Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2003, p. 1738-1739, Vol. 41, No. 4
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1738-1739.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pathology, Microbiology Section, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Received 25 July 2002/ Returned for modification 17 November 2002/ Accepted 7 January 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In clinical specimens, it has been found primarily as one of the components of polymicrobial wound infections (8, 15). Infections caused by L. adecarboxylata alone, as determined by the results of blood cultures, have been found only in immunocompromised patients (2, 10, 16).
L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1 was isolated in August 2001 from a blood culture of a 58-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia admitted to the hematology unit of the Verona University Hospital. The strain was initially identified with biochemical tests by means of API ID32E (Biomérieux, Marcy lEtoile, France). The identification was confirmed by the 16S rRNA gene sequence; the gene was amplified by using primers and the conditions reported by Woo et al. (17). The sequence was obtained with an ABI PRISM 377 automated sequencer (Perkin-Elmer) in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and compared with the known 16S rRNA gene sequences in GenBank, with no resulting detectable difference.
This isolate showed a behavior typical of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains in the Kirby-Bauer testnamely, it presented resistance to ceftazidime, cefotaxime, aztreonam, and cefepime, and these resistances were reversed by clavulanic acid; this finding had never been described before in this species.
The isolate was also tested for its antimicrobial susceptibilities by broth microdilution in Müeller-Hinton medium at 37°C with a standard inoculum (9). The antimicrobials were all obtained from commercial sources. The MICs obtained for L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1 are reported in Table 1. The susceptibility pattern proved compatible with the presence of an ESBL that is capable of hydrolyzing ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and aztreonam, but not cephamycins, and that is susceptible to the common inhibitors.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. MICs for L. adecarboxylata and E. coli XL10 strains
|
The presence of blaTEM or blaSHV resistance genes was checked by PCR. The oligonucleotide primers used for the PCR assays were as follows. TEM-FW and TEM-REV, specific for blaTEM (7), were 5'-ATAAAATTCTTGAAGACGAAA and 5'-GACAGTTACCAATGCTTAATCA, respectively; SHV-FW and SHV-REV, specific for blaSHV (12), were 5'-GGGTTATTCTTATTTGTCGC and 5'-TTAGCGTTGCCAGTGCTC, respectively.
The PCR conditions were 94°C 1 for min, 58°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min for 35 cycles. For direct sequencing, PCR products were purified with a Qiagen microspin apparatus (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1 showed an SHV-type gene which, after sequencing, was identified as an SHV-12 ß-lactamase gene.
The gene was cloned in the phagemid vector pPCR Script Cam SK+ (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). The entire SHV-12 gene was amplified by PCR with the primers SHV-CF (5'-GGGGAATTCTTATTTGTCGC) and SHV-CR (5'-CAGAATTCGCTTAGCGTTGCCAGT).
The PCR product was ligated with the phagemid vector pPCR Script Cam SK+. This cloning vector has a chloramphenicol resistance gene and a lac promoter for gene expression. Ligated vectors were transformed in Escherichia coli XL10 ultracompetent cells by the ligation kit polishing protocol (Stratagene). Transformants were selected on a Luria-Bertani agar plate with 30 µg of chloramphenicol/ml and then checked by PCR and endonuclease digestion.
After ligating the SHV-12 PCR product of L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1 in the vector, we obtained the pAJ1 plasmid coding for SHV-12 ß-lactamase.
The pAJ1 plasmid was transferred into the E. coli XL10 host cells, and mutants were selected on Luria-Bertani agar plates containing 30 µg of chloramphenicol/ml.
Both L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1 and the E. coli XL10/pAJ1 strain showed a band of pI 8.2 in the isoelectric focusing, while the E. coli XL10, harboring the vector alone, showed no such band, thus confirming the successful cloning.
Table 1 gives the MICs of a number of antimicrobial agents for L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1, E. coli XL10 harboring the plasmid pAJ1, and E. coli XL10 harboring only the vector pPCR Script Cam SK+. The results show that the SHV-12 ß-lactamase was responsible for increased MICs of ampicillin (>32 times), cephaloridine (32 times), penicillin G (>4 times), ceftazidime (256 times), cefotaxime (>64 times), cefuroxime (4 times), cefpirome (>32 times), and aztreonam (256 times). These MICs were the same in L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1 and E. coli XL10/pAJ1.
To investigate where the SHV-12 gene of L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1 was located, the plasmidic DNA was extracted from L. adecarboxylata with a Qiagen kit. We were able to amplify the SHV-12 gene from the plasmidic DNA of L. adecarboxylata, but all attempts to transfer the plasmid into E. coli XL10 or E. coli DH5
host cells by electroporation proved unsuccessful.
The world literature reports only nine cases of L. adecarboxylata over the past 10 years (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 14, 16), and most of them are quite recent.
The isolation of L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1 from the bloodstream of a patient with acute myeloid leukemia confirms that infections by L. adecarboxylata alone can be found only in patients whose immune defenses are compromised by an underlying medical condition, while in otherwise healthy adults, this microorganism is found primarily as just one of the components of a polymicrobial infection.
Testing antimicrobial agents in all the L. adecarboxylata strains reported to date has demonstrated pansensitivity. Thus, the presence of an ESBL in an isolate of this species and its location on a transposable element are disquieting findings which may be a prelude to the wider diffusion of this microorganism.
The identification of the L. adecarboxylata VR-01-1 ESBL as an SHV-12 ß-lactamase confirms the widespread diffusion in Italy of this enzyme, which was one of the most common variants found in most hospitals and in several different species of Enterobacteriaceae in a recent Italian nationwide survey (11).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»