Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2003, p. 1480-1485, Vol. 41, No. 4
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1480-1485.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Enteric Products, Inc., Stony Brook, New York,1 Department of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo,2 Department of Gastroenterology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan,3 Veterans Administration Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas4
Received 25 September 2002/ Returned for modification 5 December 2002/ Accepted 14 January 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The heterogeneity of H. pylori strains has been well documented, with considerable variation in the prevalence of specific strains between isolates from East Asia and Western countries (e.g., between North America and East Asia, in particular, Korea, China, and Japan) (2, 6, 10, 14-17, 23, 28). Heterogeneity related to these geographic areas has also been described with regard to virulence factors such as cagA, vacA, and iceA. Strains from East Asia have been reported to have these virulence factors at a very high frequency, often exceeding 90%, whereas in the United States the frequency of strains with these virulence factors appears to be lower (1, 5). The success of immunoassay depends on the use of antigens present in H. pylori strains that predominate among the population being evaluated (3, 18, 29).
The HM-CAP EIA for immunoglobulin G antibodies to H. pylori (Enteric Products, Inc.) has previously been shown to be an accurate and reliable method for detection of H. pylori infection (21). This assay is based on high-molecular-weight cell-associated antigen HM-CAP (9). The high-molecular-weight antigens are highly conserved complexes with important conformational determinants that are composed of both subunits of urease (UreA and UreB) and the Hsp60 chaperonin (7, 8, 20, 26). This study was designed to determine whether EIAs based on the high-molecular-weight antigens derived from bacterial isolates obtained from the United States and Japan would demonstrate differences in performance between U.S. and Japanese populations.
|
|
|---|
(ii) U.S. samples characterized by UBT.
A total of 109 patients residing in the Houston, Tex., metropolitan area were included in this study. Patients were evaluated at the Texas Medical Center facilities in Houston. This group included asymptomatic volunteers as well as symptomatic patients who had been referred for endoscopy. Enrollment in the study was based on previously described criteria (11). Each patient provided information on a screening questionnaire that included demographic information, medical history, frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms, and history of use of medications within the preceding 2 months, specifically, antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, H2 blockers, bismuth-containing compounds, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Subjects were excluded from the study if they regularly used antacids or antibiotics. The H. pylori status of all 109 patients was confirmed by the 13C-urea breath test (UBT; Meretek, Nashville, Tenn.). A result of greater than 2.4
was considered positive for H. pylori infection. A blood sample was drawn at the time of breath testing. The serum was separated and frozen at -70°C until use.
(iii) U.S. samples uncharacterized with regard to H. pylori infection status. An additional 136 serum samples were obtained from a licensed blood center (Millennium Biotech, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.) for testing. These samples had not previously been characterized with regard to H. pylori infection status.
(iv) Characterized Japanese samples.
A total of 288 serum samples from Japanese populations were included in this study, including 179 serum samples from the Hyogo College of Medicine and 109 samples from Hokkaido University. Biopsy for histological analysis and UBT were performed for all Japanese patients. The UBT was performed as follows: 100 mg of 13C-labeled urea was given, breath samples were collected before ingestion of the labeled urea and 20 min after ingestion, and the samples were analyzed by mass spectroscopy by using a positive cutoff of 2.5
(27). Patients were considered positive for H. pylori infection if either UBT or histology was positive. Patients were considered negative for infection if both UBT and histology were negative. For both medical centers, patients were excluded from the study if they had a history of use of antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, H2 blockers, or bismuth-containing compounds within the preceding 2 months. Blood was drawn at the time of UBT, and the serum was separated and frozen at -70°C until use.
H. pylori clinical isolates and culture conditions. Four clinical isolates from four Japanese patients from Hokkaido University were used for culture. The isolate identification and the disease state of the patients from whom they were obtained were as follows: isolate 159A, gastric ulcer; isolate 193C, gastric cancer; isolate 198C, gastric ulcer; isolate 225C, nonulcer dyspepsia. One clinical isolate from a Caucasian U.S. resident was from the Baylor College of Medicine. The patient from whom this strain was isolated was diagnosed with a gastric ulcer. The bacterial isolate was genotyped and positive for both the vacA and the cagA virulence factors.
All isolates were grown on serum agar plates containing 6.25% horse serum. Confluent cultures were subsequently scaled up in tryptic soy broth containing 10% horse serum. The bacteria were cultured for 2 to 3 days at 37°C under microaerophilic conditions of 10% CO2 and 95% relative humidity. Bacterial colonies were confirmed to be H. pylori on the basis of Gram staining and catalase, oxidase and urease testing performed upon initial culture, at each passage thereafter, and upon final harvest. The culture of each isolate was strictly segregated from the others.
Preparation of antigen. H. pylori broth cultures were harvested, and the high-molecular-weight cell-associated (HM-CAP) antigen was isolated from each clinical isolate cultured as described by Evans et al. (9). Culture and isolation of all isolates were performed in a single laboratory.
In order to evaluate potential variability in the culture and antigen isolation process and to compare this variability to the variability that might be observed between antigens obtained from the different clinical isolates, replicate batches of HM-CAP antigen were produced. Two batches of antigen were produced from Japanese clinical isolate 159A; these are referred to as batches 159A,1 and 159A,2. All HM-CAP antigens from Japanese isolates were designated JHM-CAP antigen. In addition, two batches of antigen were produced from U.S. isolate 8826. One batch of antigen from U.S. isolate 8826, batch 197SR, was previously used in the manufacture of commercially distributed kits. This batch was designated the U.S. standard HM-CAP antigen lot. The second batch of antigen from U.S. isolate 8826 was manufactured for use in this study exclusively and is referred to as batch 8826A.
In order to compare population antibody responses to antigen derived from a single Japanese H. pylori strain and antigen pooled from all four Japanese isolates, an antigen pool was manufactured, consisting of equal portions of each JHM-CAP antigen isolated from four clinical isolates, isolates 159A, 193C, 198C, and 225C. This pool was designated the JHM-CAP antigen pool.
In summary, a total of 8 H. pylori antigens were manufactured for this study: six JHM-CAP antigen batches (batches 159A,1-J, 159A,2-J, 193C-J, 198C-J, 225C-J, and JHM-CAP pool) and two HM-CAP antigen batches (batches 197SR-US and 8826A-US).
HM-CAP EIA for immunoglobulin G antibodies to H. pylori. (i) Kits. Eight separate lots of EIA kits were manufactured by using each of the HM-CAP or JHM-CAP antigens described above. These kits were manufactured, and quality control was performed in accordance with the proprietary protocols of Enteric Products, Inc., used for its commercially marketed EIA kit. All kits passed the quality control specifications of Enteric Products, Inc.
(ii) EIA. All EIAs were performed and interpreted in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer. In order to eliminate any variability or potential error observed in assay results due to preparation of the initial 1:101 dilution of the serum sample, bulk dilutions were prepared by adding 50 µl of serum to 5.0 ml of kit buffer for all serum samples: 109 U.S. characterized samples, 136 U.S. uncharacterized samples, and 288 Japanese samples. These bulk dilutions were used throughout the study, so that the results for each kit were derived from the same 1:101 dilution of the sample. The EIA kit cutoffs used were those recommended by the manufacturer and were as follows: positive, >2.2 EV (enzyme immunoassay value); indeterminate, 1.8 to 2.2 EV; and negative, <1.8 EV.
Data analysis. The test results for samples with results in the indeterminate zone were excluded from calculation of EIA performance parameters of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. However, the results for these samples were included in the correlation analysis. The performance parameters for each of the eight kits were calculated for U.S. and Japanese populations versus reference method data by using all serum sample results with the exception of the 136 samples from a U.S. blood center, for which no reference method data existed. Correlation analysis was performed by comparing EIA results observed for each kit to those observed for the U.S. standard antigen 197SR-US. In order to obtain EIA performance parameters based on a larger number of U.S. samples, correlation analysis was based on the entire U.S. population of 245 samples.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. EIA performance with samples from the U.S. populationa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. EIA performance with samples from the Japanese populationa
|
In order to further investigate the trends in the EIA results, a box plot analysis was performed with the EVs obtained with each antigen with isolates from both the U.S. and the Japanese populations (Fig. 1 and 2). The EV is dependent on both the titer of specific antibody and its affinity for the antigens. Box plots were generated for isolates from both groups in order of increasing sensitivity observed with each antigen prepared from isolates from the Japanese population, with U.S. HM-CAP 197SR-US followed by JHM-CAP 193C charting first and second and giving the lowest median positive EVs for samples from both UBT-positive U.S. and Japanese populations. For the Japanese population, a clear trend toward increased EVs for UBT-positive samples was observed as the sensitivity increased, with the JHM-CAP pool, 225C, and 198C antigens giving the highest median EVs. Replicate JHM-CAP lots 159A,1 and 159A,2 gave distributions for positive samples that were between those for the other antigens. In addition, the range of positive results was broader for antigens 197SR-US and 193C and became tighter as the sensitivity and the median EV for the samples from the UBT-positive groups increased. For the samples from the U.S. population, again, HM-CAP antigens 197SR-US and 193C also gave lower median EVs and slightly broader distributions compared to the results obtained with the other antigens.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Distribution of EV results by UBT status for 109 U.S. samples.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Distribution of EV results by UBT status for 288 Japanese samples.
|
|
|
|---|
Other studies have reported on the relatively poor performance of Western antigen-based serology with samples from Asian groups. Leung et al. (19) reported on the poor performances of three commercial kits, including the HM-CAP kit, when biopsy and UBT combined was used as the reference method for a group of 80 Chinese patients. Kim et al. (18) in a study of Korean patients, reported on the poor performance of four Western EIA kits compared to that of an in-house EIA when biopsy was used as the reference method. However, additional Western blotting of sera with discrepant results by EIA against sonicates of H. pylori antigen preparations from four separate strains, including strains from Korea, did not explain the variable performances of these samples, suggesting that the observed differences in kit performance were not due to strain variation or were due to conformational structures that could not be determined by Western blotting. As noted before, besides the technical factors related to test kit preparation and performance, the accuracies reported for serological tests are markedly influenced by the histological techniques used to determine the presence or absence of active H. pylori infection as well as those used to estimate the proportion of individuals with prior H. pylori infection (12, 24).
Interpretation of the results of many prior studies is difficult because the evaluations were not standardized in design and did not include a direct comparison of the performance of the assay(s) for the group for which the kit was originally validated and the performance of the assay(s) for the group under evaluation. In general, it has been reported that the in-house EIA was best, but this has rarely been tested in a prospective blinded evaluation. No prior studies have evaluated the performance of the bacterial antigen derived from H. pylori isolates obtained from the locale and the population under study compared with that of the antigen used in the kit under investigation to be able to directly assess whether H. pylori strain differences are indeed responsible for possible differences in the performances observed. We based our evaluations on a commercially available kit using a partially purified, complex, but well-characterized antigen preparation, HM-CAP, comprised virtually exclusively of the UreA and UreB subunits and the associated chaperonin, Hsp60. The HM-CAP antigen complex retains conformational epitopes that cannot be demonstrated by standard Western blotting techniques that denature the tertiary protein structure. Although there is considerable antigenic diversity of H. pylori strains across and within geographic locales, the human serological response has been reported to be equally diverse. However, major H. pylori antigens, including the urease and Hsp60 antigens, are conserved and recognized by sera from all locales, suggesting a core conserved serological response (15). Kim et al. (18) performed sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis with whole-cell sonicates of five H. pylori strains, including Western and Korean isolates, and reported that the major protein bands were present in all strains, including bands at the target molecular weights of UreA, UreB, and Hsp60. However, a pattern of minor protein banding which did vary between strains was also apparent. Our study analyzed antigenic performance at the level of an EIA, thereby preserving additional conformational epitopes not accounted for in Western blotting.
Variations in the performances of tests with different H. pylori antigens for different populations may be reduced by the pooling of antigens from several strains (15, 29). We observed variations in performance with different H. pylori clinical isolates, with one of four of the Japanese strains performing slightly differently than the others. We suggest that the use of antigens pooled from several strains is both a practical and a sound potential approach to resolving this issue, provided the method is validated with samples from the population of interest.
In summary, our results demonstrate the excellent performance of the HM-CAP EIA kit both when the standard U.S. HM-CAP antigens derived from the original U.S. clinical isolate are used to test samples from the U.S. population and when the mixed JHM-CAP pool of antigens derived from Japanese clinical isolates are used to test samples from the Japanese population. Our data suggest that the use of EIAs based on a single local H. pylori isolate will not necessarily improve the diagnostic accuracy locally and that such EIAs are subject to the same pitfalls when assays developed in one region are used in other geographic locales. The variations observed by use of antigens from different strains may be reduced by using a pool of HM-CAP antigens from several H. pylori strains.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»