Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2003, p. 2385-2390, Vol. 41, No. 6
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2385-2390.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca,1 Departamento Médico, GlaxoSmithKline, Tres Cantos,2 Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona,3 Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón,4 Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid,6 Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain5
Received 15 November 2002/ Returned for modification 19 January 2003/ Accepted 19 March 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Penicillin remains the drug of choice for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis (7); however, an increased failure of this treatment due to copathogenicity with ß-lactamase-producing microorganisms has been reported (3). In these cases and in cases where patients are allergic to penicillin, other antibiotics not subject to inactivation by ß-lactamases, i.e., amoxicillin-clavulanate, oral cephalosporins, or erythromycin, have been substituted for penicillin (3).
Resistance to erythromycin remained at low levels among S. pyogenes in most countries of the world (14); however, in the last years, a significant increase in erythromycin-resistant isolates in different countries has been reported (15, 20, 22, 23). In most of these studies, resistance to erythromycin was caused by a few clones and the mechanisms of resistance were mainly based on the presence of an active drug efflux by pumps encoded by the gene mefA (M phenotype) that take out of the cells 14- and 15-membered macrolides (25). By contrast, the other strategy described for erythromycin resistance, target site modification by erm methylase strains that express the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS) phenotype, was not very common among the erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes isolates.
In the last few years, in two different nationwide antimicrobial surveillance studies, an increasing resistance to erythromycin has been reported in S. pyogenes isolated in Spain, where the erythromycin resistance frequency has increased from 12 to 26% in the last 10 years, reaching 60% in some regions of the country (2, 19). Therefore, we decided to conduct an epidemiologic investigation to determine the reasons for the high frequency of erythromycin resistance in S. pyogenes observed in our country.
A serologic test for M protein antigens has long been a primary method for the identification and epidemiological study of S. pyogenes isolates. However, this method is dependent on the preparation of type-specific antisera and extraction of a protein identified as M protein on the surface of S. pyogenes, a process that is difficult and specialized. The 5' ends of emm genes are highly heterogeneous and encode the serotype specificity used for the M typing system developed by Lancefield in 1928. Since, in 1995, Beall et al. demonstrated the usefulness of emm gene sequence analysis for the routine typing of GAS (5), few studies have used this typing method for monitoring S. pyogenes diversity (4, 5, 8, 9, 27).
In this study, we conducted an epidemiological survey of emm gene sequences from pharyngeal S. pyogenes isolates isolated over a period of 4 years in 8 Spanish hospitals and studied their relationship to erythromycin resistance.
|
|
|---|
1 µg/ml) from both surveillance collections (145 isolates from 1996 to 1997 and 170 isolates from 1998 to 1999). Additional 1:1 matched erythromycin-susceptible S. pyogenes strains were also selected. Hence, for every resistant isolate, the immediate next susceptible strain isolated in the same hospital from a patient belonging to the same age group was chosen in order to minimize temporal, geographical, or age-related bias. Two hundred ninety-nine isolates (133 from 1996 to 1997 and 166 from 1998 to 1999) fulfilled the above criteria. The organisms were isolated from patients from 7 cities (number of isolates and period of isolation): Córdoba (30 isolates, 1996 to 1997; 15 isolates, 1998 to 1999), Seville (26 isolates, 1996 to 1997; 47 isolates, 1998 to 1999), Granada (24 isolates, 1996 to 1997; 34 isolates, 1998 to 1999), Valencia (117 isolates, 1996 to 1997), Madrid (81 isolates, 1996 to 1997; 174 isolates, 1998 to 1999), San Sebastián (32 isolates, 1998 to 1999), and Santander (34 isolates, 1998 to 1999). Identification of S. pyogenes isolates was confirmed by serogroup A immunoagglutination assays (Streptex; Murex, Chantillon, France).
Susceptibility tests.
Susceptibility testing was performed on all isolates by double dilution with the semiautomated microdilution method with custom-dried 96-well trays and Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 3% lysed horse blood according to the guidelines of the NCCLS (18) and with a final inoculum of 5 x 105 CFU/ml. Cultures were incubated for 24 h at 35°C in ambient air with erythromycin. The breakpoint used for erythromycin resistance was
1 µg/ml.
The mechanism of resistance to erythromycin was evaluated with a double-diffusion disk test as described elsewhere (24) with erythromycin (15 µg) and clindamycin (2 µg) disks placed 20 mm (edge to edge) apart on 5% defibrinated horse blood agar. After overnight incubation at 35°C, the presence of blunting in the zone of inhibition of the clindamycin disk was recorded (21). If the clindamycin inhibition zone was blunted toward the erythromycin disk, the strain was interpreted as clindamycin inducible. Resultant phenotype patterns were clindamycin-sensitive strains (M phenotype) and clindamycin-resistant or -inducible strains (MLS phenotype).
emm gene typing. The emm gene type of S. pyogenes isolates was determined by amplification and sequencing of the emm gene as described by Beall et al. (5). Lysates of the S. pyogenes isolates were prepared with mutanolysin as described previously (1). Primers GASM1 and GASM2 were used in PCRs carried out according to the method described previously (5). PCR products were sequenced with primer GASM1 with the dye terminator mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) and were subjected to automated sequence analysis on a 377 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). DNA sequences were subjected to homology searches against the bacterial DNA database with BLASTN. Sequences were given the GenBank emm designations following the criteria previously described (4, 10).
Ribotyping analysis. Ten micrograms of purified genomic DNA, isolated following the protocol previously described (1), were digested with HindIII, SacI, or XhoI according to the specifications of the manufacturer (Amersham-Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). DNA fragments were separated on a 1% agarose gel. Southern blot analysis and S. pyogenes 16S rRNA gene probe labeling and detection were carried out with the ECL kit (Amersham-Pharmacia). Differences in banding patterns were documented by visual examination and indexed by small lettering.
PFGE analysis. Analysis of chromosomal DNA was carried out by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis by following standard procedures (16). Chromosomal DNA was digested with SfiI (Amersham-Pharmacia), and fragments were separated in a CHEF-DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Barcelona, Spain). Electrophoretic pulses were linearly distributed from 20 to 70 s, for a run time of 22 h. The voltage was 6 V/cm, and the temperature of the electrophoresis chamber was kept at 14°C. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide and photographed.
Differences in banding patterns were documented by visual examination and indexed by capital lettering. The interpretation of restriction fragment patterns was performed in accordance with recent consensus publications (28).
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The sequence of emmst2002 obtained in this study has been given GenBank accession number AJ515525.
|
|
|---|
95% identical to the 160 first bases of one of the emm or emm-like genes deposited in GenBank. For most of these sequences, this high level of identity actually extended to 200 to 450 bases, without diminishing. The sequences of 522 (85%) isolates were
95% identical to the sequence of standard M type reference strain emm genes, and the sequences of 75 isolates were
95 identical to the sequence of st1815, a sequence not linked with known M typing specificity. The remaining 17 of 614 isolates had an undocumented emm gene sequence. This sequence was provisionally designated as st2002 and was only 85% identical to the emm104 (formerly st2035) sequence over the first 160 bases.
emm1, emm3, emm12, and emm9 were the most prevalent emm sequences among S. pyogenes isolates susceptible to erythromycin (Table 1). They accounted for 12.4, 11.4, 10, and 9.4%, respectively, of these isolates. Besides these emm sequences, the following most common sequences were emm28, emm44, emm4, emm6, and the new emm gene sequence designated emmst2002, each one of which accounted for approximately
6% of the erythromycin-susceptible isolates. We did not detect substantial differences between both periods (1996 to 1997 versus 1998 to 1999) in the distribution of the prevalent emm sequences among GAS erythromycin-susceptible isolates (Table 1). Perhaps the most interesting difference was that most of the M type st2002 isolates were collected in the first period and their number decreased markedly in the second period.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. emm sequences of pharyngeal S. pyogenes isolated in Spain (1996 to 1999)
|
We found that 298 (94.6%) of the erythromycin-resistant isolates expressed the M phenotype of resistance. All the M type 4, type st1815, and type 75 (except one M75 isolate) erythromycin-resistant isolates presented this phenotype of resistance. Only 17 (5.4%) resistant isolates (M types 22, 6, 77, and 28) displayed the classical MLS phenotype, including constitutive (5 isolates) and inducible (12 isolates) resistance.
Clonal diversity of the erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes isolates. We investigated whether the erythromycin-resistant isolates represent only a few clonal types, since they belong mainly to only three different M types (M4, st1805, and M75), and all of them displayed the M phenotype. For this purpose, we randomly selected at least one S. pyogenes erythromycin-resistant isolate of each one of these M types from each hospital and from both national surveillance collections.
Ribotyping analysis with genomic DNA from S. pyogenes isolates digested with SacI and probed with an internal fragment of the 16S rRNA gene led to 13 different patterns, which are illustrated in Fig. 1A. Each strain was tested at least twice with SacI and with two additional enzymes (XhoI and HindIII); however, SacI-digested fragments were more discriminatory than the XhoI- and HindIII-digested fragments that only rendered two and three different patterns, respectively (data not shown). Type c and j were the most common types among M type 4 and M type st1815 isolates, respectively. For both M types, we observed more variability between the S. pyogenes isolated from 1996 to 1997 than in those isolated from 1998 to 1999, where types c and j were almost exclusive (Table 2). Similarly, all M type 75 S. pyogenes isolates that were collected only between 1998 and 1999 presented pattern j. All the other patterns were represented by only one strain.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Representative ribotypes (A) and PFGE types (B) of erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes M types 4, st1815, and 75 isolated between 1996 to 1997 and 1998 to 1999 in Spain. (A) Southern blot of genomic S. pyogenes DNA digested with SacI and probed with a GAS 16S rRNA gene probe as described in Materials in Methods. (B) PFGE analysis of genomic DNA restricted with SfiI. Letters on the lanes refer to types, and numbers below each lane refer to the number of isolates of each type. Molecular size markers (in kilobases) are indicated on the left.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Correlation between emm typing, ribotyping, and PFGE typing of erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes isolated in two different time periods in Spain
|
In summary, results obtained by either ribotyping or PFGE suggest that S. pyogenes resistance to erythromycin in Spain between 1996 to 1999 was caused by a few clones belonging to three M types. For M types 4 and st1815, we observed more variability between the S. pyogenes isolated from 1996 to 1997 than in those isolated from 1998 to 1999, where all the isolates presented the same genotyping profile. Interestingly, clones c and j, prevalent from 1998 to 1999, were also present from 1996 to 1997.
|
|
|---|
In our study, we have determined the 5' emm sequence from 614 pharyngeal S. pyogenes isolates taken from two nationwide surveillance collections conducted from 1996 to 1999. To our knowledge, this is the first survey study of emm typing conducted in Spain. As expected, nearly 100% of the strains could be genotyped by the emm typing system as described recently Facklam et al. (10). Only one newly encountered emm gene, provisionally designated emm st2002, from 17 isolates had a 5' emm sequence with an identity
95% over the first 160 bases to emm sequences deposited in GenBank. However, according to Facklman et al. (10), further studies are required to validate this new emm type that shows only 85% identity over the first 160 bases with emm104 (formerly st2035) (11).
In our survey, M type 1 and M type 3 were the most prevalent M types among S. pyogenes isolates susceptible to erythromycin. Since resistance to erythromycin represents approximately 20 to 30% of the isolates (2, 19), we can conclude that these M types are probably the most common in Spain. This result is in agreement with other M typing studies conducted by other authors (4, 8, 13).
To investigate the reasons for the increased levels of resistance to erythromycin detected in Spain, we analyzed the emm gene sequence of 315 GAS isolates resistant to erythromycin collected simultaneously and at the same site to that of the erythromycin-susceptible isolates. Our results show that a few M types were responsible for up to 85% of the erythromycin-resistant isolates, suggesting that few clones caused this phenomenon. This hypothesis was supported by the fact that the M phenotype was the most common resistance mechanism, a feature previously reported by other authors (20, 23). However, genetic divergence among strains sharing the same emm gene sequence has been reported (5, 6, 17, 29). For this reason, emm sequencing must be supplemented with other approaches such as PFGE to identify related GAS isolates (4). To further investigate the clonal diversity of the erythromycin-resistant GAS isolates, we randomly selected strains from each hospital geographically distributed all over Spain and from both surveillance collections. We used two genotyping techniques that yielded similar results. Ribotyping analysis of the GAS genomic DNA digested with HindIII and XhoI was poorly discriminatory as previously described (data not shown) (26). However, ribotyping by SacI restriction polymorphism showed equivalent power for strain typing to that of PFGE in favor of labor and time benefit.
The data obtained by both approaches indicate that during the first period (1996 to 1997) many different clones sharing the same M type (M type 4 or M type st1815) were distributed all over Spain and responsible for the resistance to erythromycin detected between 1996 to 1997. By contrast, in the following two years (1997 to 1998), clonal diversity was reduced to a few clones that were the major clones identified in the years 1996 to 1997. These results suggest that these clones have been selected over a short period of time (only 2 years) and have become predominant in Spain. It is reasonable to believe that selection of these clones is related to the consumption of macrolides and that this may account for the geographical differences in the prevalence of resistance to erythromycin in Spain (12, 19).
Our results are in agreement with those of a previous study conducted by Pérez-Trallero et al. in Spain (20). In that study, erythromycin-resistant GAS isolates from Spain (n = 437, 1988 to 1997) were composed mainly of two clones designated clone B (emm type 4) and clone D (emm type 75) that were already isolated in Spain in 1991. Those clonal types showed same lineage to our emm types, corresponding to PFGE C and J types, respectively, suggesting that they are probably the same strains. Apart from the strains described in Spain, M type 4 strains with the M phenotype were isolated in Finland and Great Britain before 1991 (22, 23). We do not know whether the strains of clone C isolated in our study are the same as the erythromycin-resistant type 4 found in Finland and Great Britain, but it is probable. In addition to emm type 4, emm type st1815 accounted for 20% of the GAS resistant to erythromycin. This emm type was not detected by Pérez-Trallero et al. in their study, where they assayed only 14 emm types (20); however, it was one of the prevalent types in our study. Interestingly, the most common PFGE and ribotype pattern among st1815 emm type strains was identical to that of emm type 75 strains. A similar observation was previously reported by Whatmore et al. that demonstrated that highly divergent emm sequences were present in strains with identical multilocus electrophoretic types, suggesting horizontal transfer of emm genes between unrelated strains (29). Alternatively, it might be that emm75 and emmst1815 share identical PFGE types because emm sequence st1815 was generated by homologous excision between the tandem emm and enn sequences in an emm75 parental strain, as suggested in the emm sequence database (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/emmtypes.htm).
In summary, our results show that monitoring of GAS isolate diversity by emm gene typing is a useful approach for a better understanding of the epidemiology and origins of specific GAS strains. The application of this typing technique to nationwide multicenter surveillance has revealed that a few clones cause GAS erythromycin resistance in Spain.
Participants of the Spanish Surveillance Group for Respiratory Pathogens are not listed, but the list is available from the corresponding author. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»