Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2003, p. 1337-1338, Vol. 41, No. 3
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.3.1337-1338.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Bacteremia Caused by Acinetobacter ursingii
Julien Loubinoux,1* Liliana Mihaila-Amrouche,1 Anne Le Fleche,2 Etienne Pigne,3 Gerard Huchon,3 Patrick A. D. Grimont,2 and Anne Bouvet1
Service de Microbiologie,1
Service de Pneumologie, Hôtel Dieu Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VI, 75181 Paris Cedex 04,3
Centre d'Identification Moléculaire des Bactéries, Unité de Biodiversité des Bactéries Pathogenes Emergentes, U 389 INSERM, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France2
Received 12 August 2002/
Returned for modification 10 October 2002/
Accepted 15 December 2002

ABSTRACT
Acinetobacter ursingii has not been reported in infectious processes
apart from its recent description as a new species. A bacteremia
caused by
A. ursingii in a patient with a pulmonary adenocarcinoma
confirms that this microorganism is an opportunistic human pathogen.
The isolate was susceptible to imipenem, aminoglycosides, rifampin,
and fluoroquinolones.

CASE REPORT
A 63-year-old man presenting with a pulmonary adenocarcinoma
diagnosed in July 2001 was admitted to the University Hospital
Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France. A fifth course of intravenous
chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (50 mg/m
2 of body area)
and vinorelbine (30 mg/m
2) was initiated through a catheter
chamber, which had been implanted 12 weeks earlier. The patient
had received corticosteroids for 2 months because of thoracic
pain due to tumoral compression. On the day following admission
(day 1), his condition deteriorated with fever (39.5°C)
and chills associated with an increase of white blood cell count
(15
x 10
3 cells per µl with 90% neutrophils), C-reactive
protein (9.5 mg/dl), and fibrinogen (0.51 mg/dl). Thus, he received
cefotaxime (3 g per day) and gentamicin (180 mg per day) for
2 days. Urine analysis was normal. The chest X ray and the abdominal
and cardiac echography were not modified. A strain of an
Acinetobacter sp. was isolated from five blood samples, including two obtained
from the catheter chamber. The catheter chamber was removed,
but its culture was sterile. On day 3, the antimicrobial therapy
was changed to imipenem (2 g per day) and amikacin (900 mg per
day) for 2 weeks according to the susceptibility of the strain.
On day 5, rifampin (1.2 g per day) was added as the patient
remained febrile. On day 7, the patient was apyretic, with normalization
of white blood cell count and C-reactive protein.
Blood samples were inoculated in aerobic and anaerobic blood culture vials (BACTEC PLUS; BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Md.). Aerobic vials were positive and were subcultured on nutrient agar at 37°C. After 24 h of incubation, colonies were 1 to 1.5 mm in diameter, circular, convex, smooth, and slightly opaque with entire margins. Staining of the bacteria showed gram-negative coccobacilli. Growth in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth was observed at 37°C but not at 41 and 44°C. The microorganism (isolate 954) was nonmotile, strictly aerobic, and oxidase negative. It grew on MacConkey agar (colorless colonies), was nonhemolytic on sheep blood agar, did not oxidize D-glucose, did not reduce nitrate, and was urease and gelatinase negative. In an attempt to identify this isolate, the strips API 20 NE and API ID 32 GN (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) were used as recommended by the manufacturer. The repeated bacterial identifications obtained with API 20 NE and API ID 32 GN strips were Acinetobacter junii or Acinetobacter johnsonii (code no. 0000071; percentage of identification [p] = 63.5%; index of typicity [T] = 0.77) and A. johnsonii (code no. 00270063062; p = 90.5%; T = 0.87), respectively. These results prompted us to determine the 16S rRNA gene (16S ribosomal DNA [rDNA]) sequence of the isolate as previously described (3, 6). Briefly, the 16S rDNA was amplified by PCR with the primers Ad (5'-AGAGTTTGATC[A,C]TGGCTCAG-3') and rJ (5'-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3'). A total of 1,484 continuous nucleotides of 16S rDNA were determined. The complete 16S rDNA sequence of the isolate was compared to all bacterial sequences available from the GenBank database by using the Blast program (National Center for Biotechnology Information) and showed 99% similarity to that of the type strain of Acinetobacter ursingii (GenBank accession no. AJ275038). 16S rDNA sequences from phylogenetically related strains were obtained from the GenBank database. All 16S rDNA sequences were aligned with CLUSTAL X, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by using DENDROGRAF, a program of the Taxotron package (Taxolab Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) (Fig. 1). Antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolate was determined by the agar diffusion method using the Epsilometer test (E test; AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) on Mueller-Hinton agar as recommended by the manufacturer. MIC results were as follows: amoxicillin, 16 µg/ml; piperacillin, 12 µg/ml; cefotaxime, 32 µg/ml; cefepime, 24 µg/ml; ceftazidime, 128 µg/ml; imipenem, 0.125 µg/ml; gentamicin, 0.25 µg/ml; amikacin, 1 µg/ml; tobramycin, 0.5 µg/ml; rifampin, 3 µg/ml; ciprofloxacin, 0.19 µg/ml. An assay for the detection of beta-lactamase by using a nitrocefin disk (BD Cefinase; BD Diagnostic Systems) was positive.
Members of the genus
Acinetobacter belong to the gamma subdivision
of the class
Proteobacteria. In 1986, Bouvet and Grimont described
four new species of
Acinetobacter, namely,
Acinetobacter baumannii,
Acinetobacter haemolyticus,
A. johnsonii, and
A. junii (
2).
In addition, these authors emended the descriptions of two other
species,
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and
Acinetobacter lwoffii.
In 1988,
Acinetobacter radioresistens, from the environment,
was described (
9). More recently,
A. ursingii and
Acinetobacter schindleri, isolated from human clinical specimens, have been
delineated (
7,
8). Thus, at present, the genus
Acinetobacter consists of the above nine species. However, this remains insufficient
to name all the members of this genus, as shown by the 21 different
DNA groups (genomospecies) previously reported (
5). In clinical
laboratories, the identification of nonfermentative gram-negative
rods is usually carried out by using identification systems
such as the API 20 NE and the API ID 32 GN strips (bioMérieux).
A. baumannii, the most frequent species of
Acinetobacter involved
in nosocomial infections, is easily identified with these systems.
However, the discriminative power of the tests using API strips
has been shown to be insufficient for accurate identification
of the other species of
Acinetobacter (
1). In the present case,
the preliminary misidentification was due to the absence of
A. ursingii in the databases of the API 20 NE and API ID 32
GN strips. Additional phenotypic tests, such as growth in BHI
broth at 37 and 41°C and oxidization of glutarate and
L-aspartate,
may help to differentiate
A. ursingii from
A. junii and
A. johnsonii (Table
1).
Acinetobacter species are commonly isolated from the environment
and may also be isolated from humans (skin and mucous membranes)
(
10). During the last 2 decades, they have emerged as nosocomial
pathogens. In debilitated patients, they may be responsible
for severe and fatal infections involving the respiratory tract,
the urinary tract, and wounds (including catheter sites). Risk
factors for infection include serious underlying disease such
as cancer, intravascular or intravesical catheterization, treatment
with broad-spectrum antibiotics or corticosteroids, prolonged
hospital stay, and stay in intensive care units. Due to their
prolonged survival in the environment,
Acinetobacter species
may spread among patients and cause hospital-associated outbreaks
(
4,
11). In the present case, the pulmonary adenocarcinoma and
the corticosteroid administration were two major risk factors
for the dissemination of
A. ursingii in blood. Although
A. ursingii has been isolated solely from humans, its natural habitat is
not known. We assume that this isolate colonized the patient's
skin and that the intravascular catheterization triggered its
spread to the bloodstream. The accurate identification of the
species of
Acinetobacter is important for epidemiological and
therapeutic reasons. Improvement of the taxonomy and of the
methods of identification must be taken into account when analyzing
previous studies, which often used names or methods no longer
valid. The
Acinetobacter species involved in human infections
and their antimicrobial susceptibilities remain partly undetermined.
A. ursingii has not been reported in infectious processes apart
from its recent description as a new species (
8). However, this
species may have the same medical importance as our isolate.
Indeed, out of the 29 strains reported in the literature, 13
were isolated from the blood of patients suffering from severe
underlying disease. Furthermore,
A. ursingii strains may have
the potential to spread to other patients, as demonstrated by
molecular typing (
7). For these reasons, clinical microbiologists
must be aware of the opportunistic pathogenicity of this newly
described species, which deserves further studies to determine
its prevalence in humans.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Service de Microbiologie, Hôtel Dieu, 1 place du Parvis Notre-Dame, 75181 Paris Cedex 04, France. Phone: (33) 1 42 34 82 73. Fax: (33) 1 42 34 87 19. E-mail:
j.loubinoux{at}voila.fr.


REFERENCES
1 - Bernards, A. T., J. van der Toorn, C. P. van Boven, and L. Dijkshoorn. 1996. Evaluation of the ability of a commercial system to identify Acinetobacter genomic species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:303-308.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Bouvet, P. J. M., and P. A. D. Grimont. 1986. Taxonomy of the genus Acinetobacter with the recognition of Acinetobacter baumannii sp. nov., Acinetobacter haemolyticus sp. nov., Acinetobacter johnsonii sp. nov., and Acinetobacter junii sp. nov. and emended description of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter lwoffii. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 36:228-240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Edwards, U., T. Rogall, H. Blöcker, M. Emde, and E. C. Böttger. 1989. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7843-7853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Gouby, A., M.-J. Carles-Nurit, N. Bouziges, G. Bourg, R. Mesnard, and P. J. M. Bouvet. 1992. Use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for investigation of hospital outbreaks of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1588-1591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Ibrahim, A., P. Gerner-Smidt, and W. Liesack. 1997. Phylogenetic relationship of the twenty-one DNA groups of the genus Acinetobacter as revealed by 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:837-841.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Janvier, M., and P. A. D. Grimont. 1995. The genus Methylophaga, a new line of descent within phylogenetic branch
of Proteobacteria. Res. Microbiol. 146:543-550.[Medline]
7 - Nemec, A., L. Dijkshoorn, and P. Jezek. 2000. Recognition of two novel phenons of the genus Acinetobacter among non-glucose-acidifying isolates from human specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3937-3941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Nemec, A., T. De Baere, I. Tjernberg, M. Vaneechoutte, T. J. K. van der Reijden, and L. Dijkshoorn. 2001. Acinetobacter ursingii sp. nov. and Acinetobacter schindleri sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51:1891-1899.[Abstract]
9 - Nishimura, Y., T. Ino, and H. Hzuka. 1988. Acinetobacter radioresistens sp. nov. isolated from cotton and soil. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 38:209-211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Seifert, H., L. Dijkshoorn, P. Gerner-Smidt, N. Pelzer, I. Tjernberg, and M. Vaneechoutte. 1997. Distribution of Acinetobacter species on human skin: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic identification methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2819-2825.[Abstract]
11 - Wendt, C., B. Dietze, E. Dietz, and H. Rüden. 1997. Survival of Acinetobacter baumannii on dry surfaces. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1394-1397.[Abstract]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2003, p. 1337-1338, Vol. 41, No. 3
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.3.1337-1338.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
de la Tabla Ducasse, V. O., Gonzalez, C. M., Saez-Nieto, J. A., Gutierrez, F.
(2008). First case of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography bacteraemia caused by Acinetobacter ursingii in a patient with choledocholithiasis and cholangitis. J Med Microbiol
57: 1170-1171
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kilic, A., Li, H., Mellmann, A., Basustaoglu, A. C., Kul, M., Senses, Z., Aydogan, H., Stratton, C. W., Harmsen, D., Tang, Y.-W.
(2008). Acinetobacter septicus sp. nov. Association with a Nosocomial Outbreak of Bacteremia in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 902-908
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dortet, L., Legrand, P., Soussy, C.-J., Cattoir, V.
(2006). Bacterial Identification, Clinical Significance, and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Acinetobacter ursingii and Acinetobacter schindleri, Two Frequently Misidentified Opportunistic Pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 4471-4478
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rodriguez-Bano, J., Marti, S., Ribera, A., Fernandez-Cuenca, F., Dijkshoorn, L., Nemec, A., Pujol, M., Vila, J.
(2006). Nosocomial Bacteremia Due to an As Yet Unclassified Acinetobacter Genomic Species 17-Like Strain. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 1587-1589
[Abstract]
[Full Text]