed the different solutions. Powders (n = 33) received by the Florida Department of Health Tampa Laboratory were cultured and processed in duplicate. For four of the culture-negative powders, a third set of swabs was spiked with spore suspensions.

Our results show that DNA that was only autoclaved did not produce reliably sensitive results. Samples that received only sonication allowed PCR detection of 10 to 100 spores but contained viable spores (Table 1). When autoclaving and sonication were combined, irrespective of order, there was a slight improvement in the overall results (Table 1). After heat shock (2 min, 80°C) was administered prior to sonication and autoclaving, the PCR assay detected target DNA at <=10 spores/sample (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Comparison of sample preparation methods for DNA extraction and PCRa

 
The ABI PRISM 7700 and LightCycler assays detected the target sequence in 6.45 and 2.58 pg of whole-cell DNA, respectively. After the DNA was concentrated to one-half to one-third of the total volume, the PCR assay consistently identified samples containing <=10 spores regardless of powder type or presence (Table 2). No interference was seen. The sensitivities and specificities of the solutions were as follows: PBS only, 99.3 and 99%, respectively; PBS-Tween, 82.9 and 99%; and PBS-Tween-lecithin, 84.3 and 97%. Chi-square analysis (P < 0.05) gave P values of 0.0247 for PBS versus PBS-Tween, 0.0020 for PBS versus PBS-Tween-lecithin, and 0.1546 for PBS-Tween versus PBS-Tween-lecithin. All nasopharyngeal samples with >=10 spores were identified. Due to poor sampling distribution, we could not accurately determine the true sensitivity and specificity of samples with <10 spores.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. PCR detection of lowest number of spores in powders and nasal specimens

 
Of the 33 powders, results for 17 (51.5%) were negative by PCR and culture (Table 3). Thirteen (39.3%) PCR-negative powders grew infrequent to many numbers of colonies of Bacillus species. The remaining 3 (9.1%) PCR-positive powders grew a variety of Bacillus spp. (no B. anthracis) upon multiple cultures. When individually tested, one isolate (B. cereus) from each powder was PCR positive. The presence of Ba813 in B. cereus has previously been reported and demonstrates the importance of testing for the virulence plasmids in current LRN protocols (17, 18, 19, 23).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Detection of spores by PCR and culture in unknown environmental powders submitted to Florida Department of Health analysis

 
A combination of heat shock, sonication, and autoclaving, followed by sample concentration, allows the detection of <=10 B. anthracis spores and infrequent Ba813-positive isolates in nasal specimens and powders in a reproducible, sensitive, simple, and safe method. Automated DNA extraction allows high throughput without cross-contamination. Real-time PCR shortens turnaround time to <=6 h. Because current LRN protocols split specimens for culture and molecular tests, sampling distribution errors are possible in specimens with infrequent (1 to 2) spores. All positive culture or PCR results would be sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for further examination.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by DOD contract number DAAD13-01C-0043.

We are grateful to Loree Heller for discussions and reviews.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Biological Defense, University of South Florida, 3602 Spectrum Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612. Phone: (813) 974-3873. Fax: (813) 974-1479. E-mail: vluna{at}bt.usf.edu. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Abolmaaty, A., C. Vu, J. Oliver, and R. E. Levin. 2000. Development of a new lysis solution for releasing genomic DNA from bacterial cells for DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction. Microbios 101:181-189.[Medline]
  2. Belgrader, P., D. Hansford, G. T. A. Kovacs, K. Venkateswaran, R. Mariella, Jr., F. Milanovich, S. Nasarabadi, M. Okuzumi, F. Pourahmadi, and M. A. Northrup. 1999. A minisonicator to rapidly disrupt bacterial spores for DNA analysis. Anal. Chem. 71:4232-4236.[Medline]
  3. Belgrader, P., M. Okuzumi, F. Pourahmadi, D. A. Borkholder and M. A. Northrup. 2000. A microfluidic cartridge to prepare spores for PCR analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 14:849-852.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Boom, R., C. J. A. Sol, M. M. M. Salimans, C. L. Jansen, P. M. E. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. van der Noordaa. 1990. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:495-503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001. Interim guidelines for investigation of and response to Bacillus anthracis exposures. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 50:987-990.[Medline]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001. Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax and interim guidelines for exposure management and antimicrobial therapy, October 2001. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 50:909-919.[Medline]
  7. Chandler, D. P., J. Brown, J. Bruckner-Lea, L. Olson, G. J. Posakony, J. R. Stults, N. B. Alentive, and L. J. Bond. 2001. Continuous spore disruption using gradually focused, high-frequency ultrasound. Anal. Chem. 73:3784-3789.[Medline]
  8. Daffonchio, D., S. Borin, G. Frova, R. Gallo, E. Mori, R. Fani, and C. Sorlini. 1999. A randomly amplified polymorphic DNA marker specific for the Bacillus cereus group is diagnostic for Bacillus anthracis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1298-1303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dang, J. L., K. Heroux, J. Kearney, A. Arasteh, M. Gostomski, and P. A. Emanuel. 2001. Bacillus spore inactivation methods affect detection assays. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:3665-3670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dixon, T. C., M. Meselson, J. Guillemin, and P. C. Hanna. 1999. Anthrax. N. Engl. J. Med. 341:815-826.[Free Full Text]
  11. Helmann, J. D., M. F. W. Wu, P. A. Kobel, F.-J. Gamo, M. Wilson, M. M. Morshedi, M. Navre, and C. Paddon. 2001. Global transcriptional response of Bacillus subtilis to heat shock. J. Bacteriol. 183:7318-7328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Holt, J. G., N. R. Krieg, P. H. A. Sneath, J. T. Staley, and S. T. Williams. 1993. Endospore-forming gram positive rods and cocci, p. 559-564. In J. G. Holt et al. (ed.), Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.
  13. Inglesby, T., D. A. Henderson, J. G. Bartlett, M. S. Ascher, E. Eitzen, A. M. Friedlander, J. Hauer, J. McDade, M. T. Osterholm, T. O'Toole, G. Pareker, T. M. Perl, P. K. Russell, and K. Tonat for the Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. 1999. Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 281:1735-1745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Inglesby, T., T. O'Toole, D. A. Henderson, J. G. Bartlett, M. S. Ascher, E. Eitzen, A. M. Friedlander, J. Gerberding, J. Hauer, J. Jughes, J. McDade, M. T. Osterholm, G. Parker, T. M. Perl, P. K. Russell, and K. Tonat for the Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. 2002. Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management. JAMA 287:2236-2251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Logan, N. A., and P. C. B. Turnbull. 1999. Bacillus and recently derived genera, p. 357-369. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken, (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
  16. Patra, G., P. Sylvestre, V. Ramisse, J. Therasse, and J. Guesdon. 1996. Isolation of a specific chromosomic DNA sequence of Bacillus anthracis and its possible use in diagnosis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 15:223-231.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Patra, G., J. Vaissaire, M. Weber-Levy, C. Le Doujet, and M. Mock. 1998. Molecular characterization of Bacillus strains involved in outbreaks of anthrax in France in 1997. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3412-3414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ramisse, V., G. Patra, J. Vaissaire, and M. Mock. 1999. The Ba813 chromosomal DNA sequence effectively traces the whole Bacillus anthracis community. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87:224-228.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Ramisse, V., G. Patra, H. Garrigue, J. L. Guesdon, and M. Mock. 1996. Identification and characterization of Bacillus anthracis by multiplex PCR analysis of sequences on plasmids pX01 and pX02 and chromosomal DNA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 145:9-16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Redmond, C., M. J. Pearce, R. J. Manchee, and B. P. Berdal. 1998. Deadly relic of the great war. Nature 393:747-748.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Van Ness, G. B. 1971. Ecology of anthrax. Science 172:1303-1307.[Free Full Text]
  22. Zilinskas, R. A. 1997. Iraq's biological weapons: the past and future? JAMA 278:418-424.[Abstract]
  23. Weyant, R. S., J. W. Ezzell, and T. Popovic. 10 December 2001, posting date. Level B Laboratory procedure for the identification of Bacillus anthracis, p. 47-64. In K. Q. Lindsey and S. A. Morse (ed.), Laboratory protocols for bioterrorism response laboratories for the identification of Bacillus anthracis. [Online.] http://www.LRNB.cdc.gov.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2003, p. 1252-1255, Vol. 41, No. 3
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.3.1252-1255.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luna, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cattani, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luna, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cattani, J.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS