Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2003, p. 2235-2236, Vol. 41, No. 5
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.2235-2236.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Laboratoire de Bactériologie,1 Service de Cancérologie, Hôpital Timone, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France2
Received 25 September 2001/ Returned for modification 6 June 2002/ Accepted 28 January 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Growth of the gram-positive bacterium was observed in a Lytic 10 BACTEC anaerobic bottle (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) after 10 days of incubation in a BACTEC 9240 automated instrument. The isolate was subcultured on blood agar plates (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) incubated at 37°C in an anaerobic atmosphere. After 15 days small colonies were seen, and staining revealed a gram-positive, non-acid-fast bacillus. A test for catalase was negative. The biochemical characteristics of the organism determined with the API 20A, API STREPTO 20E, and API 20E systems (bioMérieux) are presented in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Phenotypic characteristics of E. callanderi
|
The cell wall fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatography (5890 series II; Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, Calif.) (L. Miller and T. Berger, Bacterial identification by chromatography of whole cell fatty acids, Hewlett-Packard application note 228-241, Hewlett-Packard, Avondale, Pa., 1985) with a culture grown for 15 days on blood agar and was as follows: C14:0 fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), 11.90%; C16:0 aldhehyde, 4.50%; C16:0 FAME, 18.65%; C16:0 dimethyl acetyl (DMA), 17.74%; C18:2
9,12 FAME, 4.84%; C18:1
9 FAME, 10.38%; C18:0 FAME, 7.23%; C18:0 DMA, 4.06%.
The mean ± standard deviation of the G+C content after five determinations by high-pressure liquid chromatography (L-6200 system pump; Merck Clevenot, Nogent-sur-Marne, France) was 54.8 ± 0.6 mol. The G+C content of the type species, Eubacterium limosum, is 47% (7), although the G+C content is quite variable in the genus Eubacterium, ranging from 30% in Eubacterium rectale to 55% in Eubacterium suis (7).
For sequencing, the organism was incubated for 1 h at 37°C and then the DNA was extracted in 180 µl of Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 M NaCl) at pH 8.0. Digestion was carried out with 40 µl of proteinase K solution (25 mg/ml) and 25 µl of 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate for 1 h at 55°C. The digestion was stopped by the addition of 200 µl of 4 M guanidine thiocyanate, and the mixture was left at room temperature for 1 h before it was heated to 100°C for 10 min following the addition of 50 µl of 0.5 M NaOH. Final extraction of nucleic acid was carried out with a QIAmp kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR-mediated amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and sequence determination were performed with primers FD1 (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and RP2 (5'-ACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3') and controls (Escherichia coli DNA as a positive control and distilled water as a negative control), as described previously (10). The 1,462-bp sequence was aligned and compared with all eubacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences available in the GenBank database by using the multisequence Advanced BLAST comparison software from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (2). The highest sequence (16S rRNA gene) similarity value (99.3%) was obtained with the E. callanderi strain DSM 3662 16S rRNA gene sequence (GenBank/EMBL accession no. X969610.1).
Although our isolate was similar to Eubacterium spp. in morphology, G+C content, cell wall fatty acid profile, and antibiotic susceptibility (3, 4), it was the 16S rRNA gene sequence that enabled us to identify the organism to the species level.
The genus Eubacterium includes strictly anaerobic, non-spore-forming, nonmotile rod-shaped bacteria. E. callanderi is an environmental bacterium that was initially isolated from an anaerobic digester processing the contents from a wood fiber-to-alcohol fermentation plant (9). Among the strictly anaerobic, non-spore-forming, gram-positive rods, species of the genus Eubacterium have mostly been isolated in clinical samples: Eubacterium lentum and Eubacterium agalactolyticum from pleuropulmonary exudates and Eubacterium aerofaciens, Eubacterium nodatum, Eubacterium saphenum, and Eubacterium timidum from oral-dental exudates (5, 6). E. aerofaciens has been implicated in endocarditis, and E. lentum is frequently isolated from blood. Although bacteria of the genus Eubacterium have been found in cavities of humans and animals, the isolation of E. callanderi from blood has not been reported previously (7).
The fact that E. callanderi is not part of the common skin flora and the fact that we isolated the organism from independent cultures of blood collected at different sites shows that our isolate was not a contaminant introduced during blood collection. It was also not a laboratory contaminant, as we had not isolated E. callanderi in our laboratory over the previous 24 months and there was no amplification with the negative control. The isolate was recovered from blood collected when the patient presented with an acute onset of fever. While the route of entry of E. callanderi may have been the central infusion implant, the organism most likely entered the body from the bowel through the neoplasm. E. callanderi is a nonglucidolytic bacterium (Table 1), and phenotypic identification of the organism is not reliable since it is fastidious and rarely available for most routine laboratory work. Moreover, the available phenotypic tests do not enable E. callanderi to be identified to the species level because it is not included in the API 20A system database (bioMérieux). Fatty acid analysis is not useful for the identification of Eubacterium species (8). Analysis of the 16S rRNA sequence of the organism, however, provides a reliable and straightforward identification tool, and the routine use of this method should increase our knowledge of the clinical spectrum of E. callanderi infections in people.
We acknowledge Marie-Jo Casagrande and Christiane Bibard for technical assistance and P. J. Kelly for reviewing the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»