Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2003, p. 2465-2470, Vol. 41, No. 6
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2465-2470.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pediatrics,1 Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama,5 Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York,2 Center for International Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts,3 Center for International Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts4
Received 19 November 2002/ Returned for modification 31 January 2003/ Accepted 24 March 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Few studies have focused on quantitation of HIV RNA and DNA in breast milk. Breast milk is a complex fluid consisting of more than 100,000 constituents, including lipids, immunoglobulins, glycoproteins, lactoferrin, and enzymes that could inhibit amplification and/or result in nucleic acid degradation (14). Using the Roche Amplicor assay, Shepard et al. reported partial inhibition, as evidenced by low recovery of the internal quantitation standard (QS), in 38% of breast milk samples (n = 5) spiked with HIV (26). However, they did not observe sufficient inhibition of their PCR product to invalidate the assay. Other groups (21, 24) using the same assay on samples from HIV-infected women did not report such inhibition, and inhibition was not noted by Lewis et al. using a quantitative competitive PCR assay (17). To date, there have been no systematic studies addressing the effects of breast milk on detection of HIV by PCR amplification.
Until recently, most HIV-1 RNA quantitation in breast milk has been performed on the acellular skim milk fraction (17, 21, 24). However, breast milk contains 1 to 10% lipid, which could harbor virus or viral nucleic acid (15). Hoffman et al. recently reported that HIV RNA could be detected in the lipid fraction of milk from 47% of HIV-infected women in Malawi (I. Hoffman, F. Martinson, S. Fiscus, P. Sohonil, C. Komoltril, D. Chilangozi, P. Kazembe, P. Stewart, and M. S. Cohen, 8th Conf. Retrovir. Opportun. Infect., Chicago, Ill., 2001). Since breastfeeding infants are exposed to whole milk, not skim milk, we designed experiments to address the sensitivity of the Roche Amplicor assay in detecting HIV in whole human milk, as well as in the skim milk and lipid fractions.
Most studies of HIV in breast milk have taken place in developing countries where access to refrigeration is limited. Thus, defining the influence of collection and storage conditions on HIV RNA and DNA stability is critical to ensure measurement accuracy, as well as to permit comparisons of data collected in multicenter clinical trials. Therefore, we sought to establish the effects of temperature and storage conditions on the stability and accuracy of HIV-1 nucleic acid detection. We examined the stability of HIV-1 RNA in whole breast milk over time at different temperatures, including the effects of freeze-thaw cycles. Finally, since HIV-infected breast milk cells are a potential source of HIV infection, we used real-time PCR (TaqMan) to quantitate HIV-1 proviral DNA burden in breast milk samples. It is anticipated that these studies will have significant impact on the design of future studies of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 via breast milk, particularly in areas where alternatives to breast-feeding are unsustainable and refrigeration is not commonly available.
|
|
|---|
Spiking of breast milk samples with viruses. Three different sources of HIV-1 were used for the spiking experiments: (i) culture supernatant from 293T cells transfected with the HIV-1 molecular clone (NL4-3); (ii) plasma from HIV-infected persons infected with both subtype B and C viruses; and (iii) a stock obtained from the Virology Quality Assurance Laboratory of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Nominal copy numbers for culture supernatant and the patient isolate were determined by the Roche Amplicor Ultrasensitive HIV-1 Monitor assay (Roche, Branchburg, N.J.) and found to have 207,760 and 53,796 copies/ml, respectively. The stock obtained from the Virology Quality Assurance Laboratory has been previously described and consists of HIV derived from two patients and quantitated by electron microscopy and p24 antigen and RNA quantitation by both Roche Molecular Diagnostics and Chiron (5).
Twofold serial dilutions (starting input, 50,000 copies/ml) of HIV-1 were added to breast milk. Spiked milk samples were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with periodic low-speed vortexing before further processing or storage at -80°C for future analysis.
8E5/LAV cells. The 8E5/LAV cell line is a subcloned HIV-1LAV-infected human T-cell line obtained from the AIDS Research and Reference Program of the National Institutes of Health. The cells contain a single integrated copy of HIV-1LAV proviral DNA.
Aliquots of cell-free milk were spiked with log10 dilutions of 8E5/LAV cells (106 through 100). The total number of cells in each sample was kept constant (106) by adding fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or breast milk cells obtained from HIV-negative donors. Whenever possible, breast milk cells isolated from the same donor as the milk sample were used in the experiment.
DNA extraction. DNA was extracted using a PUREGENE DNA isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Fractionation of whole breast milk. Aliquots of whole breast milk (1 ml) spiked with HIV were centrifuged at 1,600 x g for 15 min at ambient temperature to fractionate milk into the aqueous supernatant (skim milk) and an overlying lipid fraction. The underlying aqueous fraction along with the pelleted cells or cellular debris was carefully removed. Extreme care was taken to avoid carryover of the overlying lipid. The aqueous portion was added to a new microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged, and the cell-free supernatant was removed. Since the cell counts in these samples were <1,000 cells per ml, no cell pellet was visible. Equal volumes of spiked whole milk were also processed for HIV RNA detection without fractionation.
Quantitation of HIV-1 RNA. HIV RNA levels in the spiked samples were determined by the Amplicor UltraSensitive HIV-1 Monitor version 1.0 assay (Roche Diagnostics Systems), according to the manufacturer's protocol. HIV RNA levels in the ZEBS cohort were quantitated using the Amplicor UltraSensitive HIV-1 Monitor version 1.5 (Roche Diagnostics Systems). These assays differ in the primers utilized but are otherwise comparable.
Creamatocrit. Creamatocrit analysis was based on the original methodology of Lucas et al. (18). Approximately 75 µl of well-mixed breast milk samples were drawn into a glass capillary tube; tubes were sealed at one end and centrifuged in a hematocrit centrifuge for 15 min at 12,000 x g. To prevent the cream layer "setting" at an angle, the tubes were removed immediately after centrifugation and placed vertically with the cream layer at the top. The creamatocrit was determined using a moving stage calibrator and expressed as a percentage of the length of the milk column in the tube. Since the cream layer is opaque, it was measured to the top, rather than the bottom, of the meniscus.
Real-time PCR assay. All standards, controls, and samples were run in triplicate; the average value of the copy number was used to quantify both HIV-1 DNA and cellular ß-globin copies. Standard curves for HIV copies were generated using a 10-fold dilution series of 8E5/LAV DNA. Unstimulated, HIV-1-negative human PBMC DNA was used to determine human cell equivalents, or genomes, through the amplification of the ß-globin gene. The normalized value of HIV DNA load was expressed as the number of HIV copies/105 PBMC, which was calculated as the ratio of mean HIV copy number/mean ß-globin copy number.
Target mixes were made from two primers and a fluorescently labeled probe. All primers and probes were synthesized by Sigma Genosys (Sigma Genosys Ltd., Woodlands, Tex.). The primers used to detect HIV were SR1 (5'-CAA GTA GTG TGT GCC CGT CTG T-3') and AA55 (5'-CTG CTA GAG ATT TTC CAC ACT GAC-3'). The sequence of the ZXF probe is 5'-TGT GAC TCT GGT AAC TAG AGA TCC CTC AGA CCC-3', with 6-carboxyfluorescine linked to the 5' end. The ß-globin primers are BGF1 (5'-CAA CCT CAA ACA GAC ACC ATG G-3') and BGR1 (5'-TCC ACG TTC ACC TTG CCC-3'), and the probe is BGX1 (5'-CTC CTG AGG AGA AGT CTG CCG TTA CTG CC-3', with 6-carboxyfluorescine linked to the 5' end).
TaqMan PCR Core Reagents (Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, N.J.) were used in all reaction mixtures. The PCR reagent mixture contained the following: 1x TaqMan buffer A; 5 mM MgCl2; 0.2 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dUTP; 0.01 U of uracil DNA glycosylase per µl; and 0.025 U of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase per µl. Reaction mixture volumes were 25 µl, and both the HIV and ß-globin mixtures contained 300 nM concentrations of forward primers and 150 nM concentrations of reverse complement primers and 200 nM ZXF or BGX1 probe. The reaction was run in a sequence detector (model 7700; ABI/PE Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Thermal cycling conditions were 50°C for 2 min for uracil DNA glycosylase activity, 95°C for 10 min for AmpliTaq Gold activation, followed by 45 cycles, each cycle consisting of 15 s at 95°C for and 60 s at 60°C.
Statistical analysis. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (r) were computed to describe associations between input and observed viral quantities. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to test for differences in observed viral quantity under different conditions. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to test for differences in the observed viral quantities before and after different processing conditions.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Aliquots of whole breast milk from 10 women were spiked with serial twofold dilutions of HIV-1 stocks and then assayed using the Roche Amplicor UltraSensitive version 1.0 assay. Next the spiked breast milk was spun, and the skim milk and lipid fractions were analyzed separately. The log10 numbers of HIV-1 RNA copies, measured by the nominal input copy number in the skim milk fraction (A), the lipid fraction (B), and whole milk (C), are shown.
|
Inhibition of HIV-1 RNA detection in whole breast milk. The Roche Amplicor assay contains an internal standard (QS) to control for amplification. If the optical density for the QS is less than 0.3 in the undiluted well, the assay is invalid and no HIV RNA result is reported. A low QS can be due to PCR inhibition or loss of RNA during extraction. We observed low QS values in 24 of 249 (9.64%) of spiked whole-milk samples, 9 of 88 (10.34%) of spiked skim milk samples, and 10 of 88 (11.36%) spiked milk lipid samples. However, these results appeared to be sporadic, since different aliquots of the same breast milk sample did not consistently demonstrate a low QS. When the spiked whole-milk samples were repeated without dilution, all 24 samples had quantifiable RNA. This strongly suggests that the PCR inhibition encountered during RNA quantitation was random rather than due to the presence of a persistent inhibitory agent.
Detection of HIV-1 RNA in whole milk from HIV-infected women. Whole-milk samples from HIV-infected women participating in ZEBS were analyzed using the Roche Amplicor UltraSensitive HIV-1 Monitor version 1.5 kit. Subtype C is the predominant circulating form of HIV in Zambia. Breast milk RNA levels ranged from <50 copies/ml to >75,000 copies/ml. HIV RNA quantitation was performed on 491 breast milk samples from HIV-infected women participating in ZEBS. Inhibition was observed in 43 samples (8.76%). All 43 samples were retested without dilution, and no inhibition was observed on the repeat test, confirming the observation among spiked breast milk samples. In contrast, none of the plasma samples from the same cohort (n = 408) had low QS values.
Stability of HIV-1 RNA in whole breast milk and breast milk fractions. Whole breast milk samples were spiked with HIV-1 RNA and then kept at room temperature or 4°C for 6, 18, and 30 h prior to processing. Spiked samples at 0 h and replicate samples from other time points were frozen immediately at -80°C and then assayed 2 weeks later. HIV RNA levels were stable in whole milk when kept at room temperature for as long as 30 h (Fig. 2). Control samples kept at 4°C or at -80°C were equally stable (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Whole breast milk samples were spiked with HIV-1 RNA and then were either frozen immediately or kept at room temperature for 6, 18, or 30 h prior to testing using the Roche Amplicor UltraSensitive version 1.0 assay. The observed log10 numbers of HIV-1 RNA copies per milliliter of milk measured when the input nominal copy number was 50,000 copies/ml (thick lines) or 20,776 copies/ml (thin lines) are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Whole breast milk samples from five women were spiked with either 5,000 or 25,000 copies of HIV-1 RNA per ml in duplicate. The Samples were tested immediately for HIV-1 RNA after sample collection and after three freeze-thaw cycles. The HIV-1 RNA quantities in milk spiked with 5,000 copies (thin lines) or 25,000 copies (thick lines) of HIV-1 RNA observed before and after three freeze-thaw cycles are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Real-time PCR of HIV-1 standards. A standard curve was obtained by real-time PCR from 10-fold dilutions of 8E5/LAV cells (containing a single integrated HIV proviral copy per cell) into breast milk. The mean Ct is plotted against the logarithmic number of HIV-1 copies detected in the serial dilutions. The uniform slope of the ß-globin copies detected demonstrated that an equivalent cellular background was present in each sample.
|
|
|
|---|
Breast milk lipid content, typically less than 10% of the total, is highly variable; maternal body fat (4) and timing of the sample collection (30) are important determinants of milk lipid. Our spiking experiments suggest that HIV may preferentially migrate into the lipid fraction of milk. However, since breast milk lipid represents such a small fraction of the total volume, sample variation in the lipid proportion does not substantially affect the amount of virus detected in whole milk. Thus, efforts to ensure standardization in the timing of breast milk sample collection (e.g., to attempt to collect only foremilk or hind-milk) may not be clinically relevant for measurement of HIV RNA quantities in breast milk. Our data do not address whether these lipid-bound virus can replicate and/or remain infectious.
Breast milk is known to contain many factors that inhibit PCR amplification including lactoferrin and immunoglobulin G. The Roche Amplicor assay uses recombinant Thermus thermophilus DNA polymerase (rTth polymerase) that has been shown to be less susceptible to amplification inhibition than other Taq polymerases (1-3). Using whole breast milk samples, we found that insufficient recovery of the QS occurred in less than 10% of the samples. This rate was similar in different milk fractions (skim milk and lipid), spiked whole-milk samples, and whole-milk samples obtained from HIV-infected women. In all cases where inhibition was observed, another aliquot of the same sample had quantifiable HIV-1 RNA detected. This strongly suggests that the insufficient QS recovery was due to errors in handling (protein carryover, loss of sample, etc.) and not necessarily due to the presence of intrinsic inhibitory factors in breast milk.
Shepard et al. reported partial inhibition, i.e., less than maximal recovery of the internal QS standard (optical density of the first QS well of <1.0), in three of five spiked skim milk samples of breast milk (26). However, in no case did the degree of decreased recovery invalidate the assay. We also observed that about one-third of the breast milk samples exhibited partial inhibition as defined above. However, in our experience, more than 90% of the samples had sufficient recovery to obtain valid results. Our results are consistent with those obtained by other groups using this assay (21, 24). These data suggest that although breast milk contains factors that could potentially impede HIV quantification by PCR, these substances do not generally affect accurate measurement.
Breast milk should be refrigerated to decrease bacterial growth and prevent activation of enzymes that could degrade virions and thereby expose HIV RNA to the degradation activities of enzymes. No significant decreases in HIV RNA levels were observed when whole breast milk was left at room temperature (25°C) or at 4°C for up to 30 h. These data suggest that HIV RNA is remarkably stable in breast milk and refrigeration does not offer any significant advantage. However, it must be stressed that we did not examine the effects of higher temperatures (30 to 40°C) that are often experienced in the field. It is therefore prudent to ensure that samples are not exposed to temperature extremes or temperatures that would support the growth of bacterial contaminants. The stability of HIV RNA at room temperature beyond 30 h needs to be evaluated to determine the maximal length of time samples can be held prior to separation or storage at -70°C.
The majority of breast milk specimens are transported and frozen at -70°C until the time of testing. Specimens must be thawed prior to RNA quantitation. Freeze-thawing has been shown to result in significant loss of plasma viral infectivity (20) but has insignificant effects on plasma RNA levels. We found that three consecutive freeze-thaw cycles had no significant effect on HIV RNA levels in breast milk. The stability of HIV RNA in breast milk is similar to that in whole blood or plasma (9, 11, 13, 16, 23, 29).
The breast-feeding infant of an HIV-infected woman is exposed not only to free virions (RNA) but also to HIV-infected breast milk cells. Breast milk lymphocytes have the ability to traverse the neonatal intestine and thus serve as a source of infection (12). The cellular pellet of breast milk often includes milk lipid globule membranes and other proteins. The majority of the cells in breast milk are fat-laden macrophages. These substances could influence PCR amplification. Using a real-time PCR methodology, we found that HIV could be accurately detected in spiked breast milk samples and samples from HIV-infected women.
Breast milk viral load is likely to be one of the chief factors associated with HIV transmission. It is critical that breast milk collection, processing, and storage methods that provide the highest degree of HIV-1 RNA and DNA stability be determined and standardized prior to implementation in studies of breast milk transmission. This standardization will ensure the accuracy of the results and allow comparison of data, especially when specimens are collected and transported from multiple sites. Our studies indicate that HIV RNA in breast milk can be accurately detected in all milk fractions (whole milk, skim milk, and lipid) and that the Roche Amplicor assay could reliably quantitate HIV in more than 90% of the breast milk samples.
Although it is always advantageous to process specimens as soon as possible, this is not always practical. Our studies indicate that HIV RNA is remarkably stable in breast milk. The RNA copy number did not significantly decrease when whole milk was maintained at room temperature or 4°C for up to 30 h or subjected to three cycles of freezing and thawing. These results should assist investigators in the development of standardized collection, transportation, processing, and storage procedures for studies involving HIV and breast milk.
We thank all the women who donated breast milk and the volunteers and staff of the ZEBS. We thank Cheryl Jennings for critical review of the manuscript, Glenda Corley for outstanding technical assistance, the Virology Quality Assurance Program of Rush Medical College (Chicago, Ill.) for providing the HIV RNA external standard, and Jerry Zack and Greg Bristol at the University of California at Los Angeles for assistance with the real-time PCR assay.
Present address: University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»