Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2003, p. 1569-1573, Vol. 41, No. 4
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1569-1573.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Viral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia,1 Washington and Jefferson College, Washington,2 School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,4 Bacterial Zoonoses Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado3
Received 14 August 2002/ Returned for modification 6 November 2002/ Accepted 23 January 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although HGE has recently been made a reportable disease in Pennsylvania, it is still difficult to assess the county-specific incidence (22). To date, there have been <30 confirmed cases in the state, most occurring in the southeastern region. Although it is likely that failure to diagnose and differentiate ehrlichial infections from other illnesses presenting acute febrile symptoms contributes to the low number of HGE cases in Pennsylvania, the prevalence of the etiologic agent of HGE, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, in the state is unknown.
Since the agents of both Lyme disease and HGE are transmitted by the same tick vector (Ixodes scapularis) and have the same rodent reservoir (Peromyscus leucopus), A. phagocytophilum is likely to be found in areas where Lyme disease is endemic (4, 12, 16, 20, 23, 25). Most previous studies of the distribution of A. phagocytophilum and the agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, in ticks have focused on these organisms in areas where the ticks are endemic and where there is a high prevalence of human disease. In this study, we identified and characterized A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi in I. scapularis ticks collected from two counties in southeastern Pennsylvania having a high incidence of Lyme disease and few cases of HGE and from a county in northwestern Pennsylvania with a modest number of Lyme disease cases and no reported HGE cases.
|
|
|---|
PCR detection. A nested PCR assay targeting a 546-bp amplicon of the 16S rRNA gene was utilized to identify samples infected with A. phagocytophilum as described by Massung et al. (19). Nested PCR amplifying a 390-bp amplicon from the fla gene was performed as described by Johnson et al. (13) to identify specimens infected with B. burgdorferi. PCRs for both organisms were done with the Taq PCR Master Mix kit (Qiagen) and were performed in Perkin-Elmer (Applied Biosystems Division, Foster City, Calif.) 9600 or 2400 thermal cycler. Primary PCRs used the following parameters: a 30-s denaturation at 94°C, a 30-s annealing period at 55°C, and a 1-min extension at 72°C. The primary 40 cycles were preceded by a 2-min denaturation at 95°C and followed by a 5-min extension at 72°C. Nested PCRs used the same cycling conditions stated above but for only 30 cycles.
DNA sequencing of A. phagocytophilum 16S rRNA and B. burgdorferi fla genes. DNA sequences were obtained using an Applied Biosystems 377 or 3100 automated DNA sequencer. Nested PCR products were purified using the Wizard DNA purification system (Promega, Madison, Wis.), and sequencing reactions were done with the ABI BigDye terminator kit (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystems Division). DNA sequence alignment was performed using MegaAlign (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, Wis.).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. Four novel sequences were determined for the B. burgdorferi fla gene, and each was submitted to GenBank (accession no. AY196690, AY196691, AY196692, and AY196693). The partial sequence of the 16S rRNA gene for AP-Variant 1 was also submitted to GenBank (accession no. AY193887).
|
|
|---|
PCR analysis of 73 partially engorged adult females collected in 2000 from 30 white-tailed deer in Delaware County revealed 62 (84.9%) to be positive for A. phagocytophilum, compared to eight (11.0%) testing positive for B. burgdorferi, with seven coinfections. Sixty-four questing adult males from the same area were also tested, and six (9.4%) and four (6.25%) were found to be positive for A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi, respectively, with two coinfections. Furthermore, 8 of 54 (14.8%) adult ticks (11 partially engorged females and 43 questing males) collected from Chester County tested positive for A. phagocytophilum, and 13 of 54 (24.1%) were found to harbor B. burgdorferi, with 3 ticks infected with both organisms (Table 1). The percentage of coinfected ticks was not statistically significant by the chi-square test with one degree of freedom, and the coinfection rates are consistent with the two agents being acquired independently.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Spatial and temporal distributions of A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi in I. scapularis ticks collected from sites in northwestern and southeastern Pennsylvania
|
3 bp. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. DNA-sequencing results for samples testing positive for A. phagocytophilum by nested PCR amplification of 16S rRNA gene
|
|
|
|---|
We examined I. scapularis ticks collected in 2000 and 2001 from Pennsylvania for the presence of A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi. Ticks were collected from three forested areas having high tick densities and categorized by the CDC as being at high risk for Lyme disease: Erie County in the northwestern corner of the state and Chester and Delaware Counties in southeastern Pennsylvania (6). Lyme borreliosis is very common in southeastern Pennsylvania, and the five-county region surrounding Philadelphia has reported the vast majority of Lyme disease cases documented from 1988 to 2001 for the state. Chester County had the highest number of cases, with 4,832 reports during this period, followed by bordering Delaware County, where 2,965 cases were documented (http://webserver.health.state.pa.us/health/site/). In fact, only Windham (296.5 cases per 100,000 population) and Litchfield (244.7 cases per 100,000 population) Counties in Connecticut had a higher Lyme disease incidence than Chester County (221.6 cases per 100,000 population) in 1999 (http://www.dph.state.ct.us; http://webserver.health.state.pa.us/health/site/). Chester County is also one of three counties in Pennsylvania where more than five cases of HGE have been confirmed. Hence, we were not surprised to find both A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi in deer ticks collected from the Delaware and Chester County areas. However, the number of engorged ticks containing A. phagocytophilum that were collected from white-tailed deer was extremely high in Delaware (84.9%) and Chester (27.3%) Counties. Interestingly, the DNA sequences amplified from these ticks revealed that a large percentage (>86%) harbored an A. phagocytophilum variant (AP-Variant 1). To date, AP-Variant 1 has never been isolated or PCR amplified from a confirmed HGE infection. The Rickettsial Laboratory at the CDC has PCR amplified and sequenced the 16S rRNA genes from >50 confirmed HGE cases, and the AP-Variant 1 sequence has never been detected. These data suggest that AP-Variant 1 is not a human pathogen. However, additional studies will be needed to confirm that AP-Variant 1 is not capable of causing HGE. AP-Variant 1 is the predominant A. phagocytophilum genotype found in I. scapularis ticks collected from Rhode Island and has also been identified in Wisconsin, Maryland, and Connecticut (3, 18, 19). Questing ticks from Delaware and Chester Counties were less frequently infected than the engorged ticks, but again, they contained a high percentage of AP-Variant 1 (81.8%). The percentages of B. burgdorferi-positive ticks in Delaware and Chester Counties ranged from 6.3 to 27.3%, rates that are relatively low for an area where Lyme disease is endemic. Previous studies from the northeastern and mid-Atlantic regions have shown that infection rates in adult tick populations in areas where Lyme disease is endemic generally range from 20 to 80% (21, 24, 26; I. Schwartz, D. Fish, and T. J. Daniels, Letter, N. Engl. J. Med. 337:49, 1997). The percentage of ticks positive for B. burgdorferi was higher in the engorged females than in questing males (11 versus 6.3% in Delaware County; 27.3 versus 23.3% in Chester County). White-tailed deer are not recognized as efficient reservoirs for harboring B. burgdorferi, and therefore, it is unlikely that the higher prevalence in engorged females was due to acquisition of the agent from deer (17). Using a murine model, tick feeding has been shown to stimulate B. burgdorferi growth in the tick midgut and dissemination to the salivary glands, with the spirochete load peaking 72 h postattachment (9). Our results suggest that the apparent higher prevalence we found in engorged females may have been due to an increase in spirochete replication stimulated by the ticks feeding on deer. Thus, in ticks with low-level infections that would be undetectable by PCR, the blood meal activated growth of the agent to a level detectable by PCR.
Although Erie County in northwestern Pennsylvania has been designated as a high-risk area for Lyme disease by the CDC based on vector distribution and human exposure factors, surveillance records show that <15 cases of Lyme borreliosis per year have been reported from 1993 through 2000, and there has never been a case of HGE reported in Erie County (6) (http://webserver.health.state.pa.us/health/site/). Our results from Erie County suggest that a significant risk exists for acquiring Lyme borreliosis, as 61.6% of ticks were PCR positive for B. burgdorferi, and the high rate of B. burgdorferi positives was consistent in both 2000 and 2001. While no ticks were positive for A. phagocytophilum in Erie County in the year 2000, five positive ticks were identified in 2001, and the sequence found in each of the five matched the DNA sequence of the human pathogenic form of A. phagocytophilum. Although the overall percentage of positives was low (<2%), these data provide the first evidence that A. phagocytophilum is present in northwestern Pennsylvania and suggest the possible emergence of the organism and HGE in that area.
The actual number of Lyme disease and HGE infections that are acquired in Erie County is likely to be higher than the number of cases reported for several reasons. Presque Isle State Park, where the ticks were collected, is a recreational site that is frequented by many individuals who live in surrounding counties, so the diagnosis may be made in the county where the individual resides rather than in Erie County. In the absence of erythema migrans in cases of Lyme disease, the other symptoms of both Lyme borreliosis and HGE are nonspecific and may include fever, chills, headache, myalgia, and malaise, leading to misdiagnosis that may also contribute to the low number of confirmed case reports from the area (22). Although physicians practicing in areas throughout Pennsylvania where ticks are endemic are trained in the clinical assessment of Lyme disease, they also need to be aware of the symptoms of HGE. HGE and Lyme disease should be considered in the differential diagnosis of an acute febrile illness, particularly if there is a history of tick bite and the individual resides in, or has recently visited, an area of the state where I. scapularis is endemic.
A. phagocytophilum is present in Pennsylvania I. scapularis ticks in two forms, the HGE agent and AP-Variant 1, which differ by 2 bases within the amplified region of the 16S rRNA gene. Because standard PCR assays used to amplify A. phagocytophilum cannot distinguish between these two strains, studies based on PCR results without subsequent DNA sequencing may be misleading. For example, based on PCR data alone, we would have concluded that 8 (3 engorged females and 5 questing males) of 54 (14.8%) adult female deer ticks collected from Chester County in 2001 were infected with the HGE agent. Subsequent DNA sequencing revealed, however, that none of the samples were infected with the HGE agent. Rather, all eight of the ticks harbored AP-Variant 1, whose biological properties have not been characterized because no isolates of the organism have been obtained. Our data reinforce the suggestion that PCR assays alone are not adequate to distinguish the HGE agent from AP-Variant 1 (18). Either DNA sequencing or a single-nucleotide polymorphism assay designed to characterize the PCR product is required to differentiate these agents.
In this study, deer blood or tissue samples were not tested for the presence of either the HGE agent or AP-Variant 1, as the focus of the study was the prevalence of these agents in ticks. Likewise, the engorged ticks were randomly collected from 30 deer, and we were unable to identify which ticks were collected from each deer. However, the high prevalence of AP-Variant 1 in these ticks (62 positive of 73 tested in Delaware County) adds to a growing body of data which suggests that white-tailed deer may have an essential role in the natural maintenance of this agent (18). Even if one were to assume that each of the 11 AP-Variant 1-negative engorged ticks was the only tick collected from 11 different deer, then infected ticks must have been collected from each of the remaining 19 deer. Therefore, AP-Variant 1-positive ticks were, at a minimum, collected from approximately two-thirds of all the deer. These data suggest that deer may be a reservoir for AP-Variant 1 and that ticks may acquire the agent during feeding. Although previous studies have reported that white-tailed deer are a reservoir of the HGE agent, the role of white-tailed deer remains questionable, given that these studies were based on serological and PCR-based assays that did not examine the variable region of the 16S rRNA gene (17, 27, 28). Additional studies are needed to address the reservoir competency of white-tailed deer for both the HGE agent and AP-Variant 1.
Other questions exist regarding the high prevalence of the AP-Variant 1 strain in engorged ticks removed from deer. A. phagocytophilum is not transmitted transovarially, and because engorged females will not feed again, they will not be factors in either maintaining the strain in nature or transmission to other hosts, including humans. Therefore, additional studies are needed to determine the prevalence of the HGE agent and AP-Variant 1 in immature ticks, including both questing ticks and ticks feeding on deer or other potential reservoir species.
Coinfected I. scapularis ticks have been shown to be capable of transferring both A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi in a single feeding (1, 8, 14, 15). This phenomenon may further complicate the successful diagnosis and treatment of patients suffering from concomitant infections. Although the effects of dual infections on human susceptibility and clinical disease are uncertain, recent evidence obtained from in vivo laboratory experiments suggests that infection with either B. burgdorferi or A. phagocytophilum does not affect the acquisition of the other pathogen during subsequent or simultaneous feedings (15). Other studies have also demonstrated the simultaneous presence of A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi in I. scapularis ticks (7, 26; Schwartz et al., letter). Factors affecting tick coinfection and the risk to humans posed by such dual infections will need further study.
This research was supported in part by the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) through an appointment of the Emerging Infectious Diseases Fellowship Program funded by the CDC. The research was further supported in part by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Undergraduate Biological Science Education Program Grant no. 52003033 to Washington and Jefferson College and a Discretionary Grant from Washington and Jefferson College to J. Courtney.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»